PMP Exam Results

The project manager should always monitor and control the project schedule and make adjustments as needed to ensure timely completion of the project. If the project manager identifies that some activities can be done faster by other resources, they should review the work allocation and reassign some tasks to shorten the critical path. The critical path is the longest sequence of activities that determines the project duration. By reducing the duration of the critical path activities, the project manager can avoid delays and meet the project deadline. This is also consistent with the principle of optimizing resources and minimizing waste, which is part of the PMI Talent Triangle®. References:

PMBOK Guide 7th Edition, page 131

Agile Practice Guide, page 50

PMI Talent Triangle® 1

The project manager should implement a project management information system (PMIS) to avoid this situation in the future. A PMIS is a system that provides the tools and techniques to gather, integrate, and disseminate the outputs of project management processes. A PMIS can help the project manager and the team to manage the project documents, such as the requirements document, and ensure that they are updated, controlled, and shared in a timely and consistent manner. A PMIS can also facilitate collaboration and communication among the project team and other stakeholders, and reduce the risk of errors, conflicts, and rework. Encouraging better team communication by positioning team members closer together may not be enough, as it does not address the issue of document management and version control. Updating the communications management plan to ensure correct delivery of the latest version may not be effective, as it does not provide the tools and techniques to implement the plan. Restricting team members from sending the requirements documents via email may not be feasible or appropriate, as it may limit the flexibility and accessibility of the project information. References:

A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Seventh Edition, Chapter 4: Integration, Section 4.4: Manage Project Knowledge, Section 4.5: Monitor and Control Project Work

Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Handbook, Section 2.3: Domains and Tasks, Domain 2: Planning, Task 6: Plan Business Analysis Information Management

Professional in Business Analysis (PMI-PBA)® Examination Content Outline, Domain 2: Planning, Task 6: Plan Business Analysis Information Management

 This answer is based on the concept of adaptive life cycle or agile project management, which is one of the approaches to managing projects in the PMBOK Guide1. Adaptive life cycle is suitable for projects that have high uncertainty, changing requirements, and complex or innovative products1. The main characteristics of adaptive life cycle are:

Delivering products in iterations or increments, each with a fixed duration and scope1.

Seeking frequent feedback from customers and stakeholders to validate the product value and quality1.

Embracing changes and responding to them quickly and effectively1.

Empowering the project team to make decisions and collaborate with each other1.

A minimum viable product (MVP) is a version of the product that has enough features to satisfy the initial needs of the customers and stakeholders, and to provide feedback for future development2. By focusing on releasing an MVP quickly, the project manager can:

Reduce the risk of wasting time and resources on building a product that does not meet the customer’s expectations or needs2.

Increase the customer’s satisfaction and engagement by involving them in the product development process2.

Learn from the feedback and data collected from the MVP and use them to improve the product in the next iteration2.

Adapt to the changing requirements and market conditions by delivering value incrementally2.

Therefore, option D is the best answer, as it aligns with the adaptive life cycle approach and the benefits of MVP. Option A is not a good answer, as it implies a predictive life cycle or waterfall project management, which is more suitable for projects that have low uncertainty, stable requirements, and well-defined products1. Waiting to start the project execution phase until all requirements and acceptance criteria are clear can result in:

Missing the opportunity to deliver value early and often to the customers and stakeholders1.

Increasing the risk of scope creep, change requests, and rework due to changing customer needs or expectations1.

Reducing the flexibility and responsiveness of the project team to adapt to changes1.

Limiting the collaboration and communication between the project team and the customers and stakeholders1.

Option B is also not a good answer, as it assumes that the customer knows all of the requirements at the beginning of the project, which is unlikely for a brand new product. Asking the customer to include all of the requirements in the project charter can lead to:

Creating a rigid and unrealistic scope that does not reflect the customer’s actual needs or preferences3.

Overwhelming the customer and the project team with too many details and specifications that may not be relevant or necessary3.

Ignoring the feedback and learning opportunities that can arise during the project execution phase3.

Reducing the chances of innovation and creativity by restricting the product features and functions3.

Option C is a better answer than option A and B, as it involves the customer in the requirement elicitation process and prioritizes the most important requirements. However, it is still not the best answer, as it does not address the customer’s concern about extra costs and work. Scheduling a brainstorming session and selecting the top ten most important requirements can still result in:

Spending too much time and resources on planning and analysis, instead of delivering value and testing assumptions.

Failing to validate the requirements with the end users and other stakeholders, who may have different needs or expectations.

Missing the opportunity to learn from the feedback and data collected from the product delivery and use.

Delaying the adaptation and improvement of the product based on the changing requirements and market conditions.

 The project manager should take these two actions to align customer expectations with the current situation of the project. The sprint velocity is a measure of how much work the agile team can complete in a sprint. By reviewing the updated sprint velocity with the customer, the project manager can show the impact of losing two team members on the project schedule and scope. The customer can then adjust their expectations accordingly and provide feedback on the project progress. The prioritized backlog is a list of features and requirements that the customer wants to have in the product. By asking the product owner to review the prioritized backlog with the customer, the project manager can ensure that the most valuable and important features are delivered first. The customer can also reprioritize the backlog items based on their changing needs and preferences. This way, the project manager can deliver early results that meet the customer’s satisfaction.

The other options are not the best actions to align customer expectations. Asking the agile team to review and update the quality management plan with the customer is not relevant to the budget reduction or the early results. The quality management plan defines the quality standards, criteria, and methods for the project. It is not a tool for communicating the project status or scope with the customer. Reviewing the impediments log with the customer is not a good practice, as it may expose the internal issues and challenges of the agile team. The impediments log is a record of the obstacles and problems that the agile team faces during the project. It is used by the agile team and the scrum master to identify and resolve the impediments. The customer does not need to know the details of the impediments log, as it may affect their trust and confidence in the project team. Sending a detailed project management plan to the customer is not appropriate for an agile project, as it may imply a fixed and rigid approach to the project. The project management plan is a formal document that describes how the project will be executed, monitored, and controlled. It is not suitable for an agile project, as it does not accommodate the changes and uncertainties that occur during the project. An agile project relies on frequent and informal communication, collaboration, and feedback with the customer, rather than a detailed project management plan. References:

PMBOK® Guide, 6th Edition, Chapter 6, Section 6.7, “Control Schedule”

PMBOK® Guide, 6th Edition, Chapter 13, Section 13.2, “Plan Stakeholder Engagement”

PMBOK® Guide, 6th Edition, Appendix X3, Section X3.2.2.3, “Sprint Velocity”

PMBOK® Guide, 6th Edition, Appendix X3, Section X3.2.2.4, “Prioritized Product Backlog”

PMBOK® Guide, 6th Edition, Appendix X3, Section X3.2.2.5, “Impediments Log”

PMP Project Management Professional Exam Study Guide: 2021 Exam Update, 10th Edition, Chapter 12, Section 12.2, “Agile Project Management” 1