Project-Management-Professional PMP Release Date

The project manager should first consider organizing paired work sessions for the junior and senior economists. This is a proactive and positive way to address the issue of intimidation and improve the performance and confidence of the junior economist. Paired work sessions can also foster collaboration, knowledge sharing, and mentoring among the project team members. This option aligns with the PMI-PBA practice guide, which states that “pairing a less experienced analyst with a more experienced one can be an effective way to transfer skills and knowledge” (p. 44). The other options are not the best choices because they do not address the root cause of the problem and may have negative consequences for the project. Evaluating the performance of the junior economist in the upcoming months (option A) is a reactive and delayed approach that does not provide any immediate support or guidance to the junior economist. Reassigning some of the junior economist’s tasks to other economists (option B) may reduce the workload of the junior economist, but it does not help him or her overcome the intimidation or develop the skills and knowledge needed for the project. Requesting to replace the junior economist with a more experienced economist (option C) may seem like a quick and easy solution, but it may also demoralize the junior economist, disrupt the project team dynamics, and incur additional costs and risks for the project. References:

PMI-PBA Practice Guide, p. 44 1

PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, p. 336 2

 According to the Project Management Professional (PMP)® Examination Content Outline1, one of the tasks under the domain of executing is to “assess and prioritize impact of changes to project scope, schedule, cost, quality, resources, and risks”. This implies that before implementing any change request, the project manager should first evaluate how the change will affect the project objectives and deliverables, and whether the change is aligned with the business case and the stakeholder expectations. The business case is the document that justifies the initiation of a project by providing the expected benefits, costs, risks, and strategic alignment of the project2. Therefore, the project manager should identify how the proposed changes will benefit the project in relation to the business case, and communicate the results of the assessment to the senior management and other relevant stakeholders. This can help to ensure that the changes are necessary, feasible, and beneficial, and that they do not compromise the project scope, quality, or value. References:

1: Project Management Professional (PMP)® Examination Content Outline, page 10

2: A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK® Guide) – Seventh Edition, page 29

project objectives, scope, schedule, cost, quality, resources, or risks. The project manager should also seek their support and guidance on how to resolve the issue. In this case, the project manager should communicate with the project sponsor, the customer, the functional managers, and any other stakeholders who may be affected by the supplier’s decision. The project manager should also explore alternative options for obtaining the information security services, such as negotiating with the supplier, finding another supplier, or performing the service internally. However, these options may have implications for the project budget, schedule, quality, and risk, and should be evaluated carefully before making a decision. References: (Professional in Business Analysis Reference Materials source and documents)

PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, Chapter 13, Section 13.3.2.4, page 513

PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, Chapter 10, Section 10.2.2.4, page 385

PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, Chapter 12, Section 12.2.2.4, page 471

PMBOK Guide, 6th edition, Chapter 11, Section 11.5.2.4, page 443

According to the hybrid project management approach, which combines elements of waterfall and agile methodologies, the project manager should facilitate the collaboration and communication among the team members and adjust the scope and schedule as needed12. In this scenario, the project manager should first determine whether other cross-functional team members are able to take over the work of the developer who left the company in the middle of an iteration. This would allow the project to continue with minimal disruption and maintain the quality and value of the deliverable. If no one on the team has the skills or capacity to complete the work, the project manager should then consult with the product owner and the stakeholders to renegotiate the scope and schedule of the iteration, or to cancel the iteration and return to planning3. The project manager should avoid reviewing the backlog to reschedule the deliverable for a later iteration without involving the team and the product owner, as this would violate the agile principle of customer collaboration over contract negotiation4. The project manager should also avoid engaging with stakeholders directly to review the iteration process without involving the team and the product owner, as this would violate the agile principle of self-organizing teams4. The project manager should also avoid going to management and asking to hire a new external developer without exploring other options first, as this would incur additional costs and risks, and delay the delivery of the product feature5. References: 1: What is the Hybrid Approach in Project Management? | Hygger.io 2: Hybrid Project Management: What is it, Approach & Software - Teamhood 3: What to do when capacity is reduced in the middle of the Sprint? (e.g. Sick Leave) - Project Management Stack Exchange 4: Manifesto for Agile Software Development 5: How To Handle A Key Team Member Leaving At A Critical Project Point | IT Staffing & Technical Consulting