CIMA F3 Online Access

Profit before tax = $10m (the “10 0” in the text).

Tax @ 20% ⇒ earnings after tax = 10 × (1 − 0.20) = $8m.

For a takeover, it’s appropriate to use the takeover P/E range in the same industry: 11–12 times.

Value range = 8 × 11 to 8 × 12 = $88m to $96m.

Answer: B – Minimum $88m, maximum $96m.

Company B (all equity):

Cost of equity = asset return = Ku = 17%

Company A:

Gearing D:E = 1:2 → D/E = 0.5

Pre-tax cost of debt Kd = 7%

Tax rate T = 30%

Levered cost of equity with tax:

Ke=Ku+DE(1−T)(Ku−Kd)K_e = K_u + \frac{D}{E}(1 - T)(K_u - K_d)Ke​=Ku​+ED​(1−T)(Ku​−Kd​) Ke=17%+0.5×0.7×(17%−7%)=17%+0.5×0.7×10%=17%+3.5%=20.5%K_e = 17\% + 0.5 \times 0.7 \times (17\% - 7\%) = 17\% + 0.5 \times 0.7 \times 10\% = 17\% + 3.5\% = 20.5\%Ke​=17%+0.5×0.7×(17%−7%)=17%+0.5×0.7×10%=17%+3.5%=20.5%

✅ Correct: A. 20.5%

IFRS 7 requires detailed disclosures about financial instruments and risk management, including currency risk, sensitivity analysis, and how those risks are managed. When these are published for the first time, investors may learn new information about:

The extent of US$ exposure (40% export sales), and

The quality of risk management (hedging, matching, etc.).

Efficient market theory (covered in F3) says prices adjust to new, relevant information. That new information could make investors more confident (if risks are well managed) or more concerned (if risks are high and poorly managed). So the share price could either increase or decrease, depending on the market’s reaction.

That matches option D.

Options A and C assume a one-way direction (always up or always down), which is unrealistic. B is wrong because segmental analysis does not normally give the same detailed, risk-focused disclosure as IFRS 7.

The company is repurchasing and cancelling its own shares.

When shares are cancelled:

Share capital is reduced by the nominal value of the shares bought back. ✅

Any amount paid above nominal value reduces equity reserves (such as share premium and/or retained earnings), but it does not go through the Income Statement.

Total equity does decrease by the full repurchase amount (so option C is wrong).

No element of the repurchase (including any “premium to market value”) is treated as an expense in the Income Statement under IFRS – it’s purely an equity transaction (so D is wrong).

Option A is too specific and not strictly correct, because the premium over nominal is not necessarily all charged only to retained earnings – it can also be charged to share premium / other reserves.

So the one fully correct statement is:

B. The share capital figure would reduce by the nominal value of the shares purchased.