CIMA Strategic level F3 Full Course Free

In response to a hostile bid, one recognised defensive tactic is to seek a “white knight” – a friendlier alternative bidder whose terms may better protect existing management and shareholders. The other options are either pre-bid structural measures or not typical primary response strategies once a hostile bid has been received.

 Revenues are in E$ and F$, costs are in G$, and reporting currency is D$.

 If the D$ strengthens against G$ (option C), then G$ costs translate into fewer D$, so reported costs fall and operating profit margin improves.

 A stronger D$ against E$ or F$ (A or B) reduces the D$ value of sales, hurting margins.

 A weaker D$ against G$ (D) makes G$-denominated costs more expensive in D$, also hurting margins.

So the change that most helps maintain/improve margin is C.

 C – More cash = able to react quickly to unexpected investment opportunities.

 D – Cash buffer reduces the likelihood of liquidity problems in a downturn.

 E – If excess cash were returned, markets might read it as “no good growth opportunities”, so retaining avoids that negative signal.

The company is deciding between:

Selling the business via a Management Buyout (MBO), or

Selling to an external private equity (PE) buyer.

From the original company’s viewpoint, an advantage of an MBO is:

The buyers are the existing management team. Relationships already exist, and there’s usually more trust and alignment.

Post-divestment, the original company may still trade with the divested unit (e.g., as a supplier or customer). Cooperation tends to be better with a familiar internal team than with an external PE house whose primary focus is financial returns.

Why the others are wrong:

B. Enhanced big data opportunities – unrelated to the divestment method.

C. Improved relationships with MBO team in the event of a sale to PE – logically inconsistent; if sold to PE, it’s not an MBO.

D. Higher price due to synergistic benefits – PE typically looks for financial engineering and operational improvements, not classic corporate synergies. You are more likely to see synergy premia when selling to a trade buyer, not in an MBO.

So the key pro-MBO argument here is better cooperation post divestment → A.