PMI-ACP Exam Questions Tutorials

Delivering value in agile depends onfrequent prioritization and real-time feedback. According to thePMI Agile Practice Guide (Section 5.1 Product Backlog and Prioritization), product owners and agile teams mustcontinuously reprioritize the backlogbased on changing stakeholder needs, market shifts, and feedback. Failure to do so can result in building the wrong product—even if it's "done."

Mike Griffiths (PMI-ACP Exam Prep Book, Chapter 6: Value-Driven Delivery) stresses thatvalue delivery is iterative and depends on current priorities, not static backlogs. It is vital that teams confirm that they're working on thehighest-value itemsbefore committing to a sprint.

Option Ais correct: proper backlog refinement and reprioritization ensures alignment with evolving stakeholder needs.

Option Bis an anti-pattern; agile welcomes change even late in development.

Option CandDare irrelevant or do not address the core issue of prioritization.

The correct answer is B – The customer changed requirements. Agile teams embrace change, especially when it improves the product’s value. Customer-driven changes to requirements are the most common and legitimate reason for adjusting project plans in agile, supported by rolling wave planning and continuous backlog refinement.

From the PMI Agile Practice Guide:

“Agile projects anticipate changes in requirements. The product backlog is continuously updated to reflect new insights and customer needs.”

(PMI Agile Practice Guide, Section 5.3 – Rolling Wave Planning)

Mike Griffiths emphasizes:

“In agile, planning is dynamic. The most common source of change is evolving customer requirements, which lead to changes in scope and prioritization.”

(Mike Griffiths, PMI-ACP Exam Prep, Chapter 5 – Adaptive Planning)

Incorrect options:

A is unrelated and unrealistic.

C is useful but doesn’t directly alter the project plan.

D is ambiguous and doesn’t reflect business-driven change.

Answer: B

────────────────────────────────────

The correct answer is D – Stop updating the documentation and initiate an analysis to identify its value and act on the findings.

Agile promotes the creation of “just enough” documentation. If a document isn’t being used and adds no value, the team should reflect on whether to discontinue or improve it. Retrospectives are the appropriate venue to identify such inefficiencies and implement continuous improvement.

From the Agile Manifesto (referenced in PMI Agile Practice Guide):

“Working software over comprehensive documentation.”

From the PMI Agile Practice Guide:

“Agile teams minimize non-value-added work. If documentation is not being used or reviewed, teams should examine whether it is necessary, and if not, discontinue or replace it.”

(PMI Agile Practice Guide, Section 7.1 – Continuous Improvement)

Mike Griffiths adds:

“Documentation should serve a purpose. If stakeholders do not find value in it, the team should discontinue or refactor it to meet actual needs.”

(Mike Griffiths, PMI-ACP Exam Prep Book, Chapter 7 – Continuous Improvement)

Why the other options fall short:

A prolongs the wasteful practice unnecessarily.

B lacks the analysis needed before eliminating documentation.

C enforces process over value, which contradicts Agile principles.

Answer: D

══════════════════════════════════════════════════

To address declining morale, mistrust, and isolation within the team, the agile project manager should focus on fostering collaboration, trust, and team cohesion. Cross-training and mentoring provide opportunities for team members to learn from one another, share knowledge, and build stronger interpersonal relationships. This not only enhances productivity but also helps break down silos, encourages mutual support, and increases trust across the team.