Download Full Version CSCP APICS Exam

Context: The Supply-Chain Operations Reference-model (SCOR) provides a framework for improving supply chain performance.

Options Breakdown:

A. Sales and marketing refers to SCOR to improve demand generation: SCOR is primarily focused on supply chain processes, not sales and marketing.

B. Production and engineering uses SCOR best practices to design a new "make" process flow: SCOR provides best practices and processes for production, aligning with designing a "make" process.

C. Distribution and logistics selects suppliers from the SCOR reference list: SCOR does not provide a reference list of suppliers.

D. Marketing and development incorporates SCOR Level I metrics for new product design: SCOR metrics are generally applied to supply chain operations, not directly to marketing and product development.

Correct Answer Justification: SCOR is used to improve and design supply chain processes, including production and engineering activities, making this the correct application of the model.

Sales force automation (SFA) has significantly improved the management of the customer pipeline. Here’s how:

Efficiency: Automates routine sales tasks such as order processing, tracking customer interactions, and managing sales leads, allowing sales teams to focus on selling.

Data Management: Provides a centralized system for storing customer information, sales history, and communication records, enhancing data accessibility and accuracy.

Pipeline Visibility: Offers real-time visibility into the sales pipeline, enabling better forecasting, opportunity management, and performance tracking.

Customer Relationship Management: Enhances customer relationship management by providing tools for personalized communication, follow-ups, and customer service.

By automating and streamlining the sales process, SFA helps in managing the customer pipeline more effectively, leading to improved sales performance and customer satisfaction.

Context: Shipping directly from the point of manufacture to the customer eliminates the intermediate distribution network.

Options Breakdown:

A. Delivery lead times are consistent: Not necessarily true, as direct shipping can have variable lead times.

B. Risk pooling benefits are negated: Distribution centers pool inventory to reduce variability in demand and supply; direct shipping bypasses this advantage.

C. Distribution overhead is increased: Actually, distribution overhead is typically reduced with direct shipping.

D. Order-fill rate is decreased: Not necessarily true, as it depends on the efficiency of the direct shipping process.

Correct Answer Justification: Risk pooling helps manage demand variability and inventory levels more effectively; direct shipping bypasses distribution centers, thus negating these benefits.

The use of different costing methods by a manufacturer and a potential supplier can have significant implications for make-or-buy decisions. Here’s the explanation:

Standard Costing: This method involves assigning fixed costs to products based on predetermined standards. It simplifies cost control and variance analysis but may not capture all the activities involved in production.

Activity-Based Costing (ABC): ABC assigns costs based on actual activities and resource usage, providing a more accurate picture of costs associated with specific products or services.

Comparison for Make-or-Buy: When a manufacturer using standard costing considers outsourcing to a supplier using ABC, it must carefully compare the detailed activity-based costs with its own standard costs.

Implications: Differences in cost allocation methods can reveal hidden costs or savings, influencing the decision to manufacture in-house or outsource. ABC may highlight inefficiencies in in-house production or justify the cost-effectiveness of outsourcing.

Strategic Decisions: Understanding the true cost implications through detailed ABC can lead to better strategic decisions regarding resource allocation, production processes, and supplier selection.

References

Horngren, C. T., Datar, S. M., & Rajan, M. V. (2015). Cost Accounting: A Managerial Emphasis. Pearson.

Kaplan, R. S., & Cooper, R. (1998). Cost & Effect: Using Integrated Cost Systems to Drive Profitability and Performance. Harvard Business School Press.