CCNP Security 350-701 Updated Exam

 TAXII, short for Trusted Automated eXchange of Intelligence Information, is a protocol that defines how cyber threat information can be shared via services and message exchanges. It is designed specifically to support STIX information, which is a standardized language for expressing and exchanging cyber threat information. TAXII enables organizations to share STIX information by defining an API that aligns with common sharing models, such as hub and spoke, source/subscriber, and peer-to-peer. TAXII also defines four services that allow users to discover, manage, receive, and request STIX information. Therefore, TAXII supports STIX information and determines how threat intelligence information is relayed. TAXII does not determine the “what” of threat intelligence, as that is the role of STIX. TAXII does not allow users to describe threat motivations and abilities, as that is also part of STIX. TAXII does not exchange trusted anomaly intelligence information, as that is a specific type of threat intelligence that may or may not be represented in STIX. References:

• What are STIX/TAXII Standards I Resources I Anomali
• Cyber Threat Intelligence Technical Committee - GitHub Pages

Patching helps to mitigate vulnerabilities by applying fixes or updates to software or firmware that have known security flaws. Vulnerabilities can be exploited by cybercriminals to compromise the confidentiality, integrity, or availability of the IT systems and data. Patching endpoints consistently reduces the risk of cyberattacks and data breaches by closing the gaps that attackers can use to gain unauthorized access or cause damage. Patching also improves the performance and functionality of the IT systems by addressing bugs or errors12.

Option B is the correct answer, as it explains the main benefit of patching endpoints consistently. Option A is incorrect, as patching does not necessarily reduce the attack surface of the infrastructure, which is the total number of possible entry points for an attacker. Patching only addresses the existing vulnerabilities in the software or firmware, but does not eliminate the attack surface itself. Option C is incorrect, as patching is not always required per the vendor contract, although some vendors may provide support or incentives for patching. Option D is incorrect, as patching does not allow for creating a honeypot, which is a decoy system that is intentionally left vulnerable to lure and trap attackers. References: Patch Management Overview, Challenges, and Recommendations. Patch Management Explained: Challenges, Best Practices & Steps.

The correct command to log all events to a destination collector is flow-export event-type all destination 209.165.201.10. This command configures a flow-export action that sends all NSEL events to the specified IP address. NSEL events include flow-create, flow-teardown, flow-denied, and flow-update events. The command must be entered in the policy-map class configuration mode, after defining a policy-map and a class-map that match the traffic and event type. The other commands are incorrect because they either specify the wrong event type (flow-update instead of all) or the wrong destination IP address (209.165.201 instead of 209.165.201.10). References :=

• Implementing and Operating Cisco Security Core Technologies (SCOR) v1.0, Module 5: Securing the Cloud, Lesson 5.2: DNS Security
• Cisco Secure Firewall ASA NetFlow Implementation Guide
• Configuring Cisco ASA for NetFlow Export via CLI – Plixer