Selected CGEIT Isaca Certification Questions Answers

The best action to address the situation of the risk committee being overwhelmed by the number of false positives in risk reports is to evaluate key risk indicators (KRIs). KRIs are metrics that measure the likelihood and impact of IT-related risks on the enterprise’s objectives and goals. Evaluating KRIs can help the risk committee to identify and prioritize the most significant and relevant risks, as well as to adjust the thresholds or values that trigger the risk alerts or warnings. Evaluating KRIs can also help reduce the number of false positives, which are the cases where the risk reports indicate a high level of risk, but the actual risk is low or negligible. Reducing false positives can help improve the accuracy and reliability of risk reports, as well as save time and resources for the risk committee.

Conducting a risk assessment, changing the reporting format, and adjusting the IT balanced scorecard are also possible actions to take to address the situation of the risk committee being overwhelmed by false positives, but they are not the best action. Conducting a risk assessment is a process that involves identifying, analyzing, evaluating, and treating the IT risks that may affect the enterprise’s objectives and operations. Conducting a risk assessment can help update and validate the risk information and data, as well as implement appropriate controls and mitigation strategies. However, conducting a risk assessment may not be sufficient or feasible to address the issue of false positives, as it may require a lot of time and effort, and it may not address the root causes of false positives, such as inaccurate or outdated KRIs. Changing the reporting format is a measure that involves modifying or improving the way that risk information and data are presented or communicated in risk reports. Changing the reporting format can help enhance and simplify the readability and usability of risk reports, as well as highlight or emphasize the key points or findings. However, changing the reporting format may not solve the problem of false positives, as it may only affect the appearance or style of risk reports, not their content or quality. Adjusting the IT balanced scorecard is a task that involves revising or updating the metrics that track the performance of IT in relation to the enterprise’s vision, strategy, and goals. Adjusting the IT balanced scorecard can help evaluate and communicate the effectiveness and efficiency of IT operations, services, and projects, as well as their contribution to customer satisfaction, business value, and innovation. However, adjusting the IT balancedscorecard may not directly address the issue of false positives, as it may focus on different aspects or dimensions of IT performance than KRIs.

The next step that the enterprise should do after performing a business impact analysis (BIA) considering a number of risk scenarios is to assess risk mitigation strategies. A risk mitigation strategy is a plan of action that aims to reduce the likelihood or impact of a risk event, or to transfer or accept the risk1. Assessing risk mitigation strategies involves evaluating the costs, benefits, feasibility, and effectiveness of various options for addressing the risks identified in the BIA. Assessing risk mitigation strategies can help the enterprise prioritize and implement the most appropriate and efficient solutions for protecting its critical business processes and resources from potential disruptions2. According to the Business Continuity Planning Process Diagram, assessing risk mitigation strategies is the fourth step in the business continuity planning process, following the BIA3.

The other options are not the next steps that the enterprise should do after performing a BIA. Performing a risk controls gap analysis is a step that precedes the BIA, as it helps to identify the existing controls and their effectiveness in preventing or reducing the risks4. Updating the disaster recovery plan (DRP) is a step that follows after assessing risk mitigation strategies, as it involves documenting the procedures and resources for restoring the critical business functions and IT systems in case of a disaster5. Verifying compliance with relevant legislation is a step that is done throughout the business continuity planning process, as it ensures that the enterprise meets the legal and regulatory requirements for its industry and location6. References := 1: Risk Mitigation Strategies - ISACA72: How to Conduct aComprehensive Business Impact Analysis: A Step-by-Step Guide33: Business Continuity Planning Process Diagram - ISACA84: Business Impact Analysis: Definition and How To Conduct One15: The Complete Guide to Business Impact Analysis with Templates - Creately46: How To Conduct Business Impact Analysis in 8 Easy Steps - G25

This should be identified first when creating an inventory of information systems and data related to the mobile app, as they are the individuals or groups who have the authority and responsibility to define, classify, protect, and manage the data assets of the enterprise1. By identifying the application and data owners, the enterprise can ensure that the data is properly accounted for, categorized, and secured according to its value, sensitivity, and risk. Application and data owners can also establish data policies, standards, and procedures, as well as monitor and report on data quality, usage, and compliance1. Identifying the application and data owners is a prerequisite for identifying the other options, such as data maintained by vendors, vendors and outsourced systems, and information classification scheme, as these depend on the accurate identification and assignment of data ownership roles and responsibilities.

A balanced scorecard is a tool that would best demonstrate the current state of strategic alignment, because it is a framework that translates the enterprise’s vision and strategy into a set of performance measures that cover four perspectives: financial, customer, internal business process, and learning and growth12. A balanced scorecard can help to assess how well the IT function is supporting the business objectives, and identify the gaps and opportunities for improvement. A balanced scorecard can also help to communicate and monitor the IT strategy and goals, and align the IT activities and resources with the business needs and expectations1 .