Isaca Certification CGEIT Release Date

The first step for executive management to take in communicating what is considered acceptable use with regard to personally owned devices for company business is to develop and disseminate an applicable policy. A policy is a written set of rules and guidelines that defines the scope, objectives, roles, and responsibilities of the BYOD program. A policy also specifies the security, privacy, and usage requirements and expectations for the employees and the organization. A policy helps to establish a clear and consistent understanding of what is acceptable and unacceptable when using personal devices for work purposes, and what are the consequences of non-compliance. A policy also helps to mitigate the potential risks and challenges associated with BYOD, such as data breaches, device loss or theft, malware infections, legal liabilities, and support issues. A policy should be developed in consultation with relevant stakeholders, such asIT, HR, legal, and business units, and disseminated to all employees through various channels, such as email, intranet, training sessions, and awareness campaigns. References: BYOD Policies for Organizations (4 Examples) - Dashlane1, Mobile Device Security–Bring Your Own Device (BYOD): Draft SP 1800-22 …2, Personally Owned Device Policy — FBI

The best approach to assist an enterprise in planning for IT-enabled investments is enterprise architecture (EA). EA is a holistic and integrated view of the current and future state of the business, IT, and their alignment1. EA helps to identify and prioritize the business needs andobjectives, and to design and deliver the IT solutions that support them2. EA also helps to optimize the IT resources and processes, and to ensure that they are aligned with the business strategy and goals3. EA also helps to measure and monitor the IT performance and outcomes, and to evaluate the value and benefits of the IT investments4. EA also helps to manage the risks, costs, and complexity of the IT investments, and to ensure that they comply with the legal and regulatory requirements5.

IT process mapping, task management, and service level management are not as comprehensive or effective as EA in assisting an enterprise in planning for IT-enabled investments. IT process mapping is a visual representation of a process that shows the steps and their relationships6. It can help to understand how a process works, but it does not provide a strategic or architectural view of the business or IT. Task management is a process of managing individual or group tasks to achieve goals7. It can help to track and delegate work, but it does not address the alignment or optimization of IT with the business. Service level management is a process of defining, documenting, and agreeing on service levels within an IT service management system8. It can help to ensure that services are delivered at an agreed level, but it does not cover the design or delivery of IT solutions that meet the business needs. Therefore, EA is the best approach to assist an enterprise in planning for IT-enabled investments.

Qualitative analysis is a method that uses subjective judgments and opinions to assess plausible risk scenarios that could result in reputational risk to the enterprise. Qualitative analysis can help identify the sources, causes, and impacts of reputational risk, as well as the likelihood and severity of such risk. Qualitative analysis can also involve stakeholder feedback, surveys, interviews, focus groups, and expert opinions to evaluate the reputation of the enterprise and its IT functions.

The other options are not the most likely methods to assess plausible risk scenarios that could result in reputational risk to the enterprise. Controls gap analysis is a method that compares the existing controls with the required controls to identify any deficiencies or weaknesses that could expose the enterprise to risk. Controls gap analysis can help improve the effectiveness and efficiency of IT processes and services, but it does not directly assess the reputational risk scenarios. Quantitative analysis is a method that uses numerical data and mathematical models to measure and evaluate risk scenarios. Quantitative analysis can help estimate the financial impact and probability of risk events, but it may not capture the intangible and subjective aspects of reputational risk. SWOT analysis is a method that evaluates the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of an organization or a project. SWOT analysis can help identify the internal and external factors that affect the performance and success of the organization or the project, but it does not specifically assess the reputational risk scenarios.

For more information on qualitative analysis and reputational risk, you can refer to these web sources:

Qualitative Risk Analysis: What it is and how to implement it

Reputational Risk Management: A Framework for Measurement

Reputational Risk Management in IT Outsourcing: A Case Study

Process owners are the individuals or groups who are responsible for the design, execution, and improvement of a business process. Process owners have a deep understanding of the business needs, goals, and challenges that the process aims to address. By involving process owners in requirements gathering, the CIO can ensure that the IT enterprise roadmap meets the business requirements and expectations, and that the IT solutions align with the business processes and outcomes. Process owners can also provide valuable feedback and insights on the feasibility, usability, and effectiveness of the IT solutions, and help to prioritize and validate the IT initiatives and deliverables. References: CGEIT Exam Content Outline | ISACA1, CGEIT Review Manual (Digital Version), Definitive Guide to Developing an IT Strategy and Roadmap - CioPages2, What is a Process Owner? | Lean Six Sigma Group3