CGEIT Exam Dumps : Certified in the Governance of Enterprise IT Exam

This is because enterprise architecture (EA) is a practice that helps organizations align their IT systems and processes with their business objectives. EA provides a holistic and integrated viewof the current and future state of the organization’s IT infrastructure, as well as the gaps, issues, and opportunities for improvement1. By using EA, the organization can:

Identify and prioritize the IT investments that support the business strategy, goals, and needs1

Optimize the IT spending and maximize the IT value1

Ensure the IT quality, security, and compliance1

Avoid IT duplication, waste, and inefficiency1

Define IT roles and responsibilities and assign accountability1

EA can help the organization plan for the necessary IT investments in a systematic and structured way, and ensure that they are aligned with the business vision and value.

The other options, risk assessment report, business user satisfaction metrics, and audit findings are not as useful as enterprise architecture (EA) for planning for the necessary IT investments. They are more related to the evaluation and monitoring of the IT performance, rather than the planning and alignment of the IT strategy. They may also provide limited or partial information about the IT infrastructure, rather than a comprehensive and integrated view. They may also depend on external factors or standards that may not be relevant or applicable to the organization’s specific context and needs.

This is because employee engagement is a key factor for the success of any change initiative, especially one that involves governance. Employee engagement refers to the degree of commitment, involvement, and ownership that employees have toward the organization and its goals1. By designing the implementation plan to engage employees across the enterprise, the organization can:

Communicate the vision, purpose, and benefits of the new governance initiative to employees2

Solicit feedback and suggestions from employees on how to implement the new governance initiative effectively2

Address any concerns or resistance that employees may have toward the new governance initiative2

Empower and motivate employees to participate in and support the new governance initiative2

Foster a culture of collaboration, learning, and innovation among employees2

Designing the implementation plan to engage employees across the enterprise can help to ensure that the new governance initiative is understood, accepted, and adopted by all stakeholders, and that it delivers the desired outcomes and value.

The other options, staff have been trained on the new initiative, external consultants created the plan, and the plan assigns responsibility for completing milestones are not as indicative as the plan is designed to engage employees across the enterprise for the success of the implementation plan for a new governance initiative. They are more related to the execution and management of the implementation plan, rather than its design and alignment. They may also not be sufficient or effective for ensuring the success of the implementation plan, as they may not address the human and behavioral aspects of change, such as awareness, understanding, involvement, commitment, and ownership3. References := Employee Engagement: What Is It? | SHRM, How To Engage Employees In Organizational Change | Forbes, Change Management Best Practices: A Comprehensive Guide | Smartsheet

Final approval for accepting the associated IT risk should be obtained from the business sponsor. This is because the business sponsor is the person or group who initiates, funds, and owns the business case for the mobile sales channel project1. The business sponsor is responsible for defining the business objectives, benefits, and requirements of the project, and for ensuring its alignment with the enterprise strategy1. The business sponsor is also accountable for the outcomes and value of the project, and for managing the risks and issues that may affect its success1. Therefore, the business sponsor should have the authority and responsibility to approve the IT risk associated with the mobile sales channel project, as it may impact the business performance and value.

The other options, risk manager, chief information officer (CIO), and IT steering committee are not the best choices for obtaining final approval for accepting the associated IT risk. They are more involved in the identification, assessment, mitigation, and monitoring of IT risks, rather than their acceptance2. They may also have different perspectives and interests than the business sponsor regarding the IT risk associated with the mobile sales channel project. For example, the risk manager may focus on minimizing or avoiding IT risks, while the CIO may focus on maximizing or exploiting IT opportunities. The IT steering committee may have a broader view of IT risks across multiple projects and programs, rather than a specific one. Therefore, they may not have the final say or decision on accepting the IT risk associated with the mobile sales channel project.