All CGEIT Test Inside Isaca Questions

The most important factor to effectively initiate IT-enabled change is to obtain top management support and ownership. This is because top management can provide the vision, direction, resources, and authority for the change, as well as communicate the benefits and urgency of the change to the rest of the organization. Top management support and ownership can also help to overcome resistance, align stakeholders, and ensure accountability and governance for the change. According to a McKinsey survey1, having active and visible executive sponsorship is the most important practice for successful digital transformations.

Establishing a change management process is also important, but not the most important factor. A change management process can help to plan, execute, monitor, and control the change activities, as well as address the human side of the change. However, without top management support and ownership, a change management process may not be effective or sustainable.

Ensuring compliance with corporate policy is also important, but not the most important factor. Compliance with corporate policy can help to ensure that the change is consistent with the organization’s values, standards, and regulations, as well as avoid legal or ethical issues. However, compliance with corporate policy may not be sufficient or relevant for initiating IT-enabled change, especially if the policy is outdated or incompatible with the change objectives.

Benchmarking against best practices is also important, but not the most important factor. Benchmarking against best practices can help to identify gaps, opportunities, and solutions for improving the organization’s performance and competitiveness through IT-enabled change. However, benchmarking against best practices may not be applicable or feasible for initiating IT-enabled change, especially if the change is innovative or disruptive.

References := The Magic Bullet Theory in IT-Enabled Transformation, Introduction section. The keys to a successful digital transformation | McKinsey, The anatomy of digital transformations section. Best Practices in Change Management - Prosci, Introduction section.

Developing policies on social media is the primary focus of the enterprise approach to reduce the risk of reputational damage by employees outside of the workplace. Policies can define the acceptable and unacceptable use of social media, the roles and responsibilities of employees, and the consequences of policy violations. Policies can also provide guidance and awareness to employees on how to use social media responsibly and ethically. References: CGEIT Domain 1: Framework for the Governance of Enterprise IT

The first strategic action to address the report is to authorize a risk analysis of the practice. A risk analysis is a systematic process of identifying, assessing, and prioritizing the potential threats and vulnerabilities that may arise from the use of an offsite cloud for analyzing sensitive “big data” files. A risk analysis can help to determine the level of exposure and impact of the practice on the organization’s data security, privacy, compliance, and performance. A risk analysis can also provide recommendations for mitigating or avoiding the risks, such as implementing appropriate controls, policies, and procedures.

Updating data governance practices, revising the information security policy, and recommending the use of a private cloud are possible actions that may result from the risk analysis, but they are not the first step. Data governance practices are the rules and processes that define how data is created, stored, accessed, used, and disposed of within an organization. Data governance practices should align with the organization’s data strategy, objectives, and values. Information security policy is a document that outlines the principles, guidelines, and responsibilities for protecting the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of data. Information security policy should reflect the organization’s risk appetite, legal obligations, and industry standards. A private cloud is a cloud computing model that provides dedicated resources and services to a single organization. A private cloud may offer more control, security, and customization than an offsite cloud, but it may also require more investment, maintenance, and expertise.

Therefore, before updating data governance practices, revising the information security policy, or recommending the use of a private cloud, it is important to conduct a risk analysis of the current practice of using an offsite cloud for analyzing sensitive “big data” files. This will help to ensure that the organization makes informed and strategic decisions that balance the benefits and risks of using cloud computing for big data analytics.

The first course of action for the CIO of an enterprise to help plan for the possibility of ransomed corporate data should be to request a targeted risk assessment. This is because a targeted risk assessment can help to identify and evaluate the specific threats, vulnerabilities, and impacts of ransomware attacks on the enterprise’s data and systems. A targeted risk assessment can also help to determine the likelihood and severity of ransomware incidents, as well as the appropriate controls and mitigation strategies to reduce the risk to an acceptable level.

Requiring development of key risk indicators (KRIs) is not the first course of action, as it is a monitoring tool for measuring the risk exposure and performance. KRIs are metrics that provide information on the current level and trend of risk in relation to the risk appetite and tolerance of the enterprise. KRIs can help to track and report the progress and effectiveness of the risk management activities, as well as alert the management of any potential issues or changes that may affect the risk profile. However, requiring development of KRIs does not provide a comprehensive analysis or improvement plan for ransomed corporate data.

Developing a policy to address ransomware is not the first course of action, as it is a result of conducting a targeted risk assessment. A policy to address ransomware is a document that defines the rules, guidelines, and responsibilities for preventing, detecting, responding to, and recovering from ransomware attacks. Developing a policy to address ransomware can help to communicate the expectations and requirements for ransomware protection and compliance, as well as enforce accountability and governance for ransomware incidents. However, developing a policy to address ransomware does not provide a detailed assessment or guidance for ransomed corporate data.

Backing up corporate data to a secure location is not the first course of action, as it is an implementation step after conducting a targeted risk assessment and developing a policy to address ransomware. Backing up corporate data to a secure location can help to preserve the availability, integrity, and confidentiality of the data in case of a ransomware attack. Backing up corporate data to a secure location can also help to restore the data and resume normal operations after a ransomware attack. However, backing up corporate data to a secure location does not provide a thorough risk analysis or governance framework for ransomed corporate data.

References := Ransomware Risk Management: NISTIR 8374, 3 Risk Management Process section. Managing the Risks of Ransomware - SEI Blog, Assess Your Risk section. Ransomware Risk Management - NIST, 4 Ransomware Risk Management Profile section. NIST Releases Tips and Tactics for Dealing With Ransomware, Back Up Your Data section.