Month End Sale 70% Discount Offer - Ends in 0d 00h 00m 00s - Coupon code: save70

Free Access Cisco 300-410 New Release

Page: 35 / 45
Total 603 questions

Implementing Cisco Enterprise Advanced Routing and Services (300-410 ENARSI) Questions and Answers

Question 137

Refer to Exhibit.

Traffic from the branch network should route through HQ R1 unless the path is unavailable. An engineer tests this functionality by shutting down interface on the BRANCH router toward HQ_R1 router but 192.168.20.0/24 is no longer reachable from the branch router. Which set of configurations resolves the issue?

Options:

A.

HQ_R1(config)# ip sla responderHQ_R1(config)# ip sla responder icmp-echo 172.16.35.2

B.

BRANCH(config)# ip sla 1BRANCH(config-ip-sla)# icmp-echo 172.16.35.1

C.

HQ_R2(config)# ip sla responderHQ_R2(config)# ip sla responder icmp-echo 172.16.35.5

D.

BRANCH(config)# ip sla 1BRANCH(config-ip-sla)# icmp-echo 172.16.35.2

Question 138

Refer to the exhibit.

An engineer configured BGP between routers R1 and R3 The BOP peers cannot establish neighbor adjacency to be able to exchange routes. Which configuration resolves this issue?

Options:

A.

R3router bgp 6502address-family ipv6neighbor AB01:2011:7:100::1 activate

B.

R1router bgp 6501address-family ipv6neighbor AB01:2011:7:100;:3 activate

C.

R3router bgp 6502neighbor AB01:2011:7:100::1 ebgp-muttlhop 255

D.

R1router bgp 6501 neighborAB01:2011:7:100::3ebgp-multihop255

Question 139

Which configuration feature should be used to block rogue router advertisements instead of using the IPv6 Router Advertisement Guard feature?

Options:

A.

VACL blocking broadcast frames from nonauthorized hosts

B.

PVLANs with promiscuous ports associated to route advertisements and isolated ports for nodes

C.

PVLANs with community ports associated to route advertisements and isolated ports for nodes

D.

IPv4 ACL blocking route advertisements from nonauthorized hosts

Question 140

Refer to the exhibit. The network administrator has configured the Customer Edge router (AS 64511) to send only summarized routes toward ISP-1 (AS 100) and ISP-2 (AS 200).

router bgp 64511

network 172.16.20.0 mask 255.255.255.0

network 172.16.21.0 mask 255.255.255.0

network 172.16.22.0 mask 255.255.255.0

network 172.16.23.0 mask 255.255.255.0

aggregate-address 172.16.20.0 255.255.252.0

After this configuration. ISP-1 and ISP-2 continue to receive the specific routes and the summary route. Which configuration resolves the issue?

Options:

A.

router bgp 64511aggregate-address 172.16.20.0 255.255.252.0 summary-only

B.

router bgp 64511neighbor 192.168.100.1 summary-onlyneighbor 192.168.200.2 summary-only

C.

interface E 0/0ip bgp suppress-map BLOCK_SPECIFIC!interface E 0/1ip bgp suppress-map BLOCK_SPECIFIC!ip prefix-list PL_BLOCK_SPECIFIC permit 172.16.20.0/22 ge 24!route-map BLOCK_SPECIFIC permit 10match ip address prefix-list PL_BLOCK_SPECIFIC

D.

ip prefix-list PL_BLOCK_SPECIFIC deny 172.16.20.0/22 ge 22ip prefix-list PL BLOCK SPECIFIC permit 172.16.20.0/22!route-map BLOCK_SPECIFIC permit 10match ip address prefix-list PL_BLOCK_SPECIFIC!router bgp 64511aggregate-address 172.16.20.0 255 255.252.0 suppress-map BLOCKSPECIFIC

Page: 35 / 45
Total 603 questions