Free and Premium Amazon Web Services MLS-C01 Dumps Questions Answers

Term frequency-inverse document frequency (TF-IDF) is a technique that assigns a weight to each word in a document based on how important it is to the meaning of the document. The term frequency (TF) measures how often a word appears in a document, while the inverse document frequency (IDF) measures how rare a word is across a collection of documents. The TF-IDF weight is the product of the TF and IDF values, and it is high for words that are frequent in a specific document but rare in the overall corpus. TF-IDF can help improve the validation accuracy of a sentiment analysis model by reducing the impact of common words that have little or no sentiment value, such as “the”, “a”, “and”, etc. Scikit-learn is a popular Python library for machine learning that provides a TF-IDF vectorizer class that can transform a collection of text documents into a matrix of TF-IDF features. By using this tool, the Data Scientist can create a more informative and discriminative feature representation for the sentiment analysis task.

TfidfVectorizer - scikit-learn

Text feature extraction - scikit-learn

TF-IDF for Beginners | by Jana Schmidt | Towards Data Science

Sentiment Analysis: Concept, Analysis and Applications | by Susan Li | Towards Data Science

AWS IoT Greengrass is a service that extends AWS to edge devices, such as sensors and machines, so they can act locally on the data they generate, while still using the cloud for management, analytics, and durable storage. AWS IoT Greengrass enables local device messaging, secure data transfer, and local computing using AWS Lambda functions and machine learning models. AWS IoT Greengrass can run machine learning inference locally on devices using models that are created and trained in the cloud. This allows devices to respond quickly to local events, even when they are offline or have intermittent connectivity. Therefore, option B is the best deployment architecture for the model to address the business requirements of the manufacturer.

Option A is incorrect because deploying the model in Amazon SageMaker would require sending the sensor data to the cloud for inference, which would not work well for factory locations that do not have reliable or high-speed internet connectivity. Moreover, this option would not provide near-real-time inference capabilities, as there would be latency and bandwidth issues involved in transferring the data to and from the cloud. Option C is incorrect because deploying the model to an Amazon SageMaker batch transformation job would not provide near-real-time inference capabilities, as batch transformation is an asynchronous process that operates on large datasets. Batch transformation is not suitable for streaming data that requires low-latency responses. Option D is incorrect because deploying the model in Amazon SageMaker and using an IoT rule to write data to an Amazon DynamoDB table would also require sending the sensor data to the cloud for inference, which would have the same drawbacks as option A. Moreover, this option would introduce additional complexity and cost by involving multiple services, such as IoT Core, DynamoDB, and Lambda.

AWS Greengrass Machine Learning Inference - Amazon Web Services

Machine learning components - AWS IoT Greengrass

What is AWS Greengrass? | AWS IoT Core | Onica

GitHub - aws-samples/aws-greengrass-ml-deployment-sample

AWS IoT Greengrass Architecture and Its Benefits | Quick Guide - XenonStack

 The best model for predicting housing prices based on a historical dataset with 32 features is linear regression. Linear regression is a supervised learning algorithm that fits a linear relationship between a dependent variable (housing price) and one or more independent variables (features). Linear regression can handle multiple features and output a continuous value for the housing price. Linear regression can also return the coefficients of the features, which indicate how each feature affects the housing price. Linear regression is suitable for this problem because the outcome of interest is numerical and continuous, and the model needs to capture the linear relationship between the features and the outcome.

AWS Machine Learning Specialty Exam Guide

AWS Machine Learning Training - Regression vs Classification in Machine Learning

AWS Machine Learning Training - Linear Regression with Amazon SageMaker

The best storage option for the trucking company is to use an Amazon S3-backed data lake to store the raw images, and set up the permissions using bucket policies. A data lake is a centralized repository that allows you to store all your structured and unstructured data at any scale. Amazon S3 is the ideal choice for building a data lake because it offers high durability, scalability, availability, and security. You can store any type of data in Amazon S3, such as images, videos, audio, text, etc. You can also use AWS services such as Amazon Rekognition, Amazon SageMaker, and Amazon EMR to analyze and process the data in the data lake. To ensure the data is only accessible to specific IAM users, you can use bucket policies to grant or deny access to the S3 buckets based on the IAM user’s identity or role. Bucket policies are JSON documents that specify the permissions for the bucket and the objects in it. You can use conditions to restrict access based on various factors, such as IP address, time, source, etc. By using bucket policies, you can control who can access the data in the data lake and what actions they can perform on it.

AWS Machine Learning Specialty Exam Guide

AWS Machine Learning Training - Build a Data Lake Foundation with Amazon S3

AWS Machine Learning Training - Using Bucket Policies and User Policies

The best solution is to configure Amazon EventBridge to run a predefined SageMaker pipeline to perform the transformations when a new data is detected in the S3 bucket. This solution requires the least development effort because it leverages the native integration between EventBridge and SageMaker Pipelines, which allows you to trigger a pipeline execution based on an event rule. EventBridge can monitor the S3 bucket for new data uploads and invoke the pipeline that contains the same transformations and feature engineering steps that were defined in SageMaker Data Wrangler. The pipeline can then ingest the transformed data into the online feature store for training and inference.

The other solutions are less optimal because they require more development effort and additional services. Using AWS Lambda or AWS Step Functions would require writing custom code to invoke the SageMaker pipeline and handle any errors or retries. Using Apache Airflow would require setting up and maintaining an Airflow server and DAGs, as well as integrating with the SageMaker API.

Amazon EventBridge and Amazon SageMaker Pipelines integration

Create a pipeline using a JSON specification

Ingest data into a feature group

To evaluate the contribution of each feature before model training, feature importance scores are a primary tool. In Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler, a Quick Model can be used to rapidly generate a model on the dataset and return feature importance scores. These scores indicate how much each feature influences the target variable.

“Use Quick Model to generate feature importance scores quickly to help understand which features contribute the most to predictions. These scores range from 0 to 1, with higher values indicating higher contribution.”

This allows ML engineers to assess feature relevance without full-scale model development, thus saving time and effort in the feature selection phase of the pipeline.

 A deep convolutional neural network (CNN) classifier is a suitable architecture for image classification tasks, as it can learn features from the images and reduce the dimensionality of the input. A linear output layer that outputs the probability that an image contains a car is appropriate for a binary classification problem, as it can produce a single scalar value between 0 and 1. A softmax output layer is more suitable for a multi-class classification problem, as it can produce a vector of probabilities that sum up to 1. A deep multilayer perceptron (MLP) classifier is not as effective as a CNN for image classification, as it does not exploit the spatial structure of the images and requires a large number of parameters to process the high-dimensional input. References:

AWS Certified Machine Learning - Specialty Exam Guide

AWS Training - Machine Learning on AWS

AWS Whitepaper - An Overview of Machine Learning on AWS

 Data augmentation is a technique that can increase the size and diversity of the training data by applying various transformations to the original images, such as inversions, translations, rotations, scaling, cropping, flipping, and color variations. Data augmentation can help improve the performance and generalization of image classification models by reducing overfitting and introducing more variability to the data. Data augmentation is especially useful when the original data is limited or imbalanced, as in the case of the company’s problem. By augmenting the training data for each item using image variants, the company can build a more robust and accurate model that can recognize the items on the store shelves from different angles, positions, and lighting conditions. The company can also iterate on the model by adding more data or fine-tuning the hyperparameters to achieve better results.

Build high performing image classification models using Amazon SageMaker JumpStart

The Effectiveness of Data Augmentation in Image Classification using Deep Learning

Data augmentation for improving deep learning in image classification problem

Class-Adaptive Data Augmentation for Image Classification

The best Amazon SageMaker algorithm for this task is Image Classification - TensorFlow. This algorithm is a supervised learning algorithm that supports transfer learning with many pretrained models from the TensorFlow Hub. Transfer learning allows the company to fine-tune one of the available pretrained models on their own dataset, even if a large amount of image data is not available. The image classification algorithm takes an image as input and outputs a probability for each provided class label. The company can choose from a variety of models, such as MobileNet, ResNet, or Inception, depending on their accuracy and speed requirements. The algorithm also supports distributed training, data augmentation, and hyperparameter tuning.

Image Classification - TensorFlow - Amazon SageMaker

Amazon SageMaker Provides New Built-in TensorFlow Image Classification Algorithm

Image Classification with ResNet :: Amazon SageMaker Workshop

Image classification on Amazon SageMaker | by Julien Simon - Medium

Updating the existing SageMaker endpoint to use a new configuration that is weighted to send 5% of the traffic to the new variant is the simplest approach with the least risk to deploy the model and roll it back, if needed. This is because SageMaker supports A/B testing, which allows the Specialist to compare the performance of different model variants by sending a portion of the traffic to each variant. The Specialist can monitor the metrics of each variant and adjust the weights accordingly. If the new variant does not perform as expected, the Specialist can revert traffic to the last version by resetting the weights to 100% for the old variant and 0% for the new variant. This way, the Specialist can deploy the model without affecting the customer experience and roll it back easily if needed. References:

Amazon SageMaker

Deploying models to Amazon SageMaker hosting services

For a repository containing a large and dynamically scaling collection of images, Amazon S3 is ideal due to its scalability and versioning capabilities. Amazon S3 natively supports automatic scaling to accommodate increasing storage needs and allows versioning, which enables tracking and managing different versions of objects.

To meet the requirement of maintaining multiple, immediately accessible copies of data across AWS Regions, S3 Cross-Region Replication (CRR) can be enabled. CRR automatically replicates new or updated objects to a specified destination bucket in another AWS Region, ensuring low-latency access and disaster recovery. By setting up CRR with versioning enabled, the data scientist can achieve a multi-Region, scalable, and version-controlled repository in Amazon S3.

The best way to visualize the model’s degradation is to create a histogram of the model errors over the last 3 weeks and compare it with a histogram of the model errors from before that period. A histogram is a graphical representation of the distribution of numerical data. It shows how often each value or range of values occurs in the data. A model error is the difference between the actual value and the predicted value. A high model error indicates a poor fit of the model to the data. By comparing the histograms of the model errors, the ML team can see if there is a significant change in the shape, spread, or center of the distribution. This can indicate if the model is underfitting, overfitting, or drifting from the data. A line chart or a scatter plot would not be as effective as a histogram for this purpose, because they do not show the distribution of the errors. A line chart would only show the trend of the errors over time, which may not capture the variability or outliers. A scatter plot would only show the relationship between the errors and another variable, such as daily sales, which may not be relevant or informative for the model’s performance. References:

Histogram - Wikipedia

Model error - Wikipedia

SageMaker Model Monitor - visualizing monitoring results

The combination of steps that the ML engineer should take to train the model are to create a .lst file that contains a list of image files and corresponding class labels, upload the .lst file to Amazon S3, and initiate transfer learning by training the model using the images of less common species. This approach will allow the ML engineer to leverage the existing ImageNetV2 CNN model and fine-tune it with the new data using Pipe mode in SageMaker.

A .lst file is a text file that contains a list of image files and corresponding class labels, separated by tabs. The .lst file format is required for using the SageMaker image classification algorithm with Pipe mode. Pipe mode is a feature of SageMaker that enables streaming data directly from Amazon S3 to the training instances, without downloading the data first. Pipe mode can reduce the startup time, improve the I/O throughput, and enable training on large datasets that exceed the disk size limit. To use Pipe mode, the ML engineer needs to upload the .lst file to Amazon S3 and specify the S3 path as the input data channel for the training job1.

Transfer learning is a technique that enables reusing a pre-trained model for a new task by fine-tuning the model parameters with new data. Transfer learning can save time and computational resources, as well as improve the performance of the model, especially when the new task is similar to the original task. The SageMaker image classification algorithm supports transfer learning by allowing the ML engineer to specify the number of output classes and the number of layers to be retrained. The ML engineer can use the existing ImageNetV2 CNN model, which is trained on 1,000 classes of common objects, and fine-tune it with the new data of less common animal species, which is a similar task2.

The other options are either less effective or not supported by the SageMaker image classification algorithm. Using a ResNet model and initiating full training mode would require training the model from scratch, which would take more time and resources than transfer learning. Using an Inception model is not possible, as the SageMaker image classification algorithm only supports ResNet and ImageNetV2 models. Using an augmented manifest file in JSON Lines format is not compatible with Pipe mode, as Pipe mode only supports .lst files for image classification1.

1: Using Pipe input mode for Amazon SageMaker algorithms | AWS Machine Learning Blog

2: Image Classification Algorithm - Amazon SageMaker

Amazon CloudWatch is a service that can monitor and collect various metrics and logs from AWS resources, such as Amazon SageMaker. Amazon CloudWatch can also generate dashboards to create a single view for the metrics and logs that are of interest. By using Amazon CloudWatch, the Machine Learning Specialist can review the latency, memory utilization, and CPU utilization during the load test, as these are some of the metrics that are outputted by Amazon SageMaker. The Specialist can create a custom dashboard that displays these metrics in different widgets, such as graphs, tables, or text. The dashboard can also be configured to refresh automatically and show the latest data as the load test is running. This approach will allow the Specialist to monitor the performance and resource utilization of the model variant and adjust the Auto Scaling configuration accordingly.

[Monitoring Amazon SageMaker with Amazon CloudWatch - Amazon SageMaker]

[Using Amazon CloudWatch Dashboards - Amazon CloudWatch]

[Create a CloudWatch Dashboard - Amazon CloudWatch]

In Amazon SageMaker, hyperparameter tuning jobs optimize model performance by adjusting hyperparameters. Amazon SageMaker’s hyperparameter tuning supports completion criteria settings that enable efficient management of tuning resources. In this scenario, the ML specialist aims to set a completion criterion that will terminate the tuning job as soon as SageMaker detects that further improvements in the objective metric are unlikely to exceed 1%.

The CompleteOnConvergence setting is designed for such requirements. This criterion enables the tuning job to automatically stop when SageMaker determines that additional hyperparameter evaluations are unlikely to improve the objective metric beyond a certain threshold, allowing for efficient tuning completion. The convergence process relies on an internal optimization algorithm that continuously evaluates the objective metric during tuning and stops when performance stabilizes without further improvement.

This is supported by AWS documentation, which explains that CompleteOnConvergence is an efficient way to manage tuning by stopping unnecessary evaluations once the model performance stabilizes within the specified threshold.

Precision measures the proportion of true positive predictions out of all positive predictions made by the model. In this scenario, since the cost of a false positive is high, it is critical to minimize false positives, which means prioritizing high precision.

From AWS documentation:

“Precision is the ratio of correctly predicted positive observations to the total predicted positive observations. High precision relates to a low false positive rate.”

— AWS ML Exam Guide – Evaluation Metrics

Recall (C) would focus on minimizing false negatives, which is not important here as missing positives has no cost. F1 (D) balances precision and recall, but the question emphasizes prioritizing precision only.

Amazon Kinesis Data Analytics is a service that allows users to analyze streaming data in real time using SQL queries. Amazon Random Cut Forest (RCF) is a SQL extension that enables anomaly detection on streaming data. RCF is an unsupervised machine learning algorithm that assigns an anomaly score to each data point based on how different it is from the rest of the data. A sliding window is a type of window that moves along with the data stream, so that the anomaly detection model can adapt to changing patterns over time. A tumbling window is a type of window that has a fixed size and does not overlap with other windows, so that the anomaly detection model is based on a fixed period of time. Therefore, option D is the best approach to meet the requirements of the question, as it uses RCF to calculate anomaly scores for each web traffic entry and uses a sliding window to adapt to changing web patterns over time.

Option A is incorrect because Amazon SageMaker Random Cut Forest (RCF) is a built-in model that can be used to train and deploy anomaly detection models on batch or streaming data, but it requires more steps and resources than using the RCF SQL extension in Amazon Kinesis Data Analytics. Option B is incorrect because Amazon SageMaker XGBoost is a built-in model that can be used for supervised learning tasks such as classification and regression, but not for unsupervised learning tasks such as anomaly detection. Option C is incorrect because k-Nearest Neighbors (kNN) is a SQL extension that can be used for classification and regression tasks on streaming data, but not for anomaly detection. Moreover, using a tumbling window would not allow the anomaly detection model to adapt to changing web patterns over time.

Using CloudWatch anomaly detection

Anomaly Detection With CloudWatch

Performing Real-time Anomaly Detection using AWS

What Is AWS Anomaly Detection? (And Is There A Better Option?)

The factors that will adversely impact the performance of the forecast model are:

Sales data is aggregated by week. This will reduce the granularity and resolution of the data, and make it harder to capture the daily patterns and variations in sales volume. The data scientist should request daily sales data from the source database to enable building a daily model, which will be more accurate and useful for the prediction task.

Sales data is missing zero entries for item sales. This will introduce bias and incompleteness in the data, and make it difficult to account for the items that have no demand or are out of stock. The data scientist should request that item sales data from the source database include zero entries to enable building the model, which will be more robust and realistic.

The other options are not valid because:

Detecting seasonality for the majority of stores will not be an issue, as sales data is highly consistent from week to week. Requesting categorical data to relate new stores with similar stores that have more historical data may not improve the model performance significantly, and may introduce unnecessary complexity and noise.

The sales data does not need to have more variance, as it reflects the actual demand and behavior of the customers. Requesting external sales data from other industries will not improve the model’s ability to generalize, but may introduce irrelevant and misleading information.

Only 100 MB of sales data is not a problem, as it is sufficient to train a forecast model with Amazon S3 and Amazon Forecast. Requesting 10 years of sales data will not provide much benefit, as it may contain outdated and obsolete information that does not reflect the current market trends and customer preferences.

Amazon Forecast

Forecasting: Principles and Practice

SageMaker Automatic Model Tuning (AMT) is a fully managed hyperparameter optimization feature that finds the best values for model parameters like eta, alpha, min_child_weight, and max_depth.

“Use SageMaker automatic model tuning to find the best version of a model by running many training jobs on your dataset using the ranges of hyperparameters that you specify.”

It supports built-in algorithms like XGBoost, and can optimize for evaluation metrics like AUC, making it the least operational overhead solution for this task.

The data sources that the data scientist should use to augment the dataset of reviews are those that contain relevant and diverse customer feedback about the company or its products. Emails exchanged by customers and the company’s customer service agents can provide valuable insights into the issues and complaints that customers have, as well as the solutions and responses that the company offers. Social media posts containing the name of the company or its products can capture the opinions and sentiments of customers and potential customers, as well as their reactions to marketing campaigns and product launches. A publicly available collection of customer reviews can provide a large and varied sample of feedback from different online platforms and marketplaces, which can help to generalize the ML models and avoid bias.

Detect sentiment from customer reviews using Amazon Comprehend | AWS Machine Learning Blog

How to Apply Machine Learning to Customer Feedback

The correct solution for granting permissions for data preprocessing is to use the following steps:

Create an IAM role that has permissions to create Amazon SageMaker Processing jobs. Attach the role to the SageMaker notebook instance. This role allows the ML specialist to run Processing jobs from the notebook code1

Create an Amazon SageMaker Processing job with an IAM role that has read and write permissions to the relevant S3 bucket, and appropriate KMS and ECR permissions. This role allows the Processing job to access the data in the encrypted S3 bucket, decrypt it with the KMS CMK, and pull the container image from ECR23

The other options are incorrect because they either miss some permissions or use unnecessary steps. For example:

Option A uses a single IAM role for both the notebook instance and the Processing job. This role may have more permissions than necessary for the notebook instance, which violates the principle of least privilege4

Option C sets up both an S3 endpoint and a KMS endpoint in the default VPC. These endpoints are not required for the Processing job to access the data in the encrypted S3 bucket. They are only needed if the Processing job runs in network isolation mode, which is not specified in the question.

Option D uses the access key and secret key of the IAM user with appropriate KMS and ECR permissions. This is not a secure way to pass credentials to the Processing job. It also requires the ML specialist to manage the IAM user and the keys.

1: Create an Amazon SageMaker Notebook Instance - Amazon SageMaker

2: Create a Processing Job - Amazon SageMaker

3: Use AWS KMS–Managed Encryption Keys - Amazon Simple Storage Service

4: IAM Best Practices - AWS Identity and Access Management

Network Isolation - Amazon SageMaker

Understanding and Getting Your Security Credentials - AWS General Reference

 The issue described in the question is a sign of overfitting, which is a common problem in machine learning when the model learns the noise and details of the training data too well and fails to generalize to new and unseen data. Overfitting can result in a low training error rate but a high test error rate, which indicates poor performance and validity of the model. There are several techniques that can be used to prevent or reduce overfitting, such as data augmentation and regularization.

Data augmentation is a technique that applies various transformations to the original training data, such as rotation, scaling, cropping, flipping, adding noise, changing brightness, etc., to create new and diverse data samples. Data augmentation can increase the size and diversity of the training data, which can help the model learn more features and patterns and reduce the variance of the model. Data augmentation is especially useful for image data, as it can simulate different scenarios and perspectives that the model may encounter in real life. For example, in the question, the device uses a camera to observe drivers’ behavior, so data augmentation can help the model deal with different lighting conditions, angles, distances, etc. Data augmentation can be done using various libraries and frameworks, such as TensorFlow, PyTorch, Keras, OpenCV, etc12

Regularization is a technique that adds a penalty term to the model’s objective function, which is typically based on the model’s parameters. Regularization can reduce the complexity and flexibility of the model, which can prevent overfitting by avoiding learning the noise and details of the training data. Regularization can also improve the stability and robustness of the model, as it can reduce the sensitivity of the model to small fluctuations in the data. There are different types of regularization, such as L1, L2, dropout, etc., but they all have the same goal of reducing overfitting. L2 regularization, also known as weight decay or ridge regression, is one of the most common and effective regularization techniques. L2 regularization adds the squared norm of the model’s parameters multiplied by a regularization parameter (lambda) to the model’s objective function. L2 regularization can shrink the model’s parameters towards zero, which can reduce the variance of the model and improve the generalization ability of the model. L2 regularization can be implemented using various libraries and frameworks, such as TensorFlow, PyTorch, Keras, Scikit-learn, etc34

The other options are not valid or relevant for resolving the issue of overfitting. Adding vanishing gradient to the model is not a technique, but a problem that occurs when the gradient of the model’s objective function becomes very small and the model stops learning. Making the neural network architecture complex is not a solution, but a possible cause of overfitting, as a complex model can have more parameters and more flexibility to fit the training data too well. Using gradient checking in the model is not a technique, but a debugging method that verifies the correctness of the gradient computation in the model. Gradient checking is not related to overfitting, but to the implementation of the model.

Amazon SageMaker script mode is a feature that allows users to use training scripts similar to those they would use outside SageMaker with SageMaker’s prebuilt containers for various frameworks such as TensorFlow. Script mode supports reading data from Amazon S3 buckets without requiring any changes to the training script. Therefore, option B is the best method of providing training data to Amazon SageMaker that would meet the business requirements with the least development overhead.

Option A is incorrect because using a local path of the data would not be scalable or reliable, as it would depend on the availability and capacity of the local storage. Moreover, using a local path of the data would not leverage the benefits of Amazon S3, such as durability, security, and performance. Option C is incorrect because rewriting the train.py script to convert TFRecords to protobuf would require additional development effort and complexity, as well as introduce potential errors and inconsistencies in the data format. Option D is incorrect because preparing the data in the format accepted by Amazon SageMaker would also require additional development effort and complexity, as well as involve using additional services such as AWS Glue or AWS Lambda, which would increase the cost and maintenance of the solution.

Bring your own model with Amazon SageMaker script mode

GitHub - aws-samples/amazon-sagemaker-script-mode

Deep Dive on TensorFlow training with Amazon SageMaker and Amazon S3

amazon-sagemaker-script-mode/generate_cifar10_tfrecords.py at master

The best approach to address all of the requirements with the least development effort is to create an AWS Glue job, convert the scripts to PySpark, execute the pipeline, and store the results in Amazon S3. This is because:

AWS Glue is a fully managed extract, transform, and load (ETL) service that makes it easy to prepare and load data for analytics 1. AWS Glue can run Python and Scala scripts to process data from various sources, such as Amazon S3, Amazon DynamoDB, Amazon Redshift, and more 2. AWS Glue also provides a serverless Apache Spark environment to run ETL jobs, eliminating the need to provision and manage servers 3.

PySpark is the Python API for Apache Spark, a unified analytics engine for large-scale data processing 4. PySpark can perform various data transformations and manipulations on structured and unstructured data, such as cleaning, enriching, and compressing 5. PySpark can also leverage the distributed computing power of Spark to handle terabytes of data efficiently and scalably 6.

By creating an AWS Glue job and converting the scripts to PySpark, the company can move the scripts out of Amazon EC2 into a more managed solution that will eliminate the need to maintain servers. The company can also reduce the development effort by using the AWS Glue console, AWS SDK, or AWS CLI to create and run the job 7. Moreover, the company can use the AWS Glue Data Catalog to store and manage the metadata of the data sources and targets 8.

The other options are not as suitable as option C for the following reasons:

Option A is not optimal because loading the data into an Amazon Redshift cluster and executing the pipeline by using SQL will incur additional costs and complexity for the company. Amazon Redshift is a fully managed data warehouse service that enables fast and scalable analysis of structured data . However, it is not designed for ETL purposes, such as cleaning, transforming, enriching, and compressing data. Moreover, using SQL to perform these tasks may not be as expressive and flexible as using Python scripts. Furthermore, the company will have to provision and configure the Amazon Redshift cluster, and load and unload the data from Amazon S3, which will increase the development effort and time.

Option B is not feasible because loading the data into Amazon DynamoDB and converting the scripts to an AWS Lambda function will not work for the company’s use case. Amazon DynamoDB is a fully managed key-value and document database service that provides fast and consistent performance at any scale . However, it is not suitable for storing and processing terabytes of data daily, as it has limits on the size and throughput of each table and item . Moreover, using AWS Lambda to execute the pipeline will not be efficient or cost-effective, as Lambda has limits on the memory, CPU, and execution time of each function . Therefore, using Amazon DynamoDB and AWS Lambda will not meet the company’s requirements for processing large amounts of data quickly and reliably.

Option D is not relevant because creating a set of individual AWS Lambda functions to execute each of the scripts and building a step function by using the AWS Step Functions Data Science SDK will not address the main issue of moving the scripts out of Amazon EC2. AWS Step Functions is a fully managed service that lets you coordinate multiple AWS services into serverless workflows . The AWS Step Functions Data Science SDK is an open source library that allows data scientists to easily create workflows that process and publish machine learning models using Amazon SageMaker and AWS Step Functions . However, these services and tools are not designed for ETL purposes, such as cleaning, transforming, enriching, and compressing data. Moreover, as mentioned in option B, using AWS Lambda to execute the scripts will not be efficient or cost-effective for the company’s use case.

What Is AWS Glue?

AWS Glue Components

AWS Glue Serverless Spark ETL

PySpark - Overview

PySpark - RDD

PySpark - SparkContext

Adding Jobs in AWS Glue

Populating the AWS Glue Data Catalog

[What Is Amazon Redshift?]

[What Is Amazon DynamoDB?]

[Service, Account, and Table Quotas in DynamoDB]

[AWS Lambda quotas]

[What Is AWS Step Functions?]

[AWS Step Functions Data Science SDK for Python]

Amazon Rekognition is a service that provides computer vision capabilities for image and video analysis, such as object, scene, and activity detection, face and text recognition, and custom label detection. Amazon Rekognition can be used to automate the quality control process for plaques by comparing the images of the plaques with the images of defects in the Amazon S3 bucket and returning a confidence score for each defect. Amazon A2I is a service that enables human review of machine learning predictions, such as low-confidence predictions from Amazon Rekognition. Amazon A2I can be integrated with a private workforce option, which allows the engraving company to use its own internal team of reviewers to manually inspect the plaques that are flagged by Amazon Rekognition. This solution meets the requirements of automating the quality control process, sending low-confidence predictions to an internal team of reviewers, and using Amazon A2I for manual review. References:

1: Amazon Rekognition documentation

2: Amazon A2I documentation

3: Amazon Rekognition Custom Labels documentation

4: Amazon A2I Private Workforce documentation

The Recordio protobuf format is a binary data format that is optimized for training on SageMaker. It allows faster data loading and lower memory usage compared to other formats such as CSV or numpy arrays. The Recordio protobuf format also supports features such as sparse input, variable-length input, and label embedding. To use the Recordio protobuf format, the data needs to be serialized and deserialized using the appropriate libraries. Some of the built-in algorithms in SageMaker support the Recordio protobuf format as a content type for training and inference. References:

Common Data Formats for Training

Using RecordIO Format

Content Types Supported by Built-in Algorithms

The prior probability distribution for the discrete random variable that represents the number of minutes New Yorkers wait for a bus is a Poisson distribution. A Poisson distribution is suitable for modeling the number of events that occur in a fixed interval of time or space, given a known average rate of occurrence. In this case, the event is waiting for a bus, the interval is 10 minutes, and the average rate is 3 minutes. The Poisson distribution can capture the variability of the waiting time, which can range from 0 to 10 minutes, with different probabilities.

1: Poisson Distribution - Amazon SageMaker

2: Poisson Distribution - Wikipedia

Overfitting occurs when a model performs well on the training data but poorly on the test data. This is often because the model has learned the training data too well and is not able to generalize to new data. To avoid overfitting, the Machine Learning Specialist should lower the max_depth parameter value. This will reduce the complexity of the model and make it less likely to overfit. According to the XGBoost documentation1, the max_depth parameter controls the maximum depth of a tree and lower values can help prevent overfitting. The documentation also suggests other ways to control overfitting, such as adding randomness, using regularization, and using early stopping1. References:

XGBoost Parameters

 The best feature engineering strategy for this scenario is to apply dimensionality reduction by using the principal component analysis (PCA) algorithm. PCA is a technique that transforms a large set of correlated features into a smaller set of uncorrelated features called principal components. This can help reduce the complexity and noise in the data, improve the performance and interpretability of the model, and avoid overfitting. Amazon SageMaker provides a built-in PCA algorithm that can be used to perform dimensionality reduction on tabular data. The ML specialist can use Amazon SageMaker to train and deploy the PCA model, and then use the output of the PCA model as the input for the classification model.

Dimensionality Reduction with Amazon SageMaker

Amazon SageMaker PCA Algorithm

The most secure action to protect the data from being accessed and transferred to a remote host by malicious code accidentally installed on the training container is to enable network isolation for training jobs. Network isolation is a feature that allows you to run training and inference containers in internet-free mode, which blocks any outbound network calls from the containers, even to other AWS services such as Amazon S3. Additionally, no AWS credentials are made available to the container runtime environment. This way, you can prevent unauthorized access to your data and resources by malicious code or users. You can enable network isolation by setting the EnableNetworkIsolation parameter to True when you call CreateTrainingJob, CreateHyperParameterTuningJob, or CreateModel.

Run Training and Inference Containers in Internet-Free Mode - Amazon SageMaker

The solution that will meet the requirements with the least amount of effort is to use a semantic segmentation algorithm to identify a visitor’s hair in video frames, and pass the identified hair to an ResNet-50 algorithm to determine hair style and hair color. This solution can leverage the existing Amazon SageMaker algorithms and frameworks to perform the tasks of hair segmentation and classification.

Semantic segmentation is a computer vision technique that assigns a class label to every pixel in an image, such that pixels with the same label share certain characteristics. Semantic segmentation can be used to identify and isolate different objects or regions in an image, such as a visitor’s hair in a video frame. Amazon SageMaker provides a built-in semantic segmentation algorithm that can train and deploy models for semantic segmentation tasks. The algorithm supports three state-of-the-art network architectures: Fully Convolutional Network (FCN), Pyramid Scene Parsing Network (PSP), and DeepLab v3. The algorithm can also use pre-trained or randomly initialized ResNet-50 or ResNet-101 as the backbone network. The algorithm can be trained using P2/P3 type Amazon EC2 instances in single machine configurations1.

ResNet-50 is a convolutional neural network that is 50 layers deep and can classify images into 1000 object categories. ResNet-50 is trained on more than a million images from the ImageNet database and can achieve high accuracy on various image recognition tasks. ResNet-50 can be used to determine hair style and hair color from the segmented hair regions in the video frames. Amazon SageMaker provides a built-in image classification algorithm that can use ResNet-50 as the network architecture. The algorithm can also perform transfer learning by fine-tuning the pre-trained ResNet-50 model with new data. The algorithm can be trained using P2/P3 type Amazon EC2 instances in single or multiple machine configurations2.

The other options are either less effective or more complex to implement. Using an object detection algorithm to identify a visitor’s hair in video frames would not segment the hair at the pixel level, but only draw bounding boxes around the hair regions. This could result in inaccurate or incomplete hair segmentation, especially if the hair is occluded or has irregular shapes. Using an XGBoost algorithm to determine hair style and hair color would require transforming the segmented hair images into numerical features, which could lose some information or introduce noise. XGBoost is also not designed for image classification tasks, and may not achieve high accuracy or performance.

1: Semantic Segmentation Algorithm - Amazon SageMaker

2: Image Classification Algorithm - Amazon SageMaker

The machine learning model in this scenario shows signs of overfitting, as evidenced by better performance on the training dataset than on the testing dataset. Overfitting indicates that the model is capturing noise or details specific to the training data rather than general patterns.

One common approach to reduce overfitting is L2 regularization, which adds a penalty to the loss function for large weights and helps the model generalize better by smoothing out the weight distribution. By increasing the value of the L2 hyperparameter, the ML specialist can increase this penalty, helping to mitigate overfitting and improve performance on the testing dataset.

Options like increasing momentum or reducing dropout are less effective for addressing overfitting in this context.

 The best way to split the dataset into a training and test set for this use case is to randomly select 10% of the users and split off all interaction data from these users for the test set. This is because the company relies on a steady stream of new customers, so the test set should reflect the behavior of new customers who have not been seen by the model before. The other options are not suitable because they either mix old and new customers in the test set (A and B), or they bias the test set towards users with less interaction data ©. References:

Amazon SageMaker Developer Guide: Train and Test Datasets

Amazon Personalize Developer Guide: Preparing and Importing Data

To comply with the company’s security requirement that SageMaker notebook instances must not have internet connectivity, the most secure and recommended approach is to use VPC interface endpoints (AWS PrivateLink) for connecting SageMaker to other AWS services such as Amazon S3, without requiring internet access or a NAT Gateway.

Exact Extract from Amazon SageMaker documentation:

“You can connect to your notebook instance from your VPC through an interface endpoint in your Virtual Private Cloud (VPC) instead of connecting over the public internet. When you use a VPC interface endpoint, communication between your VPC and the notebook instance is conducted entirely and securely within the AWS network.”

Further security can be enforced using IAM and security group restrictions:

“To restrict access to only connections made from within your VPC, create an AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) policy that restricts access to only calls that come from within your VPC. Then add that policy to every AWS Identity and Access Management user, group, or role used to access the notebook instance.”

Also:

“Use VPC endpoints to keep traffic between your VPC and SageMaker in the AWS network. This is especially useful when your notebook instances or endpoints don’t have internet access.”

By configuring interface VPC endpoints and controlling security groups and IAM policies appropriately, the SageMaker notebook instances can operate without any internet connectivity, meeting the company’s policy securely and effectively.

The company wants to perform near-real time defect detection on a time-series of 200 performance metrics, and store all the data for offline analysis. The best approach for this scenario is to use Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose for ingestion and Amazon Kinesis Data Analytics Random Cut Forest (RCF) to perform anomaly detection. Use Kinesis Data Firehose to store data in Amazon S3 for further analysis.

Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose is a service that can capture, transform, and deliver streaming data to destinations such as Amazon S3, Amazon Redshift, Amazon OpenSearch Service, and Splunk. Kinesis Data Firehose can handle any amount and frequency of data, and automatically scale to match the throughput. Kinesis Data Firehose can also compress, encrypt, and batch the data before delivering it to the destination, reducing the storage cost and enhancing the security.

Amazon Kinesis Data Analytics is a service that can analyze streaming data in real time using SQL or Apache Flink applications. Kinesis Data Analytics can use built-in functions and algorithms to perform various analytics tasks, such as aggregations, joins, filters, windows, and anomaly detection. One of the built-in algorithms that Kinesis Data Analytics supports is Random Cut Forest (RCF), which is a supervised learning algorithm for forecasting scalar time series using recurrent neural networks. RCF can detect anomalies in streaming data by assigning an anomaly score to each data point, based on how distant it is from the rest of the data. RCF can handle multiple related time series, such as the performance metrics of the aircraft engine, and learn a global model that captures the common patterns and trends across the time series.

Therefore, the company can use the following architecture to build the near-real time defect detection solution:

Use Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose for ingestion: The company can use Kinesis Data Firehose to capture the streaming data from the aircraft engine testing, and deliver it to two destinations: Amazon S3 and Amazon Kinesis Data Analytics. The company can configure the Kinesis Data Firehose delivery stream to specify the source, the buffer size and interval, the compression and encryption options, the error handling and retry logic, and the destination details.

Use Amazon Kinesis Data Analytics Random Cut Forest (RCF) to perform anomaly detection: The company can use Kinesis Data Analytics to create a SQL application that can read the streaming data from the Kinesis Data Firehose delivery stream, and apply the RCF algorithm to detect anomalies. The company can use the RANDOM_CUT_FOREST or RANDOM_CUT_FOREST_WITH_EXPLANATION functions to compute the anomaly scores and attributions for each data point, and use the WHERE clause to filter out the normal data points. The company can also use the CURSOR function to specify the input stream, and the PUMP function to write the output stream to another destination, such as Amazon Kinesis Data Streams or AWS Lambda.

Use Kinesis Data Firehose to store data in Amazon S3 for further analysis: The company can use Kinesis Data Firehose to store the raw and processed data in Amazon S3 for offline analysis. The company can use the S3 destination of the Kinesis Data Firehose delivery stream to store the raw data, and use another Kinesis Data Firehose delivery stream to store the output of the Kinesis Data Analytics application. The company can also use AWS Glue or Amazon Athena to catalog, query, and analyze the data in Amazon S3.

What Is Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose?

What Is Amazon Kinesis Data Analytics for SQL Applications?

DeepAR Forecasting Algorithm - Amazon SageMaker

 The XGBoost model is a supervised machine learning algorithm, which means it requires labeled data to learn from. The customers’ current segmentation is unknown, so there is no label to train the XGBoost model on. Moreover, the XGBoost model is designed for classification or regression tasks, not for clustering. Clustering is a type of unsupervised machine learning, which means it does not require labeled data. Clustering algorithms try to find natural groups or clusters in the data based on their similarity or distance. A common clustering algorithm is k-means, which partitions the data into K clusters, where each data point belongs to the cluster with the nearest mean. To meet the current requirements, the data scientist should train a k-means model with K = 5 on the same dataset to predict a segment for each customer. This way, the data scientist can identify five customer segments based on age, income, and location, without needing any labels. References:

What is XGBoost? - Amazon SageMaker

What is Clustering? - Amazon SageMaker

K-Means Algorithm - Amazon SageMaker

To access an Amazon S3 bucket in another account that is encrypted using SSE-KMS, the following are required:

A. An AWS KMS key policy that allows access to the customer master key (CMK). The CMK is the encryption key that is used to encrypt and decrypt the data in the S3 bucket. The KMS key policy defines who can use and manage the CMK. To allow access to the CMK from another account, the key policy must include a statement that grants the necessary permissions (such as kms:Decrypt) to the principal from the other account (such as the SageMaker notebook IAM role).

B. A SageMaker notebook security group that allows access to Amazon S3. A security group is a virtual firewall that controls the inbound and outbound traffic for the SageMaker notebook instance. To allow the notebook instance to access the S3 bucket, the security group must have a rule that allows outbound traffic to the S3 endpoint on port 443 (HTTPS).

C. An IAM role that allows access to the specific S3 bucket. An IAM role is an identity that can be assumed by the SageMaker notebook instance to access AWS resources. The IAM role must have a policy that grants the necessary permissions (such as s3:GetObject) to access the specific S3 bucket. The policy must also include a condition that allows access to the CMK in the other account.

The following are not required or correct:

D. A permissive S3 bucket policy. A bucket policy is a resource-based policy that defines who can access the S3 bucket and what actions they can perform. A permissive bucket policy is not required and not recommended, as it can expose the bucket to unauthorized access. A bucket policy should follow the principle of least privilege and grant the minimum permissions necessary to the specific principals that need access.

E. An S3 bucket owner that matches the notebook owner. The S3 bucket owner and the notebook owner do not need to match, as long as the bucket owner grants cross-account access to the notebook owner through the KMS key policy and the bucket policy (if applicable).

F. A SegaMaker notebook subnet ACL that allow traffic to Amazon S3. A subnet ACL is a network access control list that acts as an optional layer of security for the SageMaker notebook instance’s subnet. A subnet ACL is not required to access the S3 bucket, as the security group is sufficient to control the traffic. However, if a subnet ACL is used, it must not block the traffic to the S3 endpoint.

The elbow method is a technique that we use to determine the number of centroids (k) to use in a k-means clustering algorithm. In this method, we plot the within-cluster sum of squares (WCSS) against the number of clusters (k) and look for the point where the curve bends sharply. This point is called the elbow point and it indicates that adding more clusters does not improve the model significantly. The graph in the question shows that the elbow point is at k = 4, which means that 4 is a reasonable choice for the optimal number of clusters. References:

Elbow Method for optimal value of k in KMeans: A tutorial on how to use the elbow method with Amazon SageMaker.

K-Means Clustering: A video that explains the concept and benefits of k-means clustering.

Option A is correct because SageMaker Pipelines is a service that enables you to create and manage automated workflows for your machine learning projects. You can use SageMaker Pipelines to orchestrate the steps of data extraction, model training, and model deployment in a repeatable and scalable way1.

Option B is correct because SageMaker Model Monitor is a service that monitors the quality of your models in production and alerts you when there are deviations in the model quality. You can use SageMaker Model Monitor to set an accuracy threshold for your model and configure a CloudWatch alarm that triggers when the threshold is exceeded. You can then connect the alarm to the workflow in SageMaker Pipelines to automatically initiate retraining and deployment of a new version of the model2.

Option C is incorrect because it is not the most operationally efficient way to maintain the model’s accuracy. Creating a daily SageMaker Processing job that reads the predictions from Amazon S3 and checks for changes in model prediction accuracy is a manual and time-consuming process. It also requires you to write custom code to perform the data analysis and send the email notification. Moreover, it does not automatically retrain and deploy the model when the accuracy drops.

Option D is incorrect because it is not the most operationally efficient way to maintain the model’s accuracy. Rerunning the steps in the Jupyter notebook that is hosted on SageMaker Studio notebooks to retrain the model and redeploy a new version of the model is a manual and error-prone process. It also requires you to monitor the model’s performance and initiate the retraining and deployment steps yourself. Moreover, it does not leverage the benefits of SageMaker Pipelines and SageMaker Model Monitor to automate and streamline the workflow.

Option E is incorrect because it is not the most operationally efficient way to maintain the model’s accuracy. Exporting the training and deployment code from the SageMaker Studio notebooks into a Python script and packaging the script into an Amazon ECS task that an AWS Lambda function can initiate is a complex and cumbersome process. It also requires you to manage the infrastructure and resources for the Amazon ECS task and the AWS Lambda function. Moreover, it does not leverage the benefits of SageMaker Pipelines and SageMaker Model Monitor to automate and streamline the workflow.

1: SageMaker Pipelines - Amazon SageMaker

2: Monitor data and model quality - Amazon SageMaker

Amazon SageMaker Autopilot is a fully managed solution that automatically explores different ML models and selects the most effective ones for a given prediction task. After model training, Amazon SageMaker Clarify can generate feature importance scores, identifying the top features in a straightforward, automated manner with minimal manual intervention.

By using SageMaker Autopilot, the data scientist can obtain the desired feature importance ranking for predictive attributes with minimal setup and low operational overhead, as opposed to manually configuring models in SageMaker.

 Amazon SageMaker is a service that allows users to build, train, and deploy ML models on AWS. Amazon SageMaker endpoints are scalable and secure web services that can be used to perform real-time inference on ML models. An endpoint configuration defines the models that are deployed and the resources that are used by the endpoint. An endpoint configuration can have multiple production variants, each representing a different version or variant of a model. Users can specify the portion of the inferences served by each production variant using the initialVariantWeight parameter. Users can also programmatically update the endpoint configuration to change the portion of the inferences served by each production variant using the UpdateEndpointWeightsAndCapacities API. Therefore, option B is the best solution to satisfy the requirements with minimal effort.

Option A is incorrect because creating multiple endpoints for each model would incur more cost and complexity than using a single endpoint with multiple production variants. Moreover, controlling the invocation of different models at the application layer would require more custom logic and coordination than using the UpdateEndpointWeightsAndCapacities API. Option C is incorrect because Amazon SageMaker Neo is a service that allows users to optimize ML models for different hardware platforms, such as edge devices. It is not relevant to the problem of running multiple versions of a model in parallel for long periods of time. Option D is incorrect because Amazon SageMaker batch transform is a service that allows users to perform asynchronous inference on large datasets. It is not suitable for the problem of performing real-time inference on streaming data from device users.

Deploying models to Amazon SageMaker hosting services - Amazon SageMaker

Update an Amazon SageMaker endpoint to accommodate new models - Amazon SageMaker

UpdateEndpointWeightsAndCapacities - Amazon SageMaker

The data scientist should remove the stop words from the blog post data by using the Count Vectorizer function in the scikit-learn library, and replace the blog post data in the S3 bucket with the results of the vectorizer. This is because:

The Count Vectorizer function is a tool that can convert a collection of text documents to a matrix of token counts 1. It also enables the pre-processing of text data prior to generating the vector representation, such as removing accents, converting to lowercase, and filtering out stop words 1. By using this function, the data scientist can remove the stop words such as “a,” “an,” and “the” from the blog post data, and obtain a numerical representation of the text that can be used as input for the NTM algorithm.

The NTM algorithm is a neural network-based topic modeling technique that can learn latent topics from a corpus of documents 2. It can be used to recommend tags from blog posts by finding the most probable topics for each document, and ranking the words associated with each topic 3. However, the NTM algorithm does not perform any text pre-processing by itself, so it relies on the quality of the input data. Therefore, the data scientist should replace the blog post data in the S3 bucket with the results of the vectorizer, to ensure that the NTM algorithm does not include the stop words in the tag recommendations.

The other options are not suitable for the following reasons:

Option A is not relevant because the Amazon Comprehend entity recognition API operations are used to detect and extract named entities from text, such as people, places, organizations, dates, etc4. This is not the same as removing stop words, which are common words that do not carry much meaning or information. Moreover, removing the detected entities from the blog post data may reduce the quality and diversity of the tag recommendations, as some entities may be relevant and useful as tags.

Option B is not optimal because the SageMaker built-in principal component analysis (PCA) algorithm is used to reduce the dimensionality of a dataset by finding the most important features that capture the maximum amount of variance in the data 5. This is not the same as removing stop words, which are words that have low variance and high frequency in the data. Moreover, replacing the blog post data in the S3 bucket with the results of the PCA algorithm may not be compatible with the input format expected by the NTM algorithm, which requires a bag-of-words representation of the text 2.

Option C is not suitable because the SageMaker built-in Object Detection algorithm is used to detect and localize objects in images 6. This is not related to the task of recommending tags from blog posts, which are text documents. Moreover, using the Object Detection algorithm instead of the NTM algorithm would require a different type of input data (images instead of text), and a different type of output data (bounding boxes and labels instead of topics and words).

Neural Topic Model (NTM) Algorithm

Introduction to the Amazon SageMaker Neural Topic Model

Amazon Comprehend - Entity Recognition

sklearn.feature_extraction.text.CountVectorizer

Principal Component Analysis (PCA) Algorithm

Object Detection Algorithm

 To meet the requirements with the least operational overhead, the company should use AWS Glue crawlers, AWS Glue workflows and jobs, and Amazon Fraud Detector. AWS Glue crawlers can scan the data in Amazon S3 and identify the schema, which is then stored in the AWS Glue Data Catalog. AWS Glue workflows and jobs can perform data transformations on the data in Amazon S3 using serverless Spark or Python scripts. Amazon Fraud Detector can train a model to detect fraud using the transformed data and the company’s historical fraud labels, and then generate fraud predictions using a simple API call.

Option A is incorrect because Amazon Athena is a serverless query service that can analyze data in Amazon S3 using standard SQL, but it does not perform data transformations or fraud detection.

Option C is incorrect because Amazon Redshift is a cloud data warehouse that can store and query data using SQL, but it requires provisioning and managing clusters, which adds operational overhead. Moreover, Amazon Redshift does not provide a built-in fraud detection capability.

Option E is incorrect because Amazon Redshift ML is a feature that allows users to create, train, and deploy machine learning models using SQL commands in Amazon Redshift. However, using Amazon Redshift ML would require loading the data from Amazon S3 to Amazon Redshift, which adds complexity and cost. Also, Amazon Redshift ML does not support fraud detection as a use case.

AWS Glue Crawlers

AWS Glue Workflows and Jobs

Amazon Fraud Detector

The Machine Learning team wants to use its own training algorithm on Amazon SageMaker, and submit both its own algorithm code and algorithm-specific parameters. The best combination of services to build a custom algorithm in Amazon SageMaker are Amazon ECR and Amazon S3.

Amazon ECR is a fully managed container registry service that allows you to store, manage, and deploy Docker container images. You can use Amazon ECR to create a Docker image that contains your training algorithm code and any dependencies or libraries that it requires. You can also use Amazon ECR to push, pull, and manage your Docker images securely and reliably.

Amazon S3 is a durable, scalable, and secure object storage service that can store any amount and type of data. You can use Amazon S3 to store your training data, model artifacts, and algorithm-specific parameters. You can also use Amazon S3 to access your data and parameters from your training algorithm code, and to write your model output to a specified location.

Therefore, the Machine Learning team can use the following steps to build a custom algorithm in Amazon SageMaker:

Write the training algorithm code in Python, using the Amazon SageMaker Python SDK or the Amazon SageMaker Containers library to interact with the Amazon SageMaker service. The code should be able to read the input data and parameters from Amazon S3, and write the model output to Amazon S3.

Create a Dockerfile that defines the base image, the dependencies, the environment variables, and the commands to run the training algorithm code. The Dockerfile should also expose the ports that Amazon SageMaker uses to communicate with the container.

Build the Docker image using the Dockerfile, and tag it with a meaningful name and version.

Push the Docker image to Amazon ECR, and note the registry path of the image.

Upload the training data, model artifacts, and algorithm-specific parameters to Amazon S3, and note the S3 URIs of the objects.

Create an Amazon SageMaker training job, using the Amazon SageMaker Python SDK or the AWS CLI. Specify the registry path of the Docker image, the S3 URIs of the input and output data, the algorithm-specific parameters, and other configuration options, such as the instance type, the number of instances, the IAM role, and the hyperparameters.

Monitor the status and logs of the training job, and retrieve the model output from Amazon S3.

Use Your Own Training Algorithms

Amazon ECR - Amazon Web Services

Amazon S3 - Amazon Web Services

Regularization is a technique that can be used to prevent overfitting and improve model performance on unseen data. Overfitting occurs when the model learns the training data too well and fails to generalize to new and unseen data. This can be seen in the question, where the validation accuracy is lower than the training accuracy, and both are lower than the human-level performance. Regularization is a way of adding some constraints or penalties to the model to reduce its complexity and prevent it from memorizing the training data. Some common forms of regularization for image classification are:

Weight decay: Adding a term to the loss function that penalizes large weights in the model. This can help reduce the variance and noise in the model and make it more robust to small changes in the input.

Dropout: Randomly dropping out some units or connections in the model during training. This can help reduce the co-dependency among the units and make the model more resilient to missing or corrupted features.

Data augmentation: Artificially increasing the size and diversity of the training data by applying random transformations, such as cropping, flipping, rotating, scaling, etc. This can help the model learn more invariant and generalizable features and reduce the risk of overfitting to specific patterns in the training data.

The other options are not likely to fix the issue of overfitting, and may even worsen it:

A longer training time: This can lead to more overfitting, as the model will have more chances to fit the noise and details in the training data that are not relevant for the validation data.

Making the network larger: This can increase the model capacity and complexity, which can also lead to more overfitting, as the model will have more parameters to learn and adjust to the training data.

Using a different optimizer: This can affect the speed and stability of the training process, but not necessarily the generalization ability of the model. The choice of optimizer depends on the characteristics of the data and the model, and there is no guarantee that a different optimizer will prevent overfitting.

Regularization (machine learning)

Image Classification: Regularization

How to Reduce Overfitting With Dropout Regularization in Keras

Clustering is a machine learning technique that can group data points into clusters based on their similarity or proximity. Clustering can help discover the underlying structure and patterns in the data, as well as identify outliers or anomalies. Clustering can also be used for customer segmentation, which is the process of dividing customers into groups based on their characteristics, behaviors, preferences, or needs. Customer segmentation can help understand the key features and needs of different customer segments, as well as design and implement targeted marketing campaigns for each segment. In this case, the Marketing Manager at a pet insurance company plans to launch a targeted marketing campaign on social media to acquire new customers. To do this, the Manager can use clustering on customer profile data to understand the key characteristics of consumer segments, such as their demographics, pet types, policy preferences, premiums paid, claims made, etc. The Manager can then find similar profiles on social media, such as Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, etc., by using the cluster features as filters or keywords. The Manager can then target these potential new customers with personalized and relevant ads or offers that match their segment’s needs and interests. This way, the Manager can implement a machine learning model to identify potential new customers on social media.

The best solution to meet the requirements is to tune the csv_weight hyperparameter and the scale_pos_weight hyperparameter by using automatic model tuning (AMT). Optimize on {“HyperParameterTuningJobObjective”: {“MetricName”: “validation:f1”, “Type”: “Maximize”}}.

The csv_weight hyperparameter is used to specify the instance weights for the training data in CSV format. This can help handle imbalanced data by assigning higher weights to the minority class examples and lower weights to the majority class examples. The scale_pos_weight hyperparameter is used to control the balance of positive and negative weights. It is the ratio of the number of negative class examples to the number of positive class examples. Setting a higher value for this hyperparameter can increase the importance of the positive class and improve the recall. Both of these hyperparameters can help the XGBoost model capture as many instances of returned items as possible.

Automatic model tuning (AMT) is a feature of Amazon SageMaker that automates the process of finding the best hyperparameter values for a machine learning model. AMT uses Bayesian optimization to search the hyperparameter space and evaluate the model performance based on a predefined objective metric. The objective metric is the metric that AMT tries to optimize by adjusting the hyperparameter values. For imbalanced classification problems, accuracy is not a good objective metric, as it can be misleading and biased towards the majority class. A better objective metric is the F1 score, which is the harmonic mean of precision and recall. The F1 score can reflect the balance between precision and recall and is more suitable for imbalanced data. The F1 score ranges from 0 to 1, where 1 is the best possible value. Therefore, the type of the objective should be “Maximize” to achieve the highest F1 score.

By tuning the csv_weight and scale_pos_weight hyperparameters and optimizing on the F1 score, the data scientist can meet the requirements most cost-effectively. This solution requires tuning only two hyperparameters, which can reduce the computation time and cost compared to tuning all possible hyperparameters. This solution also uses the appropriate objective metric for imbalanced classification, which can improve the model performance and capture more instances of returned items.

In this scenario, Kinesis Data Streams efficiently ingests real-time event data, while Amazon Managed Service for Apache Flink (formerly Amazon Kinesis Data Analytics) is ideal for transforming and analyzing data in a continuous stream. Apache Flink allows processing of time-based windows, such as the 10-minute sliding window required here, with low operational overhead.

This combination provides an effective solution for low-latency data processing and transformation, meeting the requirements for preparing data for inference with minimal setup and serverless scalability.

The Amazon SageMaker k-Nearest-Neighbors (kNN) algorithm is a supervised learning algorithm that can perform both classification and regression tasks. It can also handle time series data, such as the air quality data in this case. The kNN algorithm works by finding the k most similar instances in the training data to a given query instance, and then predicting the output based on the average or majority of the outputs of the k nearest neighbors. The kNN algorithm can be configured to use different distance metrics, such as Euclidean or cosine, to measure the similarity between instances. To use the kNN algorithm on the single time series consisting of the full year of data, the Machine Learning Specialist needs to set the predictor_type parameter to regressor, as the output variable (air quality in parts per million of contaminates) is a continuous value. The kNN algorithm can then forecast the air quality for the next 2 days by finding the k most similar days in the past year and averaging their air quality values.

Amazon SageMaker k-Nearest-Neighbors (kNN) Algorithm - Amazon SageMaker

Time Series Forecasting using k-Nearest Neighbors (kNN) in Python | by …

Time Series Forecasting with k-Nearest Neighbors | by Nishant Malik …

 The modeling technique that the Machine Learning Specialist should use is binary classification. Binary classification is a type of supervised learning that predicts whether an input belongs to one of two possible classes. In this case, the input is the customer’s recent usage data and the output is whether or not the customer is likely to switch to a competitor in the next 30 days. This is a binary outcome, either yes or no, so binary classification is suitable for this problem. The other options are not appropriate for this problem. Time-series prediction is a type of supervised learning that forecasts future values based on past and present data. Anomaly detection is a type of unsupervised learning that identifies outliers or abnormal patterns in the data. Regression is a type of supervised learning that estimates a continuous numerical value based on the input features. References: Binary Classification, Time Series Prediction, Anomaly Detection, Regression

A hyperparameter tuning job is a feature of Amazon SageMaker that allows automatically finding the best combination of hyperparameters for a machine learning model. Hyperparameters are high-level parameters that influence the learning process and the performance of the model, such as the learning rate, the number of layers, the regularization factor, etc. A hyperparameter tuning job works by launching multiple training jobs with different hyperparameters, evaluating the results using an objective metric, and choosing the next set of hyperparameters to try based on a search strategy. The objective metric is a measure of the quality of the model, such as accuracy, precision, recall, etc. The search strategy is a method of exploring the hyperparameter space, such as random search, grid search, or Bayesian optimization.

Among the four options, option C is the most repeatable and requires the least amount of effort to use hyperparameter optimization to increase the model’s accuracy. This option involves the following steps:

Create a hyperparameter tuning job: Amazon SageMaker provides an easy-to-use interface for creating a hyperparameter tuning job, either through the AWS Management Console, the AWS CLI, or the AWS SDKs. To create a hyperparameter tuning job, the Machine Learning Specialist needs to specify the following information:

The name and type of the algorithm to use, either a built-in algorithm or a custom algorithm.

The ranges and types of the hyperparameters to tune, such as categorical, continuous, or integer.

The name and type of the objective metric to optimize, such as accuracy, and whether to maximize or minimize it.

The resource limits for the tuning job, such as the maximum number of training jobs and the maximum parallel training jobs.

The input data channels and the output data location for the training jobs.

The configuration of the training instances, such as the instance type, the instance count, the volume size, etc.

Set the accuracy as an objective metric: To use accuracy as an objective metric, the Machine Learning Specialist needs to ensure that the training algorithm writes the accuracy value to a file called metric_definitions in JSON format and prints it to stdout or stderr. For example, the file can contain the following content:

This means that the training algorithm prints a line like this:

Amazon SageMaker reads the accuracy value from the line and uses it to evaluate and compare the training jobs.

The other options are not as repeatable and require more effort than option C for the following reasons:

Option A: This option requires manually launching multiple training jobs in parallel with different hyperparameters, which can be tedious and error-prone. It also requires manually monitoring and comparing the results of the training jobs, which can be time-consuming and subjective.

Option B: This option requires writing code to create an AWS Step Functions workflow that monitors the accuracy in Amazon CloudWatch Logs and relaunches the training job with a defined list of hyperparameters, which can be complex and challenging. It also requires maintaining and updating the list of hyperparameters, which can be inefficient and suboptimal.

Option D: This option requires writing code to create a random walk in the parameter space to iterate through a range of values that should be used for each individual hyperparameter, which can be unreliable and unpredictable. It also requires defining and implementing a stopping criterion, which can be arbitrary and inconsistent.

Automatic Model Tuning - Amazon SageMaker

Define Metrics to Monitor Model Performance

 The best solution to reduce the cost of the notebook instance and the data preprocessing job is to change the notebook instance type to a smaller general-purpose instance, stop the notebook when it is not in use, and run data preprocessing on an ml.r5 instance with the same memory size as the ml.m5.4xlarge instance by using Amazon SageMaker Processing. This solution will result in the most cost savings because:

Changing the notebook instance type to a smaller general-purpose instance will reduce the hourly cost of running the notebook, since the feature engineering development does not require high CPU and memory resources. For example, an ml.t3.medium instance costs $0.0464 per hour, while an ml.m5.4xlarge instance costs $0.888 per hour1.

Stopping the notebook when it is not in use will also reduce the cost, since the notebook will only incur charges when it is running. For example, if the notebook is used for 8 hours per day, 5 days per week, then stopping it when it is not in use will save about 76% of the monthly cost compared to leaving it running all the time2.

Running data preprocessing on an ml.r5 instance with the same memory size as the ml.m5.4xlarge instance by using Amazon SageMaker Processing will reduce the cost of the data preprocessing job, since the ml.r5 instance is optimized for memory-intensive workloads and has a lower cost per GB of memory than the ml.m5 instance. For example, an ml.r5.4xlarge instance has 128 GB of memory and costs $1.008 per hour, while an ml.m5.4xlarge instance has 64 GB of memory and costs $0.888 per hour1. Therefore, the ml.r5.4xlarge instance can process the same amount of data in half the time and at a lower cost than the ml.m5.4xlarge instance. Moreover, using Amazon SageMaker Processing will allow the data preprocessing job to run on a separate, fully managed infrastructure that can be scaled up or down as needed, without affecting the notebook instance.

The other options are not as effective as option C for the following reasons:

Option A is not optimal because changing the notebook instance type to a memory optimized instance with the same vCPU number as the ml.m5.4xlarge instance has will not reduce the cost of the notebook, since the memory optimized instances have a higher cost per vCPU than the general-purpose instances. For example, an ml.r5.4xlarge instance has 16 vCPUs and costs $1.008 per hour, while an ml.m5.4xlarge instance has 16 vCPUs and costs $0.888 per hour1. Moreover, running both data preprocessing and feature engineering development on the same instance will not take advantage of the scalability and flexibility of Amazon SageMaker Processing.

Option B is not suitable because running data preprocessing on a P3 instance type with the same memory as the ml.m5.4xlarge instance by using Amazon SageMaker Processing will not reduce the cost of the data preprocessing job, since the P3 instance type is optimized for GPU-based workloads and has a higher cost per GB of memory than the ml.m5 or ml.r5 instance types. For example, an ml.p3.2xlarge instance has 61 GB of memory and costs $3.06 per hour, while an ml.m5.4xlarge instance has 64 GB of memory and costs $0.888 per hour1. Moreover, the data preprocessing job does not require GPU, so using a P3 instance type will be wasteful and inefficient.

Option D is not feasible because running data preprocessing on an R5 instance with the same memory size as the ml.m5.4xlarge instance by using the Reserved Instance option will not reduce the cost of the data preprocessing job, since the Reserved Instance option requires a commitment to a consistent amount of usage for a period of 1 or 3 years3. However, the data preprocessing job only runs once a day on average and completes in only 2 hours, so it does not have a consistent or predictable usage pattern. Therefore, using the Reserved Instance option will not provide any cost savings and may incur additional charges for unused capacity.

Amazon SageMaker Pricing

Manage Notebook Instances - Amazon SageMaker

Amazon EC2 Pricing - Reserved Instances

Collaborative filtering is a machine learning technique that recommends products or services to users based on the ratings or preferences of other users. This technique is well-suited for identifying customer shopping patterns and preferences because it takes into account the interactions between users and products.

Pipe input mode is a feature of Amazon SageMaker that allows streaming large datasets from Amazon S3 directly to the training algorithm without downloading them to the local disk. This reduces the startup time, disk space, and cost of training jobs. Pipe input mode is supported by most of the built-in algorithms and can also be used with custom training algorithms. To use Pipe input mode, the data needs to be in a binary format such as protobuf recordIO or TFRecord. The training code needs to use the PipeModeDataset class to read the data from the named pipe provided by SageMaker. To verify that the training code and the model parameters are working as expected, it is recommended to train locally on a smaller subset of the data before launching a full-scale training job on SageMaker. This approach is faster and more efficient than the other options, which involve either downloading the full dataset to an EC2 instance or using AWS Glue, which is not designed for training machine learning models. References:

Using Pipe input mode for Amazon SageMaker algorithms

Using Pipe Mode with Your Own Algorithms

PipeModeDataset Class

 To improve the test error for the image classifier, the Machine Learning Specialist should use the technique of increasing the training data by adding variation in rotation for training images. This technique is called data augmentation, which is a way of artificially expanding the size and diversity of the training dataset by applying various transformations to the original images, such as rotation, flipping, cropping, scaling, etc. Data augmentation can help the model learn more robust features that are invariant to the orientation, position, and size of the objects in the images. This can improve the generalization ability of the model and reduce the test error, especially for cases where the images are not well-aligned or have different perspectives1.

1: Image Augmentation - Amazon SageMaker

 The simplest and fastest way to use the EFS dataset for SageMaker training is to run a SageMaker training job with an EFS file system as the data source. This option does not require any data copying or additional integration steps. SageMaker supports EFS as a data source for training jobs, and it can mount the EFS file system to the training container using the FileSystemConfig parameter. This way, the training script can access the data files as if they were on the local disk of the training instance. References:

Access Training Data - Amazon SageMaker

Mount an EFS file system to an Amazon SageMaker notebook (with lifecycle configurations) | AWS Machine Learning Blog

The data scientist should use Amazon SageMaker Ground Truth to sort the data into two groups named “enrolled” or “not enrolled.” This will create a labeled dataset that can be used for supervised learning. The data scientist should then use a classification algorithm to run predictions on the test data. A classification algorithm is a suitable choice for predicting a binary outcome, such as enrollment status, based on the input features, such as academic performance. A classification algorithm will output a probability for each class label and assign the most likely label to each observation.

Use Amazon SageMaker Ground Truth to Label Data

Classification Algorithm in Machine Learning

Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler is a tool that helps data scientists and ML developers to prepare data for ML. One of the features of Data Wrangler is the anomaly detection visualization, which uses an unsupervised ML algorithm to identify outliers in the dataset based on statistical properties. The ML specialist can use this feature to quickly explore the sensor data and find any anomalous values that may affect the model performance. The ML specialist can then add a transformation to a Data Wrangler data flow to remove the outliers from the dataset. The data flow can be exported as a script or a pipeline to automate the data preparation process. This option requires the least operational overhead compared to the other options.

Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler - Amazon Web Services (AWS)

Anomaly Detection Visualization - Amazon SageMaker

Transform Data - Amazon SageMaker

The combination of actions that will meet the requirements with the least operational overhead is to use SageMaker Clarify to automatically detect data bias and to configure SageMaker Data Wrangler to generate a bias report. SageMaker Clarify is a feature of Amazon SageMaker that provides machine learning (ML) developers with tools to gain greater insights into their ML training data and models. SageMaker Clarify can detect potential bias during data preparation, after model training, and in your deployed model. For instance, you can check for bias related to age in your dataset or in your trained model and receive a detailed report that quantifies different types of potential bias1. SageMaker Data Wrangler is another feature of Amazon SageMaker that enables you to prepare data for machine learning (ML) quickly and easily. You can use SageMaker Data Wrangler to identify potential bias during data preparation without having to write your own code. You specify input features, such as gender or age, and SageMaker Data Wrangler runs an analysis job to detect potential bias in those features. SageMaker Data Wrangler then provides a visual report with a description of the metrics and measurements of potential bias so that you can identify steps to remediate the bias2. The other actions either require more customization (such as using SageMaker Model Monitor or SageMaker Experiments) or do not meet the requirement of detecting data bias (such as using SageMaker Ground Truth). References:

1: Bias Detection and Model Explainability – Amazon Web Services

2: Amazon SageMaker Data Wrangler – Amazon Web Services

Linear least squares regression is a method of fitting a linear model to a set of data by minimizing the sum of squared errors between the observed and predicted values. The solution of the linear least squares problem can be obtained by solving the normal equations, which are given by

ATAx=ATb,

where A is the matrix of explanatory variables, b is the vector of response variables, and x is the vector of unknown coefficients.

However, if the matrix A has two features that are perfectly linearly dependent, then the matrix ATA will be singular, meaning that it does not have a unique inverse. This implies that the normal equations do not have a unique solution, and the linear least squares problem is ill-posed. In other words, there are infinitely many values of x that can satisfy the normal equations, and the linear model is not identifiable.

This can be an issue for the linear least squares regression model, as it can lead to instability, inconsistency, and poor generalization of the model. It can also cause numerical difficulties when trying to solve the normal equations using computational methods, such as matrix inversion or decomposition. Therefore, it is advisable to avoid or remove the linearly dependent features from the matrix A before applying the linear least squares regression model.

Linear least squares (mathematics)

Linear Regression in Matrix Form

Singular Matrix Problem

 XGBoost is a built-in Amazon SageMaker machine learning algorithm that should be used for modeling the credit card fraud detection problem. XGBoost is an algorithm that implements a scalable and distributed gradient boosting framework, which is a popular and effective technique for supervised learning problems. Gradient boosting is a method of combining multiple weak learners, such as decision trees, into a strong learner, by iteratively fitting new models to the residual errors of the previous models and adding them to the ensemble. XGBoost can handle various types of data, such as numerical, categorical, or text, and can perform both regression and classification tasks. XGBoost also supports various features and optimizations, such as regularization, missing value handling, parallelization, and cross-validation, that can improve the performance and efficiency of the algorithm.

XGBoost is suitable for the credit card fraud detection problem for the following reasons:

The problem is a binary classification problem, where the goal is to predict whether a transaction is fraudulent or not, based on the information from new transactions. XGBoost can perform binary classification by using a logistic regression objective function and outputting the probability of the positive class (fraudulent) for each transaction.

The problem involves a large and imbalanced dataset of historical data labeled as fraudulent. XGBoost can handle large-scale and imbalanced data by using distributed and parallel computing, as well as techniques such as weighted sampling, class weighting, or stratified sampling, to balance the classes and reduce the bias towards the majority class (non-fraudulent).

The problem requires a high accuracy and precision for detecting fraudulent transactions, as well as a low false positive rate for avoiding false alarms. XGBoost can achieve high accuracy and precision by using gradient boosting, which can learn complex and non-linear patterns from the data and reduce the variance and overfitting of the model. XGBoost can also achieve a low false positive rate by using regularization, which can reduce the complexity and noise of the model and prevent it from fitting spurious signals in the data.

The other options are not as suitable as XGBoost for the credit card fraud detection problem for the following reasons:

Seq2seq: Seq2seq is an algorithm that implements a sequence-to-sequence model, which is a type of neural network model that can map an input sequence to an output sequence. Seq2seq is mainly used for natural language processing tasks, such as machine translation, text summarization, or dialogue generation. Seq2seq is not suitable for the credit card fraud detection problem, because the problem is not a sequence-to-sequence task, but a binary classification task. The input and output of the problem are not sequences of words or tokens, but vectors of features and labels.

K-means: K-means is an algorithm that implements a clustering technique, which is a type of unsupervised learning method that can group similar data points into clusters. K-means is mainly used for exploratory data analysis, dimensionality reduction, or anomaly detection. K-means is not suitable for the credit card fraud detection problem, because the problem is not a clustering task, but a classification task. The problem requires using the labeled data to train a model that can predict the labels of new data, not finding the optimal number of clusters or the cluster memberships of the data.

Random Cut Forest (RCF): RCF is an algorithm that implements an anomaly detection technique, which is a type of unsupervised learning method that can identify data points that deviate from the normal behavior or distribution of the data. RCF is mainly used for detecting outliers, frauds, or faults in the data. RCF is not suitable for the credit card fraud detection problem, because the problem is not an anomaly detection task, but a classification task. The problem requires using the labeled data to train a model that can predict the labels of new data, not finding the anomaly scores or the anomalous data points in the data.

XGBoost Algorithm

Use XGBoost for Binary Classification with Amazon SageMaker

Seq2seq Algorithm

K-means Algorithm

[Random Cut Forest Algorithm]

Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC) is a metric that is best suited to score the model for the given scenario. AUC is a measure of the performance of a binary classifier, such as a model that predicts whether a credit card transaction is valid or fraudulent. AUC is calculated based on the Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve, which is a plot that shows the trade-off between the true positive rate (TPR) and the false positive rate (FPR) of the classifier as the decision threshold is varied. The TPR, also known as recall or sensitivity, is the proportion of actual positive cases (fraudulent transactions) that are correctly predicted as positive by the classifier. The FPR, also known as the fall-out, is the proportion of actual negative cases (valid transactions) that are incorrectly predicted as positive by the classifier. The ROC curve illustrates how well the classifier can distinguish between the two classes, regardless of the class distribution or the error costs. A perfect classifier would have a TPR of 1 and an FPR of 0 for all thresholds, resulting in a ROC curve that goes from the bottom left to the top left and then to the top right of the plot. A random classifier would have a TPR and an FPR that are equal for all thresholds, resulting in a ROC curve that goes from the bottom left to the top right of the plot along the diagonal line. AUC is the area under the ROC curve, and it ranges from 0 to 1. A higher AUC indicates a better classifier, as it means that the classifier has a higher TPR and a lower FPR for all thresholds. AUC is a useful metric for imbalanced classification problems, such as the credit card transaction dataset, because it is insensitive to the class imbalance and the error costs. AUC can capture the overall performance of the classifier across all possible scenarios, and it can be used to compare different classifiers based on their ROC curves.

The other options are not as suitable as AUC for the given scenario for the following reasons:

Precision: Precision is the proportion of predicted positive cases (fraudulent transactions) that are actually positive. Precision is a useful metric when the cost of a false positive is high, such as in spam detection or medical diagnosis. However, precision is not a good metric for imbalanced classification problems, because it can be misleadingly high when the positive class is rare. For example, a classifier that predicts all transactions as valid would have a precision of 0, but a very high accuracy of 99%. Precision is also dependent on the decision threshold and the error costs, which may vary for different scenarios.

Recall: Recall is the same as the TPR, and it is the proportion of actual positive cases (fraudulent transactions) that are correctly predicted as positive by the classifier. Recall is a useful metric when the cost of a false negative is high, such as in fraud detection or cancer diagnosis. However, recall is not a good metric for imbalanced classification problems, because it can be misleadingly low when the positive class is rare. For example, a classifier that predicts all transactions as fraudulent would have a recall of 1, but a very low accuracy of 1%. Recall is also dependent on the decision threshold and the error costs, which may vary for different scenarios.

Root Mean Square Error (RMSE): RMSE is a metric that measures the average difference between the predicted and the actual values. RMSE is a useful metric for regression problems, where the goal is to predict a continuous value, such as the price of a house or the temperature of a city. However, RMSE is not a good metric for classification problems, where the goal is to predict a discrete value, such as the class label of a transaction. RMSE is not meaningful for classification problems, because it does not capture the accuracy or the error costs of the predictions.

ROC Curve and AUC

How and When to Use ROC Curves and Precision-Recall Curves for Classification in Python

Precision-Recall

Root Mean Squared Error

 The F1 score is a measure of the harmonic mean of precision and recall, which are both important for fraud detection. Precision is the ratio of true positives to all predicted positives, and recall is the ratio of true positives to all actual positives. A high F1 score indicates that the classifier can correctly identify fraudulent transactions and avoid false negatives. The true positive rate is another name for recall, and it measures the proportion of fraudulent transactions that are correctly detected by the classifier. A high true positive rate means that the classifier can capture as many fraudulent transactions as possible.

Fraud Detection Using Machine Learning | Implementations | AWS Solutions

Detect fraudulent transactions using machine learning with Amazon SageMaker | AWS Machine Learning Blog

1. Introduction — Reproducible Machine Learning for Credit Card Fraud Detection

 Amazon EMR is a service that can process large amounts of data efficiently and cost-effectively. It can run distributed frameworks such as Apache Spark, which can perform feature engineering on big data. Amazon SageMaker SDK is a Python library that can interact with Amazon SageMaker service to train and deploy machine learning models. It can also use Amazon EMR as a data source for training data. References:

Amazon EMR

Amazon SageMaker SDK

A pronunciation lexicon is a file that defines how words or phrases should be pronounced by Amazon Polly. A lexicon can help customize the speech output for words that are uncommon, foreign, or have multiple pronunciations. A lexicon must conform to the Pronunciation Lexicon Specification (PLS) standard and can be stored in an AWS region using the Amazon Polly API. To use a lexicon for synthesizing speech, the lexicon name must be specified in the SSML tag. For example, the following lexicon defines how to pronounce the acronym W3C:

W3C xml:lang=“en-US” > The W3C is an international community that develops open standards to ensure the long-term growth of the Web.

Customize pronunciation using lexicons in Amazon Polly: A blog post that explains how to use lexicons for creating custom pronunciations.

Managing Lexicons: A documentation page that describes how to store and retrieve lexicons using the Amazon Polly API.

AWS Glue is a serverless data integration service that can catalogue, clean, enrich, and move data between various data stores. Amazon Athena is an interactive query service that can run SQL queries on data stored in Amazon S3. By using AWS Glue to catalogue the data and Amazon Athena to run queries, the Machine Learning Specialist can leverage the existing data in Amazon S3 without any additional data transformation or loading. This solution requires the least effort compared to the other options, which involve more complex and costly data processing and storage services. References: AWS Glue, Amazon Athena

 The best approach to maximize transcription accuracy during the development phase is to create a custom vocabulary file containing each product name with phonetic pronunciations, and use it with Amazon Transcribe to perform the ASR customization. A custom vocabulary is a list of words and phrases that are likely to appear in your audio input, along with optional information about how to pronounce them. By using a custom vocabulary, you can improve the transcription accuracy of domain-specific terms, such as product names, that may not be recognized by the general vocabulary of Amazon Transcribe. You can also analyze the transcripts and manually update the custom vocabulary file to include updated or additional entries for those names that are not being correctly identified.

The other options are not as effective as option C for the following reasons:

Option A is not suitable because Amazon Lex is a service for building conversational interfaces, not for transcribing voicemail messages. Amazon Lex also has a limit of 100 slots per bot, which is not enough to accommodate the 200 unique product names required by the company.

Option B is not optimal because it relies on the word confidence scores in the transcript, which may not be accurate enough to identify all the mis-transcribed product names. Moreover, automatically creating or updating a custom vocabulary file may introduce errors or inconsistencies in the pronunciation or display of the words.

Option D is not feasible because it requires a large amount of training data to build a custom language model. The company only has 4,000 words of Amazon SageMaker Ground Truth voicemail transcripts, which is not enough to train a robust and reliable custom language model. Additionally, creating and updating a custom language model is a time-consuming and resource-intensive process, which may not be suitable for the development phase where frequent changes are expected.

Amazon Transcribe – Custom Vocabulary

Amazon Transcribe – Custom Language Models

[Amazon Lex – Limits]

The Data Scientist needs to migrate an existing on-premises ETL process to the cloud, using a solution that can combine multiple data sources, reuse existing PySpark logic, run on the existing schedule, and minimize the number of servers that need to be managed. The best architecture for this scenario is to use AWS Glue, which is a serverless data integration service that can create and run ETL jobs on AWS.

AWS Glue can perform the following tasks to meet the requirements:

Combine multiple data sources: AWS Glue can access data from various sources, such as Amazon S3, Amazon RDS, Amazon Redshift, Amazon DynamoDB, and more. AWS Glue can also crawl the data sources and discover their schemas, formats, and partitions, and store them in the AWS Glue Data Catalog, which is a centralized metadata repository for all the data assets.

Reuse existing PySpark logic: AWS Glue supports writing ETL scripts in Python or Scala, using Apache Spark as the underlying execution engine. AWS Glue provides a library of built-in transformations and connectors that can simplify the ETL code. The Data Scientist can write the ETL job in PySpark and leverage the existing logic to perform the data processing.

Run the solution on the existing schedule: AWS Glue can create triggers that can start ETL jobs based on a schedule, an event, or a condition. The Data Scientist can create a new AWS Glue trigger to run the ETL job based on the existing schedule, using a cron expression or a relative time interval.

Minimize the number of servers that need to be managed: AWS Glue is a serverless service, which means that it automatically provisions, configures, scales, and manages the compute resources required to run the ETL jobs. The Data Scientist does not need to worry about setting up, maintaining, or monitoring any servers or clusters for the ETL process.

Therefore, the Data Scientist should use the following architecture to build the cloud solution:

Write the raw data to Amazon S3: The Data Scientist can use any method to upload the raw data from the on-premises sources to Amazon S3, such as AWS DataSync, AWS Storage Gateway, AWS Snowball, or AWS Direct Connect. Amazon S3 is a durable, scalable, and secure object storage service that can store any amount and type of data.

Create an AWS Glue ETL job to perform the ETL processing against the input data: The Data Scientist can use the AWS Glue console, AWS Glue API, AWS SDK, or AWS CLI to create and configure an AWS Glue ETL job. The Data Scientist can specify the input and output data sources, the IAM role, the security configuration, the job parameters, and the PySpark script location. The Data Scientist can also use the AWS Glue Studio, which is a graphical interface that can help design, run, and monitor ETL jobs visually.

Write the ETL job in PySpark to leverage the existing logic: The Data Scientist can use a code editor of their choice to write the ETL script in PySpark, using the existing logic to transform the data. The Data Scientist can also use the AWS Glue script editor, which is an integrated development environment (IDE) that can help write, debug, and test the ETL code. The Data Scientist can store the ETL script in Amazon S3 or GitHub, and reference it in the AWS Glue ETL job configuration.

Create a new AWS Glue trigger to trigger the ETL job based on the existing schedule: The Data Scientist can use the AWS Glue console, AWS Glue API, AWS SDK, or AWS CLI to create and configure an AWS Glue trigger. The Data Scientist can specify the name, type, and schedule of the trigger, and associate it with the AWS Glue ETL job. The trigger will start the ETL job according to the defined schedule.

Configure the output target of the ETL job to write to a “processed” location in Amazon S3 that is accessible for downstream use: The Data Scientist can specify the output location of the ETL job in the PySpark script, using the AWS Glue DynamicFrame or Spark DataFrame APIs. The Data Scientist can write the output data to a “processed” location in Amazon S3, using a format such as Parquet, ORC, JSON, or CSV, that is suitable for downstream processing.

What Is AWS Glue?

AWS Glue Components

AWS Glue Studio

AWS Glue Triggers

The metrics that will indicate an ML solution that will provide the greatest probability of detecting an abnormality are precision and recall. Precision is the ratio of true positives (TP) to the total number of predicted positives (TP + FP), where FP is false positives. Recall is the ratio of true positives (TP) to the total number of actual positives (TP + FN), where FN is false negatives. A high precision means that the ML solution has a low rate of false alarms, while a high recall means that the ML solution has a high rate of true detections. For the chemical company, the goal is to avoid process abnormalities, which are marked as 1 in the labels. Therefore, the company needs an ML solution that has a high recall for the positive class, meaning that it can detect most of the abnormalities and minimize the false negatives. Among the four options, option B has the highest recall for the positive class, which is 0.98. This means that the ML solution can detect 98% of the abnormalities and miss only 2%. Option B also has a reasonable precision for the positive class, which is 0.61. This means that the ML solution has a false alarm rate of 39%, which may be acceptable for the company, depending on the cost and benefit analysis. The other options have lower recall for the positive class, which means that they have higher false negative rates, which can be more detrimental for the company than false positive rates.

1: AWS Certified Machine Learning - Specialty Exam Guide

2: AWS Training - Machine Learning on AWS

3: AWS Whitepaper - An Overview of Machine Learning on AWS

4: Precision and recall

Principal Component Analysis (PCA) is a dimensionality reduction technique that captures the variance within the feature space, helping to understand the directions in which data varies most. In SageMaker Data Wrangler, the multicollinearity measurement and PCA features allow the data scientist to analyze interdependencies between predictor variables while reducing redundancy. PCA transforms correlated features into a set of uncorrelated components, helping to simplify the dataset without significant loss of information, making it ideal for refining features based on variance.

Options A and D offer methods to understand feature relevance but are less effective for managing multicollinearity and variance representation in the data.

The solution that the agency should consider is to use a proxy server at each local office and for each camera, and stream the RTSP feed to a unique Amazon Kinesis Video Streams video stream. On each stream, use Amazon Rekognition Video and create a stream processor to detect faces from a collection of known employees, and alert when non-employees are detected.

This solution has the following advantages:

It can handle thousands of video cameras in real time, as Amazon Kinesis Video Streams can scale elastically to support any number of producers and consumers1.

It can leverage the Amazon Rekognition Video API, which is designed and optimized for video analysis, and can detect faces in challenging conditions such as low lighting, occlusions, and different poses2.

It can use a stream processor, which is a feature of Amazon Rekognition Video that allows you to create a persistent application that analyzes streaming video and stores the results in a Kinesis data stream3. The stream processor can compare the detected faces with a collection of known employees, which is a container for persisting faces that you want to search for in the input video stream4. The stream processor can also send notifications to Amazon Simple Notification Service (Amazon SNS) when non-employees are detected, which can trigger downstream actions such as sending alerts or storing the events in Amazon Elasticsearch Service (Amazon ES)3.

1: What Is Amazon Kinesis Video Streams? - Amazon Kinesis Video Streams

2: Detecting and Analyzing Faces - Amazon Rekognition

3: Using Amazon Rekognition Video Stream Processor - Amazon Rekognition

4: Working with Stored Faces - Amazon Rekognition

The MAPE of the predictor could be improved by making the following changes to the CreatePredictor API call:

Set PerformAutoML to true. This will allow Amazon Forecast to automatically evaluate different algorithms and choose the one that minimizes the objective function, which is the mean of the weighted losses over the forecast types. By default, these are the p10, p50, and p90 quantile losses1. This option can help find a better algorithm than DeepAR+ for the given data.

Set PerformHPO to true. This will enable hyperparameter optimization (HPO), which is the process of finding the optimal values for the algorithm-specific parameters that affect the quality of the forecasts. HPO can improve the accuracy of the predictor by tuning the hyperparameters based on the training data2.

The other options are not likely to improve the MAPE of the predictor. Setting ForecastHorizon to 4 will reduce the number of time steps that the model predicts, which may not match the business requirement of predicting next month’s inventory. Setting ForecastFrequency to W for weekly will change the granularity of the forecasts, which may not be appropriate for the monthly data. Setting FeaturizationMethodName to filling will not have any effect, since there is no missing data in the dataset.

CreatePredictor - Amazon Forecast

HPOConfig - Amazon Forecast

 A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve is a model evaluation technique that can be used to understand how different classification thresholds will impact the model’s performance. A ROC curve plots the true positive rate (TPR) against the false positive rate (FPR) for various values of the classification threshold. The TPR, also known as sensitivity or recall, is the proportion of positive instances that are correctly classified as positive. The FPR, also known as the fall-out, is the proportion of negative instances that are incorrectly classified as positive. A ROC curve can show the trade-off between the TPR and the FPR for different thresholds, and help the Machine Learning Specialist to select the optimal threshold that maximizes the TPR and minimizes the FPR. A ROC curve can also be used to compare the performance of different models by calculating the area under the curve (AUC), which is a measure of how well the model can distinguish between the positive and negative classes. A higher AUC indicates a better model

The agency wants to analyze the census data for population segmentation, which is a type of unsupervised learning problem that aims to group similar data points together based on their attributes. The agency can use a combination of algorithms that can perform dimensionality reduction and clustering on the data to achieve this goal.

Dimensionality reduction is a technique that reduces the number of features or variables in a dataset while preserving the essential information and relationships. Dimensionality reduction can help improve the efficiency and performance of clustering algorithms, as well as facilitate data visualization and interpretation. One of the most common algorithms for dimensionality reduction is principal component analysis (PCA), which transforms the original features into a new set of orthogonal features called principal components that capture the maximum variance in the data. PCA can help reduce the noise and redundancy in the data and reveal the underlying structure and patterns.

Clustering is a technique that partitions the data into groups or clusters based on their similarity or distance. Clustering can help discover the natural segments or categories in the data and understand their characteristics and differences. One of the most popular algorithms for clustering is k-means, which assigns each data point to one of k clusters based on the nearest mean or centroid. K-means can handle large and high-dimensional datasets and produce compact and spherical clusters.

Therefore, the combination of algorithms that would provide the appropriate insights for population segmentation are PCA and k-means. The agency can use PCA to reduce the dimensionality of the census data from 500 features to a smaller number of principal components that capture most of the variation in the data. Then, the agency can use k-means to cluster the data based on the principal components and identify the segments of the population that share similar characteristics.

Amazon SageMaker Principal Component Analysis (PCA)

Amazon SageMaker K-Means Algorithm

The best solution for this scenario is to use a multi-model endpoint in Amazon SageMaker, which allows hosting multiple models on the same endpoint and invoking them dynamically at runtime. This way, the company can reduce the operational overhead of managing multiple EC2 instances and model servers, and leverage the scalability, security, and performance of SageMaker hosting services. By using a multi-model endpoint, the company can also save on hosting costs by improving endpoint utilization and paying only for the models that are loaded in memory and the API calls that are made. To use a multi-model endpoint, the company needs to prepare a Docker container based on the open-source multi-model server, which is a framework-agnostic library that supports loading and serving multiple models from Amazon S3. The company can then create a multi-model endpoint in SageMaker, pointing to the S3 bucket containing all the models, and invoke the endpoint from the web client at runtime, specifying the TargetModel parameter according to the city of each request. This solution also enables the company to add or remove models from the S3 bucket without redeploying the endpoint, and to use different versions of the same model for different cities if needed. References:

Use Docker containers to build models

Host multiple models in one container behind one endpoint

Multi-model endpoints using Scikit Learn

Multi-model endpoints using XGBoost

To secure calls to the Amazon SageMaker Service API, the ML specialist should take the following steps:

Modify the security group on the endpoint network interface to restrict access to the instances. This will allow the ML specialist to control which instances in the VPC can communicate with the VPC interface endpoint for the Amazon SageMaker Service API. The security group can specify inbound and outbound rules based on the instance IDs, IP addresses, or CIDR blocks1.

Add a SageMaker Runtime VPC endpoint interface to the VPC. This will allow the ML specialist to invoke the SageMaker endpoints from within the VPC without using the public internet. The SageMaker Runtime VPC endpoint interface connects the VPC directly to the SageMaker Runtime using AWS PrivateLink2.

The other options are not as effective or necessary as the steps above. Adding a VPC endpoint policy to allow access to the IAM users is not required, as the IAM users can already access the Amazon SageMaker Service API through the VPC interface endpoint. Modifying the users’ IAM policy to allow access to Amazon SageMaker Service API calls only is not sufficient, as it does not prevent unauthorized instances from accessing the VPC interface endpoint. Modifying the ACL on the endpoint network interface to restrict access to the instances is not possible, as network ACLs are associated with subnets, not network interfaces3.

Security groups for your VPC - Amazon Virtual Private Cloud

Connect to SageMaker Within your VPC - Amazon SageMaker

Network ACLs - Amazon Virtual Private Cloud

The services that are integrated with Amazon SageMaker to track the information that the Machine Learning Specialist needs are AWS CloudTrail and Amazon CloudWatch. AWS CloudTrail is a service that records the API calls and events for AWS services, including Amazon SageMaker. AWS CloudTrail can track the actions performed by the Data Scientists, such as creating notebooks, training models, and deploying endpoints. AWS CloudTrail can also provide information such as the identity of the user, the time of the action, the parameters used, and the response elements returned. AWS CloudTrail can help the Machine Learning Specialist to monitor the usage and activity of Amazon SageMaker, as well as to audit and troubleshoot any issues1 Amazon CloudWatch is a service that collects and analyzes the metrics and logs for AWS services, including Amazon SageMaker. Amazon CloudWatch can track the performance and utilization of the Amazon SageMaker endpoints, such as the CPU and GPU utilization, the inference latency, the number of invocations, etc. Amazon CloudWatch can also track the errors and alarms that are generated when an endpoint is invoked, such as the model errors, the throttling errors, the HTTP errors, etc. Amazon CloudWatch can help the Machine Learning Specialist to optimize the operational performance and reliability of Amazon SageMaker, as well as to set up notifications and actions based on the metrics and logs

 The business problem of predicting whether a new credit card applicant will default on a credit card payment can be framed as a binary classification problem. Binary classification is the task of predicting a discrete class label output for an example, where the class label can only take one of two possible values. In this case, the class label can be either “default” or “no default”, indicating whether the applicant will or will not default on a credit card payment. A binary classification model can return the probability that a given applicant belongs to each class, and then assign the applicant to the class with the highest probability. For example, if the model predicts that an applicant has a 0.8 probability of defaulting and a 0.2 probability of not defaulting, then the model will classify the applicant as “default”. Binary classification is suitable for this problem because the outcome of interest is categorical and binary, and the model needs to return the probability of each outcome.

AWS Machine Learning Specialty Exam Guide

AWS Machine Learning Training - Classification vs Regression in Machine Learning

The best way to meet the requirements is to use a principal component analysis (PCA) model, which is a technique that reduces the dimensionality of the dataset by transforming the original variables into a smaller set of new variables, called principal components, that capture most of the variance and information in the data1. This technique has the following advantages:

It can increase the accuracy of the model by removing noise, redundancy, and multicollinearity from the data, and by enhancing the interpretability and generalization of the model23.

It can decrease the processing time of the model by reducing the number of features and the computational complexity of the model, and by improving the convergence and stability of the model45.

It is suitable for numeric variables, as it relies on the covariance or correlation matrix of the data, and it can handle a large quantity of variables, as it can extract the most relevant ones16.

The other options are not effective or appropriate, because they have the following drawbacks:

A: Creating new features and interaction variables can increase the accuracy of the model by capturing more complex and nonlinear relationships in the data, but it can also increase the processing time of the model by adding more features and increasing the computational complexity of the model7. Moreover, it can introduce more noise, redundancy, and multicollinearity in the data, which can degrade the performance and interpretability of the model8.

C: Applying normalization on the feature set can increase the accuracy of the model by scaling the features to a common range and avoiding the dominance of some features over others, but it can also decrease the processing time of the model by reducing the numerical instability and improving the convergence of the model . However, normalization alone is not enough to address the high dimensionality and high latency issues of the dataset, as it does not reduce the number of features or the variance in the data.

D: Using a multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) model is not suitable for numeric variables, as it is a technique that reduces the dimensionality of the dataset by transforming the original categorical variables into a smaller set of new variables, called factors, that capture most of the inertia and information in the data. MCA is similar to PCA, but it is designed for nominal or ordinal variables, not for continuous or interval variables.

1: Principal Component Analysis - Amazon SageMaker

2: How to Use PCA for Data Visualization and Improved Performance in Machine Learning | by Pratik Shukla | Towards Data Science

3: Principal Component Analysis (PCA) for Feature Selection and some of its Pitfalls | by Nagesh Singh Chauhan | Towards Data Science

4: How to Reduce Dimensionality with PCA and Train a Support Vector Machine in Python | by James Briggs | Towards Data Science

5: Dimensionality Reduction and Its Applications | by Aniruddha Bhandari | Towards Data Science

6: Principal Component Analysis (PCA) in Python | by Susan Li | Towards Data Science

7: Feature Engineering for Machine Learning | by Dipanjan (DJ) Sarkar | Towards Data Science

8: Feature Engineering — How to Engineer Features and How to Get Good at It | by Parul Pandey | Towards Data Science

[Feature Scaling for Machine Learning: Understanding the Difference Between Normalization vs. Standardization | by Benjamin Obi Tayo Ph.D. | Towards Data Science]

[Why, How and When to Scale your Features | by George Seif | Towards Data Science]

[Normalization vs Dimensionality Reduction | by Saurabh Annadate | Towards Data Science]

[Multiple Correspondence Analysis - Amazon SageMaker]

[Multiple Correspondence Analysis (MCA) | by Raul Eulogio | Towards Data Science]

Applying L1 regularization encourages sparsity by penalizing weights directly, often driving many weights to zero. In this case, the ML specialist observes that all weights become zero, which suggests that the L1 regularization parameter is set too high. This high value overly penalizes non-zero weights, effectively removing all features from the model.

To improve the model, the ML specialist should reduce the L1 regularization parameter, allowing some features to retain non-zero weights. This adjustment will make the model less prone to excessive sparsity, allowing it to better capture essential patterns in the data without dropping all features. Introducing L2 regularization is another approach but may not directly resolve this specific issue of all-zero weights as effectively as reducing L1.

 The best way to address the overfitting problem in image classification is to increase the dropout rate at the flatten layer because the model is not generalized enough. Dropout is a regularization technique that randomly drops out some units from the neural network during training, reducing the co-adaptation of features and preventing overfitting. The flatten layer is the layer that converts the output of the convolutional layers into a one-dimensional vector that can be fed into the dense layers. Increasing the dropout rate at the flatten layer means that more features from the convolutional layers will be ignored, forcing the model to learn more robust and generalizable representations from the remaining features.

The other options are not correct for this scenario because:

Increasing the learning rate would not help with the overfitting problem, as it would make the optimization process more unstable and prone to overshooting the global minimum. A high learning rate can also cause the model to diverge or oscillate around the optimal solution, resulting in poor performance and accuracy.

Increasing the dimensionality of the dense layer next to the flatten layer would not help with the overfitting problem, as it would make the model more complex and increase the number of parameters to be learned. A more complex model can fit the training data better, but it can also memorize the noise and irrelevant details in the data, leading to overfitting and poor generalization.

Increasing the epoch number would not help with the overfitting problem, as it would make the model train longer and more likely to overfit the training data. A high epoch number can cause the model to converge to the global minimum, but it can also cause the model to over-optimize the training data and lose the ability to generalize to new data.

Dropout: A Simple Way to Prevent Neural Networks from Overfitting

How to Reduce Overfitting With Dropout Regularization in Keras

How to Control the Stability of Training Neural Networks With the Learning Rate

How to Choose the Number of Hidden Layers and Nodes in a Feedforward Neural Network?

How to decide the optimal number of epochs to train a neural network?

 The best solution for building a line-counting application for use in a quick-service restaurant is to use the following steps:

Build a custom model in Amazon SageMaker to recognize the number of people in an image. Amazon SageMaker is a fully managed service that provides tools and workflows for building, training, and deploying machine learning models. A custom model can be tailored to the specific use case of line-counting and achieve higher accuracy than a generic model1

Deploy AWS DeepLens cameras in the restaurant to capture video. AWS DeepLens is a wireless video camera that integrates with Amazon SageMaker and AWS Lambda. It can run machine learning inference locally on the device without requiring internet connectivity or streaming video to the cloud. This reduces the bandwidth consumption and latency of the application2

Deploy the model to the cameras. AWS DeepLens allows users to deploy trained models from Amazon SageMaker to the cameras with a few clicks. The cameras can then use the model to process the video frames and count the number of people in each frame2

Deploy an AWS Lambda function to the cameras to use the model to count people and send an Amazon Simple Notification Service (Amazon SNS) notification if the line is too long. AWS Lambda is a serverless computing service that lets users run code without provisioning or managing servers. AWS DeepLens supports running Lambda functions on the device to perform actions based on the inference results. Amazon SNS is a service that enables users to send notifications to subscribers via email, SMS, or mobile push23

The other options are incorrect because they either require internet connectivity or streaming video to the cloud, which may impact the bandwidth and performance of the application. For example:

Option A uses Amazon Kinesis Video Streams to stream the data to AWS over the restaurant’s existing internet connection. Amazon Kinesis Video Streams is a service that enables users to capture, process, and store video streams for analytics and machine learning. However, this option requires streaming multiple video streams to the cloud, which may consume a lot of bandwidth and cause network congestion. It also requires internet connectivity, which may not be reliable or available in some locations4

Option B uses Amazon Rekognition on the AWS DeepLens device. Amazon Rekognition is a service that provides computer vision capabilities, such as face detection, face recognition, and object detection. However, this option requires calling the Amazon Rekognition API over the internet, which may introduce latency and require bandwidth. It also uses a generic face detection model, which may not be optimized for the line-counting use case.

Option C uses Amazon SageMaker to build a custom model and an Amazon SageMaker endpoint to call the model. Amazon SageMaker endpoints are hosted web services that allow users to perform inference on their models. However, this option requires sending the images to the endpoint over the internet, which may consume bandwidth and introduce latency. It also requires internet connectivity, which may not be reliable or available in some locations.

1: Amazon SageMaker – Machine Learning Service - AWS

2: AWS DeepLens - Deep learning enabled video camera - AWS

3: Amazon Simple Notification Service (SNS) - AWS

4: Amazon Kinesis Video Streams - Amazon Web Services

Amazon Rekognition – Video and Image - AWS

Deploy a Model - Amazon SageMaker

The correct combination of actions to enable the data scientist’s IAM user to invoke the SageMaker endpoint is B, C, and E, because they ensure that the IAM user has the necessary permissions, access, and syntax to query the ML model from Athena. These actions have the following benefits:

B: Including a policy statement for the IAM user that allows the sagemaker:InvokeEndpoint action grants the IAM user the permission to call the SageMaker Runtime InvokeEndpoint API, which is used to get inferences from the model hosted at the endpoint1.

C: Including an inline policy for the IAM user that allows SageMaker to read S3 objects enables the IAM user to access the data stored in S3, which is the source of the Athena queries2.

E: Including the SQL statement “USING EXTERNAL FUNCTION ml_function_name” in the Athena SQL query allows the IAM user to invoke the ML model as an external function from Athena, which is a feature that enables querying ML models from SQL statements3.

The other options are not correct or necessary, because they have the following drawbacks:

A: Attaching the AmazonAthenaFullAccess AWS managed policy to the user identity is not sufficient, because it does not grant the IAM user the permission to invoke the SageMaker endpoint, which is required to query the ML model4.

D: Including a policy statement for the IAM user that allows the IAM user to perform the sagemaker:GetRecord action is not relevant, because this action is used to retrieve a single record from a feature group, which is not the case in this scenario5.

F: Performing a user remapping in SageMaker to map the IAM user to another IAM user that is on the hosted endpoint is not applicable, because this feature is only available for multi-model endpoints, which are not used in this scenario.

1: InvokeEndpoint - Amazon SageMaker

2: Querying Data in Amazon S3 from Amazon Athena - Amazon Athena

3: Querying machine learning models from Amazon Athena using Amazon SageMaker | AWS Machine Learning Blog

4: AmazonAthenaFullAccess - AWS Identity and Access Management

5: GetRecord - Amazon SageMaker Feature Store Runtime

[Invoke a Multi-Model Endpoint - Amazon SageMaker]

To capture word context and sequential QA information, the embedding vectors need to consider both the order and the meaning of the words in the text.

Option B, Amazon SageMaker BlazingText algorithm in Skip-gram mode, is a valid option because it can learn word embeddings that capture the semantic similarity and syntactic relations between words based on their co-occurrence in a window of words. Skip-gram mode can also handle rare words better than continuous bag-of-words (CBOW) mode1.

Option E, combination of the Amazon SageMaker BlazingText algorithm in Batch Skip-gram mode with a custom recurrent neural network (RNN), is another valid option because it can leverage the advantages of Skip-gram mode and also use an RNN to model the sequential nature of the text. An RNN can capture the temporal dependencies and long-term dependencies between words, which are important for QA tasks2.

Option A, Amazon SageMaker seq2seq algorithm, is not a valid option because it is designed for sequence-to-sequence tasks such as machine translation, summarization, or chatbots. It does not produce embedding vectors for text series, but rather generates an output sequence given an input sequence3.

Option C, Amazon SageMaker Object2Vec algorithm, is not a valid option because it is designed for learning embeddings for pairs of objects, such as text-image, text-text, or image-image. It does not produce embedding vectors for text series, but rather learns a similarity function between pairs of objects4.

Option D, Amazon SageMaker BlazingText algorithm in continuous bag-of-words (CBOW) mode, is not a valid option because it does not capture word context as well as Skip-gram mode. CBOW mode predicts a word given its surrounding words, while Skip-gram mode predicts the surrounding words given a word. CBOW mode is faster and more suitable for frequent words, but Skip-gram mode can learn more meaningful embeddings for rare words1.

1: Amazon SageMaker BlazingText

2: Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs)

3: Amazon SageMaker Seq2Seq

4: Amazon SageMaker Object2Vec

A confusion matrix is a matrix that summarizes the performance of a machine learning model on a set of test data. It displays the number of true positives (TP), true negatives (TN), false positives (FP), and false negatives (FN) produced by the model on the test data1. For multi-class classification, the matrix shape will be equal to the number of classes i.e for n classes it will be nXn1. The diagonal values represent the number of correct predictions for each class, and the off-diagonal values represent the number of incorrect predictions for each class1.

The BlazingText algorithm is a proprietary machine learning algorithm for forecasting time series using causal convolutional neural networks (CNNs). BlazingText works best with large datasets containing hundreds of time series. It accepts item metadata, and is the only Forecast algorithm that accepts related time series data without future values2.

From the confusion matrices for the training and test sets, we can observe the following:

The model has a high accuracy on the training set, as most of the diagonal values are high and the off-diagonal values are low. This means that the model is able to learn the patterns and features of the training data well.

However, the model has a lower accuracy on the test set, as some of the diagonal values are lower and some of the off-diagonal values are higher. This means that the model is not able to generalize well to the unseen data and makes more errors.

The model has a particularly high error rate for classes B and E on the test set, as the values of M_22 and M_55 are much lower than the values of M_12, M_21, M_15, M_25, M_51, and M_52. This means that the model is confusing classes B and E with other classes more often than it should.

The model has a relatively low error rate for classes A, C, and D on the test set, as the values of M_11, M_33, and M_44 are high and the values of M_13, M_14, M_23, M_24, M_31, M_32, M_34, M_41, M_42, and M_43 are low. This means that the model is able to distinguish classes A, C, and D from other classes well.

These results indicate that the model is overfitting for classes B and E, meaning that it is memorizing the specific features of these classes in the training data, but failing to capture the general features that are applicable to the test data. Overfitting is a common problem in machine learning, where the model performs well on the training data, but poorly on the test data3. Some possible causes of overfitting are:

The model is too complex or has too many parameters for the given data. This makes the model flexible enough to fit the noise and outliers in the training data, but reduces its ability to generalize to new data.

The data is too small or not representative of the population. This makes the model learn from a limited or biased sample of data, but fails to capture the variability and diversity of the population.

The data is imbalanced or skewed. This makes the model learn from a disproportionate or uneven distribution of data, but fails to account for the minority or rare classes.

Some possible solutions to prevent or reduce overfitting are:

Simplify the model or use regularization techniques. This reduces the complexity or the number of parameters of the model, and prevents it from fitting the noise and outliers in the data. Regularization techniques, such as L1 or L2 regularization, add a penalty term to the loss function of the model, which shrinks the weights of the model and reduces overfitting3.

Increase the size or diversity of the data. This provides more information and examples for the model to learn from, and increases its ability to generalize to new data. Data augmentation techniques, such as rotation, flipping, cropping, or noise addition, can generate new data from the existing data by applying some transformations3.

Balance or resample the data. This adjusts the distribution or the frequency of the data, and ensures that the model learns from all classes equally. Resampling techniques, such as oversampling or undersampling, can create a balanced dataset by increasing or decreasing the number of samples for each class3.

Confusion Matrix in Machine Learning - GeeksforGeeks

BlazingText algorithm - Amazon SageMaker

Overfitting and Underfitting in Machine Learning - GeeksforGeeks

The correct solution for updating the software on a SageMaker notebook instance is to stop and then restart the notebook instance. This will automatically apply the latest security and software updates provided by SageMaker1

The other options are incorrect because they either do not update the software or require unnecessary steps. For example:

Option A calls the CreateNotebookInstanceLifecycleConfig API operation. This operation creates a lifecycle configuration, which is a set of shell scripts that run when a notebook instance is created or started. A lifecycle configuration can be used to customize the notebook instance, such as installing additional libraries or packages. However, it does not update the software on the notebook instance2

Option B creates a new SageMaker notebook instance and mounts the Amazon Elastic Block Store (Amazon EBS) volume from the original instance. This option will create a new notebook instance with the latest software, but it will also incur additional costs and require manual steps to transfer the data and settings from the original instance3

Option D calls the UpdateNotebookInstanceLifecycleConfig API operation. This operation updates an existing lifecycle configuration. As explained in option A, a lifecycle configuration does not update the software on the notebook instance4

1: Amazon SageMaker Notebook Instances - Amazon SageMaker

2: CreateNotebookInstanceLifecycleConfig - Amazon SageMaker

3: Create a Notebook Instance - Amazon SageMaker

4: UpdateNotebookInstanceLifecycleConfig - Amazon SageMaker

Serverless inference in SageMaker is designed for workloads with intermittent traffic and unpredictable usage patterns, which aligns with the media company's periodic high-traffic windows. Because the payload is less than 4 MB (serverless inference supports payloads up to 4 MB), serverless inference is appropriate and provisioned concurrency ensures the endpoints are warm and ready during peak times to minimize latency.

From AWS documentation:

“Amazon SageMaker Serverless Inference is ideal for applications with intermittent or unpredictable traffic. You can optionally enable provisioned concurrency to ensure that your endpoints are always ready to process requests during anticipated peak traffic hours.”

— AWS SageMaker Serverless Inference documentation

Using real-time inference with auto scaling (A) incurs a higher cost as it requires always-on instances. Batch transform (D) is for offline, large-scale inferences, not low-latency real-time inference. Asynchronous inference (C) is typically used for large payloads (>4 MB) or long processing times.

 Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC) is a metric that measures the performance of a binary classifier across all possible thresholds. It is also known as the probability that a randomly chosen positive example will be ranked higher than a randomly chosen negative example by the classifier. AUC is a good metric to compare different classification models because it is independent of the class distribution and the decision threshold. It also captures both the sensitivity (true positive rate) and the specificity (true negative rate) of the model. References:

AWS Machine Learning Specialty Exam Guide

AWS Machine Learning Specialty Sample Questions

A private subnet is a subnet that does not have a route to the internet gateway, which means that the resources in the private subnet cannot access the internet or be accessed from the internet. An S3 VPC endpoint is a gateway endpoint that allows the resources in the VPC to access the S3 service without going through the internet. By launching the notebook instances in a private subnet and accessing the data through an S3 VPC endpoint, the company can set up the job in a secure and compliant way, as the data never leaves the AWS network and is not exposed to the internet. This can also improve the performance and reliability of the data transfer, as the traffic does not depend on the internet bandwidth or availability.

Amazon VPC Endpoints - Amazon Virtual Private Cloud

Endpoints for Amazon S3 - Amazon Virtual Private Cloud

Connect to SageMaker Within your VPC - Amazon SageMaker

Working with VPCs and Subnets - Amazon Virtual Private Cloud

A logarithmic transformation is a suitable data transformation for a linear regression model when the data has a skewed distribution, such as when the mode is lower than the median and the median is lower than the mean. A logarithmic transformation can reduce the skewness and make the data more symmetric and normally distributed, which are desirable properties for linear regression. A logarithmic transformation can also reduce the effect of outliers and heteroscedasticity (unequal variance) in the data. An exponential transformation would have the opposite effect of increasing the skewness and making the data more asymmetric. A polynomial transformation may not be able to capture the nonlinearity in the data and may introduce multicollinearity among the transformed variables. A sinusoidal transformation is not appropriate for data that does not have a periodic pattern.

Data Transformation - Scaler Topics

Linear Regression - GeeksforGeeks

Linear Regression - Scribbr

The approach that will meet the requirements with the least operational overhead is to deploy all the models to a single SageMaker endpoint, treat each model as a production variant, configure an S3 event notification that invokes an AWS Lambda function when new documents are created, and configure the Lambda function to call each production variant and return the results of each model. This approach involves the following steps:

Deploy all the models to a single SageMaker endpoint. Amazon SageMaker is a service that can build, train, and deploy machine learning models. Amazon SageMaker can deploy multiple models to a single endpoint, which is a web service that can serve predictions from the models. Each model can be treated as a production variant, which is a version of the model that runs on one or more instances. Amazon SageMaker can distribute the traffic among the production variants according to the specified weights1.

Treat each model as a production variant. Amazon SageMaker can deploy multiple models to a single endpoint, which is a web service that can serve predictions from the models. Each model can be treated as a production variant, which is a version of the model that runs on one or more instances. Amazon SageMaker can distribute the traffic among the production variants according to the specified weights1.

Configure an S3 event notification that invokes an AWS Lambda function when new documents are created. Amazon S3 is a service that can store and retrieve any amount of data. Amazon S3 can send event notifications when certain actions occur on the objects in a bucket, such as object creation, deletion, or modification. Amazon S3 can invoke an AWS Lambda function as a destination for the event notifications. AWS Lambda is a service that can run code without provisioning or managing servers2.

Configure the Lambda function to call each production variant and return the results of each model. AWS Lambda can execute the code that can call the SageMaker endpoint and specify the production variant to invoke. AWS Lambda can use the AWS SDK or the SageMaker Runtime API to send requests to the endpoint and receive the predictions from the models. AWS Lambda can return the results of each model as a response to the event notification3.

The other options are not suitable because:

Option A: Configuring an S3 event notification that invokes an AWS Lambda function when new documents are created, configuring the Lambda function to create three SageMaker batch transform jobs, one batch transform job for each model for each document, will incur more operational overhead than using a single SageMaker endpoint. Amazon SageMaker batch transform is a service that can process large datasets in batches and store the predictions in Amazon S3. Amazon SageMaker batch transform is not suitable for real-time inference, as it introduces a delay between the request and the response. Moreover, creating three batch transform jobs for each document will increase the complexity and cost of the solution4.

Option C: Deploying each model to its own SageMaker endpoint, configuring an S3 event notification that invokes an AWS Lambda function when new documents are created, configuring the Lambda function to call each endpoint and return the results of each model, will incur more operational overhead than using a single SageMaker endpoint. Deploying each model to its own endpoint will increase the number of resources and endpoints to manage and monitor. Moreover, calling each endpoint separately will increase the latency and network traffic of the solution5.

Option D: Deploying each model to its own SageMaker endpoint, creating three AWS Lambda functions, configuring each Lambda function to call a different endpoint and return the results, configuring three S3 event notifications to invoke the Lambda functions when new documents are created, will incur more operational overhead than using a single SageMaker endpoint and a single Lambda function. Deploying each model to its own endpoint will increase the number of resources and endpoints to manage and monitor. Creating three Lambda functions will increase the complexity and cost of the solution. Configuring three S3 event notifications will increase the number of triggers and destinations to manage and monitor6.

1: Deploying Multiple Models to a Single Endpoint - Amazon SageMaker

2: Configuring Amazon S3 Event Notifications - Amazon Simple Storage Service

3: Invoke an Endpoint - Amazon SageMaker

4: Get Inferences for an Entire Dataset with Batch Transform - Amazon SageMaker

5: Deploy a Model - Amazon SageMaker

6: AWS Lambda

 To find the most discussed topics in the comments that are in either English or Spanish, the machine learning specialist needs to perform two steps: first, translate the comments from Spanish to English if necessary, and second, apply a topic modeling algorithm to the comments. The following options are valid ways to accomplish these steps using AWS services:

Option C: Use Amazon Translate to translate from Spanish to English, if necessary. Use Amazon Comprehend topic modeling to find the topics. Amazon Translate is a neural machine translation service that delivers fast, high-quality, and affordable language translation. Amazon Comprehend is a natural language processing (NLP) service that uses machine learning to find insights and relationships in text. Amazon Comprehend topic modeling is a feature that automatically organizes a collection of text documents into topics that contain commonly used words and phrases.

Option E: Use Amazon Translate to translate from Spanish to English, if necessary. Use Amazon SageMaker Neural Topic Model (NTM) to find the topics. Amazon SageMaker is a fully managed service that provides every developer and data scientist with the ability to build, train, and deploy machine learning (ML) models quickly. Amazon SageMaker Neural Topic Model (NTM) is an unsupervised learning algorithm that is used to organize a corpus of documents into topics that contain word groupings based on their statistical distribution.

The other options are not valid because:

Option A: Amazon SageMaker BlazingText algorithm is not a topic modeling algorithm, but a text classification and word embedding algorithm. It cannot find the topics independently from language, as different languages have different word distributions and semantics.

Option B: Amazon SageMaker seq2seq algorithm is not a translation algorithm, but a sequence-to-sequence learning algorithm that can be used for tasks such as summarization, chatbot, and question answering. Amazon SageMaker Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) algorithm is a topic modeling algorithm, but it requires the input documents to be in the same language and preprocessed into a bag-of-words format.

Option D: Amazon Lex is not a topic modeling algorithm, but a service for building conversational interfaces into any application using voice and text. It cannot extract topics from the content, but only intents and slots based on a predefined bot configuration. References:

Amazon Translate

Amazon Comprehend

Amazon SageMaker

Amazon SageMaker Neural Topic Model (NTM) Algorithm

Amazon SageMaker BlazingText

Amazon SageMaker Seq2Seq

Amazon SageMaker Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) Algorithm

Amazon Lex

Amazon Kinesis Data Streams is a service that can capture, store, and process streaming data in real time. Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose is a service that can deliver streaming data to various destinations, such as Amazon S3, Amazon Redshift, or Amazon Elasticsearch Service. Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose can also transform the data before delivering it, such as converting the data format, compressing the data, or encrypting the data. One of the supported data formats that Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose can convert to is Apache Parquet, which is a columnar storage format that can improve the performance and cost-efficiency of analytics queries. By using Amazon Kinesis Data Streams and Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose, the Mobile Network Operator can ingest the .CSV data from the source systems and use Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose to convert the data into Parquet before storing it on Amazon S3. This solution takes the least effort to implement, as it does not require any additional resources, such as Amazon EC2 instances, Amazon EMR clusters, or Amazon Glue jobs. The solution can also leverage the built-in features of Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose, such as data buffering, batching, retry, and error handling.

Amazon Kinesis Data Streams - Amazon Web Services

Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose - Amazon Web Services

Data Transformation - Amazon Kinesis Data Firehose

Apache Parquet - Amazon Athena

 Amazon S3 and Amazon Athena are technologies that meet the company’s requirements for a temporary ad hoc solution for machine learning data storage and query. Amazon S3 and Amazon Athena have the following features and benefits:

Amazon S3 is a service that provides scalable, durable, and secure object storage for any type of data. Amazon S3 can store csv and JSON files, as well as other formats, and can handle large volumes of data with high availability and performance. Amazon S3 also integrates with other AWS services, such as Amazon Athena, for further processing and analysis of the data.

Amazon Athena is a service that allows querying data stored in Amazon S3 using standard SQL. Amazon Athena can query over semi-structured data, such as JSON, as well as structured data, such as csv, without requiring any loading or transformation. Amazon Athena is serverless, meaning that there is no infrastructure to manage and users only pay for the queries they run. Amazon Athena also supports the use of AWS Glue Data Catalog, which is a centralized metadata repository that can store and manage the schema and partition information of the data in Amazon S3.

Using Amazon S3 and Amazon Athena, the company can achieve the following high priorities:

Solution simplicity: Amazon S3 and Amazon Athena are easy to use and require minimal configuration and maintenance. The company can simply upload the csv and JSON files to Amazon S3 and use Amazon Athena to query them using SQL. The company does not need to worry about provisioning, scaling, or managing any servers or clusters.

Fast development time: Amazon S3 and Amazon Athena can enable the company to quickly access and analyze the data without any data preparation or loading. The company can use the existing workforce of SQL experts to write and run queries on Amazon Athena and get results in seconds or minutes.

Low cost: Amazon S3 and Amazon Athena are cost-effective and offer pay-as-you-go pricing models. Amazon S3 charges based on the amount of storage used and the number of requests made. Amazon Athena charges based on the amount of data scanned by the queries. The company can also reduce the costs by using compression, encryption, and partitioning techniques to optimize the data storage and query performance.

High flexibility: Amazon S3 and Amazon Athena are flexible and can support various data types, formats, and sources. The company can store and query any type of data in Amazon S3, such as csv, JSON, Parquet, ORC, etc. The company can also query data from multiple sources in Amazon S3, such as data lakes, data warehouses, log files, etc.

The other options are not as suitable as option A for the company’s requirements for the following reasons:

Option B: Amazon Redshift and AWS Glue are technologies that can be used for data warehousing and data integration, but they are not ideal for a temporary ad hoc solution. Amazon Redshift is a service that provides a fully managed, petabyte-scale data warehouse that can run complex analytical queries using SQL. AWS Glue is a service that provides a fully managed extract, transform, and load (ETL) service that can prepare and load data for analytics. However, using Amazon Redshift and AWS Glue would require more effort and cost than using Amazon S3 and Amazon Athena. The company would need to load the data from Amazon S3 to Amazon Redshift using AWS Glue, which can take time and incur additional charges. The company would also need to manage the capacity and performance of the Amazon Redshift cluster, which can be complex and expensive.

Option C: Amazon DynamoDB and DynamoDB Accelerator (DAX) are technologies that can be used for fast and scalable NoSQL database and caching, but they are not suitable for the company’s data storage and query needs. Amazon DynamoDB is a service that provides a fully managed, key-value and document database that can deliver single-digit millisecond performance at any scale. DynamoDB Accelerator (DAX) is a service that provides a fully managed, in-memory cache for DynamoDB that can improve the read performance by up to 10 times. However, using Amazon DynamoDB and DAX would not allow the company to continue to use SQL as a query language, as Amazon DynamoDB does not support SQL. The company would need to use the DynamoDB API or the AWS SDKs to access and query the data, which can require more coding and learning effort. The company would also need to transform the csv and JSON files into DynamoDB items, which can involve additional processing and complexity.

Option D: Amazon RDS and Amazon ES are technologies that can be used for relational database and search and analytics, but they are not optimal for the company’s data storage and query scenario. Amazon RDS is a service that provides a fully managed, relational database that supports various database engines, such as MySQL, PostgreSQL, Oracle, etc. Amazon ES is a service that provides a fully managed, Elasticsearch cluster, which is mainly used for search and analytics purposes. However, using Amazon RDS and Amazon ES would not be as simple and cost-effective as using Amazon S3 and Amazon Athena. The company would need to load the data from Amazon S3 to Amazon RDS, which can take time and incur additional charges. The company would also need to manage the capacity and performance of the Amazon RDS and Amazon ES clusters, which can be complex and expensive. Moreover, Amazon RDS and Amazon ES are not designed to handle semi-structured data, such as JSON, as well as Amazon S3 and Amazon Athena.

Amazon S3

Amazon Athena

Amazon Redshift

AWS Glue

Amazon DynamoDB

[DynamoDB Accelerator (DAX)]

[Amazon RDS]

[Amazon ES]

Principal component analysis (PCA) is an unsupervised machine learning algorithm that attempts to reduce the dimensionality (number of features) within a dataset while still retaining as much information as possible. This is done by finding a new set of features called components, which are composites of the original features that are uncorrelated with one another. They are also constrained so that the first component accounts for the largest possible variability in the data, the second component the second most variability, and so on. By using PCA, the impact of having a large number of features that are highly correlated with each other can be reduced, as the new feature space will have fewer dimensions and less redundancy. This can make the linear models more stable and less prone to overfitting. References:

Principal Component Analysis (PCA) Algorithm - Amazon SageMaker

Perform a large-scale principal component analysis faster using Amazon SageMaker | AWS Machine Learning Blog

Machine Learning- Prinicipal Component Analysis | i2tutorials

 The question is about improving the testing accuracy of a gradient boosting regression model. The testing accuracy is much lower than the training accuracy, which indicates that the model is overfitting the training data. To reduce overfitting, the following steps are recommended:

Use a one-hot encoder for the categorical fields in the dataset. This will create binary features for each category and avoid imposing an ordinal relationship among them. This can help the model learn the patterns better and generalize to unseen data.

Perform standardization on the financial fields in the dataset. This will scale the features to have zero mean and unit variance, which can improve the convergence and performance of the model. This can also help the model handle features with different units and ranges.

Apply L1 regularization to the data. This will add a penalty term to the loss function that is proportional to the absolute value of the coefficients. This can help the model reduce the complexity and select the most relevant features by shrinking the coefficients of less important features to zero.

1: AWS Machine Learning Specialty Exam Guide

2: AWS Machine Learning Specialty Course

3: AWS Machine Learning Blog