Amazon Web Services MLS-C01 Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

 The best approach to maximize transcription accuracy during the development phase is to create a custom vocabulary file containing each product name with phonetic pronunciations, and use it with Amazon Transcribe to perform the ASR customization. A custom vocabulary is a list of words and phrases that are likely to appear in your audio input, along with optional information about how to pronounce them. By using a custom vocabulary, you can improve the transcription accuracy of domain-specific terms, such as product names, that may not be recognized by the general vocabulary of Amazon Transcribe. You can also analyze the transcripts and manually update the custom vocabulary file to include updated or additional entries for those names that are not being correctly identified.

The other options are not as effective as option C for the following reasons:

Option A is not suitable because Amazon Lex is a service for building conversational interfaces, not for transcribing voicemail messages. Amazon Lex also has a limit of 100 slots per bot, which is not enough to accommodate the 200 unique product names required by the company.

Option B is not optimal because it relies on the word confidence scores in the transcript, which may not be accurate enough to identify all the mis-transcribed product names. Moreover, automatically creating or updating a custom vocabulary file may introduce errors or inconsistencies in the pronunciation or display of the words.

Option D is not feasible because it requires a large amount of training data to build a custom language model. The company only has 4,000 words of Amazon SageMaker Ground Truth voicemail transcripts, which is not enough to train a robust and reliable custom language model. Additionally, creating and updating a custom language model is a time-consuming and resource-intensive process, which may not be suitable for the development phase where frequent changes are expected.

Amazon Transcribe – Custom Vocabulary

Amazon Transcribe – Custom Language Models

[Amazon Lex – Limits]

 To meet the requirements with the least operational overhead, the company should use AWS Glue crawlers, AWS Glue workflows and jobs, and Amazon Fraud Detector. AWS Glue crawlers can scan the data in Amazon S3 and identify the schema, which is then stored in the AWS Glue Data Catalog. AWS Glue workflows and jobs can perform data transformations on the data in Amazon S3 using serverless Spark or Python scripts. Amazon Fraud Detector can train a model to detect fraud using the transformed data and the company’s historical fraud labels, and then generate fraud predictions using a simple API call.

Option A is incorrect because Amazon Athena is a serverless query service that can analyze data in Amazon S3 using standard SQL, but it does not perform data transformations or fraud detection.

Option C is incorrect because Amazon Redshift is a cloud data warehouse that can store and query data using SQL, but it requires provisioning and managing clusters, which adds operational overhead. Moreover, Amazon Redshift does not provide a built-in fraud detection capability.

Option E is incorrect because Amazon Redshift ML is a feature that allows users to create, train, and deploy machine learning models using SQL commands in Amazon Redshift. However, using Amazon Redshift ML would require loading the data from Amazon S3 to Amazon Redshift, which adds complexity and cost. Also, Amazon Redshift ML does not support fraud detection as a use case.

AWS Glue Crawlers

AWS Glue Workflows and Jobs

Amazon Fraud Detector

The best solution is to configure Amazon EventBridge to run a predefined SageMaker pipeline to perform the transformations when a new data is detected in the S3 bucket. This solution requires the least development effort because it leverages the native integration between EventBridge and SageMaker Pipelines, which allows you to trigger a pipeline execution based on an event rule. EventBridge can monitor the S3 bucket for new data uploads and invoke the pipeline that contains the same transformations and feature engineering steps that were defined in SageMaker Data Wrangler. The pipeline can then ingest the transformed data into the online feature store for training and inference.

The other solutions are less optimal because they require more development effort and additional services. Using AWS Lambda or AWS Step Functions would require writing custom code to invoke the SageMaker pipeline and handle any errors or retries. Using Apache Airflow would require setting up and maintaining an Airflow server and DAGs, as well as integrating with the SageMaker API.

Amazon EventBridge and Amazon SageMaker Pipelines integration

Create a pipeline using a JSON specification

Ingest data into a feature group