Amazon Web Services MLS-C01 Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

The Machine Learning team wants to use its own training algorithm on Amazon SageMaker, and submit both its own algorithm code and algorithm-specific parameters. The best combination of services to build a custom algorithm in Amazon SageMaker are Amazon ECR and Amazon S3.

Amazon ECR is a fully managed container registry service that allows you to store, manage, and deploy Docker container images. You can use Amazon ECR to create a Docker image that contains your training algorithm code and any dependencies or libraries that it requires. You can also use Amazon ECR to push, pull, and manage your Docker images securely and reliably.

Amazon S3 is a durable, scalable, and secure object storage service that can store any amount and type of data. You can use Amazon S3 to store your training data, model artifacts, and algorithm-specific parameters. You can also use Amazon S3 to access your data and parameters from your training algorithm code, and to write your model output to a specified location.

Therefore, the Machine Learning team can use the following steps to build a custom algorithm in Amazon SageMaker:

Write the training algorithm code in Python, using the Amazon SageMaker Python SDK or the Amazon SageMaker Containers library to interact with the Amazon SageMaker service. The code should be able to read the input data and parameters from Amazon S3, and write the model output to Amazon S3.

Create a Dockerfile that defines the base image, the dependencies, the environment variables, and the commands to run the training algorithm code. The Dockerfile should also expose the ports that Amazon SageMaker uses to communicate with the container.

Build the Docker image using the Dockerfile, and tag it with a meaningful name and version.

Push the Docker image to Amazon ECR, and note the registry path of the image.

Upload the training data, model artifacts, and algorithm-specific parameters to Amazon S3, and note the S3 URIs of the objects.

Create an Amazon SageMaker training job, using the Amazon SageMaker Python SDK or the AWS CLI. Specify the registry path of the Docker image, the S3 URIs of the input and output data, the algorithm-specific parameters, and other configuration options, such as the instance type, the number of instances, the IAM role, and the hyperparameters.

Monitor the status and logs of the training job, and retrieve the model output from Amazon S3.

Use Your Own Training Algorithms

Amazon ECR - Amazon Web Services

Amazon S3 - Amazon Web Services

 The best solution to reduce the cost of the notebook instance and the data preprocessing job is to change the notebook instance type to a smaller general-purpose instance, stop the notebook when it is not in use, and run data preprocessing on an ml.r5 instance with the same memory size as the ml.m5.4xlarge instance by using Amazon SageMaker Processing. This solution will result in the most cost savings because:

Changing the notebook instance type to a smaller general-purpose instance will reduce the hourly cost of running the notebook, since the feature engineering development does not require high CPU and memory resources. For example, an ml.t3.medium instance costs $0.0464 per hour, while an ml.m5.4xlarge instance costs $0.888 per hour1.

Stopping the notebook when it is not in use will also reduce the cost, since the notebook will only incur charges when it is running. For example, if the notebook is used for 8 hours per day, 5 days per week, then stopping it when it is not in use will save about 76% of the monthly cost compared to leaving it running all the time2.

Running data preprocessing on an ml.r5 instance with the same memory size as the ml.m5.4xlarge instance by using Amazon SageMaker Processing will reduce the cost of the data preprocessing job, since the ml.r5 instance is optimized for memory-intensive workloads and has a lower cost per GB of memory than the ml.m5 instance. For example, an ml.r5.4xlarge instance has 128 GB of memory and costs $1.008 per hour, while an ml.m5.4xlarge instance has 64 GB of memory and costs $0.888 per hour1. Therefore, the ml.r5.4xlarge instance can process the same amount of data in half the time and at a lower cost than the ml.m5.4xlarge instance. Moreover, using Amazon SageMaker Processing will allow the data preprocessing job to run on a separate, fully managed infrastructure that can be scaled up or down as needed, without affecting the notebook instance.

The other options are not as effective as option C for the following reasons:

Option A is not optimal because changing the notebook instance type to a memory optimized instance with the same vCPU number as the ml.m5.4xlarge instance has will not reduce the cost of the notebook, since the memory optimized instances have a higher cost per vCPU than the general-purpose instances. For example, an ml.r5.4xlarge instance has 16 vCPUs and costs $1.008 per hour, while an ml.m5.4xlarge instance has 16 vCPUs and costs $0.888 per hour1. Moreover, running both data preprocessing and feature engineering development on the same instance will not take advantage of the scalability and flexibility of Amazon SageMaker Processing.

Option B is not suitable because running data preprocessing on a P3 instance type with the same memory as the ml.m5.4xlarge instance by using Amazon SageMaker Processing will not reduce the cost of the data preprocessing job, since the P3 instance type is optimized for GPU-based workloads and has a higher cost per GB of memory than the ml.m5 or ml.r5 instance types. For example, an ml.p3.2xlarge instance has 61 GB of memory and costs $3.06 per hour, while an ml.m5.4xlarge instance has 64 GB of memory and costs $0.888 per hour1. Moreover, the data preprocessing job does not require GPU, so using a P3 instance type will be wasteful and inefficient.

Option D is not feasible because running data preprocessing on an R5 instance with the same memory size as the ml.m5.4xlarge instance by using the Reserved Instance option will not reduce the cost of the data preprocessing job, since the Reserved Instance option requires a commitment to a consistent amount of usage for a period of 1 or 3 years3. However, the data preprocessing job only runs once a day on average and completes in only 2 hours, so it does not have a consistent or predictable usage pattern. Therefore, using the Reserved Instance option will not provide any cost savings and may incur additional charges for unused capacity.

Amazon SageMaker Pricing

Manage Notebook Instances - Amazon SageMaker

Amazon EC2 Pricing - Reserved Instances

The factors that will adversely impact the performance of the forecast model are:

Sales data is aggregated by week. This will reduce the granularity and resolution of the data, and make it harder to capture the daily patterns and variations in sales volume. The data scientist should request daily sales data from the source database to enable building a daily model, which will be more accurate and useful for the prediction task.

Sales data is missing zero entries for item sales. This will introduce bias and incompleteness in the data, and make it difficult to account for the items that have no demand or are out of stock. The data scientist should request that item sales data from the source database include zero entries to enable building the model, which will be more robust and realistic.

The other options are not valid because:

Detecting seasonality for the majority of stores will not be an issue, as sales data is highly consistent from week to week. Requesting categorical data to relate new stores with similar stores that have more historical data may not improve the model performance significantly, and may introduce unnecessary complexity and noise.

The sales data does not need to have more variance, as it reflects the actual demand and behavior of the customers. Requesting external sales data from other industries will not improve the model’s ability to generalize, but may introduce irrelevant and misleading information.

Only 100 MB of sales data is not a problem, as it is sufficient to train a forecast model with Amazon S3 and Amazon Forecast. Requesting 10 years of sales data will not provide much benefit, as it may contain outdated and obsolete information that does not reflect the current market trends and customer preferences.

Amazon Forecast

Forecasting: Principles and Practice