PECB Related Exams
ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer Exam

The PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer exam caters to professionals seeking to lead and manage ISMS implementation within organizations. It's ideal for:
The PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer exam delves into the core concepts and principles of ISO/IEC 27001, including:
The main difference between the PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer and ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor exams lies in their focus and objectives:
Scenario 2: NyvMarketing is a marketing firm that provides different services to clients across various industries. With expertise in digital marketing. branding, and market research, NyvMarketing has built a solid
reputation for delivering innovative and impactful marketing campaigns. With the growing Significance Of data Security and information protection within the marketing landscape, the company decided to
implement an ISMS based on 27001.
While implementing its ISMS NyvMarketing encountered a significant challenge; the threat of insufficient resources, This challenge posed a risk to effectively executing its ISMS objectives and could potentially
undermine the company'S efforts to safeguard Sensitive information. TO address this threat, NyvMarketing adopted a proactive approach by appointing Michael to manage the risks related to resource Constraints.
Michael was pivotal in identifying and addressing resource gaps. strategizing risk mitigation. and allocating resources effectively for ISMS implementation at NyvMarket•ng, strengthening the company's resilience
against resource challenges.
Furthermore, NyvMarketing prioritized industry standards and best practices in information security, diligently following ISOfIEC 27002 guidelines. This commitment, driven by excellence and ISO/IEC 27001
requirements, underscored NyvMafketinq•s dedication to upholding the h•ghest Standards Of information security governance.
While working on the ISMS implementation, NyvMarketing opted to exclude one Of the requirements related to competence (as stipulated in ISO/IEC 27001, Clause 7.2). The company believed that its existing
workforce possessed the necessary competence to fulfill ISMS•telated tasks_ However, it did not provide a valid justification for this omission. Moreover. when specific controls from Annex A Of ISO/IEC 27001
were not implemented. NyvMarketing neglected to provide an acceptable justification for these exclusions.
During the ISMS implementation, NFMarketing thoroughly assessed vulnerabilities that could affect its information Security These vulnerabilities included insufficient maintenance and faulty installation Of
storage media, insufficient periodic replacement schemes for equipment, Inadequate software testing. and unprotected communication lines. Recognizing that these vulnerabilities could pose risks to its data
security. NBMarketing took steps to address these specific weaknesses by implementing the necessary controls and countermeasures-
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question.
In the scenario 2. NyvMarketing faced the threat of insufficient resources during the ISMS implementation. In which of the following categories does this threat fall?
According to scenario 2, did NyvMarketing take actions that comply with ISO/IEC 27001 regarding the implementation of Annex A controls?
Scenario 8: SunDee is a biopharmaceutical firm headquartered in California, US. Renowned for its pioneering work in the field of human therapeutics, SunDee places a strong emphasis on addressing critical healthcare concerns, particularly in the domains of cardiovascular diseases, oncology, bone health, and inflammation. SunDee has demonstrated its commitment to data security and integrity by maintaining an effective information security management system (ISMS) based on ISO/IEC 27001 for the past two years.
In preparation for the recertification audit, SunDee conducted an internal audit. The company's top management appointed Alex, who has actively managed the Compliance Department's day-to-day operations for the last six months, as the internal auditor. With this dual role assignment, Alex is tasked with conducting an audit that ensures compliance and provides valuable recommendations to improve operational efficiency.
During the internal audit, a few nonconformities were identified. To address them comprehensively, the company created action plans for each nonconformity, working closely with the audit team leader.
SunDee's senior management conducted a comprehensive review of the ISMS to evaluate its appropriateness, sufficiency, and efficiency. This was integrated into their regular management meetings. Essential documents, including audit reports, action plans, and review outcomes, were distributed to all members before the meeting. The agenda covered the status of previous review actions, changes affecting the ISMS, feedback, stakeholder inputs, and opportunities for improvement. Decisions and actions targeting ISMS improvements were made, with a significant role played by the ISMS coordinator and the internal audit team in preparing follow-up action plans, which were then approved by top management.
In response to the review outcomes, SunDee promptly implemented corrective actions, strengthening its information security measures. Additionally, dashboard tools were introduced to provide a high-level overview of key performance indicators essential for monitoring the organization's information security management. These indicators included metrics on security incidents, their costs, system vulnerability tests, nonconformity detection, and resolution times, facilitating effective recording, reporting, and tracking of monitoring activities. Furthermore, SunDee embarked on a comprehensive measurement process to assess the progress and outcomes of ongoing projects, implementing extensive measures across all processes. The top management determined that the individual responsible for the information, aside from owning the data that contributes to the measures, would also be designated accountable for executing these measurement activities.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
Based on scenario 8, which of the following dashboards did SunDee utilize?
Scenario 4: TradeB. a commercial bank that has just entered the market, accepts deposits from its clients and offers basic financial services and loans for investments. TradeB has decided to implement an information security management system (ISMS) based on ISO/IEC 27001 Having no experience of a management [^system implementation, TradeB's top management contracted two experts to direct and manage the ISMS implementation project.
First, the project team analyzed the 93 controls of ISO/IEC 27001 Annex A and listed only the security controls deemed applicable to the company and their objectives Based on this analysis, they drafted the Statement of Applicability. Afterward, they conducted a risk assessment, during which they identified assets, such as hardware, software, and networks, as well as threats and vulnerabilities, assessed potential consequences and likelihood, and determined the level of risks based on three nonnumerical categories (low, medium, and high). They evaluated the risks based on the risk evaluation criteria and decided to treat only the high risk category They also decided to focus primarily on the unauthorized use of administrator rights and system interruptions due to several hardware failures by establishing a new version of the access control policy, implementing controls to manage and control user access, and implementing a control for ICT readiness for business continuity
Lastly, they drafted a risk assessment report, in which they wrote that if after the implementation of these security controls the level of risk is below the acceptable level, the risks will be accepted
What should TradeB do in order to deal with residual risks? Refer to scenario 4.