New Year Sale 70% Discount Offer - Ends in 0d 00h 00m 00s - Coupon code: save70

PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

Exam Code:
ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer
Exam Name:
PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 : 2022 Lead Implementer exam
Certification:
Vendor:
Questions:
334
Last Updated:
Jan 17, 2026
Exam Status:
Stable
PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer

ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer: ISO 27001 Exam 2025 Study Guide Pdf and Test Engine

Are you worried about passing the PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer (PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 : 2022 Lead Implementer exam) exam? Download the most recent PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer braindumps with answers that are 100% real. After downloading the PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer exam dumps training , you can receive 99 days of free updates, making this website one of the best options to save additional money. In order to help you prepare for the PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer exam questions and verified answers by IT certified experts, CertsTopics has put together a complete collection of dumps questions and answers. To help you prepare and pass the PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer exam on your first attempt, we have compiled actual exam questions and their answers. 

Our (PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 : 2022 Lead Implementer exam) Study Materials are designed to meet the needs of thousands of candidates globally. A free sample of the CompTIA ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer test is available at CertsTopics. Before purchasing it, you can also see the PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer practice exam demo.

PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 : 2022 Lead Implementer exam Questions and Answers

Question 1

Which option below should be addressed in an information security policy?

Options:

A.

Actions to be performed after an information security incident

B.

Legal and regulatory obligations imposed upon the organization

C.

The complexity of information security processes and their interactions

Buy Now
Question 2

Scenario 9:

OpenTech, headquartered in San Francisco, specializes in information and communication technology (ICT) solutions. Its clientele primarily includes data communication enterprises and network operators. The company's core objective is to enable its clients to transition smoothly into multi-service providers, aligning their operations with the complex demands of the digital landscape.

Recently, Tim, the internal auditor of OpenTech, conducted an internal audit that uncovered nonconformities related to their monitoring procedures and system vulnerabilities. In response to these nonconformities, OpenTech decided to employ a comprehensive problem-solving approach to address the issues systematically. This method encompasses a team-oriented approach, aiming to identify, correct, and eliminate the root causes of the issues. The approach involves several steps: First, establish a group of experts with deep knowledge of processes and controls. Next, break down the nonconformity into measurable components and implement interim containment measures. Then, identify potential root causes and select and verify permanent corrective actions. Finally, put those actions into practice, validate them, take steps to prevent recurrence, and recognize and acknowledge the team's efforts.

Following the analysis of the root causes of the nonconformities, OpenTech's ISMS project manager, Julia, developed a list of potential actions to address the identified nonconformities. Julia carefully evaluated the list to ensure that each action would effectively eliminate the root cause of the respective nonconformity. While assessing potential corrective actions, Julia identified one issue as significant and assessed a high likelihood of its recurrence. Consequently, she chose to implement temporary corrective actions. Julia then combined all the nonconformities into a single action plan and sought approval from top management. The submitted action plan was written as follows:

"A new version of the access control policy will be established and new restrictions will be created to ensure that network access is effectively managed and monitored by the Information and Communication Technology (ICT) Department."

However, Julia's submitted action plan was not approved by top management. The reason cited was that a general action plan meant to address all nonconformities was deemed unacceptable. Consequently, Julia revised the action plan and submitted separate ones for approval. Unfortunately, Julia did not adhere to the organization's specified deadline for submission, resulting in a delay in the corrective action process. Additionally, the revised action plans lacked a defined schedule for execution.

Did Julia make an appropriate decision regarding the nonconformities with a high likelihood of reoccurrence?

Options:

A.

Yes, Julia's decision to implement temporary corrective actions was consistent with best practices

B.

No, as temporary corrective actions are not allowed in the evaluation phase

C.

No, implementing temporary actions during the corrective action process is not recommended

Question 3

Nimbus Route, a cloud-native logistics optimization company based in the Netherlands, offers Al-driven route planning fleet management tools, and real time shipment tracking solutions to clients across Europe and North America. To safeguard sensitive logistics data and ensure resilience across its cloud services. Nimbus Route has implemented an information security management system (ISMS) based on ISO/lEC 27001. The company is also integrating intelligent transport systems and predictive analytics to increase operational efficiency and sustainability. As part of the ISMS implementation process, the company is determining the competence levels required to manage its ISMS. It has considered various factors when defining these competence requirements, including technological advancements, regulatory requirements, the company's mission. strategic objectives, available resources. as well as the needs and expectations of its customers. Furthermore, the company has established clear guidelines for internal and external communication related to the ISMS, defining what information to share, when to share it. with whom, and through which channels. However, not all communications have been formally documented: instead, the company classified and managed communication based on its needs. ensuring that documentation is maintained only to the extent necessary for the ISMS's effectiveness To support its expanding digital services and ensure operational scalability. Nimbus Route utilizes virtualized computing resources provided by an external cloud service provider. This setup allows the company to configure and manage its operating systems, deploy applications. and control storage environments as needed while relying on the provider to maintain the underlying cloud environment. To further enhance is predictive capabilities. Nimbus Route is adopting machine learning techniques across several of its core services Specifically, it uses machine learning for route optimization and delivery time estimation, leveraging algorithms such as logistic regression and support vector machines to identify patterns in historical transportation data. As Nimbus Route's ISMS matures, the company has chosen a chased approach to its transition into full operational mode Rather than waiting for a formal launch, individual elements of the ISMS, such as risk treatment procedures, access controls, and audit logging, are being activated progressively as soon as they are developed and approved Based on the scenario above answer the following question.

Is the Nimbus Route's approach to documenting communication acceptable? Refer to scenario 6.

Options:

A.

No, as ISO/IEC 27001 requires all ISMS-related communication to be formally documented in various formats.

B.

No, as ISO/IEC 27001 provides a predefined template for all ISMS communication

C.

Yes, documentation can be done to the extent the organization deems necessary for the ISMS effectiveness.