PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

Scenario 7: CyTekShield

CyTekShield based in Dublin. Ireland, is a cybersecurity consulting provider specializing in digital risk management and enterprise security solutions. After facing multiple security incidents. CyberTekShield formed expanded its information security team by bringing in Sadie and Niamh as part of the team. This team is structured into three key divisions: incident response, security architecture and forensics

Sadie will separate the demilitarized zone from CyTekShield's private network and publicly accessible resources, as part of implementing a screened subnet network architecture. In addition, Sadie will carry out comprehensive evaluations of any unexpected incidents, analyzing their causes and assessing their potential impact. She also developed security strategies and policies. Whereas Niamh. a specialized expert in forensic investigations, will be responsible for creating records of different data for evidence purposes To do this effectively, she first reviewed the company's information security incident management policy, which outlines the types of records to be created, their storage location, and the required format and content for specific record types.

To support the process of handling of evidence related to information security events. CyTekShield has established internal procedures. These procedures ensure that evidence is properly identified, collected, and preserved within the company CyTekShield's procedures specify how to handle records in various storage mediums, ensuring that all evidence is safeguarded in its original state, whether the devices are powered on or off.

As part of CyTekShield's initiative to strengthen information security measures, Niamh will conduct information security risk assessments only when significant changes are proposed and will document the results of these risk assessments Upon completion of the risk assessment process, Niamh is responsible to develop and implement a plan for treating information security risks and document the risk treatment results.

Furthermore, while implementing the communication plan for information security, the CyTekShield's top management was responsible for creating a roadmap for new product development. This approach helps the company to align its security measures with the product development efforts, demonstrating a commitment to integrating security into every aspect of its business operations.CyTekShield uses a cloud service model that includes cloud-based apps accessed through the web or an application programming interface (API). All cloud services are provided by the cloud service provider, while data is managed by CyTekShield This introduces unique security considerations and becomes a primary focus for the information security team to ensure data and systems are protected in this environment.CyTekShield uses a cloud service model that includes cloud-based apps accessed through the web or an application programming interface (API). All cloud services are provided by the cloud service provider, while data is managed by CyTekShield This introduces unique security considerations and becomes a primary focus for the information security team to ensure data and systems are protected in this environment.

Question:

Has CyTekShield appropriately addressed the handling of evidence related to information security events?

Scenario 4: TradeB is a newly established commercial bank located in Europe, with a diverse clientele. It provides services that encompass retail banking, corporate banking, wealth management, and digital banking, all tailored to meet the evolving financial needs of individuals and businesses in the region. Recognizing the critical importance of information security in the modern banking landscape, TradeB has initiated the implementation of an information security management system (ISMS) based on ISO/IEC 27001. To ensure the successful implementation of the ISMS, the top management decided to contract two experts to lead and oversee the ISMS implementation project.

As a primary strategy for implementing the ISMS, the experts chose an approach that emphasizes a swift implementation of the ISMS by initially meeting the minimum requirements of ISO/IEC 27001, followed by continual improvement over time. Additionally, under the guidance of the experts, TradeB opted for a methodological framework, which serves as a structured framework and a guideline that outlines the high-level stages of the ISMS implementation, the associated activities, and the deliverables without incorporating any specific tools.

The experts analyzed the ISO/IEC 27001 controls and listed only the security controls deemed applicable to the company and its objectives. Based on this analysis, they drafted the Statement of Applicability. Afterward, they conducted a risk assessment, during which they identified assets, such as hardware, software, and networks, as well as threats and vulnerabilities, assessed potential consequences and likelihood, and determined the level of risks based on a methodical approach that involved defining and characterizing the terms and criteria used in the assessment process, categorizing them into non-numerical levels (e.g., very low, low, moderate, high, very high). Explanatory notes were thoughtfully crafted to justify assessed values, with the primary goal of enhancing repeatability and reproducibility.

Then, they evaluated the risks based on the risk evaluation criteria, where they decided to treat only the risks of the high-risk category. Additionally, they focused primarily on the unauthorized use of administrator rights and system interruptions due to several hardware failures. To address these issues, they established a new version of the access control policy, implemented controls to manage and control user access, and introduced a control for ICT readiness to ensure business continuity.

Their risk assessment report indicated that if the implemented security controls reduce the risk levels to an acceptable threshold, those risks will be accepted.

Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:

According to scenario 4, what type of assets were identified during the risk assessment?

Scenario 3: Socket Inc is a telecommunications company offering mainly wireless products and services. It uses MongoDB. a document model database that offers high availability, scalability, and flexibility.

Last month, Socket Inc. reported an information security incident. A group of hackers compromised its MongoDB database, because the database administrators did not change its default settings, leaving it without a password and publicly accessible.

Fortunately. Socket Inc. performed regular information backups in their MongoDB database, so no information was lost during the incident. In addition, a syslog server allowed Socket Inc. to centralize all logs in one server. The company found out that no persistent backdoor was placed and that the attack was not initiated from an employee inside the company by reviewing the event logs that record user faults and exceptions.

To prevent similar incidents in the future, Socket Inc. decided to use an access control system that grants access to authorized personnel only. The company also implemented a control in order to define and implement rules for the effective use of cryptography, including cryptographic key management, to protect the database from unauthorized access The implementation was based on all relevant agreements, legislation, and regulations, and the information classification scheme. To improve security and reduce the administrative efforts, network segregation using VPNs was proposed.

Lastly, Socket Inc. implemented a new system to maintain, collect, and analyze information related to information security threats, and integrate information security into project management.

Based on scenario 3. which information security control of Annex A of ISO/IEC 27001 did Socket Inc. implement by establishing a new system to maintain, collect, and analyze information related to information security threats?