Big Black Friday Sale 70% Discount Offer - Ends in 0d 00h 00m 00s - Coupon code: save70

PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

Exam Code:
ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer
Exam Name:
PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 : 2022 Lead Implementer exam
Certification:
Vendor:
Questions:
293
Last Updated:
Nov 26, 2025
Exam Status:
Stable
PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer

ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer: ISO 27001 Exam 2025 Study Guide Pdf and Test Engine

Are you worried about passing the PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer (PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 : 2022 Lead Implementer exam) exam? Download the most recent PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer braindumps with answers that are 100% real. After downloading the PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer exam dumps training , you can receive 99 days of free updates, making this website one of the best options to save additional money. In order to help you prepare for the PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer exam questions and verified answers by IT certified experts, CertsTopics has put together a complete collection of dumps questions and answers. To help you prepare and pass the PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer exam on your first attempt, we have compiled actual exam questions and their answers. 

Our (PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 : 2022 Lead Implementer exam) Study Materials are designed to meet the needs of thousands of candidates globally. A free sample of the CompTIA ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer test is available at CertsTopics. Before purchasing it, you can also see the PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Implementer practice exam demo.

PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 : 2022 Lead Implementer exam Questions and Answers

Question 1

TradeB communicated the information security processes and procedures to employees. Which principle of efficient communication strategy did they use?

Options:

A.

Transparency

B.

Appropriateness

C.

Responsiveness

Buy Now
Question 2

Scenario 10: ProEBank

ProEBank is an Austrian financial institution known for its comprehensive range of banking services. Headquartered in Vienna, it leaverages the city's advanced technological and financial ecosystem To enhance its security posture, ProEBank has implementied an information security management system (ISMS) based on the ISO/IEC 27001. After a year of having the ISMS in place, the company decided to apply for a certification audit to obtain certification against ISO/IEC 27001.

To prepare for the audit, the company first informed its employees for the audit and organized training sessions to prepare them. It also prepared documented information in advance, so that the documents would be ready when external auditors asked to review them Additionally, it determined which of its employees have the knowledge to help the external auditors understand and evaluate the processes.

During the planning phase for the audit, ProEBank reviewed the list of assigned auditors provided by the certification body. Upon reviewing the list, ProEBank identified a potential conflict of interest with one of the auditors, who had previously worked for ProEBank's mein competitor in the banking industry To ensure the integrity of the audit process. ProEBank refused to undergo the audit until a completely new audit team was assigned. In response, the certification body acknowledged the conflict of interest and made the necessary adjustments to ensure the impartiality of the audit team

After the resolution of this issue, the audit team assessed whether the ISMS met both the standard's requirements and the company's objectives. During this process, the audit team focused on reviewing documented information.

Three weeks later, the team conducted an on-site visit to the auditee’s location where they aimed to evaluate whether the ISMS conformed to the requirements of ISO/IEC 27001. was effectively implemented, and enabled the auditee to reach its information security objectives. After the on-site visit the team prepared the audit conclusions and notified the auditee that some minor nonconformities had been detected The audit team leader then issued a recommendation for certification.

After receiving the recommendation from the audit team leader, the certification body established a committee to make the decision for certification. The committee included one member from the audit team and two other experts working for the certification body.

To prepare for their ISO/IEC 27001 certification audit, ProEBank trained employees, prepared documentation, and identified key personnel to support the audit. However, they did not conduct a self-assessment before the audit.

Question:

Did ProEBank follow all of the best practices while preparing for the certification audit?

Options:

A.

Yes – the company followed all of the best practices in preparation for the certification audit

B.

No – the company should have also conducted a self-assessment to prepare for the audit

C.

No – the company should not have informed its employees regarding the upcoming audit

Question 3

Scenario 5: Bytes iS a dynamic and innovative Company specializing in the design, manufacturing. and distribution Of hardware and software, with a focus On providing comprehensive network and supporting

services. It is headquartered in the vibrant tech hub of Lagos, Nigeria. It has a diverse and dedicated team, boasting a workforce of over 800 employees who are passionate about delivering cutting-edge solutions

to their Clients. Given the nati-jte Of its business. Bytes frequently handles sensitive data both internally and When collaborating With Clients and partners.

Recognizing the Challenges inherent in securely sharing data with clients. partners, and within its own internal operations. Bytes has implemented robust information security measures, They utilize a defined risk

assessment process, which enables them to assess and address potential threats and information security risks. This process ensures compliance with ISOflEC 27001 requirements, a critical aspect of Bytes'

operations.

Initially. Bytes identified both external and internal issues that are relevant to its purpose and that impact its ability to achieve the intended information security management System Outcomes, External issues

beyond the company'S control include factors Such as social and Cultural dynamics, political. legal. normative, and regulatory environments, financial and macroeconomic conditions. technological developments,

natural factors, and competitive pressures. Internal issues, which are within the organization's control, encompass aspects like the company's culture. its policies, objectives, and strategies; govetnance structures.

roles, and responsibilities: adopted standards and guidelines; contractual relationships that influence processes within the ISMS scope: processes and procedures resources and knowledge capabilities; physical

infrastructure information systems. information flows. and decisiorwnaking processes; as well as the results of previous audits and risk assessments. Bytes also focused on identifying the interested parties

relevant to the ISMS understanding their requirements, and determining which Of those requirements will be addressed by the ISMS

In pursuing a secure digital environment, Bytes leverages the latest technology, utilizing automated vulnerability scanning tools to identify known vulnerable services in their ICT systems. This proactive approach

ensures that potential weaknesses are swiftly addressed. bolstering their overall information security posture. In their comprehensive approach to information security, Bytes has identified and assessed various

risks. During this process, despite implementing the security controls, Bytes' expert team identified unacceptable residual risks, and the team Currently faces uncertainty regarding which specific options to for

addressing these identified and unacceptable residual risks.

According to scenario 5, what should Bytes consider when assessing the security of its ICT systems?

Options:

A.

The skills and expertise of the IT team responsible for assessing the ICT systems

B.

The cost of the tools they used when assessing the security of their ICT systems

C.

The tools they used may produce false positives due to a lack of environmental context