PECB ISO-45001-Lead-Auditor Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

Comprehensive Detailed Explanation along with All ISO 45001 Audit References

Corrections address immediate issues, such as errors or omissions, without addressing root causes. Clause 10.2 of ISO 45001:2018 allows for corrections alongside corrective actions.

Analysis of Options:

A. Adding a missing signature to a corrective action record:Correct. This is a correction addressing an administrative oversight.

B. Changing a process to reduce its inherent risk:Incorrect. This is a corrective action aimed at addressing root causes, not a correction.

C. Changing the name of a tutor that did not deliver a course to the name of the tutor that did:Correct. This corrects an error in records without addressing systemic issues.

D. Reviewing workers’ training records:Incorrect. This is part of ongoing monitoring or auditing, not a correction.

E. Updating the emergency preparedness plan as a result of carrying out a practical test:Incorrect. This is a corrective action resulting from performance evaluation, not a correction.

F. Using OHSMS induction training to address an identified lack of OHSMS awareness among workers:Incorrect. This is a preventive or corrective action, not a correction.

ISO References:

Clause 10.2: Nonconformity and corrective action.

Clause 7.5: Control of documented information

Comprehensive Detailed Explanation along with All ISO 45001 Audit References

Clause 8.1.2 of ISO 45001 pertains to Eliminating Hazards and Reducing OH&S Risks. Organizations must implement appropriate controls to manage workplace hazards effectively.

Issue Identified:The kitchen environment at the audited site presents multiple hazards, including:

Oil spillage creating a slip hazard.

Open drums of waste material posing a chemical or hygiene hazard.

Unsecured knives and cleavers increasing the risk of cuts.

Boiling water left unattended, posing a risk of burns.

Lack of visible fire extinguishers or fire blankets, increasing fire risk.

Analysis of Options:

A. Failure to reduce risks associated with working in the kitchen.This option accurately captures the broader failure to implement effective measures to eliminate or reduce hazards across multiple areas in the kitchen.

B. Measures to prevent slippage in the kitchen from waste cooking oil were not taken.This is specific to one hazard (oil spillage) and does not address other significant risks observed, such as fire safety or sharp tools.

C. Staff are at risk of serious injury while working in the kitchen.While true, this is more of a general observation and does not address the root cause of the hazards or the failure of controls.

D. Training of the kitchen staff was not effective enough to prevent poor safety awareness in the kitchen area.Although training deficiencies may contribute to the issue, this option does not reflect the overarching systemic failure to manage hazards effectively.

Best Description of the Nonconformance:Failure to reduce risks associated with working in the kitchen (Option A) is the most comprehensive finding, reflecting the organization’s lack of adequate controls to mitigate hazards.

ISO References:

Clause 8.1.2: Organizations must establish controls to eliminate or minimize OH&S risks systematically.

Clause 7.2: Ensuring competency through training is important but must be coupled with hazard control measures.