PECB ISO-45001-Lead-Auditor Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

ISO 45001:2018 requires a holistic approach to occupational health and safety. This means considering all aspects that could impact worker well-being, not just obvious physical hazards. The correct answer encompasses work activities (the tasks themselves), workplace design (the physical environment), and human factors (psychological and social aspects like working hours and harassment). It's the most comprehensive and aligned with the standard's philosophy

ISO 45001:2018, Clause 6.1.2, outlines requirements for hazard identification. Hazards to consider include work activities, workplace design, human factors, and social factors that may impact OH&S. These go beyond traditional physical risks and include psychosocial and organizational hazards.

Analysis of Options:

A. Work activities, workplace design, and human factors such as hours of work and bullying and harassment:Correct. This comprehensively addresses hazard categories outlined in ISO 45001, Clause 6.1.2.

B. Work activities where there is the possibility of danger:Too general. ISO 45001 includes broader categories of hazards, including those related to organizational and social factors.

C. Hot-work, working at height, enclosed space entry, and work on electrical equipment:Too narrow. These are specific hazards but do not encompass the full range outlined in ISO 45001.

D. Work hazards and environmental factors such as bad weather:Incomplete. While environmental factors are relevant, ISO 45001 also includes workplace design, human factors, and psychosocial hazards.

ISO References:

Clause 6.1.2.1: Hazard identification.

Annex A.6.1.2: Examples of hazard categories, including workplace design and human factors.

ISO 45001 requires organizations to identify and maintain documentation to demonstrate compliance with legal and other requirements (Clause 7.5 and Clause 9.1.2). It also requires the evaluation and control of outsourced processes (Clause 8.1.4.3).

Analysis of Options:

A. The park did not have the required documentation to demonstrate compliance with legal requirements:Correct. The outdated and incomplete inspection report (8 years old, lacking detailed identification) fails to demonstrate compliance with health and safety legislation.

B. The organization did not monitor the safety checks by staff of equipment:Incorrect. While there is a potential gap in monitoring, the evidence provided does not directly indicate a lack of monitoring of staff checks.

C. The inspection organization employed by the insurance organization was not evaluated:Correct. ISO 45001 requires the organization to evaluate outsourced services, including those provided by the inspection body, to ensure their adequacy.

D. The park relied on the insurance organization to evaluate its OHS risks:Incorrect. Reliance on external evaluations may not constitute a nonconformity if risks are properly managed, but there is no evidence provided for noncompliance here.

E. Testing to determine the safe loading of equipment was not carried out:Incorrect. While load testing is crucial, there is no evidence presented to confirm this specific issue as a nonconformity.

ISO References:

Clause 7.5: Control of documented information.

Clause 8.1.4.3: Control of outsourced processes.

Clause 9.1.2: Evaluation of compliance.