PECB ISO-45001-Lead-Auditor Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

The correct answers are B and D.

In certification audits, the certification body decides the audit team composition and audit time using its own documented procedures and competence requirements. ISO/IEC 17021-1 requires the certification body to determine the competencies needed for the audit team and to assign an audit team that is competent for the audit scope. It also requires the certification body to determine the audit time needed to plan and accomplish a complete and effective audit.

IAF MD 5 further explains that the certification body should consider the composition and size of the audit team to ensure audit effectiveness. This means a client request for “only one auditor” may be considered, but it cannot simply be accepted just to reduce travel costs if that would undermine competence, coverage, or effectiveness.

Therefore:

B is correct because the OHS Manager should be told that audit duration and team make-up are decided in line with the certification body’s internal procedures.

D is correct because the request can be considered, and the certification body can respond after applying its rules and competence requirements.

Why the other options are incorrect:

A is not the best answer because the people managing the audit programme already operate within the certification body’s process.

C is inappropriate; a client request does not justify telling them to use another certification body.

E is incorrect because the accreditation body does not decide the audit team for the client’s audit.

F is incorrect because the request cannot be automatically accepted based only on cost saving.

The best answer is B.

Under ISO 45001, worker consultation and participation is required by Clause 5.4, but the standard does not require a specific documented procedure for that clause. The organization must provide mechanisms, information, time, training, and resources for consultation and participation, but ISO 45001 does not say it must maintain a formal procedure specifically for this.

Also, ISO 45001 Clause 7.5.3 requires documented information to be controlled so that it is available and suitable for use, and adequately protected. An “obsolete” document is not automatically a nonconformity just because it exists. It may be retained for reference or historical reasons, provided the organization controls it properly and it is not being used unintentionally as current information. That is why the correct audit reaction is to note it and verify on site whether it is actually part of the current controlled documented information.

Why the other options are not the best:

A is weak because using an obsolete procedure to prepare the checklist risks relying on invalid information before confirming what the current controlled version is.

C is unnecessary as the first response. You already have enough evidence to note a potential document-control point and verify it during the audit.

D is incorrect because you should not raise a nonconformity before verifying the facts on site. An obsolete-marked document alone does not prove a breach of Clause 7.5.3. A nonconformity must be based on objective evidence gathered during the audit.