New Year Sale 70% Discount Offer - Ends in 0d 00h 00m 00s - Coupon code: save70

PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

Exam Code:
ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor
Exam Name:
ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam
Vendor:
Questions:
198
Last Updated:
Dec 26, 2025
Exam Status:
Stable
PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor

ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor: AI management system (AIMS) Exam 2025 Study Guide Pdf and Test Engine

Are you worried about passing the PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor (ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam) exam? Download the most recent PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor braindumps with answers that are 100% real. After downloading the PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor exam dumps training , you can receive 99 days of free updates, making this website one of the best options to save additional money. In order to help you prepare for the PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor exam questions and verified answers by IT certified experts, CertsTopics has put together a complete collection of dumps questions and answers. To help you prepare and pass the PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor exam on your first attempt, we have compiled actual exam questions and their answers. 

Our (ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam) Study Materials are designed to meet the needs of thousands of candidates globally. A free sample of the CompTIA ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor test is available at CertsTopics. Before purchasing it, you can also see the PECB ISO-IEC-42001-Lead-Auditor practice exam demo.

ISO/IEC 42001:2023 Artificial Intelligence Management System Lead Auditor Exam Questions and Answers

Question 1

What among the below list of steps comes before the other ones in the management system audit process?

Options:

A.

Conducting the opening meeting

B.

Preparing the audit report

C.

Initiating the audit

D.

Performing document review

Buy Now
Question 2

Were VeridicAI’s action plans drafted appropriately? Refer to Scenario 8.

Scenario 8: VeridicAI. based in San Francisco. USA, specializes in market research using Al technologies to analyze customer behavior. Founded in 2023, the company

employs natural language processing, machine learning, and predictive analytics to provide real time insights to a range of businesses. VeridicAI has implemented an

artificial intelligence management system AIMS based on ISO/IEC 42001 to manage its Al technologies effectively. The AIMS scope includes select departments within

the company, for which it has received a four-year certification against ISO/IEC 42001. Committed to transparency. VeridicAI publicly shares details of this certification.

As the certification nears its end, VeridicAI is preparing for an audit to renew its certification.

The audit process was led by Sharona, the audit team leader, who is a full-time employee of the certification body. Sharona and the audit team undertook all planned

audit activities. Afterward, they organized the closing meeting with VeridicAl’s management. During the meeting, Sharona and the team made a recap on audit

objectives and scope, presented the audit findings and conclusions, presented identified nonconformities, and organized a session for questions and answers for the

auditee.

VeridicAI received a conditional recommendation for certification, underscoring its compliance with the industry's standards. Sharona confirmed that the company met

the essential requirements but noted some identified minor nonconformities. In response, VeridicAI compiled and submitted a comprehensive action plan that

addresses all identified nonconformities within a designated timeframe. Because of the comprehensive action plan, Sharona did not see the need for an additional on-

site visit to verify the effectiveness of the action plan.

Sharona played an integral role in the certification decision process. Her thorough understanding of VeridicAI's operations, gained from the audit, guided the

certification body towards a well-informed certification decision.

Options:

A.

Yes, a general action plan must be submitted, addressing all nonconformities simultaneously

B.

No, a general action plan must be submitted for all the minor nonconformities, whereas for major nonconformities, a separate action plan for each

C.

No, an action plan must be submitted separately for each nonconformity

Question 3

Did the audit team leader appropriately schedule the follow-up after the initial audit? Refer to scenario 9.

Scenario 9: ImoAl, headquartered in California. USA, provides Al solutions for various industries such as finance, healthcare, retail, and manufacturing. Its clients

include major financial institutions seeking Al powered fraud detection systems, healthcare providers leveraging Al for diagnostics and patient care, retailers

optimizing supply chain management with Al forecasting, and manufacturers enhancing production efficiency through Al-driven automation.

ImoAl has recently undergone a certification audit to ensure that its artificial intelligence management system AIMS is in compliance with ISO/IEC 42001. During the

audit, a major nonconformity related to data security protocols was identified, requiring urgent resolution. ImoAl swiftly initiated corrective actions to address the

major nonconformity. The audit follow-up, in agreement with the auditee, was scheduled six weeks after the initial audit. As part of exploring alternatives to audit

follow-up, the audit team leader chose to verify the effectiveness of the actions taken by the auditee by scheduling a specific visit to ImoAI's premises.

The follow-up audit involved a thorough evaluation of the effectiveness of these actions. The audit team leader thoroughly examined the corrections, corrective actions,

and root cause analysis conducted by ImoAl to assess whether they adequately addressed the nonconformity identified during the initial audit.

In conjunction with the external audit follow-up, ImoAl engaged its internal auditing team to oversee the progress of corrective actions. The AIMS manager of ImoAl

updated Ms. Rebecca Hayes, the internal auditor, on the status of corrections and corrective actions prompted by the nonconformity identified during the external

audit. Subsequently, Ms. Hayes thoroughly reviewed these measures, analyzing the corrections, root causes, and effectiveness of the implemented actions.

Upon satisfactory validation of the action plans, ImoAl was recommended for certification.

Options:

A.

Yes, the audit follow-up was scheduled six weeks after the initial audit

B.

No, the audit follow-up should have been scheduled immediately after the initial audit

C.

No, the audit follow-up should have been scheduled 15 weeks after the initial audit