Spring Sale 70% Discount Offer - Ends in 0d 00h 00m 00s - Coupon code: save70

PECB ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

Exam Code:
ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor
Exam Name:
QMS ISO 9001:2015 Lead Auditor Exam
Certification:
Vendor:
Questions:
249
Last Updated:
Feb 28, 2026
Exam Status:
Stable
PECB ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor

ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor: ISO 9001 Exam 2025 Study Guide Pdf and Test Engine

Are you worried about passing the PECB ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor (QMS ISO 9001:2015 Lead Auditor Exam) exam? Download the most recent PECB ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor braindumps with answers that are 100% real. After downloading the PECB ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor exam dumps training , you can receive 99 days of free updates, making this website one of the best options to save additional money. In order to help you prepare for the PECB ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor exam questions and verified answers by IT certified experts, CertsTopics has put together a complete collection of dumps questions and answers. To help you prepare and pass the PECB ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor exam on your first attempt, we have compiled actual exam questions and their answers. 

Our (QMS ISO 9001:2015 Lead Auditor Exam) Study Materials are designed to meet the needs of thousands of candidates globally. A free sample of the CompTIA ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor test is available at CertsTopics. Before purchasing it, you can also see the PECB ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor practice exam demo.

QMS ISO 9001:2015 Lead Auditor Exam Questions and Answers

Question 1

A person who provides specific knowledge or expertise to the audit team during the audit is known as a/an:

Options:

A.

Observer.

B.

Technical expert.

C.

Guide.

Buy Now
Question 2

During a second-party audit, the auditor examines the records that are available for the external provider, ABC Forgings, to whom manufacturing has recently been outsourced.

There are standard external provider checklists for three competitors for the contract and there are inspection records from the trial manufacturing batches produced by ABC Forgings. There is no documented evidence of the criteria used to confirm the appointment of ABC Forgings, and no contract or terms and conditions. Ongoing monitoring indicates that external provider performance is satisfactory, but no documented information has been retained.

Select two options for the evidence which demonstrates a nonconformity with clause 8.4 of ISO 9001.

Options:

A.

There was no documentation which provided evidence of any monitoring of the external provider.

B.

The auditee required the outsourced products on an urgent basis before the completion of the paperwork.

C.

The auditee did not retain documentation on the selection and evaluation of the external provider.

D.

The external provider asked for the contract details to be verbal only.

E.

There were no receipt inspection records of the incoming materials.

F.

The auditee trusted the external provider because of a long-standing relationship with them.

Question 3

Scenario 7: POLKA is a car manufacturing company based in Stockholm, Sweden. The company has around 14,000 employees working in different sectors which help with the design, painting, assembling, and test drives of the final product. The company is widely known for its qualitative products and affordable prices. In order to retain their reputation, POLKA implemented a quality management system (QMS) based on ISO 9001.

Before applying for certification, the company decided to conduct an internal audit to check whether there are any nonconformities in their QMS and if the requirements of ISO 9001 are being fulfilled. The top management appointed Sean, the internal auditor, as the team leader of the internal audit team. Sean required from the top management to have unrestricted access to the employees and executives of POLKA and to the documented information. Furthermore, Sean required to establish a team with a large number of auditors, considering the size and the complexity of the organization. The top management of POLKA agreed with Sean's requirements.

The top management, in cooperation with Sean, assigned 10 more employees to the audit team. Following that. Sean planned the audit activities and assigned the roles and responsibilities to each auditor. They began by interviewing employees of different manufacturing departments to check whether they are aware of the process of the QMS implementation. While conducting these activities, one of the auditors asked Sean for permission to audit the department in which he worked on a daily basis, as he was very familiar with the processes of the department.

Along the way, the teams findings showed that the staff were trained, documented information was updated, and the QMS fulfilled the requirements of ISO 9001. The internal audit took three weeks to complete, and on the last week the audit team held a final meeting

The team shared their results and together drafted the audit report This report was submitted to the top management of the company. The report was maintained as documented information, and was available to the relevant interested parties.

Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:

According to Scenario 7, one of the auditors requested permission from Sean to audit the department in which he worked on a daily basis. Should Sean grant the auditor permission?

Options:

A.

No, internal auditors should be independent of the processes being audited

B.

Yes, Sean should grant the auditor permission

C.

Yes, but Sean himself must be present in every audit activity