Pre-Summer Sale 70% Discount Offer - Ends in 0d 00h 00m 00s - Coupon code: save70

PECB ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

Exam Code:
ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor
Exam Name:
QMS ISO 9001:2015 Lead Auditor Exam
Certification:
Vendor:
Questions:
249
Last Updated:
Apr 27, 2026
Exam Status:
Stable
PECB ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor

ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor: ISO 9001 Exam 2025 Study Guide Pdf and Test Engine

Are you worried about passing the PECB ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor (QMS ISO 9001:2015 Lead Auditor Exam) exam? Download the most recent PECB ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor braindumps with answers that are 100% real. After downloading the PECB ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor exam dumps training , you can receive 99 days of free updates, making this website one of the best options to save additional money. In order to help you prepare for the PECB ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor exam questions and verified answers by IT certified experts, CertsTopics has put together a complete collection of dumps questions and answers. To help you prepare and pass the PECB ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor exam on your first attempt, we have compiled actual exam questions and their answers. 

Our (QMS ISO 9001:2015 Lead Auditor Exam) Study Materials are designed to meet the needs of thousands of candidates globally. A free sample of the CompTIA ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor test is available at CertsTopics. Before purchasing it, you can also see the PECB ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor practice exam demo.

QMS ISO 9001:2015 Lead Auditor Exam Questions and Answers

Question 1

You are carrying out an audit to ISO 9001 at an organisation which offers regulatory consultancy services to manufacturers of cosmetics.

You are interviewing the Technical Director (TD), who manages a team of regulatory experts responsible for providing regulatory services to customers.

You: "How do you ensure your regulatory team's competence concerning regulatory requirements is maintained?"

TD: "The two Regulatory Experts we employ full-time have years of experience of working in the cosmetics industry."

You: "How is their regulatory competence maintained?"

TD: "They are dedicated individuals with lots of contacts in the sector."

You: "How does the business enable them to maintain their understanding of current regulatory requirements?"

TD: "We leave that up to them."

Options:

Buy Now
Question 2

XYZ Corporation is an organisation that employs 100 people. As audit team leader, you are conducting a

certification audit at Stage 1. When reviewing the quality management system (QMS) documentation, you

find that quality objectives have been set for every employee in the organisation except top management.

The Quality Manager complains that this has created a lot of resistance to the QMS, and the Chief Executive

is asking questions about how much it will cost. He asks for your opinion on whether this is the correct

method of setting objectives.

Three months after Stage 1, you return to XYZ Corporation to conduct a Stage 2 certification audit as Audit

Team Leader with one other auditor. You find that the Quality Manager has cancelled the previous quality

objectives for all employees and replaced them with a single objective for himself. This states that "The

Quality Manager will drive multiple improvements in the QMS in the next year". The Quality Manager indicates

that this gives him the authority to issue instructions to department managers when quality improvement is

needed. He says that this approach has the full backing of senior management. He shows you the latest

Quality Improvement Request that was included in the last management review.

After further auditing, the issues below were found. Select two statements that apply to the term

`nonconformity'.

Options:

A.

No quality objectives planned for the top management team

B.

Decisions on improvement action timescales not involving departmental managers.

C.

Evaluation of the results of the improvement action not always documented by the Quality Manager.

D.

Limited knowledge of the content of Quality Improvement Requests by departmental staff.

E.

Quality improvements not aligning with the quality policy.

F.

Top management claim not to be aware of the improvement request (QI/12/20/HR-3) initiated by the Quality Manager.

Question 3

Scenario 6: Davis Clinic (DC) is an American medical center focused on integrated health care. Since its establishment DC was committed to providing qualitative services for its clients, which is the reason why the company decided to implement a quality management system (QMS) based on ISO 9001. After a year of having an active QMS in place, DC applied for a certification audit.

A team of five auditors, from a well-known certification body, was selected to conduct the audit. Eva was appointed as the audit team leader. After three days of auditing, the team gathered to review and examine their findings. They also discussed the audit findings with DC's top management and then drafted the audit conclusions.

In the closing meeting, which was held between the audit team and the top management of DC. Eva presented two nonconformities that were detected during the audit. Eva stated that the company did not retain documented information regarding its outsourced services for an analysis laboratory and regarding the conducted management reviews. During the closing meeting, the audit team required from DCs top management to come up with corrective action plans within two weeks. Although the top management did not agree with the audit findings, the audit team insisted that the auditee must submit corrective actions within the given time frame in order for the audit activities to continue.

Once the action plans were evaluated, the audit team began preparing the audit report. Eva required from the team to provide accurate descriptions of the audit findings and the audit conclusions. The report was then distributed to all the interested parties involved in the audit, including the certification body Based on the report, the certification body together with Eva, as the audit team leader, made the certification decision.

Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:

The audit team delayed audit activities until DC’s top management submitted their action plans. Is this acceptable?

Options:

A.

No, the audit report should be prepared and submitted to the certification body prior to the submission of action plans by the auditee

B.

Yes, the audit report can be prepared once the auditee submits the action plans in cases of minor nonconformities

C.

Yes, DC’s top management promised the submission of action plans within a short period of time