PECB ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

The nonconformity was raised against ISO 9001:2015 Clause 8.5.1 – Control of production and service provision. This clause requires organisations to carry out production and service provision under controlled conditions, including:

the use of suitable infrastructure and equipment,

the availability and use of appropriate monitoring and control, and

the prevention of nonconforming outputs being delivered to customers.

In this scenario, the evidence shows a systemic failure in operational control, not isolated human error.

Explanation of the selected evidence:

E. The organisation failed to control the laundry operations in 5 shops adequately.

Clause 8.5.1 requires consistent control of service provision. The fact that 80% of complaints come from five specific shops demonstrates a lack of effective operational control in those locations.

G. The organisation failed to maintain all of its equipment to an adequate standard.

Clause 8.5.1 requires suitable infrastructure for service provision. Management acknowledged that equipment in these shops is old and cannot currently be replaced, meaning it is not being maintained at a level necessary to ensure conformity of service.

H. Some equipment used was not suitable for the laundry process.

The poor cleaning outcomes and high complaint levels directly indicate that the equipment is not fit for purpose, which is a clear breach of the requirement to provide suitable resources for controlled service provision under Clause 8.5.1.

Explanation of why the other options are not appropriate evidence for Clause 8.5.1:

A relates to strategic planning and investment decisions, not directly to operational control.

B and C relate to inspection activities, which were not evidenced in the scenario.

D and F relate to complaint handling behaviour, which would align more closely with Clause 9.1.2 (customer satisfaction) or Clause 10.2 (nonconformity and corrective action), not Clause 8.5.1.

ISO-aligned conclusion:

The nonconformity is justified because the organisation is continuing to provide services using unsuitable and inadequately maintained equipment, resulting in repeated service failures in multiple locations. This demonstrates a clear failure to control service provision as required by ISO 9001:2015 Clause 8.5.1, supported by evidence E, G and H.

The auditor could raise the following nonconformities to ISO 9001 based on the scenario:

•Option A: 10.3 - The organisation did not continuously improve. Reject rates were unchanged. This option is correct because ISO 9001:2015 clause 10.3 requires the organization to improve the suitability, adequacy and effectiveness of the quality management system. The organization did not demonstrate any improvement in reducing the reject rate of the finished product, which was a stated objective of top management. The corrective action taken by the organization was not effective in addressing the root cause of the problem and preventing its recurrence.

•Option B: 7.1.4 - The factory environment is not suitably maintained to prevent dirty products. This option is correct because ISO 9001:2015 clause 7.1.4 requires the organization to determine, provide and maintain the environment necessary for the operation of its processes and to achieve conformity of products and services. The organization did not ensure that the factory floor was clean and dry, which affected the quality of the products and increased the risk of nonconformity.

•Option C: 7.1.1 - The organization failed to provide the required resources to prevent nonconforming products. This option is correct because ISO 9001:2015 clause 7.1.1 requires the organization to determine and provide the resources needed for the establishment, implementation, maintenance and continual improvement of the quality management system. The organization did not provide adequate collection baskets for the products ejecting from the moulding machines, which resulted in products falling onto the factory floor and becoming nonconforming.

The following options are not correct:

•Option D: 9.2.2 - Report IA202 contained a poorly worded nonconformity (NC 3). This option is not correct because ISO 9001:2015 clause 9.2.2 does not specify the requirements for the wording of nonconformities in internal audit reports. The nonconformity (NC 3) stated by the internal auditor was clear and relevant to the audit criteria and audit evidence. The issue is not with the report, but with the corrective action taken by the organization.

•Option E: 8.6 - Dirty products were released to the customer. This option is not correct because ISO 9001:2015 clause 8.6 requires the organization to implement planned arrangements, at appropriate stages, to verify that the product and service requirements have been met. The scenario does not indicate that the dirty products were released to the customer, but that they were recalled and repaired then returned to the customers. The issue is not with the release, but with the production process and the environment.

•Option F: 7.3 - Staff were not aware that products were falling onto the factory floor. This option is not correct because ISO 9001:2015 clause 7.3 requires the organization to ensure that the persons doing work under its control are aware of the quality policy, relevant quality objectives, their contribution to the effectiveness of the quality management system, and the implications of not conforming with the quality management system requirements. The scenario does not indicate that the staff were not aware of these aspects, but that the management did not provide adequate resources and environment for the staff to perform their work. The issue is not with the awareness, but with the management responsibility and resource provision.

•Option G: 10.2.1 - Conduct of an investigation was not sufficient to understand the cause of the nonconformity. This option is not correct because ISO 9001:2015 clause 10.2.1 requires the organization to react to the nonconformity and, as applicable, take action to control and correct it and deal with the consequences. The scenario indicates that the Quality Manager conducted an investigation into the reject rates and identified the cause of the nonconformity. The issue is not with the investigation, but with the corrective action taken by the management.

•Option H: 8.5.1 - Production operations were not properly controlled to avoid reject products. This option is not correct because ISO 9001:2015 clause 8.5.1 requires the organization to implement production and service provision under controlled conditions. The scenario indicates that the production operations were controlled by the moulding machines, which ejected the products into the collection baskets. The issue is not with the production operations, but with the size of the collection baskets and the condition of the factory floor.

In the context of a third-party certification audit, match the roles with the following responsibilities:

Responsibilities:

Conduct the audit to the assigned area.= Auditors

Assist the auditors in identifying personnel to participate in the audit.= Guide

Assign each team member’s responsibility for the audit.= Audit team leader

Respond to questions and provide evidence to the auditor.= Auditee

According to ISO 19011:2018, clause 3, the definitions of the roles are as follows1:

Auditors: persons with the competence to conduct an audit

Guide: person appointed by the auditee to assist the audit team

Auditee: organization being audited

Audit team leader: member of an audit team appointed to manage the audit or an audit team

Therefore, the roles can be matched to the responsibilities based on these definitions and the description of the audit process in clause 6 of the standard1.