PECB ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

Match each of the following statements into the table below to show whether they apply to first-party audits, second-party audits or third-party audits:

Scenario 7: POLKA is a car manufacturing company based in Stockholm, Sweden. The company has around 14,000 employees working in different sectors which help with the design, painting, assembling, and test drives of the final product. The company is widely known for its qualitative products and affordable prices. In order to retain their reputation, POLKA implemented a quality management system (QMS) based on ISO 9001.

Before applying for certification, the company decided to conduct an internal audit to check whether there are any nonconformities in their QMS and if the requirements of ISO 9001 are being fulfilled. The top management appointed Sean, the internal auditor, as the team leader of the internal audit team. Sean required from the top management to have unrestricted access to the employees and executives of POLKA and to the documented information. Furthermore, Sean required to establish a team with a large number of auditors, considering the size and the complexity of the organization. The top management of POLKA agreed with Sean's requirements.

The top management, in cooperation with Sean, assigned 10 more employees to the audit team. Following that. Sean planned the audit activities and assigned the roles and responsibilities to each auditor. They began by interviewing employees of different manufacturing departments to check whether they are aware of the process of the QMS implementation. While conducting these activities, one of the auditors asked Sean for permission to audit the department in which he worked on a daily basis, as he was very familiar with the processes of the department.

Along the way, the teams findings showed that the staff were trained, documented information was updated, and the QMS fulfilled the requirements of ISO 9001. The internal audit took three weeks to complete, and on the last week the audit team held a final meeting

The team shared their results and together drafted the audit report This report was submitted to the top management of the company. The report was maintained as documented information, and was available to the relevant interested parties.

Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:

According to Scenario 7, one of the auditors requested permission from Sean to audit the department in which he worked on a daily basis. Should Sean grant the auditor permission?

At the end of a second-party audit, the audit team enters the meeting room to hold the closing meeting; only

two people are present and waiting for them: the Health and Safety supervisor and the Administrative Officer.

Neither has participated in the audit. However, the team had previously agreed with the auditee Quality

Manager on two nonconformities identified during the audit (NC1 and NC2).

They said:

Health and Safety Supervisor: "Good evening. We are sorry to inform you that the general manager was

involved in a serious car accident, and the other two managers have had to leave urgently to attend to the

emergency."

The Administration Officer: "Concerning 'nonconformity 2', the General Manager left a message asking us

to tell you that he does not accept it and requests you not to include it in the audit report. Here is a note in

which he explains why."

Which one of the following would be your preferred answer (as team leader) to the General

Manager's request?