Understanding Clause 6.2 of ISO 9001:2015:Clause 6.2 (Quality Objectives and Planning to Achieve Them) specifies that organizations must:
Establish measurable and relevant quality objectives consistent with the quality policy (Clause 6.2.1).
Include objectives applicable to product/service conformity and customer satisfaction.
Document these objectives and their planning as documented information (Clause 6.2.1 & 6.2.2).
Plan how to achieve the objectives, including defining actions, resources, responsibilities, timelines, and methods for evaluation.
Analysis of Options:
A. Quality objectives are not being implemented by the organisation's personnel:Incorrect. While implementation is critical, this relates more to operational aspects rather than the direct requirements of Clause 6.2. Implementation issues would typically raise concerns under Clause 9.1 (Performance Evaluation).
B. The consultant has not interpreted ISO 9001 correctly:Incorrect. The consultant's interpretation of ISO 9001 is irrelevant in terms of Clause 6.2 compliance. The focus is on whether the organization aligns with the requirements, not the consultant's role.
C. Establishing quality objectives did not include top management:Incorrect. While top management involvement is vital for QMS effectiveness (Clause 5.1), this is not a direct requirement of Clause 6.2. Top management alignment is implied but not explicitly mandated for establishing quality objectives.
D. Quality objectives were not established in alignment with the organisation's quality policy:Correct. Clause 6.2.1 requires that quality objectives be consistent with the organization’s quality policy, ensuring they reflect its purpose, strategic direction, and commitment to continual improvement. Misalignment would constitute a nonconformity.
E. The organisation cannot afford to undertake quality objectives all at once:Incorrect. Financial constraints are not directly addressed in Clause 6.2. The clause focuses on planning to achieve objectives, which includes defining the necessary resources but does not demand achieving all objectives simultaneously.
F. Quality objectives are not maintained as documented information:Correct. Clause 6.2.1 specifically requires that quality objectives be maintained as documented information. Failure to document the objectives is a direct violation of this clause.
Why Options D and F Are Correct:
D: Misalignment between the quality objectives and the quality policy directly violates Clause 6.2.1, which mandates that objectives support the strategic direction of the organization.
F: Lack of documentation for quality objectives breaches the requirement to maintain them as documented information under Clause 6.2.1.
Relevant References:
Clause 6.2.1: Establishing quality objectives aligned with the quality policy.
Clause 6.2.2: Maintaining documented information for quality objectives and planning to achieve them.
Clause 5.1.1: Top management's responsibility to ensure alignment between the QMS and strategic direction.
