Selected Professional-Machine-Learning-Engineer Machine Learning Engineer Questions Answers

The best option to serve the model while optimizing cost, user experience, and ease of management is to deploy the model to Vertex AI Prediction, which is a managed service that can scale up or down according to the demand and provide low latency and high availability. Vertex AI Prediction can also handle TensorFlow models natively, without requiring any additional steps or conversions. By using batch prediction, the model can process large volumes of data efficiently and periodically, without affecting the user experience. The data can be read from Cloud Bigtable, which is a scalable and performant NoSQL database that can store user data in a flexible schema. The predictions can then be pushed to Cloud SQL, which is a fully managed relational database that can store the predictions in a structured format and enable easy querying and analysis. This option also simplifies the management of the model and the data, as it leverages the existing Google Cloud services and does not require any additional infrastructure or code.

The other options are not optimal for the following reasons:

• A. Importing the model into BigQuery ML is not a good option, as it requires converting the TensorFlow model into a format that BigQuery ML can understand, which can introduce errors and reduce the performance. Moreover, BigQuery ML is not designed for serving real-time predictions, but rather for training and evaluating models using SQL queries. Reading and writing data from BigQuery and Cloud SQL can also incur additional costs and latency, as they are both relational databases that require schema definition and data transformation.
• C. Embedding the model in the mobile application is not a good option, as it increases the size and complexity of the application, and requires updating the application every time the model changes. Moreover, it exposes the model to the users, which can pose security and privacy risks, as well as potential misuse or abuse. Additionally, it does not leverage the benefits of the cloud, such as scalability, reliability, and performance.
• D. Embedding the model in the streaming Dataflow pipeline is not a good option, as it requires building and maintaining a custom pipeline that can handle the model inference and data processing. This can increase the development and operational costs and complexity, as well as the potential for errors and failures. Moreover, it does not take advantage of the batch prediction feature of Vertex AI Prediction, which can optimize the resource utilization and cost efficiency.

References:

• Professional ML Engineer Exam Guide
• Preparing for Google Cloud Certification: Machine Learning Engineer Professional Certificate
• Google Cloud launches machine learning engineer certification
• Vertex AI Prediction documentation
• Cloud Bigtable documentation
• Cloud SQL documentation

 Sentiment analysis is the process of identifying and extracting the emotions, opinions, and attitudes expressed in a text or speech. Sentiment analysis can help businesses understand their customers’ feedback, satisfaction, and preferences. There are different approaches to building a sentiment analysis tool, depending on the input data and the output format. Some of the common approaches are:

• Extracting sentiment directly from the voice recordings: This approach involves using acoustic features, such as pitch, intensity, and prosody, to infer the sentiment of the speaker. This approach can capture the nuances and subtleties of the vocal expression, but it also requires a large and diverse dataset of labeled voice recordings, which may not be easily available or accessible. Moreover, this approach may not account for the semantic and contextual information of the speech, which can also affect the sentiment.
• Converting the speech to text and building a model based on the words: This approach involves using automatic speech recognition (ASR) to transcribe the voice recordings into text, and then using lexical features, such as word frequency, polarity, and valence, to infer the sentiment of the text. This approach can leverage the existing text-based sentiment analysis models and tools, but it also introduces some challenges, such as the accuracy and reliability of the ASR system, the ambiguity and variability of the natural language, and the loss of the acoustic information of the speech.
• Converting the speech to text and extracting sentiments based on the sentences: This approach involves using ASR to transcribe the voice recordings into text, and then using syntactic and semantic features, such as sentence structure, word order, and meaning, to infer the sentiment of the text. This approach can capture the higher-level and complex aspects of the natural language, such as negation, sarcasm, and irony, which can affect the sentiment. However, this approach also requires more sophisticated and advanced natural language processing techniques, such as parsing, dependency analysis, and semantic role labeling, which may not be readily available or easy to implement.
• Converting the speech to text and extracting sentiment using syntactical analysis: This approach involves using ASR to transcribe the voice recordings into text, and then using syntactical analysis, such as part-of-speech tagging, phrase chunking, and constituency parsing, to infer the sentiment of the text. This approach can identify the grammatical and structural elements of the natural language, such as nouns, verbs, adjectives, and clauses, which can indicate the sentiment. However, this approach may not account for the pragmatic and contextual information of the speech, such as the speaker’s intention, tone, and situation, which can also influence the sentiment.

For the use case of building a sentiment analysis tool that predicts customer sentiment from recorded phone conversations, the best approach is to convert the speech to text and extract sentiments based on the sentences. This approach can balance the trade-offs between the accuracy, complexity, and feasibility of the sentiment analysis tool, while ensuring that the gender, age, and cultural differences of the customers who called the contact center do not impact any stage of the model development pipeline and results. This approach can also handle different types and levels of sentiment, such as polarity (positive, negative, or neutral), intensity (strong or weak), and emotion (anger, joy, sadness, etc.). Therefore, converting the speech to text and extracting sentiments based on the sentences is the best approach for this use case.

TFRecords are a binary file format that can store large amounts of data efficiently. By converting the images to TFRecords and storing them in a Cloud Storage bucket, you can reduce the data size and improve the data transfer speed. You can then read the TFRecords by using the tf.data.TFRecordDataset function, which creates a dataset of tensors from the TFRecord files. This way, you can read images at scale during training while minimizing data I/O bottlenecks. References:

• TFRecord documentation
• tf.data.TFRecordDataset documentation
• Preparing for Google Cloud Certification: Machine Learning Engineer Professional Certificate

• Option A is incorrect because training a time-series model to predict the machines’ performance values, and configuring an alert if a machine’s actual performance values significantly differ from the predicted performance values, is not the best way to build a predictive maintenance solution that uses monitoring data from the VMs to detect potential failures and then alerts the service desk team. This option assumes that the performance values follow a predictable pattern, which may not be the case for complex systems. Moreover, this option does not use any historical incident data, which may contain useful information for identifying failures. Furthermore, this option does not involve any model evaluation or validation, which are essential steps for ensuring the quality and reliability of the model.
• Option B is correct because implementing a simple heuristic (e.g., based on z-score) to label the machines’ historical performance data, and training a model to predict anomalies based on this labeled dataset, is a reasonable way to build a predictive maintenance solution that uses monitoring data from the VMs to detect potential failures and then alerts the service desk team. This option uses a simple and fast method to label the historical performance data, which is necessary for supervised learning. A z-score is a measure of how many standard deviations a value is away from the mean of a distribution1. By using a z-score, we can label the performance values that are unusually high or low as anomalies, which may indicate failures. Then, we can train a model to learn the patterns of normal and anomalous performance values, and use it to predict anomalies on new data. We can also evaluate and validate the model using metrics such as precision, recall, or F1-score, and compare it with other models or methods.
• Option C is incorrect because developing a simple heuristic (e.g., based on z-score) to label the machines’ historical performance data, and testing this heuristic in a production environment, is not a safe way to build a predictive maintenance solution that uses monitoring data from the VMs to detect potential failures and then alerts the service desk team. This option does not involve any model training or evaluation, which are essential steps for ensuring the quality and reliability of the solution. Moreover, this option does not test the heuristic on a separate dataset, such as a validation or test set, before deploying it to production, which may lead to errors or failures in the production environment.
• Option D is incorrect because hiring a team of qualified analysts to review and label the machines’ historical performance data, and training a model based on this manually labeled dataset, is not a feasible way to build a predictive maintenance solution that uses monitoring data from the VMs to detect potential failures and then alerts the service desk team. This option may produce high-quality labels, but it is also costly, time-consuming, and prone to human errors or biases. Moreover, this option may not scale well with large or complex datasets, which may require more analysts or more time to label.

References:

• Z-score
• [Predictive maintenance]
• [Anomaly detection]
• [Time-series analysis]
• [Model evaluation]