Machine Learning Engineer Professional-Machine-Learning-Engineer Release Date

 The best option for determining how often to retrain your model to maintain a high level of performance while minimizing cost is to run training-serving skew detection batch jobs every few days. Training-serving skew refers to the discrepancy between the distributions of the features in the training dataset and the serving data. This can cause the model to perform poorly on the new data, as it is not representative of the data that the model was trained on. By running training-serving skew detection batch jobs, you can monitor the changes in the feature distributions over time, and identify when the skew becomes significant enough to affect the model performance. If skew is detected, you can send the most recent serving data to the labeling service, and use the labeled data to retrain your model. This option has the following benefits:

• It allows you to retrain your model only when necessary, based on the actual data changes, rather than on a fixed schedule or a heuristic. This can save you the cost of the labeling service and the retraining process, and also avoid overfitting or underfitting your model.
• It leverages the existing tools and frameworks for training-serving skew detection, such as TensorFlow Data Validation (TFDV) and Vertex Data Labeling. TFDV is a library that can compute and visualize descriptive statistics for your datasets, and compare the statistics across different datasets. Vertex Data Labeling is a service that can label your data with high quality and low latency, using either human labelers or automated labelers.
• It integrates well with the MLOps practices, such as continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD), which can automate the workflow of running the skew detection jobs, sending the data to the labeling service, retraining the model, and deploying the new model version.

The other options are less optimal for the following reasons:

• Option A: Training an anomaly detection model on the training dataset, and running all incoming requests through this model, introduces additional complexity and overhead. This option requires building and maintaining a separate model for anomaly detection, which can be challenging and time-consuming. Moreover, this option requires running the anomaly detection model on every request, which can increase the latency and resource consumption of the prediction service. Additionally, this option may not capture the subtle changes in the feature distributions that can affect the model performance, as anomalies are usually defined as rare or extreme events.
• Option B: Identifying temporal patterns in your model’s performance over the previous year, and creating a schedule for sending serving data to the labeling service for the next year, introduces additional assumptions and risks. This option requires analyzing the historical data and model performance, and finding the patterns that can explain the variations in the model performance over time. However, this can be difficult and unreliable, as the patterns may not be consistent or predictable, and may depend on various factors that are not captured by the data. Moreover, this option requires creating a schedule based on the past patterns, which may not reflect the future changes in the data or the environment. This can lead to either sending too much or too little data to the labeling service, resulting in either wasted cost or degraded performance.
• Option C: Comparing the cost of the labeling service with the lost revenue due to model performance degradation over the past year, and adjusting the frequency of model retraining accordingly, introduces additional challenges and trade-offs. This option requires estimating the cost of the labeling service and the lost revenue due to model performance degradation, which can be difficult and inaccurate, as they may depend on various factors that are not easily quantifiable or measurable. Moreover, this option requires finding the optimal balance between the cost and the performance, which can be subjective and variable, as different stakeholders may have different preferences and expectations. Furthermore, this option may not account for the potential impact of the model performance degradation on other aspects of the business, such as customer satisfaction, retention, or loyalty.

AI Platform Notebooks is a service that provides managed Jupyter notebooks for data science and machine learning. You can use AI Platform Notebooks to create, run, and share your code and analysis in a collaborative and interactive environment1. BigQuery is a service that allows you to analyze large-scale and complex data using SQL queries. You can use BigQuery to stream, store, and query your data in a fast and cost-effective way2. Pandas is a popular Python library that provides data structures and tools for data analysis and manipulation. You can use pandas to create, manipulate, and visualize dataframes, which are tabular data structures with rows and columns3.

AI Platform Notebooks provides a cell magic, %%bigquery, that allows you to run SQL queries on BigQuery data and ingest the results as a pandas dataframe. A cell magic is a special command that applies to the whole cell in a Jupyter notebook. The %%bigquery cell magic can take various arguments, such as the name of the destination dataframe, the name of the destination table in BigQuery, the project ID, and the query parameters4. By using the %%bigquery cell magic, you can query the data in BigQuery with minimal code and manipulate the results with pandas in AI Platform Notebooks. This is the most convenient and efficient way to achieve your goal.

The other options are not as good as option A, because they involve more steps, more code, and more manual effort. Option B requires you to export your table as a CSV file from BigQuery to Google Drive, and then use the Google Drive API to ingest the file into your notebook instance. This option is cumbersome and time-consuming, as it involves moving the data across different services and formats. Option C requires you to download your table from BigQuery as a local CSV file, and then upload it to your AI Platform notebook instance. This option is also inefficient and impractical, as it involves downloading and uploading large files, which can take a long time and consume a lot of bandwidth. Option D requires you to use a bash cell in your AI Platform notebook to export the table as a CSV file to Cloud Storage, and then copy the data into the notebook. This option is also complex and unnecessary, as it involves using different commands and tools to move the data around. Therefore, option A is the best option for this use case.

References:

• AI Platform Notebooks documentation
• BigQuery documentation
• pandas documentation
• Using Jupyter magics to query BigQuery data

• Monitoring model performance is an essential part of production readiness, as it allows the team to detect and address any issues that may arise after deployment, such as data drift, model degradation, or errors.
• Other Options:

According to the web search results, TensorFlow Extended (TFX) is a platform for building end-to-end machine learning pipelines using TensorFlow1. TFX provides a set of components that can be orchestrated using either the TFX SDK or Kubeflow Pipelines. TFX components can handle different aspects of the pipeline, such as data ingestion, data validation, data transformation, model training, model evaluation, model serving, and more. TFX components can also leverage other Google Cloud services, such as Dataflow2 and Vertex AI3. Dataflow is a fully managed service for running Apache Beam pipelines on Google Cloud. Dataflow handles the provisioning and management of the compute resources, as well as the optimization and execution of the pipelines. Vertex AI is a unified platform for machine learning development and deployment. Vertex AI offers various services and tools for building, managing, and serving machine learning models. Therefore, option D is the best way to create a low maintenance, automated workflow for the given use case, as it allows you to use the TFX SDK to define and execute your pipeline components, and use Dataflow and Vertex AI services to scale and optimize your pipeline. The other options are not relevant or optimal for this scenario. References:

• TensorFlow Extended
• Dataflow
• Vertex AI
• Google Professional Machine Learning Certification Exam 2023
• Latest Google Professional Machine Learning Engineer Actual Free Exam Questions