Machine Learning Engineer Professional-Machine-Learning-Engineer Book

 Comparing the training and evaluation losses of the current run is a good way to check if the model is overfitting or underfitting. If the losses are similar, it means that the model is generalizing well and can be deployed to a Vertex AI endpoint. Vertex AI endpoint is a service that allows you to serve your ML models online and scale them automatically. By using a training/serving skew threshold model monitoring, you can detect if there is a significant difference between the data used for training and the data used for serving. This can indicate that the model is becoming stale or inaccurate over time. When the model monitoring threshold is triggered, it means that the model needs to be retrained with the latest data. By redeploying the pipeline, you can automate the retraining process and update the model with the new data. This way, you can minimize the cost of retraining and ensure that your model is always up-to-date and accurate.  References :

Vertex AI documentation

Vertex AI endpoint documentation

Model monitoring documentation

Preparing for Google Clo ud Certification: Machine Learning Engineer Professional Certificate

The most likely problem is that the tables that you created to hold your training and validation records share some records, and you may not be using all the data in your initial table. This is because the RAND() function generates a random number between 0 and 1 for each row, and the probability of a row being in both the training and validation tables is 0.2 * 0.8 = 0.16, which is not negligible. This means that some of the records that you use to validate your model are also used to train your model, which can lead to overfitting and poor generalization. Moreover, the probability of a row being in neither the training nor the validation table is 0.2 * 0.2 = 0.04, which means that you are wasting some of the data in your initial table and reducing the size of your datasets. A better way to split your data into training and validation sets is to use a hash function on a unique identifier column, such as the following queries:

CREATE OR REPLACE TABLE ‘myproject.mydataset.training‘ AS (SELECT * FROM ‘myproject.mydataset.mytable‘ WHERE MOD(FARM_FINGERPRINT(id), 10) < 8); CREATE OR REPLACE TABLE ‘myproject.mydataset.validation‘ AS (SELECT * FROM ‘myproject.mydataset.mytable‘ WHERE MOD(FARM_FINGERPRINT(id), 10) > = 8);

This way, you can ensure that each row has a fixed 80% chance of being in the training table and a 20% chance of being in the validation table, without any overlap or omission.

Option A is incorrect because creating a collaborative filtering system that recommends articles to a user based on the user’s past behavior is not the best approach to suggest articles that are similar to the articles they are currently reading.  Collaborative filtering is a method of recommendation that uses the ratings or prefe rences of other users to predict the preferences of a target user 1 . However, this method does not consider the content or features of the articles, and may not be able to find articles that are similar in terms of topic, style, or sentiment.

Option B is correct because encoding all articles into vectors using word2vec, and building a model that returns articles based on vector similarity is a suitable approach to suggest articles that are similar to the articles they are currently reading.  Word2vec is a technique that learns low-dimensional and dense representations of words from a large corpus o f text, such that words that are semantically similar have similar vectors 2 . By applying word2vec to the articles, we can obtain vector representations of the articles that capture their meaning and usage.  Then, we can use a similarity measure, such as cosine similarity, to find articles that have similar vectors to the current article 3 .

Option C is incorrect because building a logistic regression model for each user that predicts whether an article should be recommended to a user is not a feasible approach to suggest articles that are similar to the articles they are currently reading.  Logistic regression is a supervised learning method that models the probability of a binary outcome (such as recommend or not) based on some input features (such as user prof ile or article content) 4 . However, this method requires a large amount of labeled data for each user, which may not be available or scalable. Moreover, this method does not directly measure the similarity between articles, but rather the likelihood of a user’s preference.

Option D is incorrect because manually labeling a few hundred articles, and then training an SVM classifier based on the manually classified articles that categorizes additional articles into their respective categories is not an effective approach to suggest articles that are similar to the articles they are currently reading.  SVM (support vector machine) is a supervised learning method that finds a hyperplane that separates the data into different classes (such as news categories) with the maximum margin 5 . However, this method also requires a large amount of labeled data, which may be costly and time-consuming to obtain. Moreover, this method does not account for the fine-grained similarity between articles within the same category, or the cross-category similarity between articles from different categories.

The best option to build a comprehensive system that recommends images to users that are similar in appearance to their own uploaded images is to download a pretrained convolutional neural network (CNN), and use the model to generate embeddings of the input images. Embeddings are low-dimensional representations of high-dimensional data that capture the essential features and semantics of the data. By using a pretrained CNN, you can leverage the knowledge learned from large-scale image datasets, such as ImageNet, and apply it to your own domain. A pretrained CNN can be used as a feature extractor, where the output of the last hidden layer (or any intermediate layer) is taken as the embedding vector for the input image. You can then measure the similarity between embeddings using a distance metric, such as cosine similarity or Euclidean distance, and recommend images that have the highest similarity scores to the user’s uploaded image. Option A is incorrect because downloading a pretrained CNN and fine-tuning the model to predict hashtags based on the input images may not capture the visual similarity of the images, as hashtags may not reflect the appearance of the images accurately. For example, two images of different breeds of dogs may have the same hashtag #dog, but they may not look similar to each other. Moreover, fine-tuning the model may require additional data and computational resources, and it may not generalize well to new images that have different or missing hashtags. Option B is incorrect because retrieving image labels and dominant colors from the input images using the Vision API may not capture the visual similarity of the images, as labels and colors may not reflect the fine-grained details of the images. For example, two images of the same breed of dog may have different labels and colors depending on the background, lighting, and angle of the image. Moreover, using the Vision API may incur additional costs and latency, and it may not be able to handle custom or domain-specific labels. Option C is incorrect because using the provided hashtags to create a collaborative filtering algorithm may not capture the visual similarity of the images, as collaborative filtering relies on the ratings or preferences of users, not the features of the images. For example, two images of different animals may have similar ratings or preferences from users, but they may not look similar to each other. Moreover, collaborative filtering may suffer from the cold start problem, where new images or users that have no ratings or preferences cannot be recommended. References:

Image similarity search with TensorFlow

Image embeddings documentation

Pretrained models documentation

Similarity metrics documentation