Isaca Certification CISM Release Date

Information security governance is the process of establishing and maintaining a framework to provide assurance that information security strategies are aligned with business objectives and consistent with applicable laws and regulations. In addition to executive sponsorship and business alignment, a critical factor for effective information security governance is ownership of security, which means that the roles and responsibilities for information security are clearly defined and assigned to the appropriate stakeholders, such as business owners, information owners, information custodians, and users. Ownership of security also implies accountability for the protection of information assets and the management of security risks. References:

 According to the CISM Review Manual, the information security manager’s best course of action when security controls may no longer be adequate due to changes in the organization’s environment is to perform a new risk assessment. A risk assessment is a process of identifying, analyzing, and evaluating the risks that affect the organization’s information assets and business processes. A risk assessment should be performed periodically or whenever there are significant changes in the organization’s environment, such as new threats, vulnerabilities, technologies, regulations, or business objectives. A risk assessment helps to determine the current level of risk exposure and the adequacy of existing security controls. A risk assessment also provides the basis for developing or updating the risk treatment plan, which defines the appropriate risk responses, such as implementing new or enhanced security controls, transferring the risk to a third party, accepting the risk, or avoiding the risk.

The other options are not the best course of action in this scenario. Reviewing the previous risk assessment and countermeasures may not reflect the current state of the organization’s environment and may not identify new or emerging risks. Evaluating countermeasures to mitigate new risks may be premature without performing a new risk assessment to identify and prioritize the risks. Transferring the new risk to a third party may not be feasible or cost-effective without performing a new risk assessment to evaluate the risk level and the available risk transfer options.

References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, Chapter 2, Section 1, pages 43-45.

The ultimate goal of an anti-phishing campaign is to reduce the risk and impact of phishing attacks on the organization. Therefore, the most relevant and reliable indicator of the effectiveness of an anti-phishing campaign is the decreased number of incidents that have occurred as a result of phishing. This metric shows how well the employees have learned to recognize and report phishing emails, and how well the security controls have prevented or mitigated the damage caused by phishing.

References = Five Ways to Achieve a Successful Anti-Phishing Campaign; Don’t click: towards an effective anti-phishing training. A comparative literature review; CISA, NSA, FBI, MS-ISAC Publish Guide on Preventing Phishing Intrusions

The most important issue in a penetration test is having a defined goal as well as success and failure criteria. A penetration test is a simulated cyber attack against a computer system or an application to check for exploitable vulnerabilities. The goal of a penetration test is to identify and evaluate the security risks and weaknesses of the target system or application, and to provide recommendations for improvement. The success and failure criteria of a penetration test are the metrics and indicators that measure the effectiveness and efficiency of the test, and the extent to which the test achieves its goal. By having a defined goal as well as success and failure criteria, the penetration tester can plan and execute the test in a systematic and structured manner, and can communicate and report the results and findings in a clear and concise way. The other options are not the most important issue in a penetration test, although they may be some factors or considerations that affect the test. Having an independent group perform the test is a desirable practice, as it can provide an unbiased and objective assessment of the target system or application. However, it is not essential, as long as the penetration tester follows ethical hacking principles and standards. Obtaining permission from audit is a mandatory requirement, as it ensures that the penetration test is authorized and compliant with the organization’s policies and regulations. However, it is not an issue, as it is a prerequisite for conducting the test. Performing the test without the benefit of any insider knowledge is an optional approach, as it simulates a real-world attack by an external hacker who does not have access to the internal design or configuration of the target system or application. However, it is not always feasible or effective, as some vulnerabilities may be hidden or inaccessible from an outsider’s perspective.