New Release CISM Isaca Certification Questions

 Ensuring current documentation of security processes is the best way to support information security management in the event of organizational changes in security personnel. Documentation of security processes provides a clear and consistent reference for the roles, responsibilities, procedures, and standards of the information security program. It helps to maintain the continuity and effectiveness of the security operations, as well as the compliance with the security policies and regulations. Documentation of security processes also facilitates the knowledge transfer and training of new or existing security personnel, as well as the communication and collaboration with other stakeholders. By ensuring current documentation of security processes, the information security manager can minimize the impact of organizational changes in security personnel, and ensure a smooth transition and alignment of the security program. References = CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, page 43, page 45.

Assessing the consequences of noncompliance is the next step that should be done after determining that there are a significant number of exceptions to a newly released industry-required security standard. The information security manager should evaluate the potential impact and exposure of the organization due to the noncompliance with the security standard. The assessment should consider the legal, regulatory, contractual, and reputational implications of the noncompliance, as well as the likelihood and severity of the incidents or penalties that may result from the noncompliance. The assessment should also compare the cost and benefit of complying with the security standard versus accepting the risk of noncompliance. The assessment should provide the basis for making informed and rational decisions about how to address the noncompliance issue and prioritize the actions and resources needed to achieve compliance. Documenting risk acceptances, revising the organization’s security policy, and conducting an information security audit are all possible actions that may be taken to address the noncompliance issue, but they are not the next steps that should be done. These actions should be performed after assessing the consequences of noncompliance, and based on the results and recommendations of the assessment. Documenting risk acceptances may be appropriate if the organization decides to accept the risk of noncompliance, and if the risk is within the risk appetite and tolerance of the organization. Revising the organization’s security policy may be necessary if the organization decides to comply with the security standard, and if the policy needs to be updated to reflect the new requirements and expectations. Conducting an information security audit may be useful if the organization wants to verify the level of compliance and identify the gaps and weaknesses in the security controls and processes. Therefore, assessing the consequences of noncompliance is the next step that should be done after determining that there are a significant number of exceptions to a newly released industry-required security standard, as it helps the information security manager to understand the risk and impact of the noncompliance and to make informed and rational decisions about how to address it. References = CISM Review Manual 2023, page 43 1; CISM Practice Quiz 2

 Business managers are best suited to determine the recovery time objectives (RTOs) for their business processes and functions, as they have the knowledge and authority to assess the impact of downtime and the acceptable level of service continuity. RTOs are the maximum acceptable time that a business process or function can be disrupted before it causes significant harm to the organization’s objectives, reputation, or compliance. References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, Chapter 5, Section 5.2.1.11

Program metrics measure the effectiveness of governance processes and provide a basis for continuous improvement and informed decision-making.

“Metrics are essential for evaluating governance performance, demonstrating effectiveness, and identifying areas for improvement.”

— CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 1: Information Security Governance, Section: Monitoring and Metrics*

ISACA’s practice questions confirm that program metrics are key to evaluating governance effectiveness.