IIA CIA IIA-CIA-Part3 New Questions

A focus strategy targets a specific market segment, geographical area, or niche customer base rather than competing in the entire market.

Why Option D (Focus strategy) is Correct:

The car manufacturer introduced a hybrid vehicle specifically for the European market to address increasing emission taxes, meaning they are focusing on a specific region and customer need.

Focus strategy aims at tailoring products to meet the needs of a particular group of consumers (e.g., environmentally conscious European customers).

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

Option A (Reactive strategy):

Incorrect because while the company is responding to regulatory changes, "reactive strategy" is not a recognized competitive strategy under Porter’s model.

Option B (Cost leadership strategy):

Incorrect because cost leadership focuses on minimizing costs and offering the lowest price in the broad market. This scenario does not emphasize cost reduction.

Option C (Differentiation strategy):

Incorrect because differentiation involves offering unique products across a broad market, whereas the hybrid vehicle is targeted specifically for the European market.

IIA Practice Guide – "Auditing Strategic Risk Management": Discusses competitive strategies, including focus strategy.

Porter's Competitive Strategy Model: Defines focus strategy as targeting a niche market.

COSO ERM Framework – "Strategic Decision-Making": Recommends market-specific focus strategies to mitigate regulatory risks.

IIA References:

Automated attacks that attempt to exploit weak or leaked passwords—such as credential stuffing, brute force attacks, and dictionary attacks—pose a significant cybersecurity risk. Implementing two-step verification (also known as multi-factor authentication, or MFA) is one of the most effective measures to mitigate these threats.

Why Two-Step Verification is Effective (B - Correct Answer)

Multi-factor authentication (MFA) adds an additional security layer beyond a password, requiring a second factor such as a one-time code sent to a mobile device, biometric authentication, or a security key.

Even if an attacker obtains a password, they cannot access the account without the second authentication factor.

The IIA Global Technology Audit Guide (GTAG) 1: Information Security Management emphasizes the use of multi-factor authentication to prevent unauthorized access.

Why Other Options Are Less Effective:

Option A: Changing passwords every two years

Ineffective because attackers often use compromised credentials that may be recent. Best practices recommend regular password updates but coupled with MFA.

The IIA's GTAG 16: Identity and Access Management highlights that password rotation alone does not fully protect against automated attacks.

Option C: Using a VPN when out of the office

Irrelevant to password attacks. A VPN encrypts data and secures network connections but does not prevent brute force or credential stuffing attacks.

The IIA GTAG 17: Auditing Network Security discusses VPNs for secure remote access but does not consider them a solution for password-based attacks.

Option D: Using antivirus and security tools

While important for overall security, these tools cannot prevent attacks that exploit stolen or weak passwords.

The IIA GTAG 15: Information Security Governance states that security tools should be combined with authentication controls like MFA for best protection.

GTAG 1: Information Security Management – Recommends multi-factor authentication to prevent unauthorized system access.

GTAG 16: Identity and Access Management – Highlights the limitations of password-only security and supports multi-factor authentication.

GTAG 17: Auditing Network Security – Covers VPN usage but does not consider it a solution for password attacks.

GTAG 15: Information Security Governance – Discusses the role of security tools and authentication in securing user accounts.

Step-by-Step Explanation:IIA References for Validation:Thus, requiring two-step verification (B) is the most effective control against automated password attacks.

When the CAE disagrees with local management’s acceptance of a risk, the next step is to escalate the issue to higher management responsible for the risk—in this case, the bank’s chief security officer. If senior management also accepts the risk and the CAE still considers it unacceptable, the matter should then be reported to the board.

Option A (direct to the board) skips the escalation chain. Option B is ineffective if the security manager has already decided. Option C alone does not address the CAE’s responsibility to escalate unacceptable risks.

Internal audit maintains independence by avoiding the design or implementation of management’s corrective actions. However, the internal audit function has a valid role in evaluating and monitoring whether management’s action plans effectively address audit observations. This ensures risks are mitigated while internal audit retains its assurance role.

Option A is too restrictive; while internal audit does not design or implement action plans, it does monitor and evaluate them. Options B and D inappropriately place responsibility for action plan design and monitoring with internal audit, which would compromise independence.