IIA-CIA-Part3 Exam Dumps : Business Knowledge for Internal Auditing

Understanding Data Analysis in Internal Auditing

Data analytics enhances audit testing by identifying patterns, anomalies, and high-risk transactions within large datasets.

Advanced analytics tools (e.g., AI, machine learning, continuous auditing) help auditors pinpoint areas of fraud, compliance violations, or operational inefficiencies.

Why Option B is Correct?

Data analysis improves risk assessment by allowing auditors to focus on high-risk areas, such as fraudulent transactions or control weaknesses.

IIA Standard 1220 – Due Professional Care requires auditors to use technology to improve audit effectiveness, including identifying risks.

IIA GTAG (Global Technology Audit Guide) 16 – Data Analytics supports using analytics to enhance risk-based auditing.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect?

Option A (Improves effectiveness of spot check testing techniques):

Data analysis enables continuous and full-population testing, rather than just improving spot checks.

Option C (Reduces the overall scope of the audit engagement):

Analytics refines audit focus but does not necessarily reduce the scope; it may expand testing capabilities.

Option D (Increases the auditor’s objectivity):

Objectivity is an ethical requirement rather than a direct effect of data analysis.

Data analytics enhances internal audit testing by providing deeper insights into high-risk areas.

IIA Standard 1220 and GTAG 16 emphasize data analytics in risk-based auditing.

Final Justification:IIA References:

IPPF Standard 1220 – Due Professional Care

IIA GTAG 16 – Data Analytics in Auditing

COSO Framework – Data-Driven Risk Management

Definition of Rooting:

Rooting (on Android) or Jailbreaking (on iOS) is the process of bypassing manufacturer and administrative security controls on a smart device.

This allows users to gain full control (root access) over the operating system, which can override security restrictions and allow installation of unauthorized applications.

How Rooting Increases Data Security Risks:

Bypassing Security Measures: Rooting removes built-in security protections, making the device more vulnerable to malware, unauthorized access, and data breaches.

Exposure to Malicious Apps: Rooted devices can install third-party applications that are not vetted by official app stores, increasing the risk of data theft, spyware, and ransomware attacks.

Circumventing Enterprise Security Policies: Many organizations use Mobile Device Management (MDM) to enforce security policies, but rooted devices can bypass these controls, exposing corporate data to cyber threats.

Increased Risk of Privilege Escalation Attacks: Attackers can exploit root access to take full control of the device, leading to unauthorized access to sensitive information.

IIA’s Perspective on Cybersecurity Risks:

IIA Standard 2110 – Governance emphasizes the importance of protecting sensitive data and ensuring compliance with IT security policies.

IIA’s GTAG (Global Technology Audit Guide) on Information Security warns against the dangers of rooted or jailbroken devices, as they compromise cybersecurity defenses.

NIST Cybersecurity Framework and ISO 27001 Information Security Standards identify unauthorized modifications to devices as a critical security risk.

Eliminating Incorrect Options:

B. Eavesdropping: This refers to intercepting communications (e.g., listening in on phone calls or network traffic) but does not involve circumventing administrative restrictions.

C. Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) Attack: This is an attack where an attacker intercepts and alters communication between two parties but does not involve rooting a device.

D. Session Hijacking: This attack involves stealing session tokens to impersonate a user but is unrelated to bypassing security controls on devices.

IIA References:

IIA Standard 2110 – Governance and IT Security

IIA GTAG – Information Security Risks

NIST Cybersecurity Framework

ISO 27001 Information Security Standards

Understanding Data Recovery and Security Risks:

Data must be protected, recoverable, and accessible when needed while maintaining security.

The best practice is to store encrypted backups offsite while keeping encryption keys separate but accessible.

Why Option D is Correct?

Storing encrypted data offsite (a few hours away) ensures protection against disasters (e.g., fire, cyberattacks, physical damage).

Keeping encryption keys at the organization ensures that recovery is quick and controlled without risking unauthorized access.

This aligns with the IIA's IT Audit Practices and ISO 27001 (Information Security Management), which emphasize separate storage of encrypted data and encryption keys for security and recoverability.

IIA Standard 2110 – Governance requires internal auditors to assess whether IT governance ensures the availability and security of critical data.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect?

Option A (Encrypted physical copies and keys stored together at the organization):

If both data and keys are in the same location, a disaster or breach would make recovery impossible.

Option B (Encrypted copies and keys stored in separate locations far away):

While secure, if encryption keys are stored too far, recovery could be delayed, impacting business continuity.

Option C (Encrypted usage reports in a cloud database):

This does not ensure full data recovery; it only provides logs and structure changes, not the actual data.

Storing encrypted data offsite while keeping encryption keys accessible onsite follows best IT security and disaster recovery practices.

IIA Standard 2110 supports evaluating IT governance, including data security and recovery controls.

Final Justification:IIA References:

IPPF Standard 2110 – Governance

ISO 27001 – Information Security Management

NIST SP 800-34 – Contingency Planning Guide for IT Systems

COBIT Framework – Data Security & Recovery Controls