CIA IIA-CIA-Part3 Full Course Free

Individual operational goals must align with an organization's overall strategy to ensure that employee efforts contribute to corporate success. Operational goals are specific, measurable objectives that support the broader strategic direction.

Why Option B (Alignment with organizational strategy) is Correct:

Organizational strategy defines the long-term vision, mission, and objectives.

Individual operational goals should align with this strategy to ensure consistency and effectiveness.

Strategic alignment ensures resources are used efficiently and performance contributes to corporate success.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

Option A (Individual skills and capabilities):

While important, skills alone do not define operational goals—they are tools to achieve goals.

Option C (Financial and human resources of the unit):

These resources support operational goals, but they do not serve as the foundation. Goals are set based on strategy first.

Option D (Targets of key performance indicators - KPIs):

KPIs measure performance but are not the basis for setting operational goals. Goals should align with strategy first, then KPIs track progress.

IIA Practice Guide – "Performance Management Auditing": Highlights strategic alignment as a basis for setting operational goals.

COSO ERM Framework – "Strategic and Performance Integration": Emphasizes aligning individual goals with organizational strategy.

IIA's Global Perspectives & Insights – "Auditing Organizational Performance": Discusses the role of strategy in goal-setting.

IIA References:Thus, the correct answer is B. Alignment with organizational strategy.

A systems development methodology refers to a structured approach used in software development and systems engineering to guide the design, development, and implementation of software applications.

Why Option A (Waterfall) is Correct:

Waterfall methodology is a linear and sequential systems development methodology where each phase (e.g., requirements, design, implementation, testing, deployment) must be completed before moving to the next.

It is widely established and historically one of the first software development methodologies.

Used in large-scale enterprise projects where detailed planning and structured execution are required.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

Option B (PRINCE2 - Projects in Controlled Environments):

Incorrect because PRINCE2 is a project management framework, not a systems development methodology.

Option C (ITIL - Information Technology Infrastructure Library):

Incorrect because ITIL is a set of IT service management (ITSM) best practices, not a software development methodology.

Option D (COBIT - Control Objectives for Information and Related Technologies):

Incorrect because COBIT is a governance framework for IT management and controls, not a development methodology.

IIA GTAG – "Auditing IT Projects and Systems Development": Highlights Waterfall as a traditional systems development methodology.

IIA’s Global Technology Audit Guide on IT Risks: Discusses software development lifecycle risks, including Waterfall methodology.

COBIT Framework – BAI03 (Manage Solutions Identification and Build): References structured methodologies like Waterfall in IT governance.

IIA References:

The Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, and Control (DMAIC) methodology is the core framework of Six Sigma, a data-driven process improvement approach that aims to reduce defects, enhance efficiency, and optimize performance.

(A) Correct – Six Sigma.

DMAIC is a structured Six Sigma methodology used for problem-solving and process improvement.

It helps organizations identify inefficiencies, eliminate errors, and standardize processes.

(B) Incorrect – Quality circle.

A quality circle is a group of employees who meet to discuss and resolve work-related issues, but it does not follow the structured DMAIC approach.

(C) Incorrect – Value chain analysis.

Value chain analysis focuses on evaluating business activities to improve competitive advantage, not structured process improvement like Six Sigma.

(D) Incorrect – Theory of constraints.

The Theory of Constraints (TOC) focuses on identifying and eliminating bottlenecks in processes, but it does not use the DMAIC approach.

IIA’s Global Internal Audit Standards – Process Improvement and Risk Management

Emphasizes methodologies like Six Sigma for operational efficiency.

COSO’s ERM Framework – Continuous Improvement and Quality Management

Discusses the role of Six Sigma in improving processes and reducing risks.

IIA’s Guide on Business Process Auditing

Recommends structured approaches such as Six Sigma for evaluating process efficiency.

Analysis of Answer Choices:IIA References and Internal Auditing Standards:

The root cause of the missing significant risks lies in the methodology used for risk identification. If the process relies too rigidly on a standard set of questions, it may overlook critical risks. By revising the risk identification methodology, the organization ensures that future projects capture relevant risks comprehensively and consistently, adding long-term value.

Option A addresses only the current project, not the underlying issue. Option B may improve knowledge but does not fix the flawed process. Option D merely shifts responsibility but does not address the methodology weakness.