Free IIA-CIA-Part3 IIA Updates

Absorption costing is a costing method that allocates all manufacturing costs (both variable and fixed) to the cost of a product. In this method, fixed manufacturing overhead costs are treated as indirect product costs because they are not directly traceable to a single unit of production but are still part of the total cost of producing goods.

Let’s analyze each option:

Option A: Direct, product costs.

Incorrect. Direct costs are costs that can be traced directly to a specific product, such as direct materials and direct labor. Fixed manufacturing overhead is not a direct cost because it is spread across all units produced.

Option B: Indirect product costs.

Correct. Fixed manufacturing overhead costs (such as rent, depreciation, and utilities for the production facility) are indirect costs because they support the entire production process rather than a specific product. However, under absorption costing, they are still treated as product costs and allocated to inventory.

IIA Reference: The IIA’s guidance on cost allocation states that absorption costing assigns all manufacturing costs (including fixed overhead) to products. (IIA Practice Guide: Cost and Profitability Analysis)

Option C: Direct period costs.

Incorrect. Period costs are expensed in the period they occur, while absorption costing treats fixed manufacturing overhead as part of inventory (product cost) until sold.

Option D: Indirect period costs.

Incorrect. Fixed manufacturing overhead is not expensed immediately as a period cost under absorption costing; it is capitalized into inventory and expensed as Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) when the product is sold.

Thus, the verified answer is B. Indirect product costs.

When auditing logical access controls for a workstation, the focus should be on user authentication methods, including:

Password policies (length, complexity, change frequency)

User access rights and permissions

Login activity logs to detect unauthorized access attempts

Correct Answer (B - Reviewing Password Policies and User List for Login Process)

Logical access controls ensure only authorized users can access a workstation.

Reviewing password length, complexity, and change frequency helps assess if security best practices are followed.

Reviewing the list of authorized users ensures that only appropriate personnel have access.

The IIA’s GTAG 9: Identity and Access Management recommends evaluating password policies and user access lists as key control measures.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

Option A (Reviewing access badges and room logs):

Physical access controls are important but do not assess logical access (login security, user authentication).

Option C (Reviewing failed access attempts and error messages):

Reviewing failed login attempts identifies security breaches but does not directly assess password policies or user access lists.

Option D (Reviewing unsuccessful passwords and activity logs):

Passwords should not be reviewed due to privacy and security policies. Logs should be checked, but reviewing actual passwords is a security violation.

IIA GTAG 9: Identity and Access Management – Covers password controls and user authentication.

IIA Practice Guide: Auditing IT Security Controls – Recommends reviewing password policies as a key security measure.

Step-by-Step Explanation:IIA References for Validation:Thus, B is the correct answer because reviewing password policies and user lists is essential for auditing logical access controls.

Both hierarchies (traditional organizations with a clear chain of command) and open organizational structures (flatter, decentralized decision-making models) share certain fundamental management principles.

Let’s analyze each statement:

A superior can delegate the authority to make decisions but cannot delegate the ultimate responsibility for the results of those decisions.

Correct. In both hierarchical and open structures, managers can delegate decision-making authority, but they remain accountable for the outcomes.

IIA Reference: Internal auditors assess governance structures to ensure that accountability remains with senior management, even when authority is delegated. (IIA Standard 2110: Governance)

A supervisor's span of control should not exceed seven subordinates.

Incorrect. While some management theories suggest an ideal span of control, there is no universal limit of seven subordinates. The optimal number depends on factors like task complexity and organizational structure.

Responsibility should be accompanied by adequate authority.

Correct. Employees must have the necessary authority to fulfill their responsibilities effectively, regardless of the organizational structure.

IIA Reference: The IIA’s guidelines on effective governance and accountability emphasize the need for clear delegation of authority to ensure operational efficiency. (IIA Practice Guide: Organizational Governance)

Employees at all levels should be empowered to make decisions.

Incorrect. While this principle applies to open organizational structures, it does not align with traditional hierarchies, where decision-making authority is concentrated at higher levels.

Thus, the verified answer is A. 1 and 3 only.

Understanding Organizational Structures:

Organizations structure their workforce based on functions, products, or a combination of both.

A matrix organization combines functional and project-based structures, where employees report to both a functional manager and a project manager.

Why Option C (Matrix Organization) Is Correct?

The software development firm uses employees from multiple departments who report to a single project manager, which is a defining characteristic of a matrix structure.

Employees maintain their departmental roles while contributing to project-based work.

IIA Standard 2110 – Governance supports evaluating flexible organizational structures like matrix organizations to ensure accountability and risk management.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect?

Option A (Functional departmentalization):

In functional structures, employees report to one department head, not a project manager.

Option B (Product departmentalization):

In product-based structures, employees are grouped based on specific product lines, not cross-functional projects.

Option D (Divisional organization):

A divisional structure separates business units based on markets, regions, or customer segments, not cross-functional teams.

A matrix organization allows employees to work across departments under a project manager, making option C the best choice.

IIA Standard 2110 supports assessing governance structures that involve cross-functional teams.

Final Justification:IIA References:

IPPF Standard 2110 – Governance (Organizational Structures & Reporting Lines)

COSO ERM – Risk Management in Matrix Organizations

Project Management Institute (PMI) – Matrix Management Best Practices