AWS Certified Professional Changed SAP-C02 Questions

AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional Questions and Answers

Question 49

A retail company has an on-premises data center in Europe. The company also has a multi-Region AWS presence that includes the eu-west-1 and us-east-1 Regions. The company wants to be able to route network traffic from its on-premises infrastructure into VPCs in either of those Regions. The company also needs to support traffic that is routed directly between VPCs in those Regions. No single points of failure can exist on the network.

The company already has created two 1 Gbps AWS Direct Connect connections from its on-premises data center. Each connection goes into a separate Direct Connect location in Europe for high availability. These two locations are named DX-A and DX-B, respectively. Each Region has a single AWS Transit Gateway that is configured to route all inter-VPC traffic within that Region.

Which solution will meet these requirements?

Options:

Create a private VIF from the DX-A connection into a Direct Connect gateway. Create a private VIF from the DX-B connection into the same Direct Connect gateway for high availability. Associate both the eu-west-1 and us-east-1 transit gateways with the Direct Connect gateway. Peer the transit gateways with each other to support cross-Region routing.

Create a transit VIF from the DX-A connection into a Direct Connect gateway. Associate the eu-west-1 transit gateway with this Direct Connect gateway. Create a transit VIF from the DX-B connection into a separate Direct Connect gateway. Associate the us-east-1 transit gateway with this separate Direct Connect gateway. Peer the Direct Connect gateways with each other to support high availability and cross-Region routing.

Create a transit VIF from the DX-A connection into a Direct Connect gateway. Create a transit VIF from the DX-B connection into the same Direct Connect gateway for high availability. Associate both the eu-west-1 and us-east-1 transit gateways with this Direct Connect gateway. Configure the Direct Connect gateway to route traffic between the transit gateways.

Create a transit VIF from the DX-A connection into a Direct Connect gateway. Create a transit VIF from the DX-B connection into the same Direct Connect gateway for high availability. Associate both the eu-west-1 and us-east-1 transit gateways with this Direct Connect gateway. Peer the transit gateways with each other to support cross-Region routing.

Question 50

A company creates an Amazon API Gateway API and shares the API with an external development team. The API uses AWS Lambda functions and is deployed to a stage that is named Production.

The external development team is the sole consumer of the API. The API experiences sudden increases of usage at specific times, leading to concerns about increased costs. The company needs to limit cost and usage without reworking the Lambda functions.

Which solution will meet these requirements MOST cost-effectivery?

Options:

Configure the API to send requests to Amazon SQS queues instead of directly to the Lambda functions. Update the Lambda functions to consume messages from the queues and to process the requests. Set up the queues to invoke the Lambda functions when new messages arrive.

Configure provisioned concurrency for each Lambda function. Use AWS Application Auto Scaling to register the Lambda functions as targets. Set up scaling schedules to increase and decrease capacity to match changes in API usage.

Create an API Gateway API key and an AWS WAF Regional web ACL. Associate the web ACL with the Production stage. Add a rate-based rule to the web ACL. In the rule, specify the rate limit and a custom request aggregation that uses the X-API-Key header. Share the API key with the external development team.

Create an API Gateway API key and usage plan. Define throttling limits and quotas in the usage plan. Associate the usage plan with the Production stage and the API key. Share the API key with the external development team.

Question 51

A financial services company runs a complex, multi-tier application on Amazon EC2 instances and AWS Lambda functions. The application stores temporary data in Amazon S3. The S3 objects are valid for only 45 minutes and are deleted after 24 hours.

The company deploys each version of the application by launching an AWS CloudFormation stack. The stack creates all resources that are required to run the application. When the company deploys and validates a new application version, the company deletes the CloudFormation stack of the old version.

The company recently tried to delete the CloudFormation stack of an old application version, but the operation failed. An analysis shows that CloudFormation failed to delete an existing S3 bucket. A solutions architect needs to resolve this issue without making major changes to the application's architecture.

Which solution meets these requirements?

Options:

Implement a Lambda function that deletes all files from a given S3 bucket. Integrate this Lambda function as a custom resource into the CloudFormation stack. Ensure that the custom resource has a DependsOn attribute that points to the S3 bucket's resource.

Modify the CloudFormation template to provision an Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS) file system to store the temporary files there instead of in Amazon S3. Configure the Lambda functions to run in the same VPC as the file system. Mount the file system to the EC2 instances and Lambda functions.

Modify the CloudFormation stack to create an S3 Lifecycle rule that expires all objects 45 minutes after creation. Add a DependsOn attribute that points to the S3 bucket's resource.

Modify the CloudFormation stack to attach a DeletionPolicy attribute with a value of Delete to the S3 bucket.

Question 52

A large company is running a popular web application. The application runs on several Amazon EC2 Linux Instances in an Auto Scaling group in a private subnet. An Application Load Balancer is targeting the Instances In the Auto Scaling group in the private subnet. AWS Systems Manager Session Manager Is configured, and AWS Systems Manager Agent is running on all the EC2 instances.

The company recently released a new version of the application Some EC2 instances are now being marked as unhealthy and are being terminated As a result, the application is running at reduced capacity A solutions architect tries to determine the root cause by analyzing Amazon CloudWatch logs that are collected from the application, but the logs are inconclusive

How should the solutions architect gain access to an EC2 instance to troubleshoot the issue1?

Options:

Suspend the Auto Scaling group's HealthCheck scaling process. Use Session Manager to log in to an instance that is marked as unhealthy

Enable EC2 instance termination protection Use Session Manager to log In to an instance that is marked as unhealthy.

Set the termination policy to Oldestinstance on the Auto Scaling group. Use Session Manager to log in to an instance that is marked as unhealthy

Suspend the Auto Scaling group's Terminate process. Use Session Manager to log in to an instance that is marked as unhealthy

Spring Sale 70% Discount Offer - Ends in 0d 00h 00m 00s - Coupon code: save70

AWS Certified Professional Changed SAP-C02 Questions

AWS Certified Solutions Architect - Professional Questions and Answers

Options:

Answer:

Explanation:

Options:

Answer:

Options:

Answer:

Explanation:

Options:

Answer:

Explanation:

CompTIA

Fortinet

Microsoft

Salesforce