Google Professional-Machine-Learning-Engineer Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

To develop a credit risk model that meets the regulatory requirements and can be monitored over time, you should follow these steps:

Use Vertex Explainable AI with the sampled Shapley method.  Vertex Explainable AI is a service that provides feature attributions for machine learning models, which can help you understand how each feature contributes to the prediction 1 .  The sampled Shapley method is a technique that estimates the Shapley values for each feature, which are based on the marginal contribution of each feature to the prediction across all possible feature subsets 2 .  The sampled Shapley method is suitable for neural networks and other complex models, as it can capture the non-linear and interaction effects of the features 3 .

Enable Vertex AI Model Monitoring to check for feature distribution drift.  Vertex AI Model Monitoring is a service that helps you track and manage the performance and quality of your deployed models over time 4 . Feature distribution drift is a type of data drift that occurs when the distribution of the input features changes significantly from the training data, which can affect the model accuracy and reliability. By checking for feature distribution drift, you can detect when your model needs to be retrained or updated with new data.

The most likely reason for the observed result is that the model is overfitting in areas with less traffic and underfitting in areas with more traffic. Overfitting means that the model learns the specific patterns and noise in the training data, but fails to generalize well to new and unseen data. Underfitting means that the model is not able to capture the complexity and variability of the data, and performs poorly on both training and test data. In this case, the model might have learned to segment the images well when there is less traffic, but it might not have enough data or features to handle the more challenging scenarios when there is more traffic. This could lead to a decrease in the AUC metric, which measures the ability of the model to distinguish between different classes. AUC is a suitable metric for this classification model, as it is not affected by class imbalance or threshold selection. The other options are not likely to be the reason for the result, as they are not related to the traffic density. Too much data representing congested areas would not cause the model to fail in those areas, but rather help the model learn better. Gradients vanishing or exploding is a problem that occurs during the training process, not after the deployment, and it affects the whole model, not specific scenarios.  References :

Image Segmentation: U-Net For Self Driving Cars

Intelligent Semantic Segmentation for Self-Driving Vehicles Using Deep Learning

Sharing Pixelopolis, a self-driving car demo from Google I/O built with TensorFlow Lite

Google Cloud launches machine learning engineer certification

Google Professional Machine Learning Engineer Certification

Professional ML Engineer Exam Guide

Preparing for Google Cloud Certification: Machine Learning Engineer Professional Certificate

 The best options for adjusting the training parameters in AutoML to improve model performance are to decrease the score threshold and add more positive examples to the training set. These options can help increase the detection rate of fraudulent transactions, which is the priority for this use case. The score threshold is a parameter that determines the minimum probability score that a prediction must have to be classified as positive. Decreasing the score threshold can increase the recall of the model, which is the proportion of actual positive cases that are correctly identified. Increasing the recall can help reduce the number of false negatives, which are fraudulent transactions that are missed by the model. However, decreasing the score threshold can also decrease the precision of the model, which is the proportion of positive predictions that are actually correct. Decreasing the precision can increase the number of false positives, which are legitimate transactions that are flagged as fraudulent by the model.  Therefore, there is a trade-off between recall and precision, and the optimal score threshold depends on the business objective and the cost of errors 1 . Adding more positive examples to the training set can help balance the data distribution and improve the model performance. Positive examples are the instances that belong to the target class, which in this case are fraudulent transactions. Negative examples are the instances that belong to the other class, which in this case are legitimate transactions. Fraudulent transactions are usually rare and imbalanced compared to legitimate transactions, which can cause the model to be biased towards the majority class and fail to learn the characteristics of the minority class.  Adding more positive examples can help the model learn more features and patterns of the fraudulent transactions, and increase the detection rate 2 .

The other options are not as good as options B and C, for the following reasons:

Option A: Increasing the score threshold would decrease the detection rate of fraudulent transactions, which is the opposite of the desired outcome. Increasing the score threshold would decrease the recall of the model, which is the proportion of actual positive cases that are correctly identified. Decreasing the recall would increase the number of false negatives, which are fraudulent transactions that are missed by the model. Increasing the score threshold would increase the precision of the model, which is the proportion of positive predictions that are actually correct. Increasing the precision would decrease the number of false positives, which are legitimate transactions that are flagged as fraudulent by the model.  However, in this use case, the cost of false negatives is much higher than the cost of false positives, so increasing the score threshold is not a good option 1 .

Option D: Adding more negative examples to the training set would not improve the model performance, and could worsen the data imbalance. Negative examples are the instances that belong to the other class, which in this case are legitimate transactions. Legitimate transactions are usually abundant and dominant compared to fraudulent transactions, which can cause the model to be biased towards the majority class and fail to learn the characteristics of the minority class.  Adding more negative examples would exacerbate th is problem, and decrease the detection rate of the fraudulent transactions 2 .

Option E: Reducing the maximum number of node hours for training would not improve the model performance, and could limit the model optimization. Node hours are the units of computation that are used to train an AutoML model. The maximum number of node hours is a parameter that determines the upper limit of node hours that can be used for training. Reducing the maximum number of node hours would reduce the training time and cost, but also the model quality and accuracy.  Reducing the maximum number of node hours wo uld limit the number of iterations, trials, and evaluations that the model can perform, and prevent the model from finding the optimal hyperparameters and architecture 3 .