Google Professional-Machine-Learning-Engineer Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

 Vertex AI Experiments is a service that allows you to track, compare, and manage experiments with Vertex AI. You can use Vertex AI Experiments to record the parameters, metrics, and artifacts of each model training run, and compare them in a graphical interface. Vertex AI Experiments supports models trained in Vertex AI Pipelines, Vertex AI Custom Training, and Vertex AI Workbench notebooks. To use Vertex AI Experiments, you need to create an experiment and submit your pipeline runs or custom training jobs as experiment runs. For models trained on notebooks, you need to use the Vertex AI SDK to log the parameters and metrics to the experiment. This way, you can minimize the effort required to store and compare the model performance across different services. References: Track, compare, manage experiments with Vertex AI Experiments, Vertex AI Pipelines: Metrics visualization and run comparison using the KFP SDK, [Vertex AI SDK for Python]

 According to the official exam guide1, one of the skills assessed in the exam is to “track the lineage of pipeline artifacts”. Vertex ML Metadata2 is a service that allows you to store, query, and visualize metadata associated with your ML workflows, such as datasets, models, metrics, and executions. Vertex ML Metadata helps you track the provenance and lineage of your ML artifacts and understand the relationships between them. Vertex AI Experiments3 is a service that allows you to track and compare the results of your model training runs. Vertex AI Experiments automatically logs metadata such as hyperparameters, metrics, and artifacts for each training run. You can use Vertex AI Experiments to train your custom model using TensorFlow, PyTorch, XGBoost, or scikit-learn. Vertex AI TensorBoard4 is a service that allows you to visualize and monitor your ML experiments using TensorBoard, an open source tool for ML visualization. Vertex AI TensorBoard helps you track the model’s training parameters and the metrics per training epoch, and compare the performance of each version of the model. Therefore, option C is the best way to determine which Vertex AI services to include in the workflow for the given use case. The other options are not relevant or optimal for this scenario. References:

Professional ML Engineer Exam Guide

Vertex ML Metadata

Vertex AI Experiments

Vertex AI TensorBoard

Google Professional Machine Learning Certification Exam 2023

Latest Google Professional Machine Learning Engineer Actual Free Exam Questions

The easiest way to integrate custom Python code into the Kubeflow Pipelines SDK is to use the func_to_container_op function, which converts a Python function into a pipeline component. This function automatically builds a Docker image that executes the Python function, and returns a factory function that can be used to create kfp.dsl.ContainerOp instances for the pipeline. This option has the following benefits:

It allows the data science team to reuse their existing Python code without rewriting it or packaging it into containers manually.

It simplifies the component specification and implementation, as the function signature defines the component interface and the function body defines the component logic.

It supports various types of inputs and outputs, such as primitive types, files, directories, and dictionaries.

The other options are less optimal for the following reasons:

Option B: Using the predefined components available in the Kubeflow Pipelines SDK to access Dataproc, and run the custom code there, introduces additional complexity and cost. This option requires creating and managing Dataproc clusters, which are ephemeral and scalable clusters of Compute Engine instances that run Apache Spark and Apache Hadoop. Moreover, this option requires writing the custom code in PySpark or Hadoop MapReduce, which may not be compatible with the existing Python code.

Option C: Packaging the custom Python code into Docker containers, and using the load_component_from_file function to import the containers into the pipeline, introduces additional steps and overhead. This option requires creating and maintaining Dockerfiles, building and pushing Docker images, and writing component specifications in YAML files. Moreover, this option requires managing the dependencies and versions of the Python code and the Docker images.

Option D: Deploying the custom Python code to Cloud Functions, and using Kubeflow Pipelines to trigger the Cloud Function, introduces additional latency and limitations. This option requires creating and deploying Cloud Functions, which are serverless functions that execute in response to events. Moreover, this option requires invoking the Cloud Functions from the Kubeflow Pipelines using HTTP requests, which can incur network overhead and latency. Additionally, this option is subject to the quotas and limits of Cloud Functions, such as the maximum execution time and memory usage.

References:

Building Python function-based components | Kubeflow

Building Python Function-based Components | Kubeflow