Google Professional-Machine-Learning-Engineer Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

The best option for resolving the training-serving skew alert is to update the model monitoring job to use the more recent training data that was used to retrain the model. This option can help align the baseline distribution of the model monitoring job with the current distribution of the production data, and eliminate the false positive alerts. Model Monitoring is a service that can track and compare the results of multiple machine learning runs. Model Monitoring can monitor the model’s prediction input data for feature skew and drift. Training-serving skew occurs when the feature data distribution in production deviates from the feature data distribution used to train the model. If the original training data is available, you can enable skew detection to monitor your models for training-serving skew. Model Monitoring uses TensorFlow Data Validation (TFDV) to calculate the distributions and distance scores for each feature, and compares them with a baseline distribution. The baseline distribution is the statistical distribution of the feature’s values in the training data. If the distance score for a feature exceeds an alerting threshold that you set, Model Monitoring sends you an email alert. However, if you retrain the model with more recent training data, and deploy it back to the Vertex AI endpoint, the baseline distribution of the model monitoring job may become outdated and inconsistent with the current distribution of the production data. This can cause the model monitoring job to generate false positive alerts, even if the model performance is not deteriorated. To avoid this problem, you need to update the model monitoring job to use the more recent training data that was used to retrain the model. This can help the model monitoring job to recalculate the baseline distribution and the distance scores, and compare them with the current distribution of the production data. This can also help the model monitoring job to detect any true positive alerts, such as a sudden change in the production data that causes the model performance to degrade1.

The other options are not as good as option B, for the following reasons:

Option A: Updating the model monitoring job to use a lower sampling rate would not resolve the training-serving skew alert, and could reduce the accuracy and reliability of the model monitoring job. The sampling rate is a parameter that determines the percentage of prediction requests that are logged and analyzed by the model monitoring job. Using a lower sampling rate can reduce the storage and computation costs of the model monitoring job, but also the quality and validity of the data. Using a lower sampling rate can introduce sampling bias and noise into the data, and make the model monitoring job miss some important features or patterns of the data. Moreover, using a lower sampling rate would not address the root cause of the training-serving skew alert, which is the mismatch between the baseline distribution and the current distribution of the production data2.

Option C: Temporarily disabling the alert, and enabling the alert again after a sufficient amount of new production traffic has passed through the Vertex AI endpoint, would not resolve the training-serving skew alert, and could expose the model to potential risks and errors. Disabling the alert would stop the model monitoring job from sending email notifications when the distance score for a feature exceeds the alerting threshold, but it would not stop the model monitoring job from calculating and comparing the distributions and distance scores. Therefore, disabling the alert would not address the root cause of the training-serving skew alert, which is the mismatch between the baseline distribution and the current distribution of the production data. Moreover, disabling the alert would prevent the model monitoring job from detecting any true positive alerts, such as a sudden change in the production data that causes the model performance to degrade. This can expose the model to potential risks and errors, and affect the user satisfaction and trust1.

Option D: Temporarily disabling the alert until the model can be retrained again on newer training data, and retraining the model again after a sufficient amount of new production traffic has passed through the Vertex AI endpoint, would not resolve the training-serving skew alert, and could cause unnecessary costs and efforts. Disabling the alert would stop the model monitoring job from sending email notifications when the distance score for a feature exceeds the alerting threshold, but it would not stop the model monitoring job from calculating and comparing the distributions and distance scores. Therefore, disabling the alert would not address the root cause of the training-serving skew alert, which is the mismatch between the baseline distribution and the current distribution of the production data. Moreover, disabling the alert would prevent the model monitoring job from detecting any true positive alerts, such as a sudden change in the production data that causes the model performance to degrade. This can expose the model to potential risks and errors, and affect the user satisfaction and trust. Retraining the model again on newer training data would create a new model version, but it would not update the model monitoring job to use the newer training data as the baseline distribution. Therefore, retraining the model again on newer training data would not resolve the training-serving skew alert, and could cause unnecessary costs and efforts1.

References:

Preparing for Google Cloud Certification: Machine Learning Engineer, Course 3: Production ML Systems, Week 4: Evaluation

Google Cloud Professional Machine Learning Engineer Exam Guide, Section 3: Scaling ML models in production, 3.3 Monitoring ML models in production

Official Google Cloud Certified Professional Machine Learning Engineer Study Guide, Chapter 6: Production ML Systems, Section 6.3: Monitoring ML Models

Using Model Monitoring

Understanding the score threshold slider

Sampling rate

 Hyperparameter tuning is the process of finding the optimal values for the parameters of a machine learning model that affect its performance. AI Platform provides a service for hyperparameter tuning that can run multiple trials in parallel and use different search algorithms to find the best combination of hyperparameters. However, hyperparameter tuning can be time-consuming and costly, especially if the search space is large and the model training is complex. Therefore, it is important to optimize the tuning job to reduce the time and resources required.

One way to speed up the tuning job is to set the early stopping parameter to TRUE. This means that the tuning service will automatically stop trials that are unlikely to perform well based on the intermediate results. This can save time and resources by avoiding unnecessary computations for trials that are not promising. The early stopping parameter can be set in the trainingInput.hyperparameters field of the training job request1

Another way to speed up the tuning job is to decrease the maximum number of trials during subsequent training phases. This means that the tuning service will use fewer trials to refine the search space after the initial phase. This can reduce the time required for the tuning job to converge to the optimal solution. The maximum number of trials can be set in the trainingInput.hyperparameters.maxTrials field of the training job request1

The other options are not effective ways to speed up the tuning job. Decreasing the number of parallel trials will reduce the concurrency of the tuning job and increase the overall time required. Decreasing the range of floating-point values will reduce the diversity of the search space and may miss some optimal solutions. Changing the search algorithm from Bayesian search to random search will reduce the efficiency of the tuning job and may require more trials to find the best solution1

References: 1: Hyperparameter tuning overview

The best option for automating the retraining of your model by using minimal additional code when model feature values change, and minimizing the number of times that your model is retrained to reduce training costs, is to create a Vertex AI Model Monitoring job configured to monitor prediction drift, configure alert monitoring to publish a message to a Pub/Sub queue when a monitoring alert is detected, and use a Cloud Function to monitor the Pub/Sub queue, and trigger retraining in BigQuery. This option allows you to leverage the power and simplicity of Vertex AI, Pub/Sub, and Cloud Functions to monitor your model performance and retrain your model when needed. Vertex AI is a unified platform for building and deploying machine learning solutions on Google Cloud. Vertex AI can deploy a trained model to an online prediction endpoint, which can provide low-latency predictions for individual instances. Vertex AI can also provide various tools and services for data analysis, model development, model deployment, model monitoring, and model governance. A Vertex AI Model Monitoring job is a resource that can monitor the performance and quality of your deployed models on Vertex AI. A Vertex AI Model Monitoring job can help you detect and diagnose issues with your models, such as data drift, prediction drift, training/serving skew, or model staleness. Prediction drift is a type of model monitoring metric that measures the difference between the distributions of the predictions generated by the model on the training data and the predictions generated by the model on the online data. Prediction drift can indicate that the model performance is degrading, or that the online data is changing over time. By creating a Vertex AI Model Monitoring job configured to monitor prediction drift, you can track the changes in the model predictions, and compare them with the expected predictions. Alert monitoring is a feature of Vertex AI Model Monitoring that can notify you when a monitoring metric exceeds a predefined threshold. Alert monitoring can help you set up rules and conditions for triggering alerts, and choose the notification channel for receiving alerts. Pub/Sub is a service that can provide reliable and scalable messaging and event streaming on Google Cloud. Pub/Sub can help you publish and subscribe to messages, and deliver them to various Google Cloud services, such as Cloud Functions. A Pub/Sub queue is a resource that can hold messages that are published to a Pub/Sub topic. A Pub/Sub queue can help you store and manage messages, and ensure that they are delivered to the subscribers. By configuring alert monitoring to publish a message to a Pub/Sub queue when a monitoring alert is detected, you can send a notification to a Pub/Sub topic, and trigger a downstream action based on the alert. Cloud Functions is a service that can run your stateless code in response to events on Google Cloud. Cloud Functions can help you create and execute functions without provisioning or managing servers, and pay only for the resources you use. A Cloud Function is a resource that can execute a piece of code in response to an event, such as a Pub/Sub message. A Cloud Function can help you perform various tasks, such as data processing, data transformation, or data analysis. BigQuery is a service that can store and query large-scale data on Google Cloud. BigQuery can help you analyze your data by using SQL queries, and perform various tasks, such as data exploration, data transformation, or data visualization. BigQuery ML is a feature of BigQuery that can create and execute machine learning models in BigQuery by using SQL queries. BigQuery ML can help you build and train various types of models, such as linear regression, logistic regression, k-means clustering, matrix factorization, and deep neural networks. By using a Cloud Function to monitor the Pub/Sub queue, and trigger retraining in BigQuery, you can automate the retraining of your model by using minimal additional code when model feature values change. You can write a Cloud Function that listens to the Pub/Sub queue, and executes a SQL query to retrain your model in BigQuery ML when a prediction drift alert is received. By retraining your model in BigQuery ML, you can update your model parameters and improve your model performance and accuracy1.

The other options are not as good as option C, for the following reasons:

Option A: Enabling request-response logging on Vertex AI Endpoints, scheduling a TensorFlow Data Validation job to monitor prediction drift, and executing model retraining if there is significant distance between the distributions would require more skills and steps than creating a Vertex AI Model Monitoring job configured to monitor prediction drift, configuring alert monitoring to publish a message to a Pub/Sub queue when a monitoring alert is detected, and using a Cloud Function to monitor the Pub/Sub queue, and trigger retraining in BigQuery. Request-response logging is a feature of Vertex AI Endpoints that can record the requests and responses that are sent to and from the online prediction endpoint. Request-response logging can help you collect and analyze the online prediction data, and troubleshoot any issues with your model. TensorFlow Data Validation is a tool that can analyze and validate your data for machine learning. TensorFlow Data Validation can help you explore, understand, and clean your data, and detect various data issues, such as data drift, data skew, or data anomalies. Prediction drift is a type of data issue that measures the difference between the distributions of the predictions generated by the model on the training data and the predictions generated by the model on the online data. Prediction drift can indicate that the model performance is degrading, or that the online data is changing over time. By enabling request-response logging on Vertex AI Endpoints, and scheduling a TensorFlow Data Validation job to monitor prediction drift, you can collect and analyze the online prediction data, and compare the distributions of the predictions. However, enabling request-response logging on Vertex AI Endpoints, scheduling a TensorFlow Data Validation job to monitor prediction drift, and executing model retraining if there is significant distance between the distributions would require more skills and steps than creating a Vertex AI Model Monitoring job configured to monitor prediction drift, configuring alert monitoring to publish a message to a Pub/Sub queue when a monitoring alert is detected, and using a Cloud Function to monitor the Pub/Sub queue, and trigger retraining in BigQuery. You would need to write code, enable and configure the request-response logging, create and run the TensorFlow Data Validation job, define and measure the distance between the distributions, and execute the model retraining. Moreover, this option would not automate the retraining of your model, as you would need to manually check the prediction drift and trigger the retraining2.

Option B: Enabling request-response logging on Vertex AI Endpoints, scheduling a TensorFlow Data Validation job to monitor training/serving skew, and executing model retraining if there is significant distance between the distributions would not help you monitor the changes in the model feature values, and could cause errors or poor performance. Training/serving skew is a type of data issue that measures the difference between the distributions of the features used to train the model and the features used to serve the model. Training/serving skew can indicate that the model is not trained on the representative data, or that the data is changing over time. By enabling request-response logging on Vertex AI Endpoints, and scheduling a TensorFlow Data Validation job to monitor training/serving skew, you can collect and analyze the online prediction data, and compare the distributions of the features. However, enabling request-response logging on Vertex AI Endpoints, scheduling a TensorFlow Data Validation job to monitor training/serving skew, and executing model retraining if there is significant distance between the distributions would not help you monitor the changes in the model feature values, and could cause errors or poor performance. You would need to write code, enable and configure the request-response logging, create and run the TensorFlow Data Validation job, define and measure the distance between the distributions, and execute the model retraining. Moreover, this option would not monitor the prediction drift, which is a more direct and relevant metric for measuring the model performance and quality2.

Option D: Creating a Vertex AI Model Monitoring job configured to monitor training/serving skew, configuring alert monitoring to publish a message to a Pub/Sub queue when a monitoring alert is detected, and using a Cloud Function to monitor the Pub/Sub queue, and trigger retraining in BigQuery would not help you monitor the changes in the model feature values, and could cause errors or poor performance. Training/serving skew is a type of data issue that measures the difference between the distributions of the features used to train the model and the features used to serve the model. Training/serving skew can indicate that the model is not trained on the representative data, or that the data is changing over time. By creating a Vertex AI Model Monitoring job configured to monitor training/serving skew, you can track the changes in the model features, and compare them with the expected features. However, creating a Vertex AI Model Monitoring job configured to monitor training/serving skew, configuring alert monitoring to publish a message to a Pub/Sub queue when a monitoring alert is detected, and using a Cloud Function to monitor the Pub/Sub queue, and trigger retraining in BigQuery would not help you monitor the changes in the model feature values, and could cause errors or poor performance. You would need to write code, create and configure the Vertex AI Model Monitoring job, configure the alert monitoring, create and configure the Pub/Sub queue, and write a Cloud Function to trigger the retraining. Moreover, this option would not monitor the prediction drift, which is a more direct and relevant metric for measuring the model performance and quality1.

References:

Preparing for Google Cloud Certification: Machine Learning Engineer, Course 3: Production ML Systems, Week 4: ML Governance

Google Cloud Professional Machine Learning Engineer Exam Guide, Section 3: Scaling ML models in production