Google Professional-Machine-Learning-Engineer Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

The best option for creating a Dataflow pipeline for real-time anomaly detection is to load the model directly into the Dataflow job as a dependency, and use it for prediction. This option has the following advantages:

It minimizes the serving latency, as the model prediction logic is executed within the same Dataflow pipeline that ingests and processes the data. There is no need to invoke external services or containers, which can introduce network overhead and latency.

It simplifies the deployment and management of the model, as the model is packaged with the Dataflow job and does not require a separate service or container. The model can be updated by redeploying the Dataflow job with a new model version.

It leverages the scalability and reliability of Dataflow, as the model prediction logic can scale up or down with the data volume and handle failures and retries automatically.

The other options are less optimal for the following reasons:

Option A: Containerizing the model prediction logic in Cloud Run, which is invoked by Dataflow, introduces additional latency and complexity. Cloud Run is a serverless platform that runs stateless containers, which means that the model prediction logic needs to be initialized and loaded every time a request is made. This can increase the cold start latency and reduce the throughput. Moreover, Cloud Run has a limit on the number of concurrent requests per container, which can affect the scalability of the model prediction logic. Additionally, this option requires managing two separate services: the Dataflow pipeline and the Cloud Run container.

Option C: Deploying the model to a Vertex AI endpoint, and invoking this endpoint in the Dataflow job, also introduces additional latency and complexity. Vertex AI is a managed service that provides various tools and features for machine learning, such as training, tuning, serving, and monitoring. However, invoking a Vertex AI endpoint from a Dataflow job requires making an HTTP request, which can incur network overhead and latency. Moreover, this option requires managing two separate services: the Dataflow pipeline and the Vertex AI endpoint.

Option D: Deploying the model in a TFServing container on Google Kubernetes Engine, and invoking it in the Dataflow job, also introduces additional latency and complexity. TFServing is a high-performance serving system for TensorFlow models, which can handle multiple versions and variants of a model. However, invoking a TFServing container from a Dataflow job requires making a gRPC or REST request, which can incur network overhead and latency. Moreover, this option requires managing two separate services: the Dataflow pipeline and the Google Kubernetes Engine cluster.

References:

[Dataflow documentation]

[TensorFlow documentation]

[Cloud Run documentation]

[Vertex AI documentation]

[TFServing documentation]

The best business metric to track to measure the model’s performance is user engagement as measured by the number of battles played daily per user. This metric reflects the main goal of the model, which is to enhance the user experience and satisfaction by creating balanced and fair battles. If the model is successful, it should increase the user retention and loyalty, as well as the word-of-mouth and referrals. This metric is also easy to measure and interpret, as it can be directly obtained from the user activity data.

The other options are not optimal for the following reasons:

A. Average time players wait before being assigned to a team is not a good metric, as it does not capture the quality or outcome of the battles. It only measures the efficiency of the model, which is not the primary objective. Moreover, this metric can be influenced by external factors, such as the availability and demand of players, the network latency, and the server capacity.

B. Precision and recall of assigning players to teams based on their predicted versus actual ability is not a good metric, as it is difficult to measure and interpret. It requires having a reliable and consistent way of estimating the player’s ability, which can be subjective and dynamic. It also requires having a ground truth label for each assignment, which can be costly and impractical to obtain. Moreover, this metric does not reflect the user feedback or satisfaction, which is the ultimate goal of the model.

D. Rate of return as measured by additional revenue generated minus the cost of developing a new model is not a good metric, as it is not directly related to the model’s performance. It measures the profitability of the model, which is a secondary objective. Moreover, this metric can be affected by many other factors, such as the market conditions, the pricing strategy, the marketing campaigns, and the competition.

References:

Professional ML Engineer Exam Guide

Preparing for Google Cloud Certification: Machine Learning Engineer Professional Certificate

Google Cloud launches machine learning engineer certification

How to measure user engagement

How to choose the right metrics for your machine learning model

 The best option for automating the model retraining workflow is to use GitHub Actions and Cloud Build. GitHub Actions is a service that can create and run workflows for continuous integration and continuous delivery (CI/CD) on GitHub. GitHub Actions can run tests, build and deploy code, and trigger other actions based on events such as code changes, pull requests, or manual triggers. Cloud Build is a service that can create and run scalable and reliable pipelines to build, test, and deploy software on Google Cloud. Cloud Build can build custom Docker images, push the images to Artifact Registry, and launch the pipeline in Vertex AI Pipelines. Vertex AI Pipelines is a service that can orchestrate machine learning (ML) workflows using Vertex AI. Vertex AI Pipelines can run preprocessing and training steps on custom Docker images, and evaluate, deploy, and monitor the ML model. By using GitHub Actions and Cloud Build, users can leverage the power and flexibility of Google Cloud to automate the model retraining workflow, while minimizing the steps required to build the workflow.

The other options are not as good as option D, for the following reasons:

Option A: Triggering a Cloud Build workflow to run tests, build custom Docker images, push the images to Artifact Registry, and launch the pipeline in Vertex AI Pipelines would require more configuration and maintenance than using GitHub Actions and Cloud Build. Cloud Build is a service that can create and run pipelines to build, test, and deploy software on Google Cloud, but it is not designed to integrate with GitHub or other source code repositories. To trigger a Cloud Build workflow from GitHub, users would need to set up a webhook, a Cloud Pub/Sub topic, and a Cloud Function1. Moreover, Cloud Build does not support manual triggers, which limits the flexibility of the workflow2.

Option B: Triggering GitHub Actions to run the tests, launching a job on Cloud Run to build custom Docker images, pushing the images to Artifact Registry, and launching the pipeline in Vertex AI Pipelines would require more steps and resources than using GitHub Actions and Cloud Build. Cloud Run is a service that can run stateless containers on a fully managed environment or on Anthos. Cloud Run can build custom Docker images, but it is not optimized for this task. Users would need to write a Dockerfile, a cloudbuild.yaml file, and a Cloud Run service configuration file, and use the gcloud command-line tool to build and deploy the image3. Moreover, Cloud Run is designed for serving HTTP requests, not for running ML pipelines, which can have different performance and scalability requirements.

Option C: Triggering GitHub Actions to run the tests, building custom Docker images, pushing the images to Artifact Registry, and launching the pipeline in Vertex AI Pipelines would require more skills and tools than using GitHub Actions and Cloud Build. GitHub Actions can run tests and build code, but it is not specialized for building Docker images. Users would need to install and configure Docker on the GitHub Actions runner, write a Dockerfile, and use the docker command-line tool to build and push the image. Moreover, GitHub Actions has limitations on the disk space, memory, and CPU of the runner, which can affect the speed and reliability of the image building process.

References:

Building CI/CD for Vertex AI pipelines: The first solution

Cloud Build

GitHub Actions

Vertex AI Pipelines

Triggering builds from GitHub

Triggering builds manually

Building containers

Cloud Run

[Building and testing Docker images with GitHub Actions]

[Usage limits, billing, and administration]