Google Professional-Machine-Learning-Engineer Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

 Vertex AI Experiments is a service that allows you to track, compare, and manage experiments with Vertex AI. You can use Vertex AI Experiments to record the parameters, metrics, and artifacts of each model training run, and compare them in a graphical interface. Vertex AI Experiments supports models trained in Vertex AI Pipelines, Vertex AI Custom Training, and Vertex AI Workbench notebooks. To use Vertex AI Experiments, you need to create an experiment and submit your pipeline runs or custom training jobs as experiment runs. For models trained on notebooks, you need to use the Vertex AI SDK to log the parameters and metrics to the experiment. This way, you can minimize the effort required to store and compare the model performance across different services. References: Track, compare, manage experiments with Vertex AI Experiments, Vertex AI Pipelines: Metrics visualization and run comparison using the KFP SDK, [Vertex AI SDK for Python]

Option A is not the best answer because it requires modifying the pipeline to use the Vertex AI Feature Store, which may not be feasible or necessary for recovering the data that the model was trained on. The Vertex AI Feature Store is a service that helps you manage, store, and serve feature values for your machine learning models1, but it is not designed for storing the raw data or the TFRecord files.

Option B is the best answer because it leverages the lineage feature of Vertex AI Metadata, which is a service that helps you track and manage the metadata of your machine learning workflows, such as datasets, models, metrics, and parameters2. The lineage feature allows you to view the relationships and dependencies among the artifacts and executions in your pipeline, and trace back the origin and history of any artifact3. By using the lineage feature, you can find the model artifact, determine the version of the model, identify the step that creates the data copy, and search in the metadata for its location.

Option C is not the best answer because it relies on the logging features in the Vertex AI endpoint, which may not be accurate or reliable for finding the data copy. The logging features in the Vertex AI endpoint help you monitor and troubleshoot the online predictions made by your deployed models, but they do not provide information about the training data or the pipeline steps4. Moreover, the timestamp of the model deployment may not match the timestamp of the pipeline run, as there may be delays or errors in the deployment process.

Option D is not the best answer because it requires finding the job ID in Vertex AI Training, which may not be easy or straightforward. Vertex AI Training is a service that helps you train your custom models on Google Cloud, but it does not provide a direct way to link the training job to the model version or the pipeline run. Moreover, searching in the logs of the job may not reveal the location of the data copy, as the logs may only contain information about the training process and the metrics.

References:

1: Introduction to Vertex AI Feature Store | Vertex AI | Google Cloud

2: Introduction to Vertex AI Metadata | Vertex AI | Google Cloud

3: View lineage for ML workflows | Vertex AI | Google Cloud

4: Monitor online predictions | Vertex AI | Google Cloud

[5]: Train custom models | Vertex AI | Google Cloud

The best option for using Vertex AI Model Monitoring for drift detection and minimizing the cost is to use the features and the feature attributions for monitoring, and set a prediction-sampling-rate value that is closer to 0 than 1. This option allows you to leverage the power and flexibility of Google Cloud to detect feature drift in the input predict requests for custom models, and reduce the storage and computation costs of the model monitoring job. Vertex AI Model Monitoring is a service that can track and compare the results of multiple machine learning runs. Vertex AI Model Monitoring can monitor the model’s prediction input data for feature skew and drift. Feature drift occurs when the feature data distribution in production changes over time. If the original training data is not available, you can enable drift detection to monitor your models for feature drift. Vertex AI Model Monitoring uses TensorFlow Data Validation (TFDV) to calculate the distributions and distance scores for each feature, and compares them with a baseline distribution. The baseline distribution is the statistical distribution of the feature’s values in the training data. If the training data is not available, the baseline distribution is calculated from the first 1000 prediction requests that the model receives. If the distance score for a feature exceeds an alerting threshold that you set, Vertex AI Model Monitoring sends you an email alert. However, if you use a custom model, you can also enable feature attribution monitoring, which can provide more insights into the feature drift. Feature attribution monitoring analyzes the feature attributions, which are the contributions of each feature to the prediction output. Feature attribution monitoring can help you identify the features that have the most impact on the model performance, and the features that have the most significant drift over time. Feature attribution monitoring can also help you understand the relationship between the features and the prediction output, and the correlation between the features1. The prediction-sampling-rate is a parameter that determines the percentage of prediction requests that are logged and analyzed by the model monitoring job. Using a lower prediction-sampling-rate can reduce the storage and computation costs of the model monitoring job, but also the quality and validity of the data. Using a lower prediction-sampling-rate can introduce sampling bias and noise into the data, and make the model monitoring job miss some important features or patterns of the data. However, using a higher prediction-sampling-rate can increase the storage and computation costs of the model monitoring job, and also the amount of data that needs to be processed and analyzed. Therefore, there is a trade-off between the prediction-sampling-rate and the cost and accuracy of the model monitoring job, and the optimal prediction-sampling-rate depends on the business objective and the data characteristics2. By using the features and the feature attributions for monitoring, and setting a prediction-sampling-rate value that is closer to 0 than 1, you can use Vertex AI Model Monitoring for drift detection and minimize the cost.

The other options are not as good as option D, for the following reasons:

Option A: Using the features for monitoring and setting a monitoring-frequency value that is higher than the default would not enable feature attribution monitoring, and could increase the cost of the model monitoring job. The monitoring-frequency is a parameter that determines how often the model monitoring job analyzes the logged prediction requests and calculates the distributions and distance scores for each feature. Using a higher monitoring-frequency can increase the frequency and timeliness of the model monitoring job, but also the computation costs of the model monitoring job. Moreover, using the features for monitoring would not enable feature attribution monitoring, which can provide more insights into the feature drift and the model performance1.

Option B: Using the features for monitoring and setting a prediction-sampling-rate value that is closer to 1 than 0 would not enable feature attribution monitoring, and could increase the cost of the model monitoring job. The prediction-sampling-rate is a parameter that determines the percentage of prediction requests that are logged and analyzed by the model monitoring job. Using a higher prediction-sampling-rate can increase the quality and validity of the data, but also the storage and computation costs of the model monitoring job. Moreover, using the features for monitoring would not enable feature attribution monitoring, which can provide more insights into the feature drift and the model performance12.

Option C: Using the features and the feature attributions for monitoring and setting a monitoring-frequency value that is lower than the default would enable feature attribution monitoring, but could reduce the frequency and timeliness of the model monitoring job. The monitoring-frequency is a parameter that determines how often the model monitoring job analyzes the logged prediction requests and calculates the distributions and distance scores for each feature. Using a lower monitoring-frequency can reduce the computation costs of the model monitoring job, but also the frequency and timeliness of the model monitoring job. This can make the model monitoring job less responsive and effective in detecting and alerting the feature drift1.

References:

Preparing for Google Cloud Certification: Machine Learning Engineer, Course 3: Production ML Systems, Week 4: Evaluation

Google Cloud Professional Machine Learning Engineer Exam Guide, Section 3: Scaling ML models in production, 3.3 Monitoring ML models in production

Official Google Cloud Certified Professional Machine Learning Engineer Study Guide, Chapter 6: Production ML Systems, Section 6.3: Monitoring ML Models

Using Model Monitoring

Understanding the score threshold slider