Google Professional-Machine-Learning-Engineer Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

The F1 score is a metric that combines both precision and recall, and is suitable for evaluating imbalanced classification problems. Precision measures the fraction of true positives among the predicted positives, and recall measures the fraction of true positives among the actual positives. The F1 score is the harmonic mean of precision and recall, and it ranges from 0 to 1, with higher values indicating better performance. The F1 score is a good metric for imbalanced data because it balances both the false positives and the false negatives, and does not favor the majority class over the minority class.

The other options are not good metrics for imbalanced data. RMSE (root mean squared error) is a metric for regression problems, not classification problems. It measures the average squared difference between the predicted and the actual values, and is not suitable for binary outcomes. F score with higher precision weighting than recall, or F0.5 score, is a metric that gives more importance to precision than recall. This means that it penalizes false positives more than false negatives, which is not desirable for imbalanced data where the minority class is more important. F score with higher recall weighting than precision, or F2 score, is a metric that gives more importance to recall than precision. This means that it penalizes false negatives more than false positives, which might be suitable for some imbalanced data problems, but not for the logo detection problem. In this problem, both false positives and false negatives are equally important, as we want to accurately identify the presence or absence of a logo in an image. Therefore, the F1 score is a better metric than the F2 score. References:

Tour of Evaluation Metrics for Imbalanced Classification

Metrics for imbalanced data (simply explained)

Quantization is a technique that reduces the numerical precision of the weights and activations of a neural network, which can improve the inference speed and reduce the memory footprint of the model1.

Reducing the floating point precision from tf.float64 to tf.float16 can potentially halve the latency and memory usage of the model, while having minimal impact on the accuracy2.

Increasing the dropout rate to 0.8 in either mode would not affect the latency, but would likely degrade the performance of the model significantly, as dropout is a regularization technique that randomly drops out units during training to prevent overfitting3.

Switching from CPU to GPU serving may or may not improve the latency, depending on the hardware specifications and the model complexity, but it would also incur additional costs and complexity for deployment4