Google Professional-Machine-Learning-Engineer Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

 According to the official exam guide1, one of the skills assessed in the exam is to “track the lineage of pipeline artifacts”. Vertex ML Metadata2 is a service that allows you to store, query, and visualize metadata associated with your ML workflows, such as datasets, models, metrics, and executions. Vertex ML Metadata helps you track the provenance and lineage of your ML artifacts and understand the relationships between them. Vertex AI Experiments3 is a service that allows you to track and compare the results of your model training runs. Vertex AI Experiments automatically logs metadata such as hyperparameters, metrics, and artifacts for each training run. You can use Vertex AI Experiments to train your custom model using TensorFlow, PyTorch, XGBoost, or scikit-learn. Vertex AI TensorBoard4 is a service that allows you to visualize and monitor your ML experiments using TensorBoard, an open source tool for ML visualization. Vertex AI TensorBoard helps you track the model’s training parameters and the metrics per training epoch, and compare the performance of each version of the model. Therefore, option C is the best way to determine which Vertex AI services to include in the workflow for the given use case. The other options are not relevant or optimal for this scenario. References:

Professional ML Engineer Exam Guide

Vertex ML Metadata

Vertex AI Experiments

Vertex AI TensorBoard

Google Professional Machine Learning Certification Exam 2023

Latest Google Professional Machine Learning Engineer Actual Free Exam Questions

The best option for automating the retraining of your model by using minimal additional code when model feature values change, and minimizing the number of times that your model is retrained to reduce training costs, is to create a Vertex AI Model Monitoring job configured to monitor prediction drift, configure alert monitoring to publish a message to a Pub/Sub queue when a monitoring alert is detected, and use a Cloud Function to monitor the Pub/Sub queue, and trigger retraining in BigQuery. This option allows you to leverage the power and simplicity of Vertex AI, Pub/Sub, and Cloud Functions to monitor your model performance and retrain your model when needed. Vertex AI is a unified platform for building and deploying machine learning solutions on Google Cloud. Vertex AI can deploy a trained model to an online prediction endpoint, which can provide low-latency predictions for individual instances. Vertex AI can also provide various tools and services for data analysis, model development, model deployment, model monitoring, and model governance. A Vertex AI Model Monitoring job is a resource that can monitor the performance and quality of your deployed models on Vertex AI. A Vertex AI Model Monitoring job can help you detect and diagnose issues with your models, such as data drift, prediction drift, training/serving skew, or model staleness. Prediction drift is a type of model monitoring metric that measures the difference between the distributions of the predictions generated by the model on the training data and the predictions generated by the model on the online data. Prediction drift can indicate that the model performance is degrading, or that the online data is changing over time. By creating a Vertex AI Model Monitoring job configured to monitor prediction drift, you can track the changes in the model predictions, and compare them with the expected predictions. Alert monitoring is a feature of Vertex AI Model Monitoring that can notify you when a monitoring metric exceeds a predefined threshold. Alert monitoring can help you set up rules and conditions for triggering alerts, and choose the notification channel for receiving alerts. Pub/Sub is a service that can provide reliable and scalable messaging and event streaming on Google Cloud. Pub/Sub can help you publish and subscribe to messages, and deliver them to various Google Cloud services, such as Cloud Functions. A Pub/Sub queue is a resource that can hold messages that are published to a Pub/Sub topic. A Pub/Sub queue can help you store and manage messages, and ensure that they are delivered to the subscribers. By configuring alert monitoring to publish a message to a Pub/Sub queue when a monitoring alert is detected, you can send a notification to a Pub/Sub topic, and trigger a downstream action based on the alert. Cloud Functions is a service that can run your stateless code in response to events on Google Cloud. Cloud Functions can help you create and execute functions without provisioning or managing servers, and pay only for the resources you use. A Cloud Function is a resource that can execute a piece of code in response to an event, such as a Pub/Sub message. A Cloud Function can help you perform various tasks, such as data processing, data transformation, or data analysis. BigQuery is a service that can store and query large-scale data on Google Cloud. BigQuery can help you analyze your data by using SQL queries, and perform various tasks, such as data exploration, data transformation, or data visualization. BigQuery ML is a feature of BigQuery that can create and execute machine learning models in BigQuery by using SQL queries. BigQuery ML can help you build and train various types of models, such as linear regression, logistic regression, k-means clustering, matrix factorization, and deep neural networks. By using a Cloud Function to monitor the Pub/Sub queue, and trigger retraining in BigQuery, you can automate the retraining of your model by using minimal additional code when model feature values change. You can write a Cloud Function that listens to the Pub/Sub queue, and executes a SQL query to retrain your model in BigQuery ML when a prediction drift alert is received. By retraining your model in BigQuery ML, you can update your model parameters and improve your model performance and accuracy1.

The other options are not as good as option C, for the following reasons:

Option A: Enabling request-response logging on Vertex AI Endpoints, scheduling a TensorFlow Data Validation job to monitor prediction drift, and executing model retraining if there is significant distance between the distributions would require more skills and steps than creating a Vertex AI Model Monitoring job configured to monitor prediction drift, configuring alert monitoring to publish a message to a Pub/Sub queue when a monitoring alert is detected, and using a Cloud Function to monitor the Pub/Sub queue, and trigger retraining in BigQuery. Request-response logging is a feature of Vertex AI Endpoints that can record the requests and responses that are sent to and from the online prediction endpoint. Request-response logging can help you collect and analyze the online prediction data, and troubleshoot any issues with your model. TensorFlow Data Validation is a tool that can analyze and validate your data for machine learning. TensorFlow Data Validation can help you explore, understand, and clean your data, and detect various data issues, such as data drift, data skew, or data anomalies. Prediction drift is a type of data issue that measures the difference between the distributions of the predictions generated by the model on the training data and the predictions generated by the model on the online data. Prediction drift can indicate that the model performance is degrading, or that the online data is changing over time. By enabling request-response logging on Vertex AI Endpoints, and scheduling a TensorFlow Data Validation job to monitor prediction drift, you can collect and analyze the online prediction data, and compare the distributions of the predictions. However, enabling request-response logging on Vertex AI Endpoints, scheduling a TensorFlow Data Validation job to monitor prediction drift, and executing model retraining if there is significant distance between the distributions would require more skills and steps than creating a Vertex AI Model Monitoring job configured to monitor prediction drift, configuring alert monitoring to publish a message to a Pub/Sub queue when a monitoring alert is detected, and using a Cloud Function to monitor the Pub/Sub queue, and trigger retraining in BigQuery. You would need to write code, enable and configure the request-response logging, create and run the TensorFlow Data Validation job, define and measure the distance between the distributions, and execute the model retraining. Moreover, this option would not automate the retraining of your model, as you would need to manually check the prediction drift and trigger the retraining2.

Option B: Enabling request-response logging on Vertex AI Endpoints, scheduling a TensorFlow Data Validation job to monitor training/serving skew, and executing model retraining if there is significant distance between the distributions would not help you monitor the changes in the model feature values, and could cause errors or poor performance. Training/serving skew is a type of data issue that measures the difference between the distributions of the features used to train the model and the features used to serve the model. Training/serving skew can indicate that the model is not trained on the representative data, or that the data is changing over time. By enabling request-response logging on Vertex AI Endpoints, and scheduling a TensorFlow Data Validation job to monitor training/serving skew, you can collect and analyze the online prediction data, and compare the distributions of the features. However, enabling request-response logging on Vertex AI Endpoints, scheduling a TensorFlow Data Validation job to monitor training/serving skew, and executing model retraining if there is significant distance between the distributions would not help you monitor the changes in the model feature values, and could cause errors or poor performance. You would need to write code, enable and configure the request-response logging, create and run the TensorFlow Data Validation job, define and measure the distance between the distributions, and execute the model retraining. Moreover, this option would not monitor the prediction drift, which is a more direct and relevant metric for measuring the model performance and quality2.

Option D: Creating a Vertex AI Model Monitoring job configured to monitor training/serving skew, configuring alert monitoring to publish a message to a Pub/Sub queue when a monitoring alert is detected, and using a Cloud Function to monitor the Pub/Sub queue, and trigger retraining in BigQuery would not help you monitor the changes in the model feature values, and could cause errors or poor performance. Training/serving skew is a type of data issue that measures the difference between the distributions of the features used to train the model and the features used to serve the model. Training/serving skew can indicate that the model is not trained on the representative data, or that the data is changing over time. By creating a Vertex AI Model Monitoring job configured to monitor training/serving skew, you can track the changes in the model features, and compare them with the expected features. However, creating a Vertex AI Model Monitoring job configured to monitor training/serving skew, configuring alert monitoring to publish a message to a Pub/Sub queue when a monitoring alert is detected, and using a Cloud Function to monitor the Pub/Sub queue, and trigger retraining in BigQuery would not help you monitor the changes in the model feature values, and could cause errors or poor performance. You would need to write code, create and configure the Vertex AI Model Monitoring job, configure the alert monitoring, create and configure the Pub/Sub queue, and write a Cloud Function to trigger the retraining. Moreover, this option would not monitor the prediction drift, which is a more direct and relevant metric for measuring the model performance and quality1.

References:

Preparing for Google Cloud Certification: Machine Learning Engineer, Course 3: Production ML Systems, Week 4: ML Governance

Google Cloud Professional Machine Learning Engineer Exam Guide, Section 3: Scaling ML models in production

Option A is incorrect because training a time-series model to predict the machines’ performance values, and configuring an alert if a machine’s actual performance values significantly differ from the predicted performance values, is not the best way to build a predictive maintenance solution that uses monitoring data from the VMs to detect potential failures and then alerts the service desk team. This option assumes that the performance values follow a predictable pattern, which may not be the case for complex systems. Moreover, this option does not use any historical incident data, which may contain useful information for identifying failures. Furthermore, this option does not involve any model evaluation or validation, which are essential steps for ensuring the quality and reliability of the model.

Option B is correct because implementing a simple heuristic (e.g., based on z-score) to label the machines’ historical performance data, and training a model to predict anomalies based on this labeled dataset, is a reasonable way to build a predictive maintenance solution that uses monitoring data from the VMs to detect potential failures and then alerts the service desk team. This option uses a simple and fast method to label the historical performance data, which is necessary for supervised learning. A z-score is a measure of how many standard deviations a value is away from the mean of a distribution1. By using a z-score, we can label the performance values that are unusually high or low as anomalies, which may indicate failures. Then, we can train a model to learn the patterns of normal and anomalous performance values, and use it to predict anomalies on new data. We can also evaluate and validate the model using metrics such as precision, recall, or F1-score, and compare it with other models or methods.

Option C is incorrect because developing a simple heuristic (e.g., based on z-score) to label the machines’ historical performance data, and testing this heuristic in a production environment, is not a safe way to build a predictive maintenance solution that uses monitoring data from the VMs to detect potential failures and then alerts the service desk team. This option does not involve any model training or evaluation, which are essential steps for ensuring the quality and reliability of the solution. Moreover, this option does not test the heuristic on a separate dataset, such as a validation or test set, before deploying it to production, which may lead to errors or failures in the production environment.

Option D is incorrect because hiring a team of qualified analysts to review and label the machines’ historical performance data, and training a model based on this manually labeled dataset, is not a feasible way to build a predictive maintenance solution that uses monitoring data from the VMs to detect potential failures and then alerts the service desk team. This option may produce high-quality labels, but it is also costly, time-consuming, and prone to human errors or biases. Moreover, this option may not scale well with large or complex datasets, which may require more analysts or more time to label.

References:

Z-score

[Predictive maintenance]

[Anomaly detection]

[Time-series analysis]

[Model evaluation]