Google Professional-Machine-Learning-Engineer Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

The best option for protecting sensitive customer data that might be used in the ML models is to coarsen the data by putting AGE into quantiles and rounding LATITUDE_LONGITUDE into single precision. This option has the following advantages:

It preserves the utility and relevance of the data for the ML models, as the coarsened data still captures the essential information and patterns that the models need to learn. For example, putting AGE into quantiles can group the customers into different age ranges, which can be useful for predicting their preferences or behavior. Rounding LATITUDE_LONGITUDE into single precision can reduce the precision of the location data, but still retain the general geographic region of the customers, which can be useful for personalizing the recommendations or offers.

It reduces the risk of exposing the personal or private information of the customers, as the coarsened data makes it harder to identify or re-identify the individual customers from the data. For example, putting AGE into quantiles can hide the exact age of the customers, which can be considered sensitive or confidential. Rounding LATITUDE_LONGITUDE into single precision can obscure the exact location of the customers, which can be considered sensitive or confidential.

The other options are less optimal for the following reasons:

Option A: Tokenizing all of the fields using hashed dummy values to replace the real values eliminates the utility and relevance of the data for the ML models, as the tokenized data loses all the information and patterns that the models need to learn. For example, tokenizing AGE using hashed dummy values can make the data meaningless and irrelevant, as the models cannot learn anything from the random tokens. Tokenizing LATITUDE_LONGITUDE using hashed dummy values can make the data meaningless and irrelevant, as the models cannot learn anything from the random tokens.

Option B: Using principal component analysis (PCA) to reduce the four sensitive fields to one PCA vector reduces the utility and relevance of the data for the ML models, as the PCA vector may not capture all the information and patterns that the models need to learn. For example, using PCA to reduce AGE, IS_EXISTING_CUSTOMER, LATITUDE_LONGITUDE, and SHIRT_SIZE to one PCA vector can lose some information or introduce noise in the data, as the PCA vector is a linear combination of the original features, which may not reflect their true relationship or importance. Moreover, using PCA to reduce the four sensitive fields to one PCA vector may not reduce the risk of exposing the personal or private information of the customers, as the PCA vector may still be reversible or linkable to the original data, depending on the amount of variance explained by the PCA vector and the availability of the PCA transformation matrix.

Option D: Removing all sensitive data fields, and asking the data science team to build their models using non-sensitive data reduces the utility and relevance of the data for the ML models, as the non-sensitive data may not contain enough information and patterns that the models need to learn. For example, removing AGE, IS_EXISTING_CUSTOMER, LATITUDE_LONGITUDE, and SHIRT_SIZE from the data can make the data insufficient and unrepresentative, as the models may not be able to learn the factors that influence the customers’ preferences or behavior. Moreover, removing all sensitive data fields from the data may not be necessary or feasible, as the data protection legislation may allow the use of sensitive data for the ML models, as long as the data is processed in a secure and ethical manner, and the customers’ consent and rights are respected.

Option A is incorrect because using latitude, longitude, and product type as features, and using profit as model output is not the best way to develop an ML model to predict the company’s profitability for a new line of naturally flavored bottled waters in different locations. This option does not capture the interaction between latitude and longitude, which may affect the profitability of the product. For example, the same product may have different profitability in different regions, depending on the climate, culture, or preferences of the customers. Moreover, this option does not account for the granularity of the location data, which may be too fine or too coarse for the model. For example, using the exact coordinates of a city may not be meaningful, as the profitability may vary within the city, or using the country name may not be informative, as the profitability may vary across the country.

Option B is incorrect because using latitude, longitude, and product type as features, and using revenue and expenses as model outputs is not a suitable way to develop an ML model to predict the company’s profitability for a new line of naturally flavored bottled waters in different locations. This option has the same drawbacks as option A, as it does not capture the interaction between latitude and longitude, or account for the granularity of the location data. Moreover, this option does not directly predict the profitability of the product, which is the target variable of interest. Instead, it predicts the revenue and expenses of the product, which are intermediate variables that depend on other factors, such as the price, the cost, or the demand of the product. To obtain the profitability, we would need to subtract the expenses from the revenue, which may introduce errors or uncertainties in the prediction.

Option C is correct because using product type and the feature cross of latitude with longitude, followed by binning, as features, and using profit as model output is a good way to develop an ML model to predict the company’s profitability for a new line of naturally flavored bottled waters in different locations. This option captures the interaction between latitude and longitude, which may affect the profitability of the product, by creating a feature cross of these two features.  A feature cross is a synthetic feature that combines the values of two or more features into a single feature 1 . This option also accounts for the granularity of the location data, by binning the feature cross into discrete buckets.  Binning is a technique that groups continuous values into intervals, which can reduce the noise and complexity of the data 2 . Moreover, this option directly predicts the profitability of the product, which is the target variable of interest, by using it as the model output.

Option D is incorrect because using product type and the feature cross of latitude with longitude, followed by binning, as features, and using revenue and expenses as model outputs is not a valid way to develop an ML model to predict the company’s profitability for a new line of naturally flavored bottled waters in different locations. This option has the same advantages as option C, as it captures the interaction between latitude and longitude, and accounts for the granularity of the location data, by creating a feature cross and binning it. However, this option does not directly predict the profitability of the product, which is the target variable of interest, but rather predicts the revenue and expenses of the product, which are intermediate variables that depend on other factors, as explained in option B.

The most likely problem is that the tables that you created to hold your training and validation records share some records, and you may not be using all the data in your initial table. This is because the RAND() function generates a random number between 0 and 1 for each row, and the probability of a row being in both the training and validation tables is 0.2 * 0.8 = 0.16, which is not negligible. This means that some of the records that you use to validate your model are also used to train your model, which can lead to overfitting and poor generalization. Moreover, the probability of a row being in neither the training nor the validation table is 0.2 * 0.2 = 0.04, which means that you are wasting some of the data in your initial table and reducing the size of your datasets. A better way to split your data into training and validation sets is to use a hash function on a unique identifier column, such as the following queries:

CREATE OR REPLACE TABLE ‘myproject.mydataset.training‘ AS (SELECT * FROM ‘myproject.mydataset.mytable‘ WHERE MOD(FARM_FINGERPRINT(id), 10) < 8); CREATE OR REPLACE TABLE ‘myproject.mydataset.validation‘ AS (SELECT * FROM ‘myproject.mydataset.mytable‘ WHERE MOD(FARM_FINGERPRINT(id), 10) > = 8);

This way, you can ensure that each row has a fixed 80% chance of being in the training table and a 20% chance of being in the validation table, without any overlap or omission.