Google Professional-Machine-Learning-Engineer Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

The best option for handling missing values in a categorical feature is to replace them with a placeholder category indicating a missing value. This is a type of imputation, which is a method of estimating the missing values based on the observed data. Imputing the missing values with a placeholder category preserves the information that the data is missing, and avoids introducing bias or distortion in the feature distribution. It also allows the machine learning model to learn from the missingness pattern, and potentially use it as a predictor for the target variable. The other options are not suitable for handling missing values in a categorical feature, because:

Removing the rows with missing values and upsampling the dataset by 5% would reduce the size of the dataset and potentially lose important information. It would also introduce sampling bias and overfitting, as the upsampling process would create duplicate or synthetic observations that do not reflect the true population.

Replacing the missing values with the feature’s mean would not make sense for a categorical feature, as the mean is a numerical measure that does not capture the mode or frequency of the categories. It would also create a new category that does not exist in the original data, and might confuse the machine learning model.

Moving the rows with missing values to the validation dataset would compromise the validity and reliability of the model evaluation, as the validation dataset would not be representative of the test or production data. It would also reduce the amount of data available for training the model, and might introduce leakage or inconsistency between the training and validation datasets. References:

Imputation of missing values

Effective Strategies to Handle Missing Values in Data Analysis

How to Handle Missing Values of Categorical Variables?

Google Cloud launches machine learning engineer certification

Google Professional Machine Learning Engineer Certification

Professional ML Engineer Exam Guide

Preparing for Google Cloud Certification: Machine Learning Engineer Professional Certificate

 Before building an insurance approval model, an ML engineer should consider the factors of traceability, reproducibility, and explainability, as these are important aspects of responsible AI and fairness in a regulated domain. Traceability is the ability to track the provenance and lineage of the data, models, and decisions throughout the ML lifecycle. It helps to ensure the quality, reliability, and accountability of the ML system, and to comply with the regulatory and ethical standards. Reproducibility is the ability to recreate the same results and outcomes using the same data, models, and parameters. It helps to verify the validity, consistency, and robustness of the ML system, and to debug and improve the performance. Explainability is the ability to understand and interpret the logic, behavior, and outcomes of the ML system. It helps to increase the transparency, trust, and confidence of the ML system, and to identify and mitigate any potential biases, errors, or risks. The other options are not as relevant or comprehensive as this option. Redaction is the process of removing sensitive or confidential information from the data or documents, but it is not a factor that the ML engineer should consider before building the model, as it is more related to the data preparation and protection. Federated learning is a technique that allows training ML models on decentralized data without transferring the data to a central server, but it is not a factor that the ML engineer should consider before building the model, as it is more related to the model architecture and privacy preservation. Differential privacy is a method that adds noise to the data or the model outputs to protect the individual privacy of the data subjects, but it is not a factor that the ML engineer should consider before building the model, as it is more related to the model evaluation and deployment. References:

Responsible AI documentation

Traceability documentation

Reproducibility documentation

Explainability documentation

The best option to build a comprehensive system that recommends images to users that are similar in appearance to their own uploaded images is to download a pretrained convolutional neural network (CNN), and use the model to generate embeddings of the input images. Embeddings are low-dimensional representations of high-dimensional data that capture the essential features and semantics of the data. By using a pretrained CNN, you can leverage the knowledge learned from large-scale image datasets, such as ImageNet, and apply it to your own domain. A pretrained CNN can be used as a feature extractor, where the output of the last hidden layer (or any intermediate layer) is taken as the embedding vector for the input image. You can then measure the similarity between embeddings using a distance metric, such as cosine similarity or Euclidean distance, and recommend images that have the highest similarity scores to the user’s uploaded image. Option A is incorrect because downloading a pretrained CNN and fine-tuning the model to predict hashtags based on the input images may not capture the visual similarity of the images, as hashtags may not reflect the appearance of the images accurately. For example, two images of different breeds of dogs may have the same hashtag #dog, but they may not look similar to each other. Moreover, fine-tuning the model may require additional data and computational resources, and it may not generalize well to new images that have different or missing hashtags. Option B is incorrect because retrieving image labels and dominant colors from the input images using the Vision API may not capture the visual similarity of the images, as labels and colors may not reflect the fine-grained details of the images. For example, two images of the same breed of dog may have different labels and colors depending on the background, lighting, and angle of the image. Moreover, using the Vision API may incur additional costs and latency, and it may not be able to handle custom or domain-specific labels. Option C is incorrect because using the provided hashtags to create a collaborative filtering algorithm may not capture the visual similarity of the images, as collaborative filtering relies on the ratings or preferences of users, not the features of the images. For example, two images of different animals may have similar ratings or preferences from users, but they may not look similar to each other. Moreover, collaborative filtering may suffer from the cold start problem, where new images or users that have no ratings or preferences cannot be recommended. References:

Image similarity search with TensorFlow

Image embeddings documentation

Pretrained models documentation

Similarity metrics documentation