Google Professional-Machine-Learning-Engineer Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

The best option for developing and comparing multiple models on a large-scale BigQuery table using TensorFlow and Vertex AI is to use TensorFlow I/O’s BigQuery Reader to directly read the data. This option has the following advantages:

It minimizes any bottlenecks during the data ingestion stage, as the BigQuery Reader can stream data from BigQuery to TensorFlow in parallel and in batches, without loading the entire table into memory or disk. The BigQuery Reader can also perform data transformations and filtering using SQL queries, reducing the need for additional preprocessing steps in TensorFlow.

It leverages the scalability and performance of BigQuery, as the BigQuery Reader can handle hundreds of millions of records worth of training data efficiently and reliably. BigQuery is a serverless, fully managed, and highly scalable data warehouse that can run complex queries over petabytes of data in seconds.

It simplifies the integration with Vertex AI, as the BigQuery Reader can be used with both custom and pre-built TensorFlow models on Vertex AI. Vertex AI is a unified platform for machine learning that provides various tools and features for data ingestion, data labeling, data preprocessing, model training, model tuning, model deployment, model monitoring, and model explainability.

The other options are less optimal for the following reasons:

Option A: Using the BigQuery client library to load data into a dataframe, and using tf.data.Dataset.from_tensor_slices() to read it, introduces memory and performance issues. This option requires loading the entire BigQuery table into a Pandas dataframe, which can consume a lot of memory and cause out-of-memory errors. Moreover, using tf.data.Dataset.from_tensor_slices() to read the dataframe can be slow and inefficient, as it creates one slice per row of the dataframe, resulting in a large number of small tensors.

Option B: Exporting data to CSV files in Cloud Storage, and using tf.data.TextLineDataset() to read them, introduces additional steps and complexity. This option requires exporting the BigQuery table to one or more CSV files in Cloud Storage, which can take a long time and consume a lot of storage space. Moreover, using tf.data.TextLineDataset() to read the CSV files can be slow and error-prone, as it requires parsing and decoding each line of text, handling missing values and invalid data, and applying data transformations and validations.

Option C: Converting the data into TFRecords, and using tf.data.TFRecordDataset() to read them, introduces additional steps and complexity. This option requires converting the BigQuery table into one or more TFRecord files, which are binary files that store serialized TensorFlow examples. This can take a long time and consume a lot of storage space. Moreover, using tf.data.TFRecordDataset() to read the TFRecord files requires defining and parsing the schema of the TensorFlow examples, which can be tedious and error-prone.

References:

[TensorFlow I/O documentation]

[BigQuery documentation]

[Vertex AI documentation]

The best option for deploying a scikit-learn model on Vertex AI with minimal additional code is to wrap the model in a custom prediction routine (CPR) and build a container image from the CPR local model. Upload your scikit-learn model container to Vertex AI Model Registry. Deploy your model to Vertex AI Endpoints, and create a Vertex AI batch prediction job. This option allows you to leverage the power and simplicity of Google Cloud to deploy and serve a scikit-learn model that supports both online and batch prediction. Vertex AI is a unified platform for building and deploying machine learning solutions on Google Cloud. Vertex AI can deploy a trained scikit-learn model to an online prediction endpoint, which can provide low-latency predictions for individual instances. Vertex AI can also create a batch prediction job, which can provide high-throughput predictions for a large batch of instances. A custom prediction routine (CPR) is a Python script that defines the logic for preprocessing the input data, running the prediction, and postprocessing the output data. A CPR can help you customize the prediction behavior of your model, and handle complex or non-standard data formats. A CPR can also help you minimize the additional code, as you only need to write a few functions to implement the prediction logic. A container image is a package that contains the model, the CPR, and the dependencies. A container image can help you standardize and simplify the deployment process, as you only need to upload the container image to Vertex AI Model Registry, and deploy it to Vertex AI Endpoints. By wrapping the model in a CPR and building a container image from the CPR local model, uploading the scikit-learn model container to Vertex AI Model Registry, deploying the model to Vertex AI Endpoints, and creating a Vertex AI batch prediction job, you can deploy a scikit-learn model on Vertex AI with minimal additional code1.

The other options are not as good as option B, for the following reasons:

Option A: Uploading your model to the Vertex AI Model Registry by using a prebuilt scikit-learn prediction container, deploying your model to Vertex AI Endpoints, and creating a Vertex AI batch prediction job that uses the instanceConfig.instanceType setting to transform your input data would not allow you to preprocess the input data for model inference, and could cause errors or poor performance. A prebuilt scikit-learn prediction container is a container image that is provided by Google Cloud, and contains the scikit-learn framework and the dependencies. A prebuilt scikit-learn prediction container can help you deploy a scikit-learn model without writing any code, but it also limits your customization options. A prebuilt scikit-learn prediction container can only handle standard data formats, such as JSON or CSV, and cannot perform any preprocessing or postprocessing on the input or output data. If your input data requires any transformation or normalization before running the prediction, you cannot use a prebuilt scikit-learn prediction container. The instanceConfig.instanceType setting is a parameter that determines the machine type and the accelerator type for the batch prediction job. The instanceConfig.instanceType setting can help you optimize the performance and the cost of the batch prediction job, but it cannot help you transform your input data2.

Option C: Creating a custom container for your scikit-learn model, defining a custom serving function for your model, uploading your model and custom container to Vertex AI Model Registry, and deploying your model to Vertex AI Endpoints, and creating a Vertex AI batch prediction job would require more skills and steps than using a CPR and a container image. A custom container is a container image that contains the model, the dependencies, and a web server. A custom container can help you customize the prediction behavior of your model, and handle complex or non-standard data formats. A custom serving function is a Python function that defines the logic for running the prediction on the model. A custom serving function can help you implement the prediction logic of your model, and handle complex or non-standard data formats. However, creating a custom container and defining a custom serving function would require more skills and steps than using a CPR and a container image. You would need to write code, build and test the container image, configure the web server, and implement the prediction logic. Moreover, creating a custom container and defining a custom serving function would not allow you to preprocess the input data for model inference, as the custom serving function only runs the prediction on the model3.

Option D: Creating a custom container for your scikit-learn model, uploading your model and custom container to Vertex AI Model Registry, deploying your model to Vertex AI Endpoints, and creating a Vertex AI batch prediction job that uses the instanceConfig.instanceType setting to transform your input data would not allow you to preprocess the input data for model inference, and could cause errors or poor performance. A custom container is a container image that contains the model, the dependencies, and a web server. A custom container can help you customize the prediction behavior of your model, and handle complex or non-standard data formats. However, creating a custom container would require more skills and steps than using a CPR and a container image. You would need to write code, build and test the container image, and configure the web server. The instanceConfig.instanceType setting is a parameter that determines the machine type and the accelerator type for the batch prediction job. The instanceConfig.instanceType setting can help you optimize the performance and the cost of the batch prediction job, but it cannot help you transform your input data23.

References:

Preparing for Google Cloud Certification: Machine Learning Engineer, Course 3: Production ML Systems, Week 2: Serving ML Predictions

Google Cloud Professional Machine Learning Engineer Exam Guide, Section 3: Scaling ML models in production, 3.1 Deploying ML models to production

Official Google Cloud Certified Professional Machine Learning Engineer Study Guide, Chapter 6: Production ML Systems, Section 6.2: Serving ML Predictions

Custom prediction routines

Using pre-built containers for prediction

Using custom containers for prediction

Option A is incorrect because using latitude, longitude, and product type as features, and using profit as model output is not the best way to develop an ML model to predict the company’s profitability for a new line of naturally flavored bottled waters in different locations. This option does not capture the interaction between latitude and longitude, which may affect the profitability of the product. For example, the same product may have different profitability in different regions, depending on the climate, culture, or preferences of the customers. Moreover, this option does not account for the granularity of the location data, which may be too fine or too coarse for the model. For example, using the exact coordinates of a city may not be meaningful, as the profitability may vary within the city, or using the country name may not be informative, as the profitability may vary across the country.

Option B is incorrect because using latitude, longitude, and product type as features, and using revenue and expenses as model outputs is not a suitable way to develop an ML model to predict the company’s profitability for a new line of naturally flavored bottled waters in different locations. This option has the same drawbacks as option A, as it does not capture the interaction between latitude and longitude, or account for the granularity of the location data. Moreover, this option does not directly predict the profitability of the product, which is the target variable of interest. Instead, it predicts the revenue and expenses of the product, which are intermediate variables that depend on other factors, such as the price, the cost, or the demand of the product. To obtain the profitability, we would need to subtract the expenses from the revenue, which may introduce errors or uncertainties in the prediction.

Option C is correct because using product type and the feature cross of latitude with longitude, followed by binning, as features, and using profit as model output is a good way to develop an ML model to predict the company’s profitability for a new line of naturally flavored bottled waters in different locations. This option captures the interaction between latitude and longitude, which may affect the profitability of the product, by creating a feature cross of these two features. A feature cross is a synthetic feature that combines the values of two or more features into a single feature1. This option also accounts for the granularity of the location data, by binning the feature cross into discrete buckets. Binning is a technique that groups continuous values into intervals, which can reduce the noise and complexity of the data2. Moreover, this option directly predicts the profitability of the product, which is the target variable of interest, by using it as the model output.

Option D is incorrect because using product type and the feature cross of latitude with longitude, followed by binning, as features, and using revenue and expenses as model outputs is not a valid way to develop an ML model to predict the company’s profitability for a new line of naturally flavored bottled waters in different locations. This option has the same advantages as option C, as it captures the interaction between latitude and longitude, and accounts for the granularity of the location data, by creating a feature cross and binning it. However, this option does not directly predict the profitability of the product, which is the target variable of interest, but rather predicts the revenue and expenses of the product, which are intermediate variables that depend on other factors, as explained in option B.

References:

Feature cross

Binning

[Profitability]

[Revenue and expenses]

[Latitude and longitude]

[Product type]