Google Professional-Machine-Learning-Engineer Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

 Overfitting occurs when a model tries to fit the training data so closely that it does not generalize well to new data. Overfitting can be caused by having a model that is too complex for the data, such as having too many parameters or layers.  Overfitting can lead to poor performance on the validation data, which reflects how the model will perform on unseen data 1

To prevent overfitting, one strategy is to use regularization techniques that penalize the complexity of the model and encourage it to learn simpler patterns. Two common regularization techniques for deep neural networks are L2 regularization and dropout. L2 regularization adds a term to the loss function that is proportional to the squared magnitude of the model’s weights. This term penalizes large weights and encourages the model to use smaller weights. Dropout randomly drops out some units in the network during training, which prevents co-adaptation of features and reduces the effec tive number of parameters.  Both L2 regularization and dropout have hyperparameters that control the strength of the regularization effect 2 3

Another strategy to prevent overfitting is to use hyperparameter tuning, which is the process of finding the optimal values for the parameters of the model that affect its performance. Hyperparameter tuning can help find the best combination of hyperparameters that minimize the validation loss and improve the generalization ability of the model. AI Platform provides a service for hyperparameter tuning that can run multiple trials in parallel and use different search algorithms to find the best solution.

Therefore, the best strategy to use when retraining the model is to run a hyperparameter tuning job on AI Platform to optimize for the L2 regularization and dropout parameters. This will allow the model to find the optimal balance between fitting the training data and generalizing to new data. The other options are not as effective, as they either use fixed values for the regularization parameters, which may not be optimal, or they do not address the issue of overfitting at all.

Option A is incorrect because using latitude, longitude, and product type as features, and using profit as model output is not the best way to develop an ML model to predict the company’s profitability for a new line of naturally flavored bottled waters in different locations. This option does not capture the interaction between latitude and longitude, which may affect the profitability of the product. For example, the same product may have different profitability in different regions, depending on the climate, culture, or preferences of the customers. Moreover, this option does not account for the granularity of the location data, which may be too fine or too coarse for the model. For example, using the exact coordinates of a city may not be meaningful, as the profitability may vary within the city, or using the country name may not be informative, as the profitability may vary across the country.

Option B is incorrect because using latitude, longitude, and product type as features, and using revenue and expenses as model outputs is not a suitable way to develop an ML model to predict the company’s profitability for a new line of naturally flavored bottled waters in different locations. This option has the same drawbacks as option A, as it does not capture the interaction between latitude and longitude, or account for the granularity of the location data. Moreover, this option does not directly predict the profitability of the product, which is the target variable of interest. Instead, it predicts the revenue and expenses of the product, which are intermediate variables that depend on other factors, such as the price, the cost, or the demand of the product. To obtain the profitability, we would need to subtract the expenses from the revenue, which may introduce errors or uncertainties in the prediction.

Option C is correct because using product type and the feature cross of latitude with longitude, followed by binning, as features, and using profit as model output is a good way to develop an ML model to predict the company’s profitability for a new line of naturally flavored bottled waters in different locations. This option captures the interaction between latitude and longitude, which may affect the profitability of the product, by creating a feature cross of these two features.  A feature cross is a synthetic feature that combines the values of two or more features into a single feature 1 . This option also accounts for the granularity of the location data, by binning the feature cross into discrete buckets.  Binning is a technique that groups continuous values into intervals, which can reduce the noise and complexity of the data 2 . Moreover, this option directly predicts the profitability of the product, which is the target variable of interest, by using it as the model output.

Option D is incorrect because using product type and the feature cross of latitude with longitude, followed by binning, as features, and using revenue and expenses as model outputs is not a valid way to develop an ML model to predict the company’s profitability for a new line of naturally flavored bottled waters in different locations. This option has the same advantages as option C, as it captures the interaction between latitude and longitude, and accounts for the granularity of the location data, by creating a feature cross and binning it. However, this option does not directly predict the profitability of the product, which is the target variable of interest, but rather predicts the revenue and expenses of the product, which are intermediate variables that depend on other factors, as explained in option B.