Google Professional-Cloud-DevOps-Engineer Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

The correct answer is D. Option D.

According to the DevOps best practices, a joint-ownership model for a service between the DevOps team and the Software Development team should follow these principles12:

The DevOps team and the Software Development team should share the responsibility and collaboration for managing the service infrastructure, performing code reviews, and adopting and sharing SLOs for the service.

The DevOps team and the Software Development team should have end-to-end ownership of the service, from design to development to deployment to operation to maintenance.

The DevOps team and the Software Development team should use common tools and processes to facilitate communication, coordination, and feedback.

The DevOps team and the Software Development team should align their goals and incentives with the business outcomes and customer satisfaction.

Option D is the only option that reflects these principles. Option D assigns both teams the responsibilities of managing the service infrastructure, performing code reviews, and adopting and sharing SLOs for the service. Option D also implies that both teams have end-to-end ownership of the service, as they are involved in every stage of the service lifecycle.Option D also encourages both teams to use common tools and processes, such as GitLab3, to collaborate and communicate effectively. Option D also aligns both teams with the business outcomes and customer satisfaction, as they use SLOs to measure and improve the service quality.

The other options are incorrect because they do not follow the DevOps best practices. Option A is incorrect because it assigns only the DevOps team the responsibility of managing the service infrastructure, which creates a silo between the two teams and reduces their collaboration. Option A also does not assign any responsibility for adopting and sharing SLOs for the service, which means that both teams lack a common metric for measuring and improving the service quality. Option B is incorrect because it assigns only the Software Development team the responsibility of performing code reviews, which creates a gap between the two teams and reduces their feedback. Option B also does not assign any responsibility for adopting and sharing SLOs for the service, which means that both teams lack a common metric for measuring and improving the service quality. Option C is incorrect because it assigns both teams the same responsibilities as option A and option B, which combines their drawbacks.

To deploy only on new release tags, which follow a semantic versioning pattern (e.g., v1.2.3), you should use a tag filter with a regular expression matching semantic versions.

From the official documentation:

"You can configure Cloud Build to start a build automatically whenever there is a new tag in your source repository by using tag triggers."

— Cloud Build Triggers

Using a tag pattern like \d+\.\d+\.\d* ensures that builds only trigger on properly versioned release tags (minimizing unnecessary executions). This matches standard semver tags such as 1.0.0, 2.1.3, etc.

Comprehensive and Detailed 150 to 200 words of Explanation From Google Cloud DevOps guides documents:

In Site Reliability Engineering (SRE), the most effective way to manage an SLO is through Burn Rate Alerting. According to Google Cloud’s SRE documentation, a burn rate is the speed at which the error budget is being consumed relative to the SLO's compliance period. Relying on simple threshold alerts (Option D) or manual dashboard checks (Option B) often leads to "alert fatigue" or missed signals because they do not account for the rate of depletion over time.

By creating an alerting policy in Cloud Monitoring specifically based on the burn rate, you can identify "fast burns" (sudden outages) and "slow burns" (gradual regressions like increased latency). The system calculates the projection; if the current rate of error budget consumption is high enough to exhaust the remaining budget before the end of the 30-day window, it triggers a proactive notification. This allows the team to intervene while they still have a portion of the error budget remaining, effectively preventing an SLO violation rather than merely reacting to one after the fact. This approach aligns perfectly with Google Cloud's recommended practices for automated, data-driven incident prevention.