Google Associate-Cloud-Engineer Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

You write a lifecycle management rule in XML and push it to the bucket with gsutil lifecycle set config-xml-file. is not right.

gsutil lifecycle set enables you to set the lifecycle configuration on one or more buckets based on the configuration file provided. However, XML is not a valid supported type for the configuration file.

Write a script that runs gsutil ls -lr gs://myapp-gcp-ace-logs/ to find and remove items older than 90 days. Repeat this process every morning. is not right.

This manual approach is error-prone, time-consuming and expensive. GCP Cloud Storage provides lifecycle management rules that let you achieve this with minimal effort.

Write a script that runs gsutil ls -l gs://myapp-gcp-ace-logs/ to find and remove items older than 90 days. Schedule the script with cron. is not right.

This manual approach is error-prone, time-consuming and expensive. GCP Cloud Storage provides lifecycle management rules that let you achieve this with minimal effort.

Write a lifecycle management rule in JSON and push it to the bucket with gsutil lifecycle set config-json-file. is the right answer.

You can assign a lifecycle management configuration to a bucket. The configuration contains a set of rules which apply to current and future objects in the bucket. When an object meets the criteria of one of the rules, Cloud Storage automatically performs a specified action on the object. One of the supported actions is to Delete objects. You can set up a lifecycle management to delete objects older than 90 days. gsutil lifecycle set enables you to set the lifecycle configuration on the bucket based on the configuration file. JSON is the only supported type for the configuration file. The config-json-file specified on the command line should be a path to a local file containing the lifecycle configuration JSON document.

The goal is to create a landing zone facilitating private IP communication across production projects and apply organization-wide firewall rules, following best practices and minimizing operational costs.

Network Structure:Individual VPCs with Peering (A, B): While VPC Peering allows private connectivity, managing a full mesh or complex peering topology across many projects becomes operationally complex and can hit peering limits. It's not the recommended pattern for centralized connectivity in a landing zone.

Shared VPC (C, D): This is the Google-recommended practice for scenarios where resources from multiple projects need to communicate privately within a common VPC network. A central host project owns the network, and service projects use it. This simplifies network administration and connectivity.

Firewall Rules:Organization Policies (A, C): These enforce organizational constraints (e.g., disable external IPs, restrict locations) but do not define specific network firewall rules (like allowing TCP ports).

Hierarchical Firewall Policies (B, D): These allow defining firewall rules at the Organization or Folder level, which are inherited by resources in descendant projects/folders. This is the mechanism to apply consistent firewall rules (like allowing specific TCP ports) across all VMs in the organization (or a specific folder) efficiently, without managing rules in each individual VPC or project.

Combining Shared VPC for the network structure (best practice for cross-project private communication and central management) with Hierarchical Firewall Policies (for applying organization-wide firewall rules) meets all requirements efficiently and follows Google recommendations.