Google Associate-Cloud-Engineer Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

As part of your workload, there might be certain VM instances that are critical to running your application or services, such as an instance running a SQL server, a server used as a license manager, and so on. These VM instances might need to stay running indefinitely so you need a way to protect these VMs from being deleted. By setting the deletionProtection flag, a VM instance can be protected from accidental deletion. If a user attempts to delete a VM instance for which you have set the deletionProtection flag, the request fails. Only a user that has been granted a role with compute.instances.create permission can reset the flag to allow the resource to be deleted.

Let's evaluate each option based on the requirement of sub-millisecond latency for globally stored IoT data:

A. Spanner with Caching: While Spanner offers strong consistency and global scalability, the base latency might not consistently be sub-millisecond for all read/write operations globally. Introducing caching adds complexity and doesn't guarantee sub-millisecond latency for all initial reads or cache misses.

B. Bigtable: Bigtable is a highly scalable NoSQL database service designed for low-latency, high-throughput workloads. It excels at storing and retrieving large volumes of time-series data, which is typical for IoT sensor data. Its architecture is optimized for single-key lookups and scans, providing consistent sub-millisecond latency, making it a strong candidate for this use case.

C. BigQuery: BigQuery is a fully managed, serverless data warehouse designed for analytical queries on large datasets. While it's excellent for analyzing IoT data in batch, it's not optimized for the low-latency, high-throughput ingestion and retrieval required for real-time IoT applications with sub-millisecond latency needs.

D. Cloud Storage with Cloud CDN: Cloud Storage is object storage and is not designed for low-latency transactional workloads. Cloud CDN is a content delivery network that caches content closer to users for faster delivery, but it's not suitable for the primary storage of rapidly incoming IoT sensor data requiring sub-millisecond write latency.

Google Cloud Documentation References:

Cloud Bigtable Overview: - This document highlights Bigtable 's suitability for low-latency and high-throughput applications, including IoT. It mentions its ability to handle massive amounts of data with consistent performance.

Spanner Overview: - While Spanner offers low latency, Bigtable is generally preferred for extremely high-throughput, low-latency use cases like raw sensor data ingestion due to its optimized architecture for such workloads.

BigQuery Overview: - This emphasizes BigQuery 's analytical capabilities rather than low-latency operational workloads.

Cloud Storage Overview: - This describes Cloud Storage as object storage, not ideal for sub-millisecond latency reads and writes required for real-time IoT data.

===========

Comprehensive and Detailed In Depth Explanation:

Let's evaluate each database option against the requirements: automatic scaling, multi-region support, and low latency for a growing social media platform:

A. Bigtable: Bigtable is a highly scalable NoSQL database designed for large analytical and operational workloads with low latency. It offers excellent horizontal scalability and can be deployed across multiple regions for high availability and lower latency for a global user base. However, it's a NoSQL database and might require significant changes to your existing PostgreSQL data model and application code.

B. BigQuery: BigQuery is a fully managed, serverless data warehouse optimized for analytical queries on large datasets. It's not designed for low-latency transactional workloads that a social media platformwould require for real-time user interactions. While it's globally available, its primary use case is not operational database needs.

C. Spanner: Spanner is a globally distributed, horizontally scalable relational database service with strong consistency. It offers automatic scaling, built-in multi-region and multi-continental configurations for high availability and low latency across a global user base, and supports standard SQL (with some extensions). This makes it a strong candidate for a rapidly growing platform needing scalability, global presence, and low latency. While it's not directly PostgreSQL, it offers a relational model and tools to aid migration.

D. Cloud SQL for PostgreSQL: Cloud SQL offers managed PostgreSQL instances with automatic scaling capabilities. It supports high availability within a region and cross-region read replicas for disaster recovery and read scaling. However, its multi-region capabilities for write operations and automatic scaling across regions are more limited compared to Spanner. For a rapidly growing platform with a primarily North American user base but future global expansion in mind and a need for low latency, Spanner's architecture is better suited for true multi-region write capabilities and consistent low latency globally.

Considering the requirements for automatic scaling, multi-region support for both reads and writes with low latency for a growing user base, Spanner is the most appropriate choice.

Google Cloud Documentation References:

Cloud Spanner Overview: - This document highlights Spanner 's global scalability, strong consistency, and multi-region capabilities.

Cloud Bigtable Overview: - While scalable and low-latency, it 's a NoSQL database, which might require significant application changes.

BigQuery Overview: - Focuses on analytics, not low-latency transactional workloads.

Cloud SQL for PostgreSQL Overview: - While it offers scaling and regional HA, its multi-region write capabilities are not as robust as Spanner 's.

===========