Free and Premium Google Professional-Cloud-DevOps-Engineer Dumps Questions Answers

To allow manual QA approval, you need separate pipeline stages (e.g., staging → production) and manual promotion between them.

"Cloud Deploy supports multi-stage pipelines where you can manually approve releases before promotion."

— Cloud Deploy Promotion

"Use a standard strategy when there are no automated tests or SLOs to support rollback decisions."

— Deployment Strategies

Canary is best used when automated health checks and metrics exist, which is not the case here.

Comprehensive and Detailed 150 to 200 words of Explanation From Google Cloud DevOps guides documents:

Google Cloud’s Dynamic Workload Scheduler offers two distinct modes designed to balance resource availability with cost and criticality. Flex Start mode is optimized for cost-sensitive, asynchronous workloads that do not have a strict start time. It allows the scheduler to obtain capacity when it becomes available within a 7-day window, making it the ideal choice for the Research team's hundreds of small experiments. This mode prioritizes resource optimization and lower costs over immediate execution.

Conversely, Calendar mode is designed for business-critical jobs that require guaranteed capacity at a specific date and time. By using Calendar mode, the Production team can reserve the necessary GPU or TPU resources for their Friday 10:00 PM retraining session. This ensures the job starts exactly on time and runs without interruption, satisfying the "business-critical" requirement. Combining these two modes allows an organization to maximize cluster utilization: using Flex Start to fill the gaps with non-urgent research while ensuring that high-priority production tasks have the "just-in-time" resource guarantees they need to maintain SLOs (Service Level Objectives).

The correct answer is D. Grant the roles/storage.objectAdmin Identity and Access Management (IAM) role to the Cloud Build service account on the state file bucket.

According to the Google Cloud documentation, Cloud Build is a service that executes your builds on Google Cloud Platform infrastructure1. Cloud Build uses a service account to execute your build steps and access resources, such as Cloud Storage buckets2. Terraform is an open-source tool that allows you to define and provision infrastructure as code3. Terraform uses a state file to store and track the state of your infrastructure4. You can configure Terraform to use a Cloud Storage bucket as a backend to store and share the state file across multiple users or environments5.

The error message indicates that Cloud Build failed to access the Cloud Storage bucket that contains the Terraform state file. This is likely because the Cloud Build service account does not have the necessary permissions to read and write objects in the bucket. To resolve this issue, you need to grant the roles/storage.objectAdmin IAM role to the Cloud Build service account on the state file bucket. This role allows the service account to create, delete, and manage objects in the bucket6. You can use the gcloud command-line tool or the Google Cloud Console to grant this role.

The other options are incorrect because they do not follow Google-recommended practices. Option A is incorrect because it changes the Terraform code to use local state, which is not recommended for production or collaborative environments, as it can cause conflicts, data loss, or inconsistency. Option B is incorrect because it creates a new storage bucket with the name specified in the Terraform configuration, but it does not grant any permissions to the Cloud Build service account on the new bucket. Option C is incorrect because it grants the roles/owner IAM role to the Cloud Build service account on the project, which is too broad and violates the principle of least privilege. The roles/owner role grants full access to all resources in the project, which can pose a security risk if misused or compromised.

The correct answer is D. Review the design of the product with the product development team to provide feedback early in the design phase.

According to the Google Cloud DevOps best practices, a Site Reliability Engineer (SRE) should collaborate with the product development team from the beginning of the product lifecycle, not just after the product is deployed or tested. This way, the SRE can provide operational input on the product design, such as scalability, reliability, security, and cost efficiency. The SRE can also help define service level objectives (SLOs) and service level indicators (SLIs) for the product, as well as monitoring and alerting strategies. By collaborating early and often, the SRE and the product development team can ensure that the product meets the operational requirements and expectations of the customers.

The logging.configWriter role grants permissions to create, update, and delete log exports. This is the correct role to give team members who need to export logs2.

Rollback to previous stable version. Then you need to find what is causing the issue.

Latency is commonly measured as a distribution. Given a distribution, you can measure various percentiles. For example, you might measure the number of requests that are slower than the historical 99th percentile.

The best option for ensuring that the three environments are consistent and following Google-recommended practices is to use Cloud Build to render and deploy the network policies and the DaemonSet, and set up Config Sync to sync the configurations for the three environments. Cloud Build is a service that executes your builds on Google Cloud infrastructure. You can use Cloud Build to render and deploy your network policies and DaemonSet as code using tools like Kustomize, Helm, or kpt. Config Sync is a feature that enables you to manage the configurations of your GKE clusters from a single source of truth, such as a Git repository. You can use Config Sync to sync the configurations for your development, staging, and production environments and ensure that they are consistent.

To deploy only on new release tags, which follow a semantic versioning pattern (e.g., v1.2.3), you should use a tag filter with a regular expression matching semantic versions.

From the official documentation:

"You can configure Cloud Build to start a build automatically whenever there is a new tag in your source repository by using tag triggers."

— Cloud Build Triggers

Using a tag pattern like \d+\.\d+\.\d* ensures that builds only trigger on properly versioned release tags (minimizing unnecessary executions). This matches standard semver tags such as 1.0.0, 2.1.3, etc.

The best way to prevent severe incidents from happening in the future is to ensure that test cases that catch errors of this type are run successfully before new software releases. This is aligned with the Site Reliability Engineering principle of testing for reliability.

The best option for configuring all current and future Compute Engine instances to collect system logs and ensure that the Ops Agent remains up to date is to use the gcloud CLI to create an Agent Policy. An Agent Policy is a resource that defines how Ops Agents are installed and configured on VM instances that match certain criteria, such as labels or zones. Ops Agents are software agents that collect metrics and logs from VM instances and send them to Cloud Operations products, such as Cloud Monitoring and Cloud Logging. By creating an Agent Policy, you can ensure that all current and future VM instances that match the policy criteria will have the Ops Agent installed and updated automatically. This way, you can collect system logs from all VM instances and use them to generate dashboards in Cloud Operations.

 The most efficient way to build an automated pipeline that deploys the application when the image is updated is to use Cloud Pub/Sub to trigger a Spinnaker pipeline. This way, you can leverage the built-in integration between GCR and Cloud Pub/Sub, and use Spinnaker as a continuous delivery platform for deploying your application .

The correct answer is D. Option D.

According to the DevOps best practices, a joint-ownership model for a service between the DevOps team and the Software Development team should follow these principles12:

The DevOps team and the Software Development team should share the responsibility and collaboration for managing the service infrastructure, performing code reviews, and adopting and sharing SLOs for the service.

The DevOps team and the Software Development team should have end-to-end ownership of the service, from design to development to deployment to operation to maintenance.

The DevOps team and the Software Development team should use common tools and processes to facilitate communication, coordination, and feedback.

The DevOps team and the Software Development team should align their goals and incentives with the business outcomes and customer satisfaction.

Option D is the only option that reflects these principles. Option D assigns both teams the responsibilities of managing the service infrastructure, performing code reviews, and adopting and sharing SLOs for the service. Option D also implies that both teams have end-to-end ownership of the service, as they are involved in every stage of the service lifecycle.Option D also encourages both teams to use common tools and processes, such as GitLab3, to collaborate and communicate effectively. Option D also aligns both teams with the business outcomes and customer satisfaction, as they use SLOs to measure and improve the service quality.

The other options are incorrect because they do not follow the DevOps best practices. Option A is incorrect because it assigns only the DevOps team the responsibility of managing the service infrastructure, which creates a silo between the two teams and reduces their collaboration. Option A also does not assign any responsibility for adopting and sharing SLOs for the service, which means that both teams lack a common metric for measuring and improving the service quality. Option B is incorrect because it assigns only the Software Development team the responsibility of performing code reviews, which creates a gap between the two teams and reduces their feedback. Option B also does not assign any responsibility for adopting and sharing SLOs for the service, which means that both teams lack a common metric for measuring and improving the service quality. Option C is incorrect because it assigns both teams the same responsibilities as option A and option B, which combines their drawbacks.

Besides the list of default logs that the Logging agent streams by default, you can customize the Logging agent to send additional logs to Logging or to adjust agent settings by adding input configurations. The configuration definitions in these sections apply to the fluent-plugin-google-cloud output plugin only and specify how logs are transformed and ingested into Cloud

The Horizontal Pod Autoscaler changes the shape of your Kubernetes workload by automatically increasing or decreasing the number of Pods in response to the workload's CPU or memory consumption

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From General Cloud Monitoring Knowledge:

The key requirement is to distinguish between failures in your own service and those caused by an underlying Google Cloud service.

A. Enable Personalized Service Health annotations on the dashboard: Google Cloud Personalized Service Health provides information about incidents affecting Google Cloud services that may impact your projects. When enabled and integrated with Monitoring, it can display these events as annotations on your dashboards, overlaying them on your service's metrics charts. This allows you to correlate dips in your service's performance with known Google Cloud service issues, directly addressing the need to distinguish failure origins.

B. Create an alerting policy for the system error metrics: Alerting policies are for notifications when metrics cross thresholds. While useful for detecting issues in your own service, they don't inherently distinguish the cause between your service and a Google Cloud dependency without further context, which option A provides.

C. Create a log-based metric to track cloud service errors, and display the metric on the dashboard: You could try to create log-based metrics from logs that might indicate a cloud service error (e.g., specific API error codes from Google Cloud services). However, this is indirect, might require complex parsing, and Personalized Service Health is a more direct and authoritative source for Google Cloud service disruptions.

D. Create a logs widget to display system errors from Cloud Logging on the dashboard: Similar to C, displaying raw system error logs can be helpful for troubleshooting your own service, but it doesn't provide a clear, curated view of whether a Google Cloud service itself is having an issue. It would require manual interpretation to link these logs to a potential Google Cloud outage.

Personalized Service Health is specifically designed to provide visibility into Google Cloud service incidents relevant to your resources. Integrating this with Monitoring dashboards is the most direct way to achieve the stated goal.

Reference (Based on Cloud Monitoring and Personalized Service Health features):

Personalized Service Health Overview:

Integrating with Cloud Monitoring: Documentation often shows how to enable annotations for Personalized Service Health events on Monitoring charts. This allows a visual correlation between your service metrics and Google Cloud service health events."Personalized Service Health integrates with Cloud Monitoring so you can see service health events alongside your metrics."

"You can enable annotations on your metric charts to display relevant Personalized Service Health events."

This feature directly helps differentiate between issues in your application versus issues in the underlying Google Cloud services.

The best option for making the third-party application work while following Google-recommended security practices is to add a rule to set the iam.disableServiceAccountKeyCreation policy to off in your project and create a key. The iam.disableServiceAccountKeyCreation policy is an organization policy that controls whether service account keys can be created in a project or organization. By default, this policy is set to on, which means that service account keys cannot be created. However, you can override this policy at a lower level, such as a project, by adding a rule to set it to off. This way, you can create a service account key for your project without affecting other projects or organizations. You should also follow the best practices for managing service account keys, such as rotating them regularly, storing them securely, and deleting them when they are no longer needed.

Eliminate bad monitoring : Unactionable alerts (i.e.,

agree with kyubiblaze about having to remove unactionable items aka spam: "good monitoring alerts on actionable problems"

The best option for deploying a new version of your containerized application to production on GKE and ensuring that the application does not have performance problems after deployment is to deploy the application through a continuous delivery pipeline by using canary deployments, use Cloud Monitoring to look for performance issues, and ramp up traffic as supported by the metrics. A canary deployment is a deployment strategy that involves releasing a new version of an application to a subset of users or servers and monitoring its performance and reliability. This way, you can test the new version in the production environment with real traffic and load, and gradually increase the traffic as the metrics indicate. You can use Cloud Monitoring to collect and analyze metrics from your application and GKE cluster, such as latency, error rate, CPU utilization, and memory usage. You can also use Cloud Monitoring to set up alerts and dashboards to track the performance of your application.

The correct answer is B. Create an attestation for the builds that pass the load test by using a private key stored in Cloud Key Management Service (Cloud KMS) authenticated through Workload Identity.

According to the Google Cloud documentation, Binary Authorization is a deploy-time security control that ensures only trusted container images are deployed on Google Kubernetes Engine (GKE) or Cloud Run1.Binary Authorization uses attestations to certify that a specific image has completed a previous stage in the CI/CD pipeline, such as passing a load test2.Attestations are signed by private keys that are associated with attestors, which are entities that verify the attestations3.To follow Google-recommended practices, you should store your private keys in Cloud Key ManagementService (Cloud KMS), which is a secure and scalable service for managing cryptographic keys4.You should also use Workload Identity, which is a feature that allows Kubernetes service accounts to act as Google service accounts, to authenticate to Cloud KMS and sign attestations without having to manage or expose service account keys5.

The other options are incorrect because they do not follow Google-recommended practices. Option A and option D require human intervention to sign the attestations, which is not scalable or automated. Option C exposes the service account JSON key as a Kubernetes Secret, which is less secure than using Workload Identity.

The best option for preparing to handle the predicted growth is to verify the maximum node pool size, enable a Horizontal Pod Autoscaler, and then perform a load test to verify your expected resource needs. The maximum node pool size is a parameter that specifies the maximum number of nodes that can be added to a node pool by the cluster autoscaler. You should verify that the maximum node pool size is sufficient to accommodate your expected growth rate and avoid hitting any quota limits. The Horizontal Pod Autoscaler is a feature that automatically adjusts the number of Pods in a deployment or replica set based on observed CPU utilization or custom metrics. You should enable a Horizontal Pod Autoscaler for your application to ensure that it runs enough Pods to handle the load. A load test is a test that simulates high user traffic and measures the performance and reliability of your application. You should perform a load test to verify your expected resource needs and identify any bottlenecks or issues.

For a postmortem to be truly blameless, it must focus on identifying the contributing causes of the incident without indicting any individual or team for bad or inappropriate behavior.

The keywords here is "developers or operators". Option A the operators could push images to production without approval (operators could touch the cluster directly and the cluster cannot do any action against them). Rest same as francisco_guerra.

The best option for determining whether the increase in availability is worth the investment for a single year of usage is to calculate the value of improved availability to be $900, and determine that the increase in availability is not worth the investment. To calculate the value of improved availability, we can use the following formula:

Value of improved availability = Revenue * (New availability - Current availability)

Plugging in the given numbers, we get:

Value of improved availability = $1,000,000 * (0.9999 - 0.999) = $900

Since the value of improved availability is less than the investment of $2,000, we can conclude that the increase in availability is not worth the investment.

When disaster strikes, the person who declares the incident typically steps into the IC role and directs the high-level state of the incident. The IC concentrates on the 3Cs and does the following: Commands and coordinates the incident response, delegating roles as needed. By default, the IC assumes all roles that have not been delegated yet. Communicates effectively. Stays in control of the incident response. Works with other responders to resolve the

To exclude a subset of users or projects from Data Access audit logging, you use the exempted principals configuration. This allows you to selectively disable logs for specific groups, such as developers in the CustomerService folder.

"You can configure exempted principals so that audit logs are not generated for certain users, service accounts, or groups."

— Configuring Audit Logs

"Data Access logs are disabled by default because of their high volume, and you can enable them at the organization, folder, or project level."

— Audit Logs Overview

Thus, enabling audit logging org-wide and exempting a specific set of users (i.e., CustomerService folder) meets the need.

 The best option for mitigating the incident impact on users and enabling the developers to troubleshoot the issue is to change the selector on the Service app-svc to app: my-app, version: blue. A Service is a resource that defines how to access a set of Pods. A selector is a field that specifies which Pods are selected by the Service. By changing the selector on the Service app-svc to app: my-app, version: blue, you can ensure that the Service only routes traffic to the Pods that have both labels app: my-app and version: blue. These Pods belong to the Deployment app-blue, which uses the previous version of the application. This way, you can mitigate the incident impact on users by switching back to the working version of the application. You can also enable the developers to troubleshoot the issue with the new version of the application in the Deployment app-green without affecting users.

To control data residency in Secret Manager, you must use a user-managed replication policy to specify that secrets reside in U.S. regions, satisfying healthcare compliance requirements (e.g., HIPAA, regional residency).

“To ensure that secrets are stored only in certain regions, use user-managed replication.”

— Secret Manager Replication Policies

“If an organization policy restricts the use of the global location, use a user-managed replication policy to comply with those restrictions.”

— Policy Restrictions on Global Resources

Using user-managed replication allows you to explicitly define U.S. regions while resolving the policy block.

Comprehensive and Detailed 150 to 200 words of Explanation From Google Cloud DevOps guides documents:

In incident management, the primary goal during the "Mitigation" phase is to restore service levels as quickly as possible, often referred to as "stopping the bleeding." Google Cloud’s SRE principles emphasize that during a high-priority incident, you should prioritize actions that have an immediate impact over long-term fixes or deep-dive forensics. While a rollback (Option C) is a standard procedure, the 15-minute CI/CD overhead is too slow when a critical payment service is failing. Using Cloud Profiler (Option A) is a diagnostic step that should be reserved for the post-mortem phase, not the heat of the outage.

Canceling the active Dataflow job (Option D) is the fastest way to alleviate the pressure on the shared Memorystore instance. Since the Dataflow pipeline is "non-critical" and "batch-based," stopping it has a low business impact compared to the payment service outage. Once the job is canceled, the write pressure on Redis drops instantly, reducing read latency and restoring the payment service to health. This aligns with the SRE practice of "shedding load" to protect critical system components. Once the immediate crisis is resolved, the team can then investigate the root cause and implement long-term fixes like rate limiting or resource isolation.

To restrict access to specific sensitive log fields (e.g. PII), Google Cloud offers Log field-level access control. You can apply field-level restrictions and then assign the Log Field Accessor role only to trusted personnel.

“You can use field-level access control to restrict access to certain fields in your logs. For example, you can restrict access to jsonPayload.user_email.”

— Cloud Logging Field-Level Access

“Grant the roles/logging.fieldAccessor role to principals that require access to these restricted fields.”

— Log Field Accessor Role

This lets your operations team continue using logs while ensuring that PII is only visible to the security team, fulfilling your compliance obligations.

To speed up Docker builds, optimize layer caching. Google Cloud recommends using --cache-from with Artifact Registry, and placing frequently changed files late in the Dockerfile so earlier layers can be reused.

“Put instructions that are less likely to change (like installing packages) early in the Dockerfile, and more frequently changing lines (like copying app code) near the end.”

— Dockerfile Best Practices

“Use the --cache-from argument to pull layers from previously built images in Artifact Registry.”

— Cloud Build Docker Caching

This dramatically reduces build time by avoiding redundant rebuilds of static layers.

OOMKilled means the containers exceeded their allocated memory. Since the HPA isn't scaling up (stuck at min), this indicates the issue is not scale-related but container memory limits are too low.

"Pods terminated with OOMKilled have exceeded their memory limits. You should adjust the container's resource requests and limits."

— Kubernetes OOMKill Debug Guide

Scaling the number of replicas won't help if each replica crashes. You need to increase memory limits so pods can run reliably before autoscaling can even work.

The best option for selecting a deployment and testing strategy that meets your requirements is to use blue/green deployment and canary testing. A blue/green deployment is a deployment strategy that involves creating two identical environments, one running the current version of the application (blue) and one running the new version of the application (green). The traffic is switched from blue to green after testing the new version, and if any issues are discovered, the traffic can be switched back to blue instantly. This way, you can reduce the complexity of release deployments and minimize the duration of deployment rollbacks. A canary testing is a testing strategy that involves releasing a new version of an application to a subset of users or servers and monitoring its performance and reliability. This way, you can test real production traffic with a gradual increase in the number of affected users.

Cloud Build is a service that executes your builds on Google Cloud Platform infrastructure. Cloud Build can import source code from Google Cloud Storage, Cloud Source Repositories, GitHub, or Bitbucket, execute a build to your specifications, and produce artifacts such as Docker containers or Java archives1. Cloud Build can also run integration tests as part of your build steps2.

You can use Cloud Build to run tests in a specific folder by specifying the path to the folder in the dir field of your build step3. For example, if you have a folder named tests that contains your integration tests, you can use the following build step to run them:

steps:

- name: 'gcr.io/cloud-builders/go'

args: ['test', '-v']

dir: 'tests'

Copy

You can use Cloud Build to trigger builds for every GitHub pull request by using the Cloud Build GitHub app. The app allows you to automatically build on Git pushes and pull requests and view your build results on GitHub and Google Cloud console4. You can configure the app to run builds on specific branches, tags, or paths5. For example, if you want to run builds on pull requests that target the master branch, you can use the following trigger configuration:

includedFiles:

- '**'

name: 'pull-request-trigger'

github:

name: 'my-repo'

owner: 'my-org'

pullRequest:

branch: '^master$'

Using Cloud Build to run tests in a specific folder and trigger builds for every GitHub pull request is a good way to continuously test your feature branch and ensure that all code is tested before changes areaccepted. This way, you can catch any errors or bugs early and prevent them from affecting the main branch.

Using a Jenkins server for CI/CD pipelines is not a bad option, but it would require more setup and maintenance than using Cloud Build, which is fully managed by Google Cloud. Periodically running all tests in the feature branch is not as efficient as running tests for every pull request, as it may delay the feedback loop and increase the risk of conflicts or failures.

Using Cloud Build to run the tests after a pull request is merged is not a good practice, as it may introduce errors or bugs into the main branch that could have been prevented by testing before merging.

Asking the pull request reviewers to run the integration tests before approving the code is not a reliable way of ensuring code quality, as it depends on human intervention and may be prone to errors or oversights.

 The best option for implementing guard rails on all GKE clusters to only allow the deployment of trusted and approved images is to use Binary Authorization to attest images during your CI/CD pipeline. Binary Authorization is a feature that allows you to enforce signature-based validation when deploying container images. You can use Binary Authorization to create policies that specify which images are allowed or denied in your GKE clusters. You can also use Binary Authorization to attest images during your CI/CD pipeline by using tools such as Container Analysis or third-party integrations. An attestation is a digital signature that certifies that an image meets certain criteria, such as passing vulnerability scans or code reviews. By using Binary Authorization to attest images during your CI/CD pipeline, you can ensure that only trusted and approved images are deployed to your GKE clusters.

The best option for ensuring continued operations until the microservice is fixed is to add a HTTP liveness probe to the microservice’s deployment. A HTTP liveness probe is a type of probe that checks if a Pod is alive by sending an HTTP request and expecting a success response code. If the probe fails, Kubernetes will restart the Pod. You can add a HTTP liveness probe to your microservice’s deployment by using a livenessProbe field in your Pod spec. This way, you can ensure that any Pod that returns 403 errors after running for more than five hours will be restarted automatically and resume normal operations.

Comprehensive and Detailed 150 to 200 words of Explanation From Google Cloud DevOps guides documents:

In Site Reliability Engineering (SRE), the most effective way to manage an SLO is through Burn Rate Alerting. According to Google Cloud’s SRE documentation, a burn rate is the speed at which the error budget is being consumed relative to the SLO's compliance period. Relying on simple threshold alerts (Option D) or manual dashboard checks (Option B) often leads to "alert fatigue" or missed signals because they do not account for the rate of depletion over time.

By creating an alerting policy in Cloud Monitoring specifically based on the burn rate, you can identify "fast burns" (sudden outages) and "slow burns" (gradual regressions like increased latency). The system calculates the projection; if the current rate of error budget consumption is high enough to exhaust the remaining budget before the end of the 30-day window, it triggers a proactive notification. This allows the team to intervene while they still have a portion of the error budget remaining, effectively preventing an SLO violation rather than merely reacting to one after the fact. This approach aligns perfectly with Google Cloud's recommended practices for automated, data-driven incident prevention.

The best option for implementing the rollback actions is to update the Kubernetes Service to point to the previous Kubernetes Deployment. A Kubernetes Service is a resource that defines how to access a set of Pods. A Kubernetes Deployment is a resource that manages the creation and update of Pods. By using the blue/green deployment methodology, you can create two Deployments, one for the current version (blue) and one for the new version (green), and use a Service to switch traffic between them. If you need to rollback, you can update the Service to point to the previous Deployment (blue) and stop sending traffic to the new Deployment (green).