Amazon Web Services DOP-C02 Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

 The correct solution is to create a new assertion safety rule in Route 53 ARC and apply it to the two routing controls. An assertion safety rule is a type of safety rule that ensures that a minimum number of routing controls are always enabled. The ATLEAST type of assertion safety rule specifies the minimum number of routing controls that must be enabled for the rule to evaluate as healthy. By setting the threshold to 1, the rule ensures that at least one routing control is always turned on. This prevents the scenario where both routing controls are accidentally turned off and the application becomes unavailable in both Regions.

The other solutions are incorrect because they do not use safety rules to prevent both routing controls from being turned off. A gating safety rule is a type of safety rule that prevents routing control state changes that violate the rule logic. The OR type of gating safety rule specifies that one or more routing controls must be enabled for the rule to evaluate as healthy. However, this rule does not prevent a user from turning off both routing controls manually. A resource set is a collection of resources that are tested for readiness by Route 53 ARC. A readiness check is a test that verifies that all the resources in a resource set are operational. However, these concepts are not related to routing control states or safety rules. Therefore, creating a new resource set and a new readiness check will not ensure that at least one routing control is turned on at all times. References:

Routing control in Amazon Route 53 Application Recovery Controller

Viewing and updating routing control states in Route 53 ARC

Creating a control panel in Route 53 ARC

Creating safety rules in Route 53 ARC

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract of DevOps Engineer documents only:

During an Amazon ECS service deployment, if tasks fail the Elastic Load Balancing target group health checks, Amazon ECS considers those tasks unhealthy and stops and replaces them. This behavior can cause the deployment to remain incomplete because healthy replacement tasks never become available.

Also, if an essential container in the task exits, the entire task stops. Since the question states that the new tasks enter a stopped state soon after launch, an essential container failure is a direct and highly likely cause.

Why the other options are incorrect:

B. The IAM role used by the DevOps engineer to update the ECS service does not need RunTask permission for the tasks to remain running after launch. A permission issue here would more likely affect the update action itself rather than cause launched tasks to stop shortly afterward.

C. Although CloudWatch Logs configuration problems can affect logging, the missing log group is not the most likely direct reason for ECS tasks to repeatedly stop in this deployment scenario.

D. The task role provides permissions to the application code running inside the container. It is not the role primarily responsible for launching the task. Task startup is typically related to the task execution role, ECS service behavior, container health, and load balancer checks.

To implement a control that requires the use of IMDSv2 on all EC2 instances in the account, the DevOps engineer can use a permissions boundary. A permissions boundary is a policy that defines the maximum permissions that an IAM entity can have. The DevOps engineer can create a permissions boundary that prevents the ec2:RunInstance action if the ec2:MetadataHttpTokens condition key is not set to a value of required. This condition key enforces the use of IMDSv2 on EC2 instances. The DevOps engineer can attach the permissions boundary to the IAM role that was used to launch the instance. This way, any attempt to launch an EC2 instance without using IMDSv2 will be denied by the permissions boundary.