Amazon Web Services DOP-C02 Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

The problem is that the DevOps engineer cannot assume the OrganizationAccountAccessRole IAM role in the new member account that joined AnyCompany’s management account through an Organizations invitation. The solution is to create a new IAM role with the same name and trust policy in the new member account.

Option A is incorrect, as it does not address the root cause of the error. The DevOps engineer’s IAM user already has permission to assume the OrganizationAccountAccessRole IAM role in any member account, as this is the default role name that AWS Organizations creates when a new account joins an organization. The error occurs because the new member account does not have this role, as it was not created by AWS Organizations.

Option B is incorrect, as it does not address the root cause of the error. An SCP is a policy that defines the maximum permissions for account members of an organization or organizational unit (OU). An SCP does not grant permissions to IAM users or roles, but rather limits the permissions that identity-based policies or resource-based policies grant to them. An SCP also does not affect how IAM roles are assumed by other principals.

Option C is correct, as it addresses the root cause of the error. By creating a new IAM role with the same name and trust policy as the OrganizationAccountAccessRole IAM role in the new member account, the DevOps engineer can assume this role and access the account. The new role should have the AdministratorAccess AWS managed policy attached, which grants full access to all AWS resources in the account. The trust policy should allow the management account to assume the role, which can be done by specifying the management account ID as a principal in the policy statement.

Option D is incorrect, as it assumes that the new member account already has the OrganizationAccountAccessRole IAM role, which is not true. The new member account does not have this role, as it was not created by AWS Organizations. Editing the trust policy of a non-existent role will not solve the problem.

To achieve multi-Region high availability for a serverless API-based application, the architecture must be duplicated in the second Region and supported by a multi-Region data layer and appropriate DNS routing. Option A provides the required multi-Region data layer using DynamoDB global tables , which replicate data automatically and asynchronously between Regions. This allows reads and writes in either Region and prevents cross-Region latency bottlenecks.

Option C ensures that the compute components—API Gateway REST API and AWS Lambda functions—are deployed in both Regions. Each Region operates independently, providing true active-active redundancy and allowing Route 53 to route traffic directly to either Region without dependency on the other.

Option E selects Route 53 latency-based routing , which directs each user to the Region with the lowest round-trip latency. This meets the requirement to route traffic based on the Region providing the best response time rather than only providing active-passive failover.

Option D (failover routing) supports active-standby topologies, not active-active. Option B creates a global secondary index, which does not provide multi-Region replication. Option F (multivalue routing) distributes traffic randomly and does not account for latency or Region placement.

Thus, combining DynamoDB global tables, duplicated serverless architecture, and latency-based routing fully satisfies the requirements.

Creating an AWS CodeCommit repository for each project, using the main branch for production code, and creating a testing branch for code deployed to testing will meet the requirements. AWS CodeCommit is a managed revision control service that hosts Git repositories and works with all Git-based tools1. By using feature branches to develop new features and pull requests to merge code to testing and main branches, the developers can avoid code conflicts and lost work, and also implement code reviews and approvals. Option B is incorrect because creating another S3 bucket for each project for testing code and using an AWS Lambda function to promote code changes between testing and production buckets will not provide the benefits of revision control, such as tracking changes, branching, merging, and collaborating. Option C is incorrect because using the main branch for production and test code with different deployment pipelines for each environment will not allow the developers to test their code changes before deploying them to production. Option D is incorrect because enabling versioning and branching on each S3 bucket will not work with Git-based tools and will not provide the same level of revision control as AWS CodeCommit. References:

AWS CodeCommit

Certified DevOps Engineer - Professional (DOP-C02) Study Guide (page 182)