Amazon Web Services DOP-C02 Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

The CfCT solution is designed for the exact purpose stated in the question. It extends the capabilities of AWS Control Tower by providing you with a way to automate resource provisioning and apply custom configurations across all AWS accounts created in the Control Tower environment. This enables the company to implement additional account customizations when new accounts are provisioned via the Control Tower Account Factory. The CloudFormation templates and SCPs can be added to a CodeCommit repository and will be automatically deployed to new accounts when they are created. This provides a highly automated solution that does not require manual intervention to deploy resources and SCPs to new accounts.

The company’s requirements span preventive governance, account baseline configuration, and continuous compliance monitoring, all with minimal operational overhead. AWS-native, organization-level services are the most efficient way to meet these goals.

To ensure that new accounts do not retain default VPCs and that development is restricted to specific Regions, AWS Control Tower is the correct foundation. However, Control Tower alone does not remove default VPCs. By installing Customizations for AWS Control Tower (CfCT), the company can automatically deploy OU-scoped CloudFormation templates during account provisioning. A simple CloudFormation template can delete default VPCs in all Regions, while Control Tower-managed Region deny guardrails (SCPs) restrict access to only approved Regions. This approach is declarative, repeatable, and tightly integrated with account creation workflows, resulting in low operational overhead.

For CIS AWS Foundations Benchmark compliance monitoring, AWS Security Hub is the purpose-built service. Enabling Security Hub at the organization level and selecting the CIS benchmark automatically evaluates all member accounts against CIS controls and continuously reports findings. This provides centralized visibility and compliance reporting without custom rule development.

Option C introduces custom Lambda automation and EventBridge logic, increasing maintenance burden. Option E is incorrect because Control Tower does not provide full CIS benchmark monitoring; it only offers related detective guardrails.

Therefore, Option B (Control Tower + CfCT) and Option D (Security Hub with CIS benchmark) together provide the most efficient, scalable, and AWS-recommended solution.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

The requirement is to restrict production deployments strictly to the pipeline, while still allowing emergency access to a specific engineer.

The best approach is to restrict the DevOps team to read-only access in production accounts, minimizing risk of manual changes (Option A).

The DevOps engineer can have an admin permission set but assume the pipeline IAM role for deployment, enforcing strict control.

Applying an SCP to deny modification by anyone other than the pipeline role enforces this at the organization level.Option B is similar but unnecessarily creates separate IAM users, increasing management overhead. Option C grants the DevOps engineer broader permissions that may conflict with controls. Option D complicates management with tagging and SCPs, increasing operational overhead.