Free and Premium ACFE CFE-Fraud-Prevention-and-Deterrence Dumps Questions Answers

Fraud Response Responsibilities:

Management is responsible for responding to fraud because they oversee the organization's operations, culture, and compliance frameworks.

Other parties, such as internal auditors and the audit committee, provide oversight and recommendations but do not directly implement responses.

Conclusion:Management has the ultimate responsibility for responding appropriately to fraud.

G20/OECD Principles Overview:

The G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance are international guidelines aimed at enhancing economic efficiency and promoting stable financial systems.

Equitable Treatment of Shareholders:

The principles stress fairness and the protection of all shareholders' rights, particularly minority shareholders, ensuring they are treated equally.

Why D is Correct:

Equitable treatment is a fundamental tenet of the Principles, which strive to maintain trust and integrity in governance practices across jurisdictions​​.

References for All Questions:

ACFE Fraud Examination Standards​​.

ISA Standards and International Corporate Governance Best Practices​​.

G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance​.

Corporate Governance in Multinational Corporations:

Multinational corporations must adhere to the legal, regulatory, and governance frameworks of each jurisdiction in which they operate. These frameworks may vary significantly across countries.

Why Other Options are Incorrect:

B:There is no Universal Corporate Governance Act applicable globally.

C:G20/OECD Principles provide guidelines but are not mandatory compliance requirements.

D:Operating in multiple jurisdictions increases governance complexity, but does not exempt corporations from compliance.

Why A is Correct:

It reflects the reality of multinational operations, where governance compliance must align with local laws and regulations​​.

References for All Questions:

ACFE and Treadway Commission fraud prevention guidelines​​.

ISSAI standards and international governance principles​​.

COSO framework and legal requirements for multinational corporations​​.

Responsibilities of an External Auditor:

When significant internal control deficiencies are discovered, the auditor is required to report them to senior management and, where appropriate, the audit committee.

The purpose is to ensure that the organization is informed of the risks and can take corrective actions.

Analysis of Other Options:

A. Suspend the audit:Not required under auditing standards.

B. Report to law enforcement:Only if fraud or illegal activities are confirmed, which is not implied here.

D. Correct deficiencies independently:This is beyond the auditor's scope of responsibilities.

Conclusion:The correct response is to provide a written communication about the findings to senior management.

Integrity in Fraud Examination:

Integrity involves critical thinking, independence, and prioritizing ethical principles over personal gain. Healthy debate and differences of opinion are integral to maintaining objectivity.

Why Option D is Incorrect:

Avoiding differences of opinion contradicts the need for professional skepticism and robust analysis in fraud examination.

Conclusion:Integrity does not require the avoidance of differences of opinion, making D the correct answer.

Impartiality in Fraud Risk Assessment:

As the lead on the fraud risk assessment, Glenda must maintain objectivity and avoid the appearance of bias.

Her history of disagreements with Bridgette creates a potential conflict of interest, which could compromise the assessment's credibility.

Why Option D is Correct:

Assigning the accounts receivable department's assessment to another individual eliminates the risk of perceived or actual bias.

Analysis of Other Options:

A. Confrontation:Not appropriate during a professional assessment.

B. Including disagreements:Personal conflicts should not influence risk evaluations.

C. Automatic high-risk designation:This lacks a factual basis and undermines objectivity.

Conclusion:Option D ensures objectivity and credibility in the fraud risk assessment.

Findings from the 2020 Report to the Nations:

Tips are the most common method of detecting fraud, accounting for over 40% of detected cases.

Whistleblower hotlines and other reporting mechanisms are vital for obtaining tips.

Analysis of Other Options:

A. Internal audit:While effective, it is less common than tips.

B. Confession:Rarely the initial method of detection.

D. External audit:Detects fraud in a smaller percentage of cases.

Conclusion:Tips are the most common method of fraud detection according to the 2020 Report to the Nations.

 Principle Overview:

Responsibility pertains to the duty of an organization to act in the best interest of society, ensuring sustainable and ethical practices that benefit all stakeholders, including employees, customers, and the environment.

 Corporate Governance Definition:

Corporate governance frameworks emphasize corporate responsibility as a key pillar for maintaining societal trust and long-term value creation.

 Why Responsibility is Correct:

While transparency, fairness, and accountability are essential, responsibility uniquely emphasizes societal interests and ethical conduct​​.

Scope of Fraud Risk Assessment:

The fraud risk assessment team must consider various factors, including:

A. Incentive programs:Can create pressures that lead to fraud.

B. Management override of controls:A key risk for fraud occurring despite existing safeguards.

C. Risks to reputation:Fraud incidents can harm the organization's public image.

Comprehensive Discussion:

Considering all these factors ensures a thorough identification of inherent fraud risks.

Conclusion:The fraud risk assessment team should discuss all listed items.

 ACFE Code of Professional Ethics:

The ACFE Code of Ethics prohibits fraud examiners from making absolute statements about the absence of fraud. Fraud cannot be definitively ruled out based on an examination's findings.

 Why B is Correct:

Stevens cannot state that the organization is "free of fraud," as fraud detection is inherently limited by the scope and methods of the examination. Such a statement could mislead stakeholders and compromise ethical standards​​.

Comprehensive and Detailed in Depth Explanation:

Fraud risk assessments can be effectively conducted by internal personnel or external consultants. The key is that they must be conducted objectively and with due professional care. There is no requirement that they be conducted only externally (eliminating A), nor should biases about the improbability of fraud influence the assessment scope (eliminating B). Management involvement can be helpful when balanced appropriately—it should not be unduly limited (eliminating D).

 Definition of Focus Groups:

Focus groups involve small groups of individuals discussing a specific topic under the guidance of a facilitator. This technique is used to gather qualitative insights through direct interaction and observation.

 Why A is Correct:

Observing employee interactions during a focus group provides rich, contextual data about attitudes, understanding, and engagement with fraud awareness training.

 Why Other Options are Incorrect:

B (Surveys):Collect quantitative data but lack interaction and observational opportunities.

C (Anonymous feedback mechanisms):Useful for confidentiality but do not allow observation.

D (Interviews):Individualized and do not involve group dynamics​​.

Reporting Fraud Risk Assessment Results:

Reports should align with the organization's operational language to ensure comprehension by management and stakeholders.

Why A is Correct:

Using business-appropriate language ensures effective communication of findings and recommendations.

Why Other Options are Incorrect:

B:Comprehensive details may overwhelm the audience; only key findings are usually reported.

C:Reports should reflect objective analysis, not subjective perspectives​​.

This scenario is an example of punishment. Punishment involves introducing a consequence (in this case, the loss of responsibility for cross-departmental projects) to discourage undesirable behavior. The manager uses this approach to address Devon’s negative attitude and to promote better cooperation with other departments in the future.

=================

COSO Definition of Internal Control:

COSO defines internal control as a process enacted by an entity's board, management, and personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding objectives in operations, reporting, and compliance.

Analysis of Options:

A. Operational risk assessment:A component of internal control, not the overall process.

C. Fraud risk management:Focuses specifically on fraud risks, a subset of internal control.

D. Financial reporting:A specific objective addressed by internal control.

Conclusion:The correct answer is internal control, as defined by COSO.

Comprehensive and Detailed in Depth Explanation:

ISA 265 requires that significant deficiencies in internal control identified during an audit be communicated in writing to those charged with governance. The auditor is not obligated to inform regulatory agencies unless required by law (eliminating A). Internal control audits are not separate engagements under standard financial statement audits (eliminating B). Withdrawalfrom the engagement is a last resort and only appropriate under severe circumstances beyond internal control issues (eliminating D).

The ACFE manual states:

“Employees should be trained to recognize and report signs such as unexplained lifestyle changes or behavioral red flags, and they should be informed that management will be watching for such indicators.”

The G20/OECD Principles include:

“Guidance regarding board responsibilities, including establishing appropriate board structures, assigning clear responsibilities, and ensuring board accountability.”

Tone at the Top:

Management must set a strong example by adhering to the same ethical standards as employees.

Visible adherence builds trust and reinforces an anti-fraud culture.

Analysis of Other Options:

A. Checklist of initiatives:Helpful but insufficient by itself.

B. Dissuading challenges:This is counterproductive, as it discourages transparency and accountability.

D. All of the above:Incorrect, as Option B is detrimental to an anti-fraud culture.

Conclusion:Visibly adhering to ethics policies is the most effective action.

COSO Definition of Internal Control:

COSO defines internal control as a process executed by an entity’s board, management, and personnel to provide reasonable assurance about achieving objectives in operations, reporting, and compliance.

Analysis of Options:

A. Corporate compliance:Corporate compliance focuses on adhering to laws and regulations, not the broader operational objectives.

B. Fraud risk management:This is a component of internal control, not its definition.

C. Risk assessment:This is a step within the internal control process but not the overarching process.

D. Internal control:Matches the COSO definition accurately.

Conclusion:Internal control is the correct answer as defined by COSO.

Professional Skepticism Defined:

Professional skepticism is an attitude that includes a questioning mind and a critical assessment of evidence. Fraud examiners must remain vigilant to indications of potential fraud throughout an engagement.

Consistent Application:

ACFE standards emphasize that skepticism should be applied consistently, even if initial findings do not indicate fraud, to avoid overlooking potential risks.

Why D is Correct:

Relaxing skepticism can lead to missed evidence or poor judgment, undermining the examination's effectiveness​​.

 Indirect Costs of Fraud:

Reputational damage is a significant indirect cost of fraud. It can lead to loss of customer trust, reduced employee morale, and long-term financial impact.

 Why A is Correct:

Quantifying reputational damage is challenging due to its intangible nature. The effects often manifest over time and are influenced by various factors, making precise calculation difficult​​.

Allowing employees to report fraud anonymously is a best practice in fraud reporting programs. This encourages whistleblowers to come forward without fear of retaliation or reprisal, increasing the likelihood of fraud detection. Transparency about confidentiality policies further supports employee trust in the reporting system.

=================

Defining Fraud Risk Management Objectives:

Management should focus on tailoring objectives to the organization's needs, examining past fraud incidents, and balancing costs with benefits. Assigning a quantitative measure to risk appetite, while potentially useful, is not a requirement for effective fraud risk management.

Analysis of Options:

A. Examining previous frauds:This helps identify vulnerabilities and design controls.

B. Balancing costs and benefits:Essential to ensure the program's efficiency and feasibility.

D. Tailoring objectives:Necessary for aligning the program with organizational goals.

Conclusion:Option C is false because assigning a quantitative measure to risk appetite is not mandatory in defining fraud risk management objectives.

Fraud Prevention Through Performance Management:Performance measurement and management programs can play a role in preventing fraud by ensuring accountability, setting ethical expectations, and reinforcing organizational goals.

Analysis of Options:

A. Ethics-based metrics:Encourages accountability and reduces fraud risks.

B. Regular training:Ensures employees are competent, reducing errors and opportunities for fraud.

D. Reasonable performance goals:Prevents pressure to commit fraud by setting realistic benchmarks.

C. Loosely defined job descriptions:This creates ambiguity, reduces accountability, and increases the risk of fraud, making it ineffective.

Conclusion:Option C is not an effective way to prevent fraud.

Fraud Risk Management Program Requirements:

Effective fraud risk management programs ensure transparency, consistency, and fairness.

Sanctions for noncompliance should be transparent and communicated to demonstrate a commitment to accountability.

Analysis of Options:

A. Mechanisms for breaches:Necessary to address compliance issues.

B. Consistent and firm punishment:Ensures a deterrent effect.

D. Designated compliance monitors:Vital for program enforcement.

C. Enacted privately:This is false because transparency is essential to maintain trust and deter similar actions.

Conclusion:Option C is false as formal sanctions should be communicated appropriately to promote deterrence and accountability.

Routine activities theory identifies three main elements necessary for crime: a motivated offender, a suitable target, and the absence of capable guardians. The lack of accountability for misdeeds is not part of this theory, as it focuses on situational factors that facilitate criminal opportunities rather than broader social or institutional factors.

=================

Rational Choice Theory Overview:

This theory asserts that individuals make conscious decisions to commit crimes after weighing the costs (risk of detection and punishment) and benefits.

Why D is Correct:

Rational choice theory aligns with strategies to deter crime by reducing opportunities and increasing personal risks.

Why Other Options are Incorrect:

A (Differential association theory):Explains crime as learned behavior.

B (Routine activities theory):Focuses on environmental factors.

C (Justification of action theory):Not a recognized criminological theory​​.

References for All Questions:

ACFE Code of Professional Ethics and Fraud Examination Guide​​.

Criminological theories and governance frameworks in fraud prevention​​.

Case studies on indirect fraud costs and ethical decision-making​​.

Findings from the 2020 Report to the Nations:

Asset misappropriation:Most common form of occupational fraud (e.g., theft of cash or inventory). It is frequent but less costly.

Financial statement fraud:Most costly, involving significant manipulation of financial data.

Analysis of Options:

A. Asset misappropriation; corruption:Corruption is less costly than financial statement fraud.

B. Corruption, asset misappropriation:Incorrect order and does not match the costliest scheme.

C. Financial statement fraud; corruption:Incorrect pairing.

Conclusion:Asset misappropriation is most common, and financial statement fraud is most costly.

nti-Fraud Policy Components:

A robust anti-fraud policy should provide clear definitions and examples of fraud and misconduct to ensure employees understand what constitutes unacceptable behavior.

Specific examples make investigations and enforcement more consistent and defensible.

Analysis of Option B:

Avoiding specific examples creates ambiguity, which can hinder enforcement and increase legal risks when discharging employees.

Properly vetted examples, reviewed with legal counsel, help ensure compliance with legal standards.

Conclusion:Option B is false because including examples of fraud and misconduct strengthens the anti-fraud policy.

 Board Responsibilities in Fraud Risk Management:

The board plays a critical role in overseeing the organization's fraud risk management activities to ensure accountability and effective governance.

 Why A is Correct:

The board provides high-level oversight but does not typically involve itself in the design or implementation of the fraud risk management program.

 Why Other Options are Incorrect:

B and D:Design and implementation are management responsibilities.

C:Punishment of fraud perpetrators is not directly within the board's purview​​.

Behavioral Studies by B.F. Skinner:

Punishment may temporarily suppress undesired behavior but does not address the root cause or provide alternative positive behaviors.

Once punishment ceases, the behavior often resurfaces.

Analysis of Options:

A. Increase in behavior:This contradicts findings; punishment reduces behavior temporarily.

B. No effect:Punishment does affect behavior but typically in the short term.

D. Permanent suppression:Rarely achieved without reinforcement of alternative behaviors.

Conclusion:Punishment results in temporary suppression of undesired behavior.

Tips have consistently been the leading method for detecting occupational fraud, as confirmed by ACFE research:

“Figure 9 shows that the leading detection methods are tips, internal audit, and management review. This finding is not surprising as these have been the three most common means of detecting occupational fraud in every edition of the report since 2010.”

Comprehensive and Detailed in Depth Explanation:

The COSO framework outlines monitoring as one of its five core components, which involves evaluating the effectiveness of internal controls over time. Monitoring includes both ongoing evaluations and separate evaluations, which is exactly what Julia is initiating. This distinguishes monitoring (correct) from control activities (which pertain to execution of policies), risk assessment (which identifies and analyzes risks), and control environment (which is the tone at the top).

Objectives of a Fraud Risk Management Program:

A. Proactively identifying fraud risks:A fundamental goal is to identify and assess potential fraud risks to implement preventative measures.

B. Limiting the damage caused by fraud occurrences:Programs should have mechanisms in place to detect and respond to fraud promptly to minimize harm.

C. Punishing fraud perpetrators:Punishment serves as both a deterrent and a means of reinforcing the organization's commitment to ethical behavior.

Comprehensive Objective Coverage:

Effective fraud risk management includes preventative, detective, and corrective measures.

Conclusion:All the listed objectives are essential components of a fraud risk management program.

Integrity, as described under the Standards of Professional Conduct, requires a mental attitude of independence and avoidance of any actual, potential, or perceived conflicts of interest.

“Certified Fraud Examiners shall conduct themselves with integrity… and shall investigate for actual, potential, and perceived conflicts of interest. CFEs shall disclose any such conflicts.”

Purpose of Anti-Fraud Controls:

Preventive controls deter fraud before it occurs, making them the primary focus of an effective anti-fraud program.

Detective controls identify fraud after it has occurred, serving as a secondary line of defense.

Analysis of Options:

A. Fully eliminates risk:No system can fully eliminate fraud risk.

B. Focus on detective controls:Less effective than prevention.

D. Increases perception of detection:Important but not the primary focus.

Conclusion:An effective anti-fraud system emphasizes preventive controls.

Fraud Reporting Program Best Practices:

Ensuring anonymity encourages employees to report fraud without fear of retaliation. This enhances the effectiveness of the reporting program.

Why D is Correct:

Communicating confidentiality builds trust and increases participation in the fraud reporting program.

Why Other Options are Incorrect:

A: Fraud risks are not limited to organization size.

B: Restricting reports to immediate supervisors may create barriers.

C: Holding employees accountable for unsubstantiated tips discourages reporting.

Comprehensive and Detailed in Depth Explanation:

Silk and Vogel’s research found that organizations often rationalize unethical or illegal behavior by diffusing responsibility across a group, thus minimizing perceived individual culpability. This"shared guilt" justification is reflected in option D. The other options either misunderstand the research or do not reflect actual rationalizations used in white-collar crime contexts.

Comprehensive and Detailed in Depth Explanation:

Government auditors typically cannot unilaterally withdraw from an audit engagement, even in cases where fraud is identified. Public-sector audits often follow mandates from higher authorities or statutes that require the auditor to continue and report findings to oversight bodies. Additionally, fraud and abuse (including misconduct and misuse of assets) are relevant to government audits under ISSAIs, contrary to A and B. Option D is incorrect because public-sector audit objectives are often broader, encompassing compliance, performance, and integrity aspects.

Regulatory and Legal Misconduct:

This category includes practices that violate laws or regulations, such as anti-competitive behavior, insider trading, and conflicts of interest.

Why A is Correct:

Fraudulent customer payments are typically categorized under operational or financial fraud, not regulatory and legal misconduct.

Why Other Options are Incorrect:

B, C, and D:These practices involve violations of regulations or legal obligations, directly aligning with regulatory and legal misconduct​​.

References for All Questions:

ACFE Fraud Examination Guide and related professional standards​​.

International and jurisdictional auditing standards for public-sector auditors​​.

COSO and governance frameworks on fraud risk management​​.

 Components of COSO Enterprise Risk Management (ERM):

The COSO ERM framework emphasizes the integration of risk management with strategy and performance, comprising the following components:

Governance and culture.

Strategy and objective-setting.

Performance.

Review and revision.

Information, communication, and reporting.

 Why D is Correct:

Governance and culture set the foundation for an organization’s risk management practices by establishing oversight, ethical values, and the operating structure.

 Why Other Options are Incorrect:

A (Independent monitoring):Monitoring is part of internal control, not specifically ERM.

B (Operating environment):Not a COSO ERM component.

C (Risk tolerance):A concept within ERM but not a standalone component​​.

Comprehensive and Detailed in Depth Explanation:

Organizational crime refers to offenses committed by organizations or their agents to benefit the organization, rather than the individual alone. Price-fixing by a group of floral companies to manipulate market conditions is a classic example of organizational crime. The other options—fraudulent returns, theft of goods, and misuse of company funds—are examples of occupational or individual fraud, which benefit the perpetrator rather than the organization.

ACFE research consistently shows that tips are the most common method for detecting occupational fraud. Organizations often rely on whistleblowing mechanisms such as hotlines to encourage employees and other stakeholders to report suspected fraud, which makes tips the most effective fraud detection tool.

=================

Communication of Fraud Risk Assessment Process:Effective communication ensures that employees understand the objectives and importance of the fraud risk assessment process. The following practices contribute to its success:

A. Personalization:Personalized communication increases engagement by making the information relevant to employees' roles and responsibilities.

B. Appropriateness to Culture:Aligning the communication format with the organization's culture ensures clarity and resonance.

C. Visibility:Disseminating communication broadly reinforces its significance and encourages widespread participation.

Why All Options are Correct:

Fraud risk assessments require buy-in and participation across all levels of the organization. Combining personalization, cultural alignment, and visibility creates an effective communication strategy.

Conclusion:All three practices—personalization, cultural appropriateness, and visibility—are critical for effective communication.

Social Control Theory Overview:

This theory posits that individuals consider social and personal relationships when deciding whether to commit a crime. They reflect on the potential consequences of their actions on their relationships and social standing.

Application to the Scenario:

The question of "What will my spouse think?" aligns directly with social control theory, as it involves weighing personal consequences within a social context.

Analysis of Other Options:

B. Operant theory:Focuses on behavior modification through rewards and punishments.

C. Cognitive theory:Centers on thought processes and decision-making patterns.

D. Behavioral theory:Examines the external influences on behavior, not personal social relationships.

Conclusion:Social control theory best explains the scenario.

Understanding G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance:These principles provide a framework to improve corporate governance worldwide. Key elements include board responsibilities, shareholder rights, equitable treatment, and stakeholder roles.

Analysis of Options:

A. Guidance on board structures:This is included in the principles to ensure effective governance and oversight.

C. Framework for corporate governance:Governments are encouraged to create legal and regulatory frameworks supporting corporate governance.

D. Stakeholder importance:Stakeholders' roles in governance are recognized, acknowledging their contribution to sustainable business practices.

B. Stronger protection for foreign shareholders:The principles advocate for equitable treatment of all shareholders, not preferential treatment for any group.

Conclusion:Option B contradicts the principle of equitable treatment, making it the correct answer.

Steve Albrecht's Research on Fraud Motivation:

Personal factors like "living beyond their means" are commonly cited as a driver of fraudulent behavior.

Organizational factors, such as excessive trust in key employees, create opportunities for fraud by reducing oversight and enabling unethical behavior.

Analysis of Options:

A. High personal debt:This can be a motivator, but it is less common than "living beyond their means."

B. Revenge:Rarely a primary driver of fraud.

D. Desire for recognition:This may motivate some individuals, but it is not as prevalent as financial pressure and opportunity.

Conclusion:Option C reflects the most common personal and organizational factors motivating fraudsters.

Comprehensive and Detailed in Depth Explanation:

The G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance advocate for transparent and fair markets and the efficient allocation of resources, making Option A the correct statement. These principles are internationally recognized as a standard for policy makers, investors, corporations, and other stakeholders worldwide. The principles are intended to apply to both developed and emerging markets, not justemerging ones (rejecting Option C), and while influential, they are not legally binding mandates (rejecting Option D). They also support the equitable treatment of shareholders, regardless of share class (rejecting Option B).

Proactive Fraud Auditing Procedures:

Analytical reviews are effective for identifying large or unusual trends and anomalies, not necessarily small frauds.

Other tools, such as detailed transaction testing, are better suited for uncovering small frauds.

Analysis of Other Options:

A. Element of surprise:A key feature of fraud audits.

C. Fraud assessment questioning:Valid as part of the audit process.

D. Management’s intentions:Proactive procedures signal a strong stance against fraud.

Conclusion:Option B is false because analytical reviews are better at detecting significant anomalies rather than small frauds.

ACFE Code of Professional Ethics Overview:

The Code explicitly prohibits unethical behavior, undisclosed conflicts of interest, and illegal activities. However, drawing evidence-based conclusions is encouraged as part of professional practice.

Why B is Correct:

Drawing conclusions based on evidence is central to the fraud examination process and is explicitly supported by ACFE standards.

Why Other Options are Prohibited:

A, C, and D:Engaging in unethical, conflicting, or illegal activities violates ACFE ethical guidelines​​.

References for All Questions:

ACFE Fraud Examination Guide and Code of Professional Ethics​​.

Best practices for fraud risk assessment and reporting​​.

Reporting standards and ethics in fraud examination​​.

Understanding the ACFE Code of Professional Ethics:The ACFE Code of Professional Ethics requires Certified Fraud Examiners to demonstrate competence and due care in their professional services. Specifically:

Rule 2 states that CFEs must "perform all professional engagements with due diligence."

Rule 4 emphasizes that CFEs must "avoid conduct that discredits the profession or the Association."

Competence and Due Care:

Benjamin, despite his attendance at a seminar on money laundering, lacks the requisite expertise or experience in investigating complex money laundering cases. Accepting an engagement of this nature without possessing adequate training, knowledge, or resources indicates a failure to exercise due care.

The Code emphasizes the importance of competence, meaning professionals must decline engagements that exceed their expertise unless they involve qualified individuals or teams.

Violation Assessment:

By choosing to conduct the investigation alone, Benjamin disregards the ethical requirement to ensure competence and quality in professional work. This likely jeopardizes the investigation's integrity and results.

This conduct could lead to suboptimal outcomes, legal liabilities, and reputational harm, which discredit the profession, violating the ACFE ethical framework.

Conclusion:Benjamin's decision is a breach of the ACFE Code of Professional Ethics because he failed to ensure adequate preparation, skills, and resources for the engagement.

The Treadway Commission emphasizes improving internal controls, which include strengthening the internal audit function. Providing adequate resources and authority to the internal audit function ensures that it operates independently and effectively, which is critical for preventing and detecting fraud. The internal audit function can evaluate financial reporting systems, detect irregularities, and provide valuable recommendations for improvement. This recommendation aligns with the goal of reducing fraud and ensuring reliable financial reporting.

​

=================

Impact of Specialized Departments on Fraud Risk:While specialization improves operational efficiency, it can also create silos, reducing oversight and coordination. This fragmentation may increase the overall fraud risk.

Key Considerations:

Fraud often occurs in areas where controls and communication are weak. Specialized departments may inadvertently facilitate fraud by isolating information.

Cross-departmental collaboration and centralized controls are essential to mitigate these risks.

Conclusion:The existence of many specialized departments increases the risk of fraud if not properly managed.

Analysis of Each Scenario:

A. Rodrigo:Reporting unrelated findings without a clear mandate violates principles of focus and relevance under the ACFE Code.

B. Vivian:Overlooking evidence demonstrates a lack of due diligence and professionalism.

C. Tom:Complying with a court order is permissible, but failure to safeguard client confidentiality before receiving the order constitutes a breach.

Ethical Standards:

Each scenario demonstrates a failure to meet the ethical and professional responsibilities outlined in the ACFE Code.

Conclusion:All scenarios represent violations of the ACFE Code of Professional Ethics.

CFEs must act ethically and responsibly when handling sensitive information. Eliece should inform Jewel that she will try to maintain confidentiality but must adhere to professional and ethical obligations, which may require disclosing the information to appropriate parties such as her employer or relevant authorities. This balanced response encourages transparency while maintaining ethical standards.

=================