Last Attempt L4M5 Questions

The objective of the buyer here is to improve supplier cost structures over time, which requires them to have insight into supplier's current cost information. Purchase price cost analysis (PPCA) can help here. PPCA is a method for gathering, analysing and using price and cost information in a systematic way. The process allows the identification of future savings and opportunities to improve current costs.

STEEPLE analysis is used to analyse the macro environment that may have impact on an organisation.

Competitive rivalry is a part of Porter's Five Forces which is a tool for strategy making.

Volume concentration is a way to increase the purchasing quantities in order for a buying organisation to improve its leverage in negotiation.

Integrative negotiation is a negotiation strategy in which the involved parties work together to find a solution that satisfies the needs and concerns of each. This process often involves group brainstorming and creative thinking for individuals to suggest different ideas that benefit both parties.

Compromising is often common in integrative negotiation, and both sides may need to give up certain needs to reach a solution. Honesty can also promote successful integrative negotiation because it can lead to a comprehensive understanding of the issue and what each party needs to be satisfied with the result.

It has been said that most negotiations are won (or lost) at the preparation stage. Success in a negotiation cannot be claimed unless you can refer back to your objectives and show how you have achieve them. In broad terms, negotiation plans/strategies involve 4 key activities:

1. Developing and prioritising your objectives and limits

2. Seeking to understand TOP's objectives

3. Developing concession plans

4. Planning the resources and logistics required and agreeing team roles.

Questions to gain an understanding of why a negotiation failed

Did we collect and make effective use of all information available when preparing for the negotiation?

Did we set objectives for the negotiation that were stretching and achievable and established MIL objectives?

Did we determine a strategy for the negotiation?

Did the other party understand our needs correctly?

Were we aware of the underlying interests of the other party?

Were our proposals convincing enough for acceptance by the other party?

Did we explore different variables in the negotiation?

Did we fully understand all proposals?

Did we give any unplanned concessions and did we check the importance of these?

Did we focus on common interests?

Did we ask a range of questions?

Did we get answers to all our questions?

Could we answer all the questions addressed to us in a proper and positive way?

Did we summarise effectively?

Did we use different methods of persuasion in the negotiations?

Which tactics did we use and what effect did they have?

Did our negotiating team work well as a team?

Did we help to create a co-operative atmosphere

There are two major persuasion methods: 'push' and 'pull'.

Persuasion can be defined as encouraging someone to do something that you want them to do for you. Persuasion is reasoning with someone so that they will believe or do something they might not otherwise do. Persuasion can be considered as 'pushing' on TOP so that they can accept the change in attitude or behaviour as a result of your actions.

Influence is the ability to affect the manner of thinking of another. Influence can be considered as pulling on TOP so that you achieve the same result, but TOP feels they have changed their attitude or behaviour as a result of their reflection and thinking, and not your direct actions.

There are multiple variables to consider when choosing between 'push' and 'pull'. Professor Fiona Dent of Ashridge Business School proposes situations when each style might be most appropriate, breaking down push into 'directive' and 'reasoning' and 'pull' into 'collaborative' and 'visionary':

Table Description automatically generated

Text Description automatically generated

Using logical and objective reasons is one of the typical characteristics of persuasion reasoning method.