CIPS Level 4 Diploma in Procurement and Supply L4M5 Exam Questions and Answers PDF

When facing a monopoly supplier, buyers must find creative ways to introduce leverage. Publicly exploring alternative solutions can create the perception of competition or a fallback plan, thus shifting bargaining power slightly toward the buyer.

Integrative negotiation seeks joint value creation. Collaboration builds trust and open exchange, while problem solving identifies creative tradeables that satisfy both sides. Coercion and risk transfer belong to adversarial, distributive strategies, where one side gains at the expense of the other. Persuasion can play a role, but without collaboration, it leans toward manipulation rather than true win-win. In practice, integrative approaches require willingness to share data, listen actively, and seek long-term alignment.

Direct costs are expenses that can be clearly attributed to the production of specific goods. These typically include raw materials, direct labor, and other costs tied directly to the manufacturing process. They are variable with production volume and help procurement teams analyze pricing more effectively during negotiations.

Persistent late payment of the supplier’s invoices (A) and Unequal sharing of gains, risks, and costs with the supplier (B) are potential sources of conflict as they create dissatisfaction and imbalance in the relationship. According to CIPS materials:

Late payments (A) can strain the supplier’s cash flow, affecting their operational stability and leading to mistrust in the buyer.

Unequal sharing of gains, risks, and costs (B) can result in one party feeling exploited or unfairly treated, which undermines the collaborative spirit essential for long-term partnerships.

In contrast, requesting early supplier involvement, planning visits, or setting delivery dates are typically part of constructive relationship management practices and do not inherently lead to conflict.