ITIL-4-Practitioner-Deployment-Management Exam Dumps : ITIL 4 Practitioner: Deployment Management Exam

Automating notifications about faulty deployments requires tools that facilitate communication and process orchestration between teams. ITIL 4 recommends workflow management and collaboration tools (Option B), such as Slack, Microsoft Teams, or ServiceNow, to automate alerts, streamline communication, and ensure timely responses to deployment issues.

Option A (Service configuration management tools):Incorrect, as these tools manage configuration item data in a CMDB, not notifications or team communication.

Option B (Workflow management and collaboration tools):Correct, as these tools automate notifications and enable seamless collaboration between development and operations teams, addressing the issue directly.

Option C (Work planning and prioritization tools):Incorrect, as tools like Jira focus on task management, not real-time notification automation.

Option D (Environment configuration and management tools):Incorrect, as these tools (e.g., Puppet) manage environment setups, not team notifications.

ITIL 4 defines capability level 3 for a practice as achieving integration across the organization, where the practice is embedded into broader workflows and understood by related practices. For deployment management, an indication of reaching capability level 3 is when employees from other practices understand how deployment activities are integrated into relevant workflows (Option B). This demonstrates cross-functional alignment and maturity, showing that deployment management is not siloed but part of the organization’s value streams.

Option A (The deployment management team regularly suggests and implements improvement opportunities):Incorrect, as continual improvement is characteristic of higher capability levels (e.g., level 4), not the defining feature of level 3.

Option B (Employees from other practices understand how deployment activities are integrated into relevant workflows):Correct, as level 3 focuses on integration and collaboration across practices, per ITIL 4’s capability framework.

Option C (The deployment manager is able to report on the effectiveness of the deployment management practice):Incorrect, as reporting effectiveness is a general management task, not specific to level 3 maturity.

Option D (Deployment models are developed and implemented):Incorrect, as model development occurs at lower capability levels (e.g., level 1 or 2), not a hallmark of level 3.

The issue of errors and delays due to unplanned manual configuration of target environments points to inconsistent or poorly managed environments. ITIL 4 recommends leveraging Infrastructure as Code (IaC) (Option A) to address this, as IaC automates and standardizes environment provisioning, ensuring consistency and reducing manual errors.

Option A (Leverage Infrastructure as Code):Correct, as IaC (e.g., using tools like Terraform or Ansible) defines environments in code, enabling repeatable, error-free setups and directly addressing the problem of manual configuration errors.

Option B (Use incremental deployments):Incorrect, as incremental deployments focus on releasing smaller changes but do not address the root cause of environment configuration issues.

Option C (Integrate build, test, and deployment activities):Incorrect, as while integration improves pipeline flow, it does not specifically resolve manual configuration errors in target environments.

Option D (Automate the CI/CD pipeline):Incorrect, as automating the pipeline is a broader solution that may include IaC, but it is not specific enough to address the environment configuration issue directly.