Free and Premium ITIL ITIL-4-Practitioner-Deployment-Management Dumps Questions Answers

The issue of errors and delays due to unplanned manual configuration of target environments points to inconsistent or poorly managed environments. ITIL 4 recommends leveraging Infrastructure as Code (IaC) (Option A) to address this, as IaC automates and standardizes environment provisioning, ensuring consistency and reducing manual errors.

Option A (Leverage Infrastructure as Code):Correct, as IaC (e.g., using tools like Terraform or Ansible) defines environments in code, enabling repeatable, error-free setups and directly addressing the problem of manual configuration errors.

Option B (Use incremental deployments):Incorrect, as incremental deployments focus on releasing smaller changes but do not address the root cause of environment configuration issues.

Option C (Integrate build, test, and deployment activities):Incorrect, as while integration improves pipeline flow, it does not specifically resolve manual configuration errors in target environments.

Option D (Automate the CI/CD pipeline):Incorrect, as automating the pipeline is a broader solution that may include IaC, but it is not specific enough to address the environment configuration issue directly.

Automating notifications about faulty deployments requires tools that facilitate communication and process orchestration between teams. ITIL 4 recommends workflow management and collaboration tools (Option B), such as Slack, Microsoft Teams, or ServiceNow, to automate alerts, streamline communication, and ensure timely responses to deployment issues.

Option A (Service configuration management tools):Incorrect, as these tools manage configuration item data in a CMDB, not notifications or team communication.

Option B (Workflow management and collaboration tools):Correct, as these tools automate notifications and enable seamless collaboration between development and operations teams, addressing the issue directly.

Option C (Work planning and prioritization tools):Incorrect, as tools like Jira focus on task management, not real-time notification automation.

Option D (Environment configuration and management tools):Incorrect, as these tools (e.g., Puppet) manage environment setups, not team notifications.

ITIL 4’s deployment management practice encompasses moving hardware, software, and associated components into or out of environments (e.g., staging, testing, or production) to support service delivery. Option A, which includes deploying network hubs (hardware) and removing applications from staging environments (software), accurately reflects this broad scope across the service lifecycle.

Option A (The practice includes deploying network hubs to and removing applications from staging environments):Correct, as it covers both hardware and software movements across environments, aligning with ITIL 4’s definition of deployment management.

Option B (The practice includes updating service documentation and transferring it to the live environment):Incorrect, as updating and transferring documentation is part of knowledge management, not deployment management.

Option C (The practice includes removing configuration documentation but not physical servers from the live environment):Incorrect, as deployment management includes moving physical servers, and configuration documentation is managed elsewhere.

Option D (The practice includes deploying network hubs but not additional software licenses to the live environment):Incorrect, as software licenses may be part of deployment if required, and the option arbitrarily limits the scope.

ITIL 4 defines capability level 3 for a practice as achieving integration across the organization, where the practice is embedded into broader workflows and understood by related practices. For deployment management, an indication of reaching capability level 3 is when employees from other practices understand how deployment activities are integrated into relevant workflows (Option B). This demonstrates cross-functional alignment and maturity, showing that deployment management is not siloed but part of the organization’s value streams.

Option A (The deployment management team regularly suggests and implements improvement opportunities):Incorrect, as continual improvement is characteristic of higher capability levels (e.g., level 4), not the defining feature of level 3.

Option B (Employees from other practices understand how deployment activities are integrated into relevant workflows):Correct, as level 3 focuses on integration and collaboration across practices, per ITIL 4’s capability framework.

Option C (The deployment manager is able to report on the effectiveness of the deployment management practice):Incorrect, as reporting effectiveness is a general management task, not specific to level 3 maturity.

Option D (Deployment models are developed and implemented):Incorrect, as model development occurs at lower capability levels (e.g., level 1 or 2), not a hallmark of level 3.

Suppliers play a key role in supporting deployment management by providing expertise, tools, and services that align with organizational needs. Option A is correct, as suppliers often advise on selecting tools that integrate with the organization’s value streams, ensuring consistency and scalability in deployment practices.

Option A (Advise on the selection of tools that can be used across the organization’s value streams):Correct, as suppliers have industry knowledge and can recommend tools (e.g., CI/CD platforms) that enhance deployment efficiency across multiple value streams, aligning with ITIL 4’s focus on value-driven tool selection.

Option B (Define the practice success factors for deployment management):Incorrect, as defining success factors is an internal responsibility of the organization, based on its goals and context, not a supplier’s role.

Option C (Create deployment models based on those of other organizations):Incorrect, as deployment models should be tailored to the organization’s unique needs, not copied from others, per ITIL 4’s context-specific approach.

Option D (Develop value streams for the organization utilizing deployment management where appropriate):Incorrect, as developing value streams is an internal strategic activity, while suppliers typically provide support through tools or expertise, not by designing value streams.

In ITIL 4, deployment tools are specifically designed to automate the transportation and installation of configuration items (CIs) into various environments, including test environments. These tools ensure consistency, repeatability, and efficiency in deployment processes, which are critical for managing CIs during testing phases.

Option A (Deployment tools):Correct, as deployment tools (e.g., Jenkins, Ansible, or Terraform for certain use cases) are tailored for automating the movement and installation of CIs, ensuring they are correctly placed in test environments with minimal manual intervention.

Option B (Environment configuration and management tools):While these tools (e.g., Puppet, Chef) manage environment settings, their primary focus is on configuring and maintaining environments, not transporting or installing CIs, making them less relevant here.

Option C (Work planning and prioritization tools):Tools like Jira or Trello focus on task management and prioritization, not on automating CI deployment, so this option is incorrect.

Option D (Service configuration management tools):These tools manage relationships and data about CIs in a configuration management database (CMDB), not the physical transport or installation of CIs, ruling out this option.