PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Study & Exam Dumps 2025

PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 2022 Lead Auditor exam Questions and Answers

Get Free ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Questions and Answers

Question 1

You ask the IT Manager why the organisation still uses the mobile app while personal data

encryption and pseudonymization tests failed. Also, whether the Service Manager is authorized to approve the test.

The IT Manager explains the test results should be approved by him according to the software security management procedure. The reason why the encryption and pseudonymization functions failed is that these functions heavily slowed down the system and service performance. An extra 150% of resources are needed to cover this. The Service Manager agreed that access control is good enough and acceptable. That's why the Service Manager signed the approval.

You sample one of the medical staff's mobile and found that ABC's healthcare mobile app, version 1.01 is installed. You found that version 1.01 has no test record.

The IT Manager explains that because of frequent ransomware attacks, the outsourced mobile app development company gave a free minor update on the tested software, performed an emergency release of the updated software, and gave a verbal guarantee that there will be no impact on any security functions. Based on his 20 years of information security experience, there is no need to re-test.

You are preparing the audit findings Select two options that are correct.

There is NO nonconformity (NC). The IT Manager demonstrates he is fully competent. (Relevant to clause 7.2)

Options:

There is a nonconformity (NC). The IT Manager does not comply with the software security management procedure. (Relevant to clause 8.1, control A.8.30)

There is a nonconformity (NC). The organisation does not control planned changes and review the consequences of unintended changes. (Relevant to clause 8.1)

There is an opportunity for improvement (OI). The organisation selects an external service provider based on the extent of free services it will provide. (Relevant to clause 8.1, control A.5.21)

There is NO nonconformity (NC). The IT Manager demonstrates good leadership. (Relevant to clause 5.1, control 5.4)

There is an opportunity for improvement (OI). The IT Manager should make the decision to continue the service based on appropriate testing. (Relevant to clause 8.1, control A.8.30)

Buy Now

Answer:

B, C

Explanation:

According to ISO 27001:2022 Annex A Control 8.30, the organisation shall ensure that externally provided processes, products or services that are relevant to the information security management system are controlled. This includes developing and entering into licensing agreements that cover code ownership and intellectual property rights, and implementing appropriate contractual requirements related to secure design and coding in accordance with Annex A 8.25 and 8.2912

In this case, the organisation and the developer have performed security tests that failed, which indicates that the secure design and coding requirements of Annex A 8.29 were not met. The IT Manager explains that the encryption and pseudonymization functions failed because they slowed down the system and service performance, and that an extra 150% of resources are needed to cover this. However, this does not justify the acceptance of the test results by the Service Manager, who is not authorised to approve the test according to the software security management procedure. The Service Manager should have consulted with the IT Manager, who is the owner of the process, and followed the procedure for handling nonconformities and corrective actions. The Service Manager’s decision to continue the service based on access control alone exposes the organisation to the risk of compromising the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of personal data processed by the mobile app. Therefore, there is a nonconformity (NC) with clause 8.1, control A.8.30.

According to ISO 27001:2022 Clause 8.1, the organisation shall plan, implement and control the processes needed to meet information security requirements, and to implement the actions determined in Clause 6.1. The organisation shall also control planned changes and review the consequences of unintended changes, taking action to mitigate any adverse effects, as necessary12

In this case, the organisation has not controlled the planned change of the mobile app from version 1.0 to version 1.01, which was a minor update provided by the outsourced developer in response to frequent ransomware attacks. The IT Manager explains that the developer performed an emergency release of the updated software, and gave a verbal guarantee that there will be no impact on any security functions. However, this is not sufficient to ensure that the change is properly assessed, tested, documented, and approved before deployment. The IT Manager should have followed the change management process and procedure, and verified that the updated software meets the security requirements and does not introduce any new vulnerabilities or risks. The IT Manager’s reliance on his 20 years of information security experience and the developer’s verbal guarantee is not a valid basis for skipping the re-testing of the software. Therefore, there is a nonconformity (NC) with clause 8.1.

[References:, 1: ISO/IEC 27001:2022 Lead Auditor (Information Security Management Systems) Course by CQI and IRCA Certified Training 1 2: ISO/IEC 27001 Lead Auditor Training Course by PECB 2, , , ]

Question 2

You are an experienced ISMS audit team leader, assisting an auditor in training to write their first audit report.

You want to check the auditor in training's understanding of terminology relating to the contents of an audit report and chose to do this by presenting the following examples.

For each example, you ask the auditor in training what the correct term is that describes the activity

Match the activity to the description.

Options:

Question 3

Scenario 9: Techmanic is a Belgian company founded in 1995 and currently operating in Brussels. It provides IT consultancy, software design, and hardware/software services, including deployment and maintenance. The company serves sectors like public services, finance, telecom, energy, healthcare, and education. As a customer-centered company, it prioritizes strong client relationships and leading security practices.

Techmanic has been ISO/IEC 27001 certified for a year and regards this certification with pride. During the certification audit, the auditor found some inconsistencies in its ISMS implementation. Since the observed situations did not affect the capability of its ISMS to achieve the intended results, Techmanic was certified after auditors followed up on the root cause analysis and corrective actions remotely During that year, the company added hosting to its list of services and requested to expand its certification scope to include that area The auditor in charge approved the request and notified Techmanic that the extension audit would be conducted during the surveillance audit

Techmanic underwent a surveillance audit to verify its iSMS's continued effectiveness and compliance with ISO/IEC 27001. The surveillance audit aimed to ensure that Techmanic’s security practices, including the recent addition of hosting services, aligned seamlessly with the rigorous requirements of the certification

The auditor strategically utilized the findings from previous surveillance audit reports in the recertification activity with the purpose of replacing the need for additional recertification audits, specifically in the IT consultancy sector. Recognizing the value of continual improvement and learning from past assessments. Techmanic implemented a practice of reviewing previous surveillance audit reports. This proactive approach not only facilitated identifying and resolving potential nonconformities but also aimed to streamline the recertification process in the IT consultancy sector.

During the surveillance audit, several nonconformities were found. The ISMS continued to fulfill the ISO/IEC 27001*s requirements, but Techmanic failed to resolve the nonconformities related to the hosting services, as reported by its internal auditor. In addition, the internal audit report had several inconsistencies, which questioned the independence of the internal auditor during the audit of hosting services. Based on this, the extension certification was not granted. As a result. Techmanic requested a transfer to another certification body. In the meantime, the company released a statement to its clients stating that the ISO/IEC 27001 certification covers the IT services, as well as the hosting services.

Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:

Question:

Auditors recommended Techmanic for certification after following up on corrective actions remotely. Is this acceptable?

Options:

Yes, auditors may follow up on action plans remotely since minor nonconformities were detected

No, an audit follow-up must be performed since the audit report contained nonconformities

No, an audit follow-up must be performed on-site since an extension was requested

Get Free ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Questions and Answers

Spring Sale 70% Discount Offer - Ends in 0d 00h 00m 00s - Coupon code: save70

PECB ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

ISO-IEC-27001-Lead-Auditor: ISO 27001 Exam 2025 Study Guide Pdf and Test Engine

Related PECB Exams

PECB Certified ISO/IEC 27001 2022 Lead Auditor exam Questions and Answers

Options:

Answer:

Explanation:

Options:

Answer:

Explanation:

Options:

Answer:

Explanation:

CompTIA

Fortinet

Microsoft

Salesforce