PECB ISO-IEC-27035-Lead-Incident-Manager Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

—

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

Yes, Mark’s approach to developing NoSpace’s information security incident management policy was aligned with the structured guidelines outlined in ISO/IEC 27035-1 and ISO/IEC 27035-2. These standards emphasize the importance of establishing an effective and realistic policy framework that supports the identification, management, and learning from information security incidents.

ISO/IEC 27035-1:2016, Clause 6.1, outlines the core components of the “Prepare” phase of the incident management lifecycle. A well-developed incident management policy should:

* Define the purpose, scope, and applicability of the policy

* Focus on critical assets and threats identified through a formal risk assessment

* Be shaped by stakeholder input

* Be realistic, enforceable, and capable of being integrated across departments

* Include training and awareness tailored to relevant personnel

In this scenario, Mark held a strategic session with stakeholders, ensured the policy was risk-based, and tailored training initiatives to critical roles only — which aligns precisely with ISO guidance on optimizing resource allocation and ensuring enforceability.

Option A is incorrect because the scenario clearly states that Mark implemented training and awareness initiatives tailored to critical response roles, which meets ISO/IEC 27035-1 expectations.

Option B is incorrect because ISO/IEC 27035-1 emphasizes prioritization of high-risk threats rather than attempting to address all potential threats equally. A focused and actionable policy that targets the most significant risks is more practical and aligns with international best practices.

Reference Extracts:

* ISO/IEC 27035-1:2016, Clause 6.1: “The preparation phase should include the definition of incident management policy, development of procedures, and awareness/training initiatives.”

* ISO/IEC 27035-2:2016, Clause 5.1: “The policy should be concise, focused on relevant threats, and shaped by organizational structure and risk appetite.”

* ISO/IEC 27001:2022, Annex A.5.25 & A.5.27: “Clear roles, responsibilities, and awareness should be assigned and supported through training.”

Therefore, the correct answer is: C. Yes, the information security incident management policy was appropriately developed.

—

Let me know when you’re ready for QUESTION NO: 16.

—

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

ISO/IEC 27035-2:2016 is titled “Information security incident management — Part 2: Guidelines to plan and prepare for incident response.” This document provides detailed guidance on establishing an incident response capability, planning for incident response, and implementing effective response actions. It also emphasizes the importance of post-incident analysis and lessons learned to improve future incident handling.

Key activities covered in ISO/IEC 27035-2 include:

* Planning and preparing for incident handling (e.g., policy development, roles and responsibilities)

* Establishing and training the incident response team (IRT)

* Developing communication strategies and escalation procedures

* Conducting root cause analysis and collecting lessons learned

* Applying improvements to prevent recurrence

By contrast:

* ISO/IEC 27035-1 provides high-level principles of incident management (Part 1: Principles).

* ISO/IEC 27037 relates to the handling of digital evidence and is focused more on forensic practices than incident response preparation.

Reference Extracts:

* ISO/IEC 27035-2:2016, Introduction: “This part provides guidance on the planning and preparation necessary for effective incident response and for learning lessons from incidents.”

* ISO/IEC 27035-2:2016, Clause 6.5: “Lessons learned and reporting can help improve future incident response and provide input to risk assessments and control improvements.”

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

The SMART model (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound) is outlined in ISO/IEC 27035-2:2016 for defining and tracking performance metrics in incident response. The “Specific” component ensures that measures are clearly defined and understood by stakeholders to avoid ambiguity.

This clarity is essential for accountability, tracking, and reporting performance accurately, which directly aligns with Option B.