Free and Premium ITIL ITIL-4-Foundation Dumps Questions Answers

ITIL 4 defines a service as:

A means of enabling value co-creation by facilitating outcomes that customers want to achieve, without the customer having to manage specific costs and risks.

The key phrase in the question is “facilitates outcomes that customers want to achieve”, which is directly part of the definition of a service in ITIL 4.

Therefore, the correct answer is A. Service.

Why the other options are incorrect:

B. WarrantyWarranty is one of the two aspects of value (warranty and utility). It relates to how the service performs (availability, capacity, continuity, security), but warranty alone does not ‘facilitate outcomes’ – it describes assurance about performance.

C. OrganizationAn organization is a person or group of people with functions and responsibilities, authorities and relationships. Organizations provide and consume services, but the concept that “facilitates outcomes” is specifically the service.

D. IT assetIT assets (hardware, software, etc.) are components that support services and are financially valuable, but on their own they do not “facilitate outcomes that customers want to achieve” – that is done through services built from these assets.

References (Aligned with ITIL 4 Foundation concepts)

ITIL 4 Foundation: Definition of service

ITIL 4 Foundation: Key concepts of value, outputs, outcomes, utility, and warranty

The problem management practice follows a three-phase approach to reduce the likelihood and impact of incidents by identifying actual and potential causes of incidents and managing workarounds and known errors1. The three phases are:

Problem identification: the process of finding problems that are the cause or potential cause of one or more incidents2.

Problem control: the process of analysing the root cause and impact of a problem and developing a workaround or a permanent solution2.

Error control: the process of managing known errors throughout their lifecycle, from recording to removal2. References: ITIL Foundation - ITIL 4 Edition, page 15; ITIL® 4 – A Pocket Guide, page 35; ITIL® 4 Practice Guide: Problem Management, page 9.

The purpose of the problem management practice is to reduce the likelihood and impact of incidents by identifying actual and potential causes of incidents and managing workarounds and known errors1. Workarounds are temporary solutions that reduce or eliminate the impact of an incident or problem for which a full resolution is not yet available2. Known errors are problems that have a documented root cause and a workaround3. References: ITIL Foundation - ITIL 4 Edition, page 15; ITIL® 4 – A Pocket Guide, page 35; ITIL® 4 Practice Guide: Problem Management, page 7.

“Service desk staff require training and competency across a number of broad technical and business areas. In particular, they need to demonstrate excellent customer service skills such as empathy, incident analysis and prioritization, effective communication, and emotional intelligence.

The purpose of the continual improvement practice is to align the organization’s practices and services with changing business needs through the ongoing identification and improvement of services, service components, practices, or any element involved in the efficient and effective management of products and services1. This practice needs the right culture to be embedded across the entire organization, as it requires a shared vision, commitment, empowerment, collaboration, learning, and measurement2. References: ITIL Foundation - ITIL 4 Edition, page 15; ITIL® 4 – A Pocket Guide, page 34; ITIL® 4 Practice Guide: Continual Improvement, page 7.

When focusing on value, the first step is to know who are the customers and key stakeholders being served. Next, it is important to have an understanding of what consitutes value from the consumer’s perspective.

's%20perspective.

In ITIL 4, an incident is defined as an unplanned interruption to a service, or a reduction in the quality of a service. Unplanned maintenance that results in a service being unavailable for two hours clearly represents an unplanned interruption, so it is managed as an incident.

The incident management practice is responsible for:

Managing the lifecycle of incidents

Restoring normal service operation as quickly as possible

Minimizing the negative impact on business operations

That makes incident management the practice most likely to be involved in handling and coordinating communication about this unplanned downtime.

Why the others are less appropriate here:

Problem management aims to manage causes of incidents and reduce their likelihood or impact over time; it does not primarily manage the immediate unplanned outage.

Change enablement manages changes (including emergency changes), but the question is focused on managing the service unavailability to users, which falls under incident management.

Service request management deals with pre-defined, user-initiated requests (such as password resets, information requests), not with unplanned outages.

Therefore, the practice most likely to manage this unplanned unavailability is incident management, so A is correct.

Don't over-engineer solutions. Think about what you can do now.

Like focus on value, this principle is heavily focused on the prevention of waste. Waste correlates with complexity. Higher complexity means there are more opportunities for waste to creep into a system.

Focus on delivering the desired outcome, not building the most elegant and elaborate solution. Use the minimum number of steps to deliver that outcome, ensuring you are not over-processing (delivering quality above and beyond what is required).

You need to use all of your resources as effectively and efficiently as you can. This means that you should automate wherever you can, and use people only for tasks that can’t be automated. It also means that you need to think carefully about what you can automate and about the circumstances where only a person will do; and about simplifying those processes you do decide to automate to eliminate wasteful or inefficient steps.

You should always optimize the work BEFORE you automate it, as automating something that is inefficient or ineffective may just result in you doing the wrong thing faster!

The ITIL continual improvement model, which provides organizations with a structured approach to implementing improvements

In ITIL 4, the ‘improve’ value chain activity is part of the service value chain within the service value system. Its official purpose is to ensure continual improvement of products, services, and practices across all value chain activities and the four dimensions of service management.

Option A matches the core wording of this purpose:

“Ensure the continual improvement of practices across all value chain activities.”

Even though the full ITIL statement also mentions products, services, and the four dimensions of service management, this option is the only one that directly reflects the continual improvement focus of the improve activity across the value chain.

Why the other options are not correct:

B. Ensure services continually meet expectations for quality, costs, and time to marketThis is more aligned with design and transition, obtain/build, and deliver and support, which focus on planning, building, and delivering services that meet agreed requirements, costs, and time constraints.

C. Ensure a shared understanding of the improvement direction for services across the organizationThis sounds closer to guiding principles or governance, and to some aspects of service level management and continual improvement planning, but it is not the formal purpose statement of the improve value chain activity.

D. Ensure continual engagement and good relationships with all stakeholdersThis aligns strongly with the engage value chain activity, whose purpose is about understanding stakeholder needs, ensuring transparency, and maintaining relationships.

Therefore, A is the correct option because it directly reflects the official purpose of the ‘improve’ value chain activity in ITIL 4.

References (ITIL 4 Foundation):

ITIL® Foundation: ITIL 4 Edition – Service Value System, Service Value Chain – Improve activity (purpose)

ITIL® Foundation: ITIL 4 Edition – Overview of service value chain activities

Organizations maximize co-creation of value with their customers by facilitating the outcomes they want to achieve. The four dimensions of service management have shown that a holistic approach is the best way for an organization to:

Achieve its goals in delivering quality and cost effective services

Meet the needs of its customers

Satisfy the requirements of its stakeholders

There are many ways in which practices and services can be optimized. Regardless of the specific techniques, the path to optimization follows these high-level steps:

Understand and agree the context in which the proposed optimization exists

Assess the current state of the proposed optimization

Agree what the future state and priorities of the organization should be, focusing on simplification and value

Ensure the optimization has the appropriate level of stakeholder engagement and commitment

Execute the improvements in an iterative way

Continually monitor the impact of optimization

A change is defined as the addition, modification, or removal of anything that could have a direct or indirect effect on services

IT asset is any financially valuable component that can contribute to the delivery of an IT product or service. The scope of IT asset management typically includes all software, hardware, networking, cloud services, and client devices

The incident management practice aims to minimize the negative impact of incidents by restoring normal service operation as quickly as possible1. This practice involves logging, categorizing, prioritizing, investigating, resolving, and closing incidents2. The service desk practice provides a single point of contact for users and customers to report issues, make requests, or seek guidance1. This practice involves providing communication with users, capturing feedback, managing user satisfaction, and facilitating continual improvement3. References: ITIL Foundation - ITIL 4 Edition, page 14; ITIL® 4 – A Pocket Guide, page 32; ITIL® 4 Practice Guide: Incident Management, page 7.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

ITIL 4 defines four dimensions of service management that are critical for the effective and efficient co-creation of value:

Organizations and people

Information and technology

Partners and suppliers

Value streams and processes

The “Organizations and people” dimension addresses:

Organizational structure – how the organization is arranged.

Roles and responsibilities – who does what and who is accountable.

Systems of authority and communication – how decisions are made and communicated.

Culture and competencies – behaviors, skills, and capabilities of people involved in service management.

Because this dimension specifically covers roles, responsibilities, and systems of authority, the correct answer is A. Organizations and people.

The other dimensions focus on different aspects:

Information and technology – data, information, and technological solutions used in service management.

Partners and suppliers – relationships and agreements with third parties that support service delivery.

Value streams and processes – how activities and processes are organized to create and deliver value.

Relevant ITIL 4 Foundation references:

The four dimensions of service management chapter.

Detailed description of the “Organizations and people” dimension (structure, roles, responsibilities, authority).

In ITIL, there are six activities in the service value chain which represent the steps an organization takes in the creation of value:

Plan

Engage

Design and Transition

Obtain/Build

Deliver and Support

Improve

CIs are simply any component that needs to be managed in order to deliver an IT service. A server, a virtual server, or even the configuration of an application could be considered a CI, for example

A guiding principle is a recommendation that provides universal and enduring guidance to an organization, which applies in all circumstances, regardless of changes in its goals, strategies, type of work, or management structure.

An SLA is defined as a documented agreement between a service provider and a customer that identifies both services required and the expected level of service.

SLAs are used to measure the performance of services from the customer’s point of view, and it is important that they are agreed in the wider business context.

Some of the key requirements for successful SLAs include:

They must be related to a defined ‘service’ in the service catalogue. Individual metrics without a specified service context are unhelpful.

They should relate to defined outcomes and not simply operational metrics. This can be achieved with balanced bundles of metrics, such as customer satisfaction and key business outcomes.

They should reflect an ‘agreement’: an engagement and discussion between the service provider and the service consumer. It is important to involve all stakeholders, including partners, sponsors, users, and customers.

They must be simply written and easy to understand and use for all parties.

&text=Some%20of%20the%20key%20requirements,and%20not%20simply%20operational%20metrics.

No service, practice, process, department, or supplier stands alone. The outputs that the organization delivers to itself, its customers, and other stakeholders will suffer unless it works in an integrated way to handle its activities as a whole, rather than as separate parts.

Taking a holistic approach to service management includes establishing an understanding of how all the parts of an organization work together in an integrated way (remember the four dimensions of service management?), including having an end-to-end visibility of how demand is captured and translated into outcomes. In a complex system, the alteration of one element can impact others and, where possible, these impacts need to be identified, analysed and planned for.

To apply this principle successfully, consider this advice:

Recognize the complexity of the systems

Collaboration is key to thinking and working holistically

Where possible, look for patterns in the needs of and interactions between system elements

Automation can facilitate working holistically

A service request is defined as a request from a user or a user’s authorized representative that initiates a service action which has been agreed as a normal part of service delivery.

The purpose of the service request management practice is to support the agreed quality of a service by handling all pre-defined, user-initiated service requests in an effective and user-friendly manner. Service request management is dependent upon well-designed processes and procedures, which are operationalized through tracking and automation tools to maximize the efficiency of the practice. To be handled optimally, service request management should follow these guidelines:

Service requests and their fulfilment should be standardized and automated to the greatest degree possible.

Policies should define which service requests will be fulfilled with limited or even no additional approvals so that fulfilment can be streamlined.

The expectations of users regarding fulfilment times and costs should be clearly set, based on what the organization can realistically deliver.

Opportunities for improvement should be identified and implemented to produce faster fulfilment times and take advantage of automation.

In ITIL 4, the purpose of the relationship management practice is to:

Establish and nurture the links between the organization and its stakeholders

Identify, analyze, monitor, and continually improve relationships with stakeholders at strategic and tactical levels

Option C closely reflects this wording: “Identifying, analyzing, monitoring, and the continual improvement of relationships with stakeholders.” This matches the official purpose description, so C is correct.

The other options actually describe other practices:

A. Creating collaborative relationships with key suppliers… – This aligns with supplier management, which focuses on obtaining value from suppliers and managing supplier relationships.

B. Setting clear business-based targets so that the delivery of a service can be properly assessed – This is the purpose of service level management, not relationship management.

D. Handling all pre-defined, user-initiated service requests in an effective and user-friendly manner – This describes service request management.

Therefore, the option that correctly reflects the purpose of the relationship management practice is C.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract (Aligned with ITIL 4 Foundation Study Guide)

In ITIL 4, improvement work is performed using iterative cycles, supported by continuous feedback. This idea comes from the ITIL Guiding Principle: “Progress iteratively with feedback.”

A feedback loop ensures that each iteration remains aligned with stakeholder needs, performance data, and contextual changes.

Why Feedback Loop is Correct:

Feedback loops provide information about:

the performance of activities

the needs and expectations of stakeholders

whether the current approach is still suitable

issues or improvements identified during the iteration

This continuous flow of information allows the team to adjust the iteration early, ensuring improvement activities remain relevant even when circumstances change.

Why the other options are incorrect:

A. Analysis paralysis: ITIL specifically warns against over-analysis that prevents progress.

B. Direct observation: Helpful for understanding work but does not keep iteration aligned with changing circumstances.

C. Minimum viable product: Useful for early delivery but not for continuous alignment during iterations.

Therefore, the concept that keeps improvement iteration activities appropriate under changing conditions is the feedback loop.

References (Aligned With ITIL 4 Foundation Publications — No URLs)

ITIL 4 Foundation: Guiding Principle “Progress iteratively with feedback”

ITIL 4 Foundation: Continual Improvement concepts

ITIL 4 Foundation: Service Value System emphasis on feedback mechanisms for adaptation

Problem Control. Problem control activities include problem analysis and documenting workarounds and known errors.

Just like incidents, problems will be prioritized based on the risk they pose in terms of probability and impact to services. Focus should be given to problems that have highest risk to services and service management.

A known error is a problem that has been analysed but not resolved1. This means that the root cause of the problem has been identified, but a permanent solution has not been implemented yet2. A known error can be recorded in a known error database (KEDB) and linked to related incidents and problems3. References: ITIL Foundation - ITIL 4 Edition, page 15; ITIL® 4 – A Pocket Guide, page 35; ITIL® 4 Practice Guide: Problem Management, page 8.

The Obtain/Build activity is responsible for ensuring that all service components are available when and where needed, and that they meet the agreed specifications.

Error control also regularly re-assesses the status of known errors that have not been resolved, taking account of the overall impact on customers and/or service availability, and the cost of permanent resolutions, and effectiveness of workarounds

In ITIL 4, a service request is defined as a user request for information, advice, or a standard change, or for access to a service.

A user asking, “How do I create a report?” and contacting the service desk is:

Requesting information/advice

A normal, expected interaction with the service

Not reporting a service failure or interruption

Handling such requests is the purpose of the service request management practice, which ensures that:

Service requests are handled efficiently and user-friendly

Users receive help, information, or access according to agreed procedures

Requests follow pre-defined workflows where possible

Therefore, the practice most likely to help in solving this issue is C. Service request management.

Why the other options are incorrect:

A. Incident managementIncident management deals with unplanned interruptions, reductions in service quality, or failures. Here, the service is working; the user just needs guidance, not restoration of service.

B. Service level managementThis focuses on defining, negotiating, and managing service level agreements (SLAs) and overall service performance, not answering “how to” questions.

D. Change enablementThis practice manages changes to services and components, reducing risk. A user asking how to create a report is not requesting a change to the service.

References (Aligned with ITIL 4 Foundation concepts)

ITIL 4 Foundation: Definition of service request and service request management

ITIL 4 Foundation: Distinction between incidents and service requests

Costs are the amount of money spent on a specific activity or resource. From the service consumer’s perspective, there are two types of cost involved in service relationships:

Costs removed from the consumer by the service (a part of the value proposition). For example, for a car sharing service, the customer does not pay for the actual cost of purchasing the car.

The purpose of the service request management practice is to support the agreed quality of a service by handling all pre-defined, user-initiated service requests in an effective and user-friendly manner. Service request management is dependent upon well-designed processes and procedures, which are operationalized through tracking and automation tools to maximize the efficiency of the practice. To be handled optimally, service request management should follow these guidelines:

Service requests and their fulfilment should be standardized and automated to the greatest degree possible.

Policies should define which service requests will be fulfilled with limited or even no additional approvals so that fulfilment can be streamlined.

The expectations of users regarding fulfilment times and costs should be clearly set, based on what the organization can realistically deliver.

Opportunities for improvement should be identified and implemented to produce faster fulfilment times and take advantage of automation.

The continual improvement practice aligns the organization’s practices and services with changing business needs through the ongoing identification and improvement of services, service components, practices, or any element involved in the efficient and effective management of products and services1. A continual improvement register (CIR) is a tool used to track and manage improvement ideas from identification through to final action2. It helps to prioritize, monitor, and communicate the status of improvement initiatives3. The other statements are not true because:

Used to help plan changes, assist in communication avoid conflicts and assign resources: This describes the purpose of a change schedule, which is a tool used by the change enablement practice2.

Used to select the right method, model or technique for identifying improvements: This describes the purpose of a continual improvement model (CIM), which is a tool used by the continual improvement practice2.

Used to provide a formal description of one or more services designed to address the needs of a target consumer group: This describes the purpose of a service offering, which is an output of the engage activity of the service value chain1. References: ITIL Foundation - ITIL 4 Edition, page 15; ITIL® 4 – A Pocket Guide, page 34; ITIL® 4 Practice Guide: Continual Improvement, page 9.

The change enablement practice maximizes the number of successful service and product changes by ensuring that risks have been properly assessed, authorized, and managed within a schedule1. Change authorization is the activity of verifying that a proposed change is desirable, viable, and achievable before committing to its implementation2. The change type (standard, normal, or emergency) and model (a predefined approach for handling a specific type of change) is the basis for assigning the change authority (the role that can authorize a change)2. The other statements are incorrect because:

A standard change is a low-risk, pre-authorized change that follows an agreed procedure and does not require authorization at the point of implementation2.

An emergency change is a high-priority change that must be implemented as soon as possible to resolve an incident or implement a security patch2. An emergency change must be authorized by an emergency change authority (ECA), which is usually a subset of the normal change authority (CAB)2.

Ensuring that changes are authorized before their deployment is done by the change enabler (the role that coordinates all aspects of a change)2. References: ITIL Foundation - ITIL 4 Edition, page 16; ITIL® 4 – A Pocket Guide, page 39; ITIL® 4 Practice Guide: Change Enablement, page 7.

In ITIL 4, the service value chain is a central element of the service value system and is composed of six activities. Each activity transforms inputs into outputs, contributing to the overall creation of value.

Key points:

Every value chain activity takes one or more inputs (such as information, resources, or outputs from other activities).

It then performs work that transforms these inputs.

It produces one or more outputs that are used by other activities or delivered to stakeholders.

Why the other options are incorrect:

A. Inputs and outputs are fixed for each value chain activity – ITIL 4 explicitly allows for flexibility; inputs and outputs vary depending on the value stream and context.

B. Some value chain activities only have inputs, whereas others only have outputs – This contradicts the model; each activity must receive inputs and produce outputs.

C. Governance determines the inputs and outputs – Governance influences direction and controls but does not prescribe specific inputs and outputs for the value chain activities.

Therefore, the correct statement is that each value chain activity receives inputs and provides outputs.