ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Exam Dumps : QMS ISO 9001:2015 Lead Auditor Exam

A screenshot of a computer AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Clause 8.5.3 – Property Belonging to Customers or External Providers:This clause requires the organization to care for customer property while it is under their control. If there is damage, they must inform the customer and retain documented information. Thus, informing customers of the reason for laundry damage relates directly to this clause.???? Reference: ISO 9001:2015 Clause 8.5.3

Clause 7.1.3 b – Infrastructure:It refers to the provision and maintenance of infrastructure necessary for the operation of processes. This includes equipment. If resources are not allocated for outdated equipment, it directly breaches this clause.???? Reference: ISO 9001:2015 Clause 7.1.3 b

Clause 10.2.1 b – Corrective Action:This clause covers actions to eliminate the causes of nonconformities to prevent recurrence, including evaluating and correcting customer complaints.???? Reference: ISO 9001:2015 Clause 10.2.1 b

Clause 5.1.2 b – Customer Focus (Top Management):Top management must ensure risks to customer satisfaction, including property damage, are addressed. This aligns with addressing the risk of damaging customer laundry.???? Reference: ISO 9001:2015 Clause 5.1.2 b

Clause 6.2 – Quality Objectives and Planning to Achieve Them:Setting objectives for reducing customer complaints (like those about laundry damage) falls under this clause.???? Reference: ISO 9001:2015 Clause 6.2

A white background with black text Description automatically generated

The auditor could raise the following nonconformities to ISO 9001 based on the scenario:

•Option A: 10.3 - The organisation did not continuously improve. Reject rates were unchanged. This option is correct because ISO 9001:2015 clause 10.3 requires the organization to improve the suitability, adequacy and effectiveness of the quality management system. The organization did not demonstrate any improvement in reducing the reject rate of the finished product, which was a stated objective of top management. The corrective action taken by the organization was not effective in addressing the root cause of the problem and preventing its recurrence.

•Option B: 7.1.4 - The factory environment is not suitably maintained to prevent dirty products. This option is correct because ISO 9001:2015 clause 7.1.4 requires the organization to determine, provide and maintain the environment necessary for the operation of its processes and to achieve conformity of products and services. The organization did not ensure that the factory floor was clean and dry, which affected the quality of the products and increased the risk of nonconformity.

•Option C: 7.1.1 - The organization failed to provide the required resources to prevent nonconforming products. This option is correct because ISO 9001:2015 clause 7.1.1 requires the organization to determine and provide the resources needed for the establishment, implementation, maintenance and continual improvement of the quality management system. The organization did not provide adequate collection baskets for the products ejecting from the moulding machines, which resulted in products falling onto the factory floor and becoming nonconforming.

The following options are not correct:

•Option D: 9.2.2 - Report IA202 contained a poorly worded nonconformity (NC 3). This option is not correct because ISO 9001:2015 clause 9.2.2 does not specify the requirements for the wording of nonconformities in internal audit reports. The nonconformity (NC 3) stated by the internal auditor was clear and relevant to the audit criteria and audit evidence. The issue is not with the report, but with the corrective action taken by the organization.

•Option E: 8.6 - Dirty products were released to the customer. This option is not correct because ISO 9001:2015 clause 8.6 requires the organization to implement planned arrangements, at appropriate stages, to verify that the product and service requirements have been met. The scenario does not indicate that the dirty products were released to the customer, but that they were recalled and repaired then returned to the customers. The issue is not with the release, but with the production process and the environment.

•Option F: 7.3 - Staff were not aware that products were falling onto the factory floor. This option is not correct because ISO 9001:2015 clause 7.3 requires the organization to ensure that the persons doing work under its control are aware of the quality policy, relevant quality objectives, their contribution to the effectiveness of the quality management system, and the implications of not conforming with the quality management system requirements. The scenario does not indicate that the staff were not aware of these aspects, but that the management did not provide adequate resources and environment for the staff to perform their work. The issue is not with the awareness, but with the management responsibility and resource provision.

•Option G: 10.2.1 - Conduct of an investigation was not sufficient to understand the cause of the nonconformity. This option is not correct because ISO 9001:2015 clause 10.2.1 requires the organization to react to the nonconformity and, as applicable, take action to control and correct it and deal with the consequences. The scenario indicates that the Quality Manager conducted an investigation into the reject rates and identified the cause of the nonconformity. The issue is not with the investigation, but with the corrective action taken by the management.

•Option H: 8.5.1 - Production operations were not properly controlled to avoid reject products. This option is not correct because ISO 9001:2015 clause 8.5.1 requires the organization to implement production and service provision under controlled conditions. The scenario indicates that the production operations were controlled by the moulding machines, which ejected the products into the collection baskets. The issue is not with the production operations, but with the size of the collection baskets and the condition of the factory floor.