ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Exam Dumps : QMS ISO 9001:2015 Lead Auditor Exam

During a second-party audit of a fruit grower (apples, pears, peaches) by a potential customer complying with ISO 9001:2015, the auditor verifies that there is a large variability in the quality of fruit production. In the last two years, they have noticed an increasing variability in daily production quality. The auditor found a trend of delivered produce showing signs of bruising and over-ripening, which led to an increasing number of customer complaints.

This process has been in operation for decades. The business was founded by the grandfather of the current owners, who did not want to alter the established practices.

The auditor raises a non-conformity against ISO 9001.

Which one of the following options would be acceptable as corrective action by the auditee?

You work for an organisation, ' ABC ' , which provides packaged food to the public. You are asked to lead a team (you as the leader and two other

auditors) to audit an external provider, ' XYZ ' , which provides packaging materials to your organisation. It is 4 pm, and the audit is dlose to an end;

you are having an internal meeting with the team to decide what will be presented to the auditee during the Closing meeting. The Closing meeting

was scheduled for 5 pm.

' XYZ ' has two manufacturing lines: M1 is a clean room for primary packaging materials (i.e. will be in direct contact with the food), and M2 is for

secondary materials (i.e. will not be in direct contact with food).

Auditor 1 audited the two manufacturing lines.

You: " What findings would you report? "

Auditor 1: " I have one issue. Earlier today in the morning I saw some secondary material stocked in the clean room. I would propose raising a

nonconformity. "

You: " How would you write the nonconformity? "

Auditor 1: " In the clean room, there was a pallet with secondary materials. "

What additional information would you add to this text to complete the nonconformity report? Select six.

Scenario 7: POLKA is a car manufacturing company based in Stockholm, Sweden. The company has around 14,000 employees working in different sectors which help with the design, painting, assembling, and test drives of the final product. The company is widely known for its qualitative products and affordable prices. In order to retain their reputation, POLKA implemented a quality management system (QMS) based on ISO 9001.

Before applying for certification, the company decided to conduct an internal audit to check whether there are any nonconformities in their QMS and if the requirements of ISO 9001 are being fulfilled. The top management appointed Sean, the internal auditor, as the team leader of the internal audit team. Sean required from the top management to have unrestricted access to the employees and executives of POLKA and to the documented information. Furthermore, Sean required to establish a team with a large number of auditors, considering the size and the complexity of the organization. The top management of POLKA agreed with Sean ' s requirements.

The top management, in cooperation with Sean, assigned 10 more employees to the audit team. Following that. Sean planned the audit activities and assigned the roles and responsibilities to each auditor. They began by interviewing employees of different manufacturing departments to check whether they are aware of the process of the QMS implementation. While conducting these activities, one of the auditors asked Sean for permission to audit the department in which he worked on a daily basis, as he was very familiar with the processes of the department.

Along the way, the teams findings showed that the staff were trained, documented information was updated, and the QMS fulfilled the requirements of ISO 9001. The internal audit took three weeks to complete, and on the last week the audit team held a final meeting

The team shared their results and together drafted the audit report This report was submitted to the top management of the company. The report was maintained as documented information, and was available to the relevant interested parties.

Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:

Scenario 7 states that Sean planned audit activities on his own. Is this acceptable?