CIPS L4M3 Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

A performance specification outlines the results or outputs required, rather than dictating how they should be achieved. This is ideal for innovation-focused procurement, like IT systems, as it allows suppliers to bring forward creative, technical solutions. It encourages market input and can lead to better value and performance.

The Unfair Contract Terms Act 1977 (c 50) is an Act of Parliament of the United Kingdom which regulates contracts by restricting the operation and legality of some contract terms. It extends to nearly all forms of contract and one of its most important functions is limiting the applicability of disclaimers of liability. The terms extend to both actual contract terms and notices that are seen to constitute a contractual obligation.

Under this regulation, if a clause within the standard terms in use is considered as 'unfair', the clause will be ineffective (or the other party will be entitled to avoid the clause). At court, the clause that is deemed to be unfair will undergo a 'reasonableness' test or an 'unfairness' test.

A revocation of offer is the withdrawal of a previous offer to engage in some sort of legally binding contract. The previous offer had to have been such that it would have immediately become legally binding if the other party had formally agreed to it.

A core ruling defining revocation of offers was established by Payne v. Cave. This case established that neither party is bound to an agreement until an offer has been made by one and formally accepted by the other.

If an offer has been made, the offering party has a right to withdraw it up to formal acceptance by the offeree. Revocation basically serves as formal, legally verifiable notice that a withdrawal was made, and it's valid so long as it is communicated to the offeree before they accept.

The case of Byrne v. Van Tienhoven supports this by establishing that the withdrawal of an offer by telegram is only valid if the telegram is received before the offer is accepted. The case of Dickinson v. Dodds further establishes that the party making the offer can communicate the revocation through a third party.