CIPS L5M1 Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

Formal vs Informal Groups (10–12 marks):

Formal groups are those deliberately created by management to achieve organisational objectives. They have defined structures, roles, and reporting lines. In Star Fish Ltd, examples include theProcurement Team, responsible for sourcing suppliers and managing contracts. This group has clear goals, formal leadership, and measurable outputs.

By contrast, informal groups arise naturally among employees based on social interactions, common interests, or personal relationships. They are not officially sanctioned but strongly influence behaviour. At Star Fish Ltd, an example could be afitness clubof employees who exercise together during breaks or aWhatsApp groupamong remote workers who support each other socially. These groups provide belonging and morale but may also resist management decisions if excluded.

Factors Influencing Group Formation (12–15 marks):

Common goals and tasks– People working on shared objectives, such as the Product Development Team working on new gym equipment, naturally form groups.

Geography and work arrangements– Staff working remotely may form virtual support groups, while office-based staff bond more through daily interactions.

Shared interests and values– Employees passionate about fitness or sustainability may form informal networks within the company.

Friendship and social needs– Based on Maslow’s hierarchy, people seek belonging. Friendships often develop into informal groups.

Leadership and influence– Charismatic or respected individuals may attract followers, leading to informal group formation around their personality.

Organisational culture– A collaborative culture encourages group formation for teamwork, while a competitive culture may create cliques or rival groups.

Technology and communication platforms– With remote work, online groups (Teams, Slack, WhatsApp) facilitate informal interaction and knowledge sharing.

Conclusion:

At Star Fish Ltd, formal groups like the Procurement Department are designed to deliver organisational objectives, while informal groups such as fitness clubs or virtual chat groups form naturally. Caleb must recognise that both types of groups are powerful. Formal groups deliver results, but informal groups influence morale, motivation, and resistance to change. By understanding the factors driving group formation, Caleb can harness both to build cohesion, encourage collaboration, and support the organisation’s success.

Thehuman relations approach to managementdeveloped in the 1930s and 1940s as a reaction against earlier mechanistic approaches such as Taylorism and bureaucracy. It emphasises that employees are not just motivated by money and rules, but also bysocial needs, relationships, and recognition. The approach highlights the importance of communication, teamwork, leadership style, and employee well-being in achieving organisational success.

The foundation of this school came from theHawthorne Studies(Elton Mayo), which showed that productivity improved not just because of physical conditions, but because workers felt valued and observed. This demonstrated the importance of social factors such as morale, group belonging, and management attention.

Key principles of the human relations approach include:

Focus on people rather than just processes– recognising employees as individuals with social and emotional needs.

Motivation through recognition and belonging– linking to theories such as Maslow’s hierarchy of needs and Herzberg’s motivators.

Leadership style matters– supportive, participative leadership fosters engagement, unlike autocratic control.

Team dynamics are critical– informal groups, communication patterns, and cooperation influence productivity.

Job satisfaction drives performance– happy, respected employees are more productive and loyal.

Advantagesof the human relations approach include higher employee engagement, improved morale, stronger teamwork, and reduced turnover. It recognises employees as assets rather than costs.

Disadvantagesinclude the risk of overemphasising relationships at the expense of efficiency or results, and the possibility of managers manipulating employees through “false concern.” It can also be less effective in highly standardised, rule-bound environments where compliance is critical.

In procurement, the human relations approach may be applied by creating strong team cohesion, involving staff in decision-making, recognising contributions, and offering development opportunities. For example, involving buyers in supplier strategy discussions and giving recognition for successful negotiations can boost morale and performance.

In conclusion, the human relations approach recognises that people are motivated by social and psychological needs, not just financial incentives. It highlights the importance of communication, leadership, and teamwork in driving performance. While it should be balanced with attention to efficiency, it remains highly relevant for modern managers in creating motivated and productive teams.

Definition of Group Norms (10 marks):

A group ‘norm’ refers to the shared standards of behaviour, values, and expectations that develop within a group. Norms guide how members act and interact, creating predictability and cohesion. They can be formal (set by rules and policies) or informal (emerging naturally over time).

Examples include:

A procurement team having anorm of punctualityfor meetings.

A social norm where colleaguesshare supplier insights openly.

A negative norm, such as tolerating late submission of purchase orders, which may undermine performance.

Norms act as unwritten rules that shape group behaviour and influence the culture of the organisation.

Impact of Group Norms on Performance (15 marks):

Positive norms can enhance performance.For example, a norm of collaboration and knowledge sharing improves innovation and decision-making in procurement projects.

Negative norms can reduce performance.If the team develops a culture of cutting corners in supplier evaluation, this may damage compliance and reputation.

Norms create consistency and cohesion.Members know what is expected of them, reducing conflict and ensuring smoother teamwork.

Peer pressure reinforces norms.High-performing norms, such as meeting deadlines, encourage all members to contribute fully, while low-performing norms, like tolerating absenteeism, can lower standards across the team.

Norms influence motivation and morale.Supportive norms (e.g., recognising achievements) motivate employees, whereas destructive norms (e.g., ignoring contributions) lead to alienation and disengagement.

In procurement specifically, if the norm is strong ethical conduct, the team will collectively avoid corruption risks. If the norm is to focus only on cost savings, the team may neglect sustainability or supplier relationships.

Conclusion:

Group norms are the unwritten rules that shape behaviour within teams. They can have a powerful effect on performance, either enhancing collaboration and accountability or reducing standards and morale. Managers must actively shape positive norms through leadership, communication, and role-modelling to ensure that group behaviour supports organisational goals.