PECB Lead-Cybersecurity-Manager Exam With Confidence Using Practice Dumps

Scenario 5:Pilotron is a large manufacturer known for its electric vehicles that use renewable energy. One of Its objectives Is 10 make the world a cleaner place by reducing the consumption of fossil fuels. In addition to electric vehicles, Pilotron also offers solar roof and advanced battery technology, all manufactured at its factory in Bastogne. Belgium. As one of the most Innovative manufacturers in Europe, Pilotron invests heavily in research and development to create unique components, such asmotors, sensors, and batteries. In addillon, it places a strong emphasis on delivering high-quality products, and requires all employees to undergo an intensive onboarding program that includes hands-on training.

Pilotron did not prioritize the establishment of a cybersecurity program to protect its information. This became evident when a frustrated employee took advantage of the company's lack of cybersecurity measures. The employee was aware that Pilotron's existing security measures could easily be evaded The company became aware of the incident after five weeks, when a sudden surge in network data transfer raised suspicions upon investigation. Pilotron discovered that the employee had multiple requests for access to software development resources that were unrelated to their daily tasks By using a false user name and avoiding the implemented cybersecurity controls, the employee directly modified the code of one of Pilotron's products. This unauthorized code change enabled the employee to transfer highly sensitive data to external parties

Knowing that insider threats pose a significant risk and the existing security controls were ineffective. Pilotron decided to shift its cybersecurity focus toward proactive detection and prevention strategies. It implemented a security software that detects unusual access patterns, large data upload, and credential abuse Additionally, Pilotron recognized the need to help improve the security of Its systems by Isolating devices (PCs. servers) on the opposite sides of a firewall.

The company also implemented an identity management solution to ensure the verification of Individuals requesting access. It decided to implement a mechanism that ensured only authorized individuals can access sensitive systems and data. In addition to the traditional username and password, employees were now required to provide a unique personal identifier, such as a fingerprint, as well as a one-time verification code generated through a mobile app

Moreover, in order to enhance security measures and gain the benefits of cloud computing, Pilotron decided to leverage cloud based services. A kiv factor in Pilotroo's decision was the capability to construct and oversee its personalized Infrastructure Instead of depending on pre-set platforms or software applications, the company could craft its virtualized environments. The significant level of customization is of utmost importance to Pilotron since it enables adjusting its infrastructure to align with the specific requirements of its projects and clients.

Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:

What type of data threat was Pitotron subject to? Refer to scenario 5

Which of the following statements regarding best describes vulnerability assessment?

Scenario 6:Finelits. a South Carolina-based banking institution in the US, Is dedicated 10 providing comprehensive financial management solutions for both individuals and businesses. With a strong focus on leveraging financial technology innovations, Finelits strives to provide its clients with convenient access to their financial needs. To do so. the company offers a range of services. Firstly, it operates a network of physical branches across strategic locations, facilitates banking transactions, and provides basic financial services to Individuals who may not have easy access to a branch Through its diverse service offerings. Finelits aims to deliver exceptional banking services, ensuring financial stability and empowerment for its clients across the US.

Recently, Vera, an employee at Finelits, was passed over for a promotion. Feeling undervalued, Vera decided to take malicious actions to harm the company's reputation and gain unrestricted access to its sensitive information. To do so. Vera decided to collaborate with a former colleague who used lo work for Finelits's software development team. Vera provided the former colleague with valuable information about the Finelils's security protocols, which allowed the former colleague to gain access and introduce a backdoor into one of the company's critical software systems during a routine update. This backdoor allowed the attacker to bypass normal authentication measures and gain unrestricted access to the private network. Vera and the former employee aimed to attack Finelits's systems by altering transactions records, account balances, and investments portfolios. Their actions were carefully calculated to skew financial outcomes and mislead both the hank and Its customers by creating false financial statements, misleading reports, and inaccurate calculations.

After receiving numerous complaints from clients, reporting that they are being redirected to another site when attempting to log into their banking accounts on Finelits's web application, the company became aware of the issue. After taking immediate measures, conducting a thorough forensic analysis and collaborating with external cybersecurity experts, Finelits's Incident response team successfully identified the root cause of the incident. They were able to trace the intrusion back to the attackers, who had exploited vulnerabilities in the bank's system and utilized sophisticated techniques to compromise data integrity

The incident response team swiftly addressed the issue by restoring compromised data, enhancing security, and implementing preventative measures These measures encompassed new access controls, network segmentation, regular security audits, the testing and application of patches frequently, and the clear definition of personnel privileges within their roles for effective authorization management.

Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:

Based on scenario 6. as a preventative measure for potential attacks, Finalist clearly defined personnel privileges within their roles for effective authorization management. Is this necessary?