Lead-Cybersecurity-Manager Exam Dumps : ISO/IEC 27032 Lead Cybersecurity Manager

Scenario 7:Established in 2005 in Arizona, the US. Hitec is one of The leading online retail companies. It Is especially known for electronic devices, such as televisions, telephones, and laptops. Hitec strives to continually enhance customer satisfaction and optimize its technologyplatforms and applications. the company's website and mobile application provide a range of features designed to simplify the online shopping experience, including customized product recommendations and a user-friendly search engine. The system enables customers to easily track the progress of their orders made through any of Hitec's platforms, in addition. Hitec employs a comprehensive customer management system to collect and manage customer information, including payment history, order details, and individual preferences.

Recently. Hitec had to deal with a serious cybersecurity incident that resulted in a data breach. Following numerous customer complaints about the malfunctioning of the ordering system. Hitec's engineers initiated an investigation into their network. The investigation unveiled multiple instances of unauthorized access by two distinct attackers. They gamed access sensitive customer information, such as credit card numbers and login credentials. Instead of promptly sharing information about the detected threats with other companies in the cybersecurity alliance and asking for help, Hitec chose to rely solely on its own detection and response capabilities. After resolving the incident, the company publicly acknowledged falling victim to a data breach. However, it refrained from disclosing specific details regarding the impact it had on its customers

Two weeks after the cyberattack, another retail company, Buyent, made an announcement regarding their successful prevention of a similar data breach unlike Hitec. Buyent took a transparent approach by providing detailed insights into the attacker's methods and the step-by-step procedures they employed to mitigate the attack. As both companies were part of the same cybersecurity alliance, Buyent willingly shared the requested information in accordance with their established information sharing and coordination framework, ensuring that any personal data shared was processed in a manner that prevented direct attribution to specific data subjects. This Involved utilizing additional information, which was kepi separately and secured through technical and organizational measures.

To ensure secure transmission. Buyent sent links that required a password for access, protecting the encrypted files sent to Hitec These files included comprehensive guidelines and approaches adopted hy Buyent to effectively detect and respond to cybersecurity events.

Upon careful analysis of the provided Information. Hitec concluded that their previous attack was primarily attributed to weaknesses in their detection capabilities in response. Hitec made strategic changes to their procedures. They implemented the utilization of Darknet as a technical approach to detect suspicious and malicious network activities. Furthermore, Hitec established a new security policy which required regular network and system testing By implementing these controls. Hilec aimed to strengthen Us ability to identify system vulnerabilities and threats, thereby boosting the overall cybersecurity defense.

Lastly, Hitec decided to contract a training provider to conduct cybersecurity training for its employees. They agreed to provide a training session that covered essential cybersecurity practices applicable to all staff, regardless of their roles within the company As the agreed upon training date approached, the training provider requested the necessary documentation from Hitec. Including the cybersecurity policy and specific examples related to the practices or guidelines employed by the company. After Hitec did not deliver the requested resources, the training provider refused to conduct the training session.

Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:

Buyent shared detailed Information related to the cyberattack with another retail company. Is this a good practice?

Which of the following statements regarding best describes vulnerability assessment?

Scenario 3: EsteeMed is a cardiovascular institute located in Orlando. Florida H Is known for tis exceptional cardiovascular and thoracic services and offers a range of advanced procedures, including vascular surgery, heart valve surgery, arrhythmia and ablation, and lead extraction. With a dedicated team of over 30 cardiologists and cardiovascular surgeons, supported by more than IUU specialized nurses and technicians, EsteeMed Is driven by a noble mission to save lives Every year. it provides its services to over 50,000 patients from across the globe.

As Its reputation continued to grow. EsteeMed recognized the importance of protecting Its critical assets. It Identified these assets and implemented the necessary measures to ensure their security Employing a widely adopted approach to Information security governance. EsteeMed established an organizational structure that connects the cybersecurity team with the information security sector under the IT Department.

Soon after these changes, there was an incident where an unauthorized employee transferred highly restricted patient data to the cloud The Incident was detected by Tony, the IT specialist. As no specific guidelines were in place to address such unlikely scenarios, Tony promptly reported the incident to his colleagues and, together. they alerted the board of managers Following that, the management of EsteeMed arranged a meeting with their cloud provider to address the situation.

During the meeting, the representatives of the cloud provider assured the management of the EsteeMed that the situation will be managed effectively The cloud provider considered the existing security measures sufficient to ensure the confidentiality, Integrity, and availability of the transferred data Additionally, they proposed a premium cloud security package that could offer enhanced protection for assets of this nature. Subsequently, EsteeMed's management conducted an internal meeting following the discussion with the cloud provider.

After thorough discussions, the management determined that the associated costs of implementing further security measures outweigh the potential risks at the present lime Therefore, they decided to accept the actual risk level for the time being. The likelihood of a similar incident occurring in the future was considered low. Furthermore, the cloud provider had already implemented robust security protocols.

To ensure effective risk management. EsteeMed had documented and reported its risk management process and outcomes through appropriate mechanisms, it recognized that decisions about the creation, retention, and handling of documented information should consider various factors. These factors include aspects such as the intended use of the Information. Its sensitivity, and the external and internal context in which It operates.

Lastly. EsteeMed identified and recorded its assets in an inventory to ensure their protection. The inventory contained detailed information such as the type of assets, their size, location, owner, and backup information.

Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:

What did EsteeMed's approach 10 protecting its critical assets Include after the incident occurred' Refer to scenario 3