Newly Released CompTIA SY0-701 Exam PDF

The Online Certificate Status Protocol (OCSP) is a technology designed to check the revocation status of digital certificates in real-time without requiring the client to download entire revocation lists. Unlike Certificate Revocation Lists (CRLs), which are periodically updated and can be large, OCSP queries an OCSP responder to receive the status of a specific certificate.

OCSP is considered passive verification because it allows clients to check a certificate ' s current validity status on-demand without maintaining local copies of revocation data. The OCSP responder returns whether the certificate is valid, revoked, or expired.

Trusted Platform Module (TPM) is hardware for secure key storage, and Certificate Signing Request (CSR) is a request for certificate issuance; neither is used for verifying certificate expiration status.

The differences and roles of OCSP and CRLs are thoroughly covered in the Cryptography and PKI chapter of the SY0-701, where OCSP is highlighted as the more efficient and real-time method to verify certificate status passively【6:Chapter 7†CompTIA Security+ Study Guide】.

SCAP (Security Content Automation Protocol) is designed to automate vulnerability management, configuration assessment, and compliance checking. According to CompTIA Security+ SY0-701, SCAP standardizes how vulnerability information is expressed, measured, and shared, allowing security tools to automatically scan systems, identify weaknesses, and assess compliance against predefined baselines.

SCAP integrates multiple standards such as CVE, CVSS, CPE, and XCCDF, enabling automated vulnerability scanning, scoring, and reporting across large environments. This makes it a core technology for continuous vulnerability management and compliance automation.

CVE (A) is a catalog of known vulnerabilities, not an automation framework. OSINT (C) provides publicly available intelligence but does not automate remediation or assessment. CVSS (D) provides severity scoring but does not automate vulnerability management.

Because SCAP enables automated identification, assessment, and reporting of vulnerabilities, the correct answer is B: SCAP.

Web serverBotnet Enable DDoS protectionUser RAT Implement a host-based IPSDatabase server Worm Change the default application passwordExecutive KeyloggerDisable vulnerable servicesApplication Backdoor Implement 2FA using push notification

A screenshot of a computer program Description automatically generated with low confidence

The correct answer is Watering-hole because the attack involves compromising a legitimate website that is regularly visited by a specific group of targeted users—in this case, journalists—in order to indirectly infect or compromise them. The Security+ SY0-701 study guide defines watering-hole attacks as targeted attacks where adversaries identify websites frequented by their intended victims and then compromise those sites to deliver malware, steal credentials, or conduct further exploitation.

In this scenario, the attacker does not directly target the journalists’ email systems. Instead, the attacker compromises a trusted website that the journalists frequently access. When the journalists visit the site, malicious code can be delivered through drive-by downloads, malicious scripts, or credential-harvesting mechanisms. This technique is particularly effective for nation-state attackers because it leverages trust and normal user behavior, making detection more difficult.

Option A, On-path, is incorrect because on-path (man-in-the-middle) attacks involve intercepting or altering communications between two parties in transit, rather than compromising a third-party website. Option C, Typosquatting, involves registering domains with misspelled names to trick users into visiting malicious sites, which is not described here. Option D, Brand impersonation, typically refers to phishing or spoofing attacks that mimic a trusted brand to deceive users, often via email or fake websites, rather than compromising a legitimate one.

The SY0-701 objectives emphasize that watering-hole attacks are commonly associated with advanced persistent threats (APTs), including nation-state actors, because they allow precise targeting of specific industries, professions, or organizations. This attack method highlights the importance of browser security, threat intelligence, web filtering, and user awareness to reduce exposure to trusted-but-compromised resources.

In summary, compromising a frequently used website to gain access to a targeted group’s accounts is a textbook example of a watering-hole attack.