Download Latest SY0-701 Questions

The correct answer is Compensating because a bastion host is being used as an alternative safeguard to reduce risk when a primary control cannot yet be fully implemented. In the context of the Security+ SY0-701 objectives, compensating controls are designed to provide protection when standard preventive controls are not available, effective, or feasible—such as during a zero-day exploit where no vendor patch or permanent fix exists.

A zero-day exploit represents a vulnerability that is actively being exploited before developers or vendors have released a fix. Since patching is not immediately possible, organizations must rely on compensating controls to limit exposure and reduce the likelihood or impact of exploitation. A bastion host is a hardened system placed in a network segment—often in a demilitarized zone (DMZ)—that acts as a controlled access point between untrusted and trusted networks. By routing access through this tightly secured host, the analyst reduces the attack surface and restricts direct access to internal systems that may be vulnerable to the zero-day.

Option B, Detective, is incorrect because detective controls are focused on identifying or alerting on malicious activity after it occurs, such as logging, monitoring, or intrusion detection systems. Option C, Operational, refers to processes and procedures carried out by people, such as incident response or change management, rather than a technical safeguard. Option D, Physical, applies to tangible protections like locks, cameras, or fencing, which are not relevant in this network-based scenario.

The SY0-701 study guide emphasizes the importance of layered security and adaptive risk management. When preventive controls fail or are temporarily unavailable, compensating controls like bastion hosts, network segmentation, and access restrictions allow organizations to maintain security posture and continuity of operations while longer-term solutions are developed.

Cross-site scripting (XSS) occurs when a web application fails to properly validate or sanitize user input, allowing attackers to inject malicious scripts into web pages viewed by other users. The most effective remediation is input validation, which ensures that only safe, expected data is accepted by the application.

Security+ SY0-701 highlights input validation as a primary defense against:

XSS

SQL injection

Command injection

Path traversal attacks

By validating and sanitizing input at both the client and server layers, organizations can strip harmful characters, block script tags, enforce strict data types, and ensure proper encoding.

A NGFW (B) or WAF (D) can mitigate attacks by blocking malicious payloads, but they do not fix the root cause within the web application. A vulnerability scan (C) identifies the issue but does not remediate it.

Therefore, only input validation (A) directly resolves the underlying coding flaw responsible for XSS.

IPS stands for intrusion prevention system, which is a network security device that monitors and blocks malicious traffic in real time. IPS is different from IDS, which only detects and alerts on malicious traffic, but does not block it. IPS would have mitigated the spread of ransomware by preventing the hacker from accessing the system via the phishing link, or by stopping the ransomware from communicating with its command and control server or encrypting the files.